Zen: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{otheruses}} |
{{otheruses}} |
||
{{Zen Infobox}} |
{{Zen Infobox}} |
||
'''Zen''' is a school of [[Mahayana|Mahāyāna]] [[Buddhism]] notable for its emphasis on [[Praxis (process)|practice]] and [[Experience|experiential]] [[Prajñā|wisdom]]—particularly as realized in the form of [[meditation]] known as ''[[zazen]]''—in the attainment of [[Bodhi|awakening]]. As such, it de-emphasizes both [[Theory|theoretical]] [[knowledge]] and the study of [[religious text]]s in favor of direct individual experience of one's own [[Buddha-nature|true nature]]. |
'''Zen''' is a school of [[Mahayana|Mahāyāna]] [[Buddhism]] notable for its emphasis on [[Praxis (process)|practice]] and [[Experience|experiential]] [[Prajñā|wisdom]]—particularly as realized in the form of [[meditation]] known as ''[[zazen]]''—in the attainment of [[Bodhi|awakening]]. As such, it de-emphasizes both [[Theory|theoretical]] [[knowledge]] and the study of [[religious text]]s in favor of direct individual experience of one's own [[Buddha-nature|true nature]]. |
||
Line 108: | Line 107: | ||
The idea of a line of descent from Śākyamuni Buddha is a distinctive institution of Zen which [[D.T. Suzuki]] contends was invented by hagiographers to grant Zen legitimacy and prestige.<ref>{{cite book | last = Suzuki | first = D.T. | authorlink = Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki | title = Essays in Zen Buddhism | origyear = 1949 | publisher = Grove Press | location = New York | id = ISBN 0-375-70510-4 | pages = 168}}</ref> Some scholars also argue that the legend of the "Flower sermon" is not based on actual historical events <ref>''The Gateless Barrier: Zen Commments on the MuMonkan'' by Zenkei Shibayama</ref>. |
The idea of a line of descent from Śākyamuni Buddha is a distinctive institution of Zen which [[D.T. Suzuki]] contends was invented by hagiographers to grant Zen legitimacy and prestige.<ref>{{cite book | last = Suzuki | first = D.T. | authorlink = Daisetz Teitaro Suzuki | title = Essays in Zen Buddhism | origyear = 1949 | publisher = Grove Press | location = New York | id = ISBN 0-375-70510-4 | pages = 168}}</ref> Some scholars also argue that the legend of the "Flower sermon" is not based on actual historical events <ref>''The Gateless Barrier: Zen Commments on the MuMonkan'' by Zenkei Shibayama</ref>. |
||
== |
== of Zen == |
||
{| style="float:right" |
{| style="float:right" |
||
| {{Buddhism}} |
| {{Buddhism}} |
||
Line 115: | Line 114: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
{{see also | Silk Road transmission of Buddhism}} |
{{see also | Silk Road transmission of Buddhism}} |
||
Zen developed as an amalgam of Mahāyāna Buddhism and Taoism.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Dumoulin|2005|p=68}} "the Taoist influence on Buddhism was later to culminate in the teachings of the Zen school."</ref> {{Harvcoltxt|Dumoulin|2005}} argues that Zen also has roots in the practices of [[yoga]], specifically ''kammaṭṭhāna'', the consideration of objects, and ''kasiṇa'', total fixation of the mind.<ref>{{Harvcolnb|Dumoulin|2005|p=17–18}}</ref> |
|||
Buddhism was introduced into [[China]] through [[missionary]] efforts from [[India]]. From there Buddhism spread to [[Korea]] and [[Japan]].<ref>[http://www.utm.edu/staff/jfieser/vita/research/Eastphil.htm Eastern Philosophy: An introduction to the classical theories of Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, and Taoism. University of Tennessee at Martin]</ref> The earliest conceptual and practical beginnings of Zen lie in India, its formation and evolution as an innovative religious movement lies in China.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895</ref> |
|||
⚫ | The entry of Buddhism into China was marked by interaction and [[syncretism]] with Taoic faiths, Taoism in particular.<ref>Maspero, Henri. Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. ''Taoism and Chinese Religion''. pg 46. University of Massachusetts, 1981.</ref> Buddhism's scriptures were translated into Chinese with Taoist vocabulary, because it was originally seen as a kind of foreign Taoism.<ref>Prebish, Charles. ''Buddhism: A Modern Perspective.'' Pg 192. Penn State Press, 1975. ISBN 0271011955.</ref> In the [[Tang period]] Taoism incorporated such Buddhist elements as monasteries, vegetarianism, prohibition of alcohol, the doctrine of emptiness, and collecting scripture into tripartite organisation. During the same time, Chan Buddhism grew to become the largest sect in Chinese Buddhism.<ref>Dumoulin, Heinrich, Heisig, James W. & Knitter, Paul. ''Zen Buddhism: A History (India and China)''. Pp 166-167, 169-172. World Wisdom, Inc, 2005. ISBN 0941532895.</ref> |
||
