Tanoan languages

Tanoan
Tanoan
Kiowa–Tanoan
Geographic; distribution	central North America
Native speakers	~5,625
Linguistic classification	One of the world's primary language families
Subdivisions	Tiwa; Tewa; Towa; Kiowa;
Language codes
Linguasphere	64-C
Glottolog	kiow1265
	Distribution of Tanoan languages before European contact. The Pueblo languages are at the left; the nomadic Kiowa at right.

Tanoan (/təˈnoʊ.ən/ tə-NOH-ən), also Kiowa–Tanoan or Tanoan–Kiowa, is a family of languages spoken by indigenous peoples in present-day New Mexico, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas.

Historical distribution of Pueblo Tanoan languages

Current distribution of Pueblo Tanoan languages

Most of the languages – Tiwa (Taos, Picuris, Southern Tiwa), Tewa, and Towa – are spoken in the Native American Pueblos of New Mexico (with one outlier in Arizona). These were the first languages collectively given the name of Tanoan. Kiowa, which is a related language, is now spoken mostly in southwestern Oklahoma. The Kiowa historically inhabited areas of modern-day Texas and Oklahoma.

Languages

The Tanoan language family has seven languages in four branches:^{[citation needed]} ^{[verification needed]}

Tanoan

Kiowa, (Cáuijògà/cáuijò:gyà): 20 speakers

Jemez (or Towa): 3,000 speakers

Tiwa

Northern

	Taos: 800 speakers

	Picuris: 225 speakers

Southern Tiwa: 1,600 speakers

? Piro †

Tewa: 1,600 speakers

Kiowa–Towa might form an intermediate branch, as might Tiwa–Tewa.

Name

Tanoan has long been recognized as a major family of Pueblo languages, consisting of Tiwa, Tewa, and Towa. The inclusion of Kiowa into the family was at first controversial given the cultural differences between those groups. The once-nomadic Kiowa people of the Plains are culturally quite distinct from the Tiwa, Tewa, and Towa pueblos, which obscured somewhat the linguistic connection between Tanoans and Kiowans. Linguists now accept that a Tanoan family without Kiowa would be paraphyletic, as any ancestor of the Pueblo languages would be ancestral to Kiowa as well. Kiowa may be closer to Towa than Towa is to Tiwa–Tewa. In older texts, Tanoan and Kiowa–Tanoan were used interchangeably. Because of the cultural use of the name Tanoan as signifying several peoples who share a culture, the more explicit term Kiowa–Tanoan is now commonly used for the language family as a whole, with Tanoan being the branch that contains the languages now spoken in New Mexico and Arizona (i.e. Arizona Tewa).

The prehistory of the Kiowa people is little known. As a result, the history is obscure about the separation of the members of this language family into two groups ('Puebloan' and 'Plains') with radically distinct lifestyles. ^{[weasel words]} There is apparently no ^{[dubious – discuss]} oral tradition^{[according to whom?]} of any ancient connection between the peoples. Scholars have not determined when the peoples were connected so that the common linguistic elements could have developed. The earliest traditions and historical notices of the Kiowa record them migrating from the north and west, to the territory now associated with the tribal nation. Today this area is within the modern states of Texas and Oklahoma, which they occupied from the late 18th century.

Historical phonology

The chart below^[1] contains the consonants of the Tanoan proto-language as reconstructed by Hale (1967) based on consonant correspondences in stem-initial position.^{[citation needed]}

		Labial	Apical	Apical Fricated	Velar	Velar Labial	Glottal
Plosive	voiced	*b	*d	*dz	(*ɡ)	*ɡʷ
	plain	*p	*t	*ts	*k	*kʷ
	glottalized	*pʼ	*tʼ	*tsʼ	*kʼ	*kʷʼ	*ʔ
	aspirated	*pʰ	*tʰ	*tsʰ	*kʰ	*kʷʰ
Nasal		*m	*n
Fricative				*s			*h
Glide						*w

The evidence for *ɡ comes from prefixes; *ɡ has not been found in stem-initial position and thus is in parentheses above. Hale reconstructs the nasalization feature for nasal vowels. Vowel quality and prosodic features like vowel length, tone, and stress have not yet been reconstructed for the Tanoan family. Hale (1967) gives certain sets of vowel quality correspondences.

