Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irevna (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:43, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Irevna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NCORP. A BEFORE search only turned up routine coverage related to acquisitions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Fails WP:NCORP. Bungstnk (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: An article on an offshoring division of CRISIL (itself a subsidiary of S&P Global), describing office locations, past acquisitions and renamings, but without providing claims or evidence of encyclopaedic notability. There's a mention of Irevna in this 2020 article about CRISIL so perhaps Irevna should be mentioned in the CRISIL article, but I don't see sufficient to demonstrate WP:NCORP for Irevna itself. AllyD (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.