User talk:Kuban kazak: Difference between revisions

Sigh... Protected for one week.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:34, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming that you mean blocking, if I do that, it would make it hard for him/her to carry out the discussion on the talk page as suggested, thus rendering the whole protection meaningless.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The IPs do not seem to match, but I posted a reminder on the talk page of the most recent IP nevertheless. Hopefully that'll be the same IP s/he use when logging in next time. Pattern or no pattern, our first assumption should be that that person is simply not aware of the rules.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:07, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kuban kazak, I am looking for the real image of this above stamp. I searched it every where possible (such as World War II), but failed. Would you please help me to find it out? Thanks in advance--NAHID 20:59, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you Mariah-Yulia--NAHID 22:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Your welcome!! Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:47, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Answering to your question: I removed them, because they are not on list. If you can see them on the official list of twinning towns ([1]) please show where. As of January 2008 there isn't even a single Russian town on the list. Of course there also are many partner cities, but that list is much longer ([2]) and has nothing to do with section entitled "Sister cities", because twin town is not the same as partner town. Furthermore I mentioned overall number of partner towns in my edits, especially Russian one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.5.214.5 (talk) 09:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you mind find this interesting [3]--Miyokan (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope part of it will go to the 250,000+ non-Chechen refugees who fled the ethnic cleansing that was imposed on the republic in the early 1990s, and that people of Naursky, Shelkovsky, Nadterechny, Sunzhensky regions and Grozny will be allowed to return to their homes. --Kuban Cossack 14:28, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ru:Нахар. --80.249.229.48 (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Большая просьба высказаться про название города "Харкив" на [4] .Спасибо. --80.249.229.48 (talk) 15:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if the colors in this image are right? Apparently it's the coat of arms of the Yaraoslav although in the source it is in black and white, not the blue and yellow colors of the modern Ukrainian coat of arms the uploader changed it to. He has uploaded several other Rus symbols using this coloring.--Miyokan (talk) 12:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am well aware of that editor and my adice that you don't even use his re-mastered and re-touched images in articles. Much like the 1930s The commissar vanishes effect. --Kuban Cossack 13:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		This is for protecting Russia–Ukraine relations from nationalist noncence Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still wonder where the Ukrainians wanted gas for free noncense came from, from Russian TV? Mariah-Yulia (talk) 17:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Думал заинтересует следуйщее

Органы управления территориями казачьих войск

• 2.4.1. Азовское казачье войско. Ф. 877. 1834 - 1866 гг. 361 ед. хр.
• 2.4.2. Войсковое правление Амурского казачьего войска. Ф. 1573. 1878- 1918 гг. 1314 ед. хр.
• 2.4.3. Войсковая земская управа Амурского казачьего войска. Ф. 1577. 1916 - 1918 гг. 3 ед. хр.
• 2.4.4. Областное правление Войска Донского. Ф. 1330. 1793 - 1917 гг. 48 ед. хр.
• 2.4.5. Комитет об устройстве Войска Донского. Ф. 331. 1819 - 1835 гг. 772 ед. хр.
• 2.4.6. Делопроизводство сенаторов Княжнина и Болгарского, назначенных для приведения в действие высочайше утвержденного 26 мая 1835 г. Положения об управлении Донским войском. Ф. 357. 1835 - 1837 гг. 20 ед. хр.
• 2.4.7. Управление начальника артиллерии Донского казачьего войска. Ф. 1331. 1892 - 1894 гг. 3 ед. хр.
• 2.4.8. Енисейское казачье войсковое управление. Ф. 954. 1917 г. 1 ед. хр.
• 2.4.9. Забайкальское казачье войско. Ф. 1553. 1881 - 1919 гг. 128 ед. хр.
• 2.4.10. Кавказское линейное казачье войско. Ф. 1058. 1833 - 1860 гг. 2308 ед. хр.
• 2.4.11. Комитет высочайше учрежденный для составления проекта Положения об устройстве Кавказского линейного казачьего войска. Ф. 15044. 1839 - 1845 гг. 35 ед. хр.
• 2.4.12. Кубанское казачье войско. Ф. 643. 1793 - 1918 гг. 203 ед. хр.
• 2.4.13. Комитет, учрежденный для составления проекта положения об устройстве Черноморского войска. Ф. 896. 1835 - 1838 гг. 65 ед. хр.
• 2.4.14. Новороссийское казачье войско. Ф. 645. 1843 - 1866 гг. 54 ед. хр.
• 2.4.15. Оренбургское казачье войско. Ф. 1445. 1853 - 1918 гг. 49 ед. хр.
• 2.4.16. Семиреченское казачье войско. Ф. 1434. 1868 - 1917 гг. 10 ед. хр.
• 2.4.17. Сибирское казачье войско. Ф. 752. 1858 - 1917 гг. 12 ед. хр.
• 2.4.18. Войсковое правление Терского казачьего войска. Ф. 1329. 1859 - 1917 гг. 49 ед. хр.
• 2.4.19. Уральское казачье войско. Ф. 653. 1773 - 1917 гг. 9 ед. хр.
• 2.4.20 Войсковое правление Уссурийского казачьего войска. Ф. 1582. 1889 - 1918 гг. 1466 ед. хр.
• 2.4.21. Гленовский участок Уссурийского казачьего войска. Ф. 1588. 1917 г. 2 ед. хр.