The following table illustrates the reconstructed^{[clarification needed]} initial consonants in Proto-Tanoan and its reflexes in the daughter languages.^{[citation needed]}

Initial consonants in proto-language and daughter languages
Proto-Tanoan	Tiwa	Tewa	Towa	Kiowa	consonant	environment	Tiwa	Tewa	Towa	Kiowa
Proto-Tanoan	Tiwa	Tewa	Towa	Kiowa	Proto-Tanoan		Tiwa	Tewa	Towa	Kiowa
*h	h	h	∅ ^[2]	h	*dz		j	j, dʒ	z	d
*ʔ	ʔ	ʔ	ʔ	∅	*d	before oral vowel	l	d	d
*p	p	p	p	p	*d	before nasal vowel	n	n	n
*pʼ	pʼ	pʼ	pʼ	pʼ	*n		n	n	n	n
*pʰ	pʰ	f	ɸ	pʰ	*w		w	w	w	j
*b	m	m	m	b	*ɡʷ		w	w	kʷ	ɡ
*m	m	m	m	m	(*ɡ)		k	ɡ	k	ɡ
*t	t	t	t	t	*k		k	k	k	k
*ts	tʃ ^[3]	ts	s	t	*kʷ		kʷ	kʷ	ɡ	k
*tʰ	tʰ	θ	ʃ	tʰ	*kʷʼ		kʷʼ	kʷʼ	ɡ	kʼ
*tsʰ	s	s	ʃ	tʰ	*kʼ		kʼ	kʼ	kʼ	kʼ
*s	ɬ	s	c ^[4]	s	*kʰ		x	x	h	kʰ
*tʼ	tʼ	tʼ	tʼ	tʼ	*kʷʰ		xʷ	xʷ	h	kʰ
*tsʼ	tʃʼ ^[3]	tsʼ	tʼ	tʼ

As can be seen in the above table, a number of phonological mergers have occurred in the different languages. Cognate sets supporting the above are listed below:

Cognate sets demonstrating initial consonant correspondences^[5]
	Tiwa	Tewa	Towa	Kiowa	meaning(s)
*b	mɑ̃	mãʔ	mĩ́ː	bɔ	"to bring"
*m	mæ̃̀n-	mãn	mãté	mɔ̃ː-dɔ	"hand"
*d (+ V)	līlū-	diː	délʔɨː	–	"fowl"
*d (+ Ṽ)	ˈnæ̃̄m-	nãn	nṍː	dɔ̃-m	"sand" (in Taos), "ground" (in Tewa, Kiowa), "space" (in Jemez)
*n	næ̃̄	nãː	nĩ́ː	nɔ̃ː	first person singular
*ts	ˈtʃī	tsíː	sé	ta	"eye"
*t	tũ̀	tṹ	tɨ̃́	tõ-	"to say"
*tsʰ	sũ̀	sũwẽ	sɨ̃́	tʰõ-m	"to drink"
*tʰ	ˈtʰɤ̄	θáː	ʃó	tʰa-	"to break" (in Taos, Tewa, Jemez), "to sever several" (in Kiowa)
*ts’	ˈtʃʼɑ̄-	–	–	tʼɔ-l	"liver"
*t’	tʼɑ́-	tʼon	tʼaː	tʼɔː	"antelope"
*dz	jɑ̄-	–	zǽː	dɔ	"song" (in Taos, Jemez), "to sing" (in Kiowa)

Notes

^ The original Americanist phonetic symbols differ from the IPA: Amer. ⟨c⟩ = IPA ⟨ts⟩, Amer ⟨ʒ⟩ = IPA ⟨dz⟩.
^ The null set symbol ∅ represents the lack of a consonant, i.e. the reconstructed proto-sound was deleted in the daughter language.
^ ^a ^b Taos (and also Picuris) /tʃ, tʃʼ/ varies between post-alveolar [tʃ, tʃʼ] and alveolar [ts, tsʼ].
^ This consonant is transcribed as a palatalized [tʸ] in Hale (1967) and palatalized [kʸ] in Hale (1962).
^ The data here is from Hale (1967), which in turn is gathered from G. Trager's publications (for Taos), Harrington's publications (for Kiowa), Dozier in personal communication to Hale (for Tewa), and Hale's own fieldwork on Jemez.