The [[sutras]] of the Mahayana literature, which originated in India, have a historically clear and certain influence on Zen.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. Page 55 </ref> This transplanting of Buddhism from its native soil in India into the culture and life of China continued with the task of translating the hundreds of volumes of the Buddhist canon from Pali and Sanskrit into the Chinese language.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. Page 64</ref> The ''collected sayings'' (Jpn., goroku) in Zen literature consist of stories, discourses, and sayings, the heritage of India melded into the the common language of China.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. Page 64</ref> |
|||
⚫ | Bodhidharma ( 500 CE) is . Bodhidharma settled in the [[Northern Wei Dynasty|kingdom of Wei]] where he took as disciples Daoyu and [[Huike]]. Shortly before his death, Bodhidharma appointed Huike to succeed him, making Huike the first Chinese patriarch and the second patriarch of Zen in China. The transmission then passed to the second patriarch ([[Huike]]), the third ([[Sengcan]]), the fourth patriarch ([[Dao Xin]]) and the fifth patriarch ([[Hongren]]). The sixth and last patriarch, [[Huineng]] (638–713), was one of the giants of Zen history, and all surviving schools regard him as their ancestor. However, the dramatic story of Huineng's life tells that there was a controversy over his claim to the title of patriarch: after being chosen by [[Hongren]], the fifth patriarch, he had to flee by night to [[Nanhua Temple]] in the south to avoid the wrath of Hongren's jealous senior disciples. In the middle of the [[8th century]], monks claiming to be the successors to Huineng, calling themselves the Southern school, cast themselves in opposition to those claiming to succeed Hongren's student [[Shenxiu]] (神秀). It is commonly held that at this point—the debates between these rival factions—that Zen enters the realm of fully documented history. The Southern school eventually became predominant and their rivals died out. Modern scholarship, however, has questioned this narrative. |
||
The [[Mahayana]] school of Buddhism is noted for its proximity with [[Yoga]]. <ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. page 22</ref> In the west, Zen is often set alongside Yoga, the two schools of meditation display obvious family resemblances.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. page xviii</ref> The melding of Yoga with Buddhism--a process that continued through the centuries--represents a landmark on the path of Yoga through the [[history of India]]. This phenomenon merits special attention since the Zen Buddhist school of meditation has its roots in yogic practices. <ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India and China) By Heinrich Dumoulin, James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter (page 13). |
|||
Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005 World Wisdom. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895 [Exact quote: "This phenomenon merits special attention since yogic roots are to be found in the Zen Buddhist school of meditation."]</ref> Certain essential elements of Yoga are important both for Buddhism in general and for Zen in particular. <ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. page 13</ref> |
|||
Buddhist monks brought sacred books, images and [[Buddhist meditation]] to China. Buddhist monks taught methods of meditation found in the [[Pali Canon]]. These in turn were soon mingled with [[Taoist]] meditational techniques. Most of the translations attributed to [[An Shih Kao]], deal with meditation ([[dhyana]]) and concentration ([[samadhi]]). His translation of the ''Sutra on Concentration by Practicing Respiratory Exercises'' explains the ancient yogic and early Buddhist practice of controlling the breath by counting inhalation and exhalations.<ref>Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. Page 64</ref> |
|||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | Bodhidharma ( |
||
The following are the six Patriarchs of Zen in China as listed in traditional sources: |
The following are the six Patriarchs of Zen in China as listed in traditional sources: |
||
Line 137: | Line 129: | ||
# [[Huineng]] (慧能, [[Japanese language|Japanese:]] Enō) [[638]] - [[713]] |
# [[Huineng]] (慧能, [[Japanese language|Japanese:]] Enō) [[638]] - [[713]] |
||
== == |
|||
⚫ | |||
In the following centuries, Zen grew to become the largest sect in [[Chinese Buddhism]]. The teachers claiming Huineng's posterity began to branch off into numerous different schools, each with their own special emphasis, but all of which kept the same basic focus on meditational practice, personal instruction and personal experience. |
In the following centuries, Zen grew to become the largest sect in [[Chinese Buddhism]]. The teachers claiming Huineng's posterity began to branch off into numerous different schools, each with their own special emphasis, but all of which kept the same basic focus on meditational practice, personal instruction and personal experience. |
||
Because Zen developed as a distinct school in medieval [[China]], it reflects the influence of [[Chinese philosophy]], including [[Taoism]] and, to a lesser extent, [[Confucianism]]. [[Taoism]] played a pivotal role in the reception that China gave to Buddhism. The two religions enjoyed close relationship during the early years of Chinese Buddhism. Taoist influence on Buddhism was later visible in the teachings of the Zen school.<ref>Heinrich Dumoulin, Zen Buddhism: A History</ref> |
|||
⚫ | The entry of Buddhism into China was marked by interaction and [[syncretism]] with Taoic faiths, Taoism in particular.<ref>Maspero, Henri. Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. ''Taoism and Chinese Religion''. pg 46. University of Massachusetts, 1981.</ref> Buddhism's scriptures were translated into Chinese with Taoist vocabulary, because it was originally seen as a kind of foreign Taoism.<ref>Prebish, Charles. ''Buddhism: A Modern Perspective.'' Pg 192. Penn State Press, 1975. ISBN 0271011955.</ref> In the [[Tang period]] Taoism incorporated such Buddhist elements as monasteries, vegetarianism, prohibition of alcohol, the doctrine of emptiness, and collecting scripture into tripartite organisation. During the same time, Chan Buddhism grew to become the largest sect in Chinese Buddhism.<ref>Dumoulin, Heinrich, Heisig, James W. & Knitter, Paul. ''Zen Buddhism: A History (India and China)''. Pp 166-167, 169-172. World Wisdom, Inc, 2005. ISBN 0941532895.</ref> |
||
Buddhism was not universally welcomed, particularly among the gentry. The Buddha [[Dharma]] seemed alien and amoral to conservative and Confucian sensibilities.<ref>Dumoulin, Heinrich, Heisig, James W. & Knitter, Paul. ''Zen Buddhism: A History (India and China)''. Pp 189-190, 268-269. World Wisdom, Inc, 2005. ISBN 0941532895.</ref> Confucianism promoted social stability, order, strong families, and practical living. Chinese officials questioned how a monk's monasticism and personal attainment of nirvana benefited the empire.<ref>Prebish, Charles. ''Buddhism: A Modern Perspective.'' Pg 192. Penn State Press, 1975. ISBN 0271011955.</ref> However, Buddhism and Confucianism eventually reconciled after centuries of conflict and assimilation.<ref>Moore, Charles Alexander. ''The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture''. Pp 133, 147. University of Hawaii |
|||
Press. 1967. ISBN 0824800753.</ref> |
|||
During the late [[Tang Dynasty|Tang]] and the Song periods, the tradition truly flowered, as a wide number of eminent teachers, such as [[Mazu Daoyi|Mazu]] ([[Wade-Giles]]: ''Ma-tsu''; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Baso), [[Shitou Xiqian|Shitou]] (Shih-t'ou; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Sekito), [[Baizhang]] (''Pai-chang''; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Hyakujo), [[Huangbo Xiyun|Huangbo]] (''Huang-po''; [[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Obaku), [[Linji]] (''Lin-chi''; [[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Rinzai), and [[Yunmen Wenyan|Yunmen]] ([[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Ummon) developed specialized teaching methods, which would variously become characteristic of the ''[[five houses]]'' (五家) of mature Chinese Zen. The traditional five houses were [[Caodong]] (曹洞宗), [[Linji school|Linji]] (臨濟宗), [[Guiyang school|Guiyang]] (潙仰宗), [[Fayan]] (法眼宗), and [[Yunmen school|Yunmen]] (雲門宗). This list does not include earlier schools such as the [[Hongzhou school|Hongzhou]] (洪州宗) of Mazu. |
During the late [[Tang Dynasty|Tang]] and the Song periods, the tradition truly flowered, as a wide number of eminent teachers, such as [[Mazu Daoyi|Mazu]] ([[Wade-Giles]]: ''Ma-tsu''; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Baso), [[Shitou Xiqian|Shitou]] (Shih-t'ou; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Sekito), [[Baizhang]] (''Pai-chang''; [[Japanese language|Japanese]]: Hyakujo), [[Huangbo Xiyun|Huangbo]] (''Huang-po''; [[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Obaku), [[Linji]] (''Lin-chi''; [[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Rinzai), and [[Yunmen Wenyan|Yunmen]] ([[Japanese language|Jap.]]: Ummon) developed specialized teaching methods, which would variously become characteristic of the ''[[five houses]]'' (五家) of mature Chinese Zen. The traditional five houses were [[Caodong]] (曹洞宗), [[Linji school|Linji]] (臨濟宗), [[Guiyang school|Guiyang]] (潙仰宗), [[Fayan]] (法眼宗), and [[Yunmen school|Yunmen]] (雲門宗). This list does not include earlier schools such as the [[Hongzhou school|Hongzhou]] (洪州宗) of Mazu. |
||
Over the course of Song Dynasty ([[960]]–[[1279]]), the Guiyang, Fayan, and Yunmen schools were gradually absorbed into the Linji. During the same period, the various developments of Zen teaching methods crystallized into the [[koan]] practice which is unique to Zen Buddhism. According to Miura and Sasaki, "it was during the lifetime of [[Yuanwu Keqin|Yüan-wu]]'s successor, [[Ta-hui Tsung-kao]] 大慧宗杲 (Daie Sōkō, 1089-1163) that Koan Zen entered its determinative stage."<ref>Isshu Miura and Ruth Sasaki, ''The Zen Koan: