Jump to content

Talk:Lewis Moonie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by BD2412 (talk | contribs) at 17:29, 23 February 2024 (top: WP Bio/Politics & government - Low importance, replaced: |politician-work-group=yes → |politician-work-group=yes|politician-priority=low). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

According to our Cash for Influence article, Lord Moonie was essentially acquitted in the "Cash for Influence" matter. Of the 4 Peers accused, 2 of them, Lord Truscott and Lord Taylor, were ultimately suspended from the House of Lords for a while, 1 of them, Lord Snape, was found by the sub-Committee to have expressed a willingness to break the rules, but later found by the Privileges Committee to not have done so. Only Lord Moonie was found by both groups to have not breached the code.

As a complete and total outsider to this topic, I am unsure that I could write this up precisely enough to include in this article. But currently, as compared to the other 3, Lord Moonie's acquittal is not given proper coverage, I think.--Jimbo Wales (talk) 07:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]