regards--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 22:58, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainian wikipedian Yakudza is trying to get this image deleted. Looks at these edits of his - [5], [6], [7]. His reason is "not corresponds WP:NFCC, the author is not specified, there is a picture collage of two photos". He does not list why it does not correspond to WP:NFCC, the author of an image is not required as far as I'm aware as long as it has a source, and the vast majority of images on wikipedia do not list who the author of the image is in their source, and I don't even know what his third reason is supposed to mean. Could you look into it?--Miyokan (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try the link here to the President's gallery: [8]. They can't charge you with montage there. --Kuban Cossack 12:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I seriously look forward to seeing your evidence. Ostap 22:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mabey we shouldn't escalate this. Edit's like this: [9] show that Kuban is not the enemy of Wikiproject Ukraine. This is prob. a case of diffrent interpertations of actions and words. Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some guy, with a contributaion showing he loves Chechenians, started this. He already tried to start an edit war, but Papa November was there to do a good job and take it under control. Anyway, i'm going to keep an eye on the article, and i ask you to do so it whenever possible. Log in, log out (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you prob. will encounter him a lot on wikipedia you can find his life history here:[10], there is also a great picture of him on the net:[11]. Mariah-Yulia (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A recent creation largely "refering" to the style of your upload Image:Moscow metro.png but with Russian and English texts totally separated into 2 images. Since you're a major Moscow Metro article contributor, if you consider to use this one over the PNG version. This SVG is currently lacking of Monorail. Russian version still require some text positioning that I will later take care of. And 1 more thing, being uploaded to Commons Wikimedia, I do not include the official logos for fair use concern. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 01:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like some parts of it, first of all stations on Moscow metro are never represented as squares, but rather as circles, and big ones, same goes for termi, second again expansion are not entirly correct, since several parts are missing, thirdly no river, fourthly geometry (you put a bend on the STL, but forgot about the more profilific one for the SL) fifthly there are no right angle turns as you put on the BLLM (considering that geographically its the other way). So no, I prefer to use the official version, besides SVGs are not supported by all browsers. --Kuban Cossack 07:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"besides SVGs are not supported by all browsers." SVG in Wikipedia are rendered as bitmap by Wiki's engine. So browser capability has no effect on SVG. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 08:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just tested it on IE 6, which is a dying breed but still common, could not open the big version to look in detail. --Kuban Cossack 08:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to remind you since you may come across more SVG files in Wiki later. In "My Preference" - "Files", set the "Limit images on file description pages to" largest amount, so you will not be limited within 800px width by default. If you wanna zoom it, more or less you should save the bitmap file (PNG) or the SVG file itself and view it in another software. The problem you've encountered is a common glitch or not. The raw file of SVG is supposed to be viewed by specific software rather than internet browser, at least in this stage. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 09:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree. This cannot be a substitute as original picture is required to show official design of the map. Elk Salmon (talk) 16:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How is this RFC is done, what could be it's outcomes? Log in, log out (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Send me an email. --Kuban Cossack 08:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That turned into a witch hunt. Log in, log out (talk) 08:53, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I'm not familiar with the specific reason for this block but can attest to this editor's generally collaborative approach. I can't believe he was blocked when certain other editors have not been.Faustian (talk) 03:36, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See this AN/3RR post for details. The block was for edit warring at Chechen people. If you believe other editors are also violating policy, please bring it to the attention of administrators. Papa November (talk) 09:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well it is a good thing a power cut in our stanitsa left me deaf to the internet for the weekend, just to find Folantin permabanned. Sometimes it really is a case that when you have a problem you feel powerless to solve its best to leave for a while and check later. AND CELEBRATE THE VICTORY!--Kuban Cossack 08:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]