User talk:Wikieditlobs
November 2022
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Technically indistinguishable from Hlav2022 and Confirmed WP:GHBH activities.-- Ponyobons mots 18:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Request for block modification
Wikieditlobs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
See below on talk page. talk (Block expiry modification)
Decline reason:
Declined. But WP:SO is still an option for you. That requires at least six months with zero edits, among other things. Yamla (talk) 12:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
I do confirm that I am Hlav2022 on an alternate account to avoid block. I accept the punishment of being blocked from Wikipedia but do ask that there could be an expiration for the block instead of having an indefinite block. I wish to be unblocked after a period of time because I look forward to coming back to wikipedia to make more productive and meaningful edits. If a blocking administrator sees this request, I ask that a note will be left regarding the reason for approval or denial of my inquiry. I deeply apologize for the trouble that I have created. Wikieditlobs (talk) 02:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC) || Hlav2022 (talk) 02:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- There are also Yourusernamehere342 and Theonewhoknows432, not to mention the logged-out shenanigans. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- For the WP:SO reference provided by Yamla, after I have not edited for 6 months or tried to avoid the block, how do I contact an administrator? I cannot contact them on their talk page as I don't have editing privileges, and I do not know how to contact one from my talk page. Wikieditlobs (talk) 13:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. Wikieditlobs (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 13:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:19, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Wikieditlobs! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 23:52, Sunday, November 12, 2023 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Unblock Appeal
Wikieditlobs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
About a year ago, I created multiple accounts to try to evade a ban and disrupt the Wikipedia community. I understand that my behavior violated multiple parts of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I would like to apologize for any inconvenience or harm that I may have caused to the community. I have read over Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and found the reasons for my block, and I completely agree with the decision to block my accounts. Some of the rules I violated were sockpuppetry, repeated vandalism, and evading a ban. I will not make the same mistakes I made before. I believe that I can positively contribute to the platform and help improve the quality of its content. I have additionally retired my alternate accounts, Yourusernamehere342, Theonewhoknows432, and Hlav2022. Thank you for your time and consideration. Wikieditlobs (talk) 23:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed sockpuppetry today. Clearly not operating in good faith. Yamla (talk) 20:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Wikieditlobs (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I know this does not sound very believable, but I am not <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nathan37567741234 Nathan37567741234]</span>. I have not used or created any accounts other than logging onto my alts to retire them. As I have seen before, making new accounts to try to evade block is stupid because you get caught almost instantly. If I had created a new account, it would have pretty much ruined my chance of getting unblocked. Another note, I mostly edit Wikipedia at my school, on a school-assigned device that has proxies linked to the school I.P address. Is it possible that another student could have signed up on the school I.P. confusing the checkuser data? [[User:Wikieditlobs|Wikieditlobs]] ([[User talk:Wikieditlobs#top|talk]]) 13:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I know this does not sound very believable, but I am not <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nathan37567741234 Nathan37567741234]</span>. I have not used or created any accounts other than logging onto my alts to retire them. As I have seen before, making new accounts to try to evade block is stupid because you get caught almost instantly. If I had created a new account, it would have pretty much ruined my chance of getting unblocked. Another note, I mostly edit Wikipedia at my school, on a school-assigned device that has proxies linked to the school I.P address. Is it possible that another student could have signed up on the school I.P. confusing the checkuser data? [[User:Wikieditlobs|Wikieditlobs]] ([[User talk:Wikieditlobs#top|talk]]) 13:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= I know this does not sound very believable, but I am not <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nathan37567741234 Nathan37567741234]</span>. I have not used or created any accounts other than logging onto my alts to retire them. As I have seen before, making new accounts to try to evade block is stupid because you get caught almost instantly. If I had created a new account, it would have pretty much ruined my chance of getting unblocked. Another note, I mostly edit Wikipedia at my school, on a school-assigned device that has proxies linked to the school I.P address. Is it possible that another student could have signed up on the school I.P. confusing the checkuser data? [[User:Wikieditlobs|Wikieditlobs]] ([[User talk:Wikieditlobs#top|talk]]) 13:47, 14 December 2023 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Possible retirement
I am considering retirement because of how irritating this all is. I am trying to get unblocked and to cooperate, but whenever I get close to being unblocked, something happens that is either a stupid mistake that I make, or on a more recent note, getting another account that is not even mine blocked because it was "confirmed to be me". Wikieditlobs (talk) 22:59, 12 December 2023 (UTC)