Bibliography

Campbell, Lyle. (1997). American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1.
Cordell, Linda A. (1979). Prehistory: Eastern Anasazi. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 9, pp. 131–151). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Davis, Irvine. (1959). Linguistic cues to northern Rio Grande prehistory. El Palacio, 66 (3), 73–84.
Davis, Irvine. (1979). The Kiowa–Tanoan, Keresan, and Zuni languages. In L. Campbell & M. Mithun (Eds.), The languages of native America: Historical and comparative assessment (pp. 390–443). Austin: University of North Texas.
Dozier, Edward P. (1954). The Hopi-Tewa of Arizona. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology, 44 (3), 259–376.
Eggan, Fred. (1979). Pueblos: Introduction. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 9, pp. 224–235). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Ellis, Florence Hawley. (1967). Where did the Pueblo people come from? El Palacio, 74 (3), 35–43.
Ford, Richard I.; Schroeder, Albert H.; & Peckham, Stewart L. (1972). Three perspectives on Puebloan prehistory. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), New perspectives on the Pueblos (pp. 19–39). Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Foster, Michael K. (1999). Language and the culture history of North America. In I. Goddard (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Languages (Vol. 17, pp. 64–110). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Hale, Kenneth L. (1962). Jemez and Kiowa correspondences in reference to Kiowa–Tanoan. International Journal of American Linguistics, 28 (1), 1–5.
Hale, Kenneth L. (1967). Toward a reconstruction of Kiowa–Tanoan phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 33 (2), 112–120.
Hale, Kenneth L. (1979). Historical linguistics and archeology. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 9, pp. 170–177). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Harrington, J. P. (1910). On phonetic and lexic resemblances in Kiowan and Tanoan. American Anthropologist, 12 (1), 119–123.
Harrington, J. P. (1928). Vocabulary of the Kiowa language. Bureau of American Ethnology bulletin (No. 84). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Govt. Print. Off.
Hill, Jane H. (2002). Toward a linguistic prehistory of the Southwest: "Azteco-Tanoan" and the arrival of maize cultivation. Journal of Anthropological Research, 58 (4), 457–476.
Hill, Jane H. (2008). Northern Uto-Aztecan and Kiowa–Tanoan: Evidence of contact between the proto-Languages? International Journal of American Linguistics, 74 (2), 155–188.
Kinkade, M. Dale; & Powell, J. V. (1976). Language and prehistory of North America. World Archaeology, 8 (1), 83-100.
Leap, William L. (1971). Who were the Piro? Anthropological Linguistics, 13 (7), 321–330.
Miller, Wick R. (1959). A note on Kiowa linguistic affiliations. American Anthropologist, 61 (1), 102–105.
Mithun, Marianne. (1999). The languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-23228-7 (hbk); ISBN 0-521-29875-X.
Mooney, James. (1898). Calendar history of the Kiowa Indians. In 17th annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology for 1895-1896 (Part 1, pp. 129–445). Washington, D.C.
Mooney, James. (1907). Kiowa. In F. W. Hodge (Ed.), Handbook of American Indians (Part 1, pp. 669–701). Bureau of American Ethnology bulletin (No. 30). Washington, D.C.
Newman, Stanley S. (1954). American Indian linguistics in the Southwest. American Anthropologist, 56 (4), 626–634.
Nichols, Lynn. (1994). Subordination and ablaut in Kiowa–Tanoan. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 13, 85–99.
Nichols, Lynn. (1996). Toward a reconstruction of Kiowa–Tanoan ablaut. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Plog, Fred. (1979). Prehistory: Western Anasazi. In A. Ortiz (Ed.), Handbook of North American Indians: Southwest (Vol. 9, pp. 108–130). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.
Reed, Erik K. (1949). Sources of upper Rio Grande Pueblo culture and population. El Palacio, 56 (6), 163–184.
Snow, Dean R. (1976). The archaeology of North America. New York: The Viking Press.
Trager, George L. (1942). The historical phonology of the Tiwa languages. Studies in Linguistics, 1 (5), 1-10.
Trager, George L. (1951). Linguistic history and ethnologic history in the Southwest. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 41, 341–343.
Trager, George L. (1967). The Tanoan settlement of the Rio Grande area: A possible chronology. In D. H. Hymes & W. E. Bittle (Eds.), Studies in southwestern ethnolinguistics: Meaning and history in the languages of the American Southwest (pp. 335–350). The Hague: Mouton.
Trager, George L. (1969). Taos and Picuris: How long separated. International Journal of American Linguistics, 35 (2), 180–182.
Trager, George L.; & Trager, Edith Crowell. (1959). Kiowa and Tanoan. American Anthropologist, 61 (6), 1078–1083.
Wendorf, Fred. (1954). A reconstruction of northern Rio Grande prehistory. American Anthropologist, 56 (2), 200–227.
Wendorf, Fred; & Reed, Erik K. (1955). An alternative reconstruction of northern Rio Grande prehistory. El Palacio, 62 (5/6), 131–173.

[1] The original Americanist phonetic symbols differ from the IPA: Amer. ⟨c⟩ = IPA ⟨ts⟩, Amer ⟨ʒ⟩ = IPA ⟨dz⟩.

[2] The null set symbol ∅ represents the lack of a consonant, i.e. the reconstructed proto-sound was deleted in the daughter language.

[apicalfricated-3] Taos (and also Picuris) /tʃ, tʃʼ/ varies between post-alveolar [tʃ, tʃʼ] and alveolar [ts, tsʼ].

[4] This consonant is transcribed as a palatalized [tʸ] in Hale (1967) and palatalized [kʸ] in Hale (1962).

[5] The data here is from Hale (1967), which in turn is gathered from G. Trager's publications (for Taos), Harrington's publications (for Kiowa), Dozier in personal communication to Hale (for Tewa), and Hale's own fieldwork on Jemez.

[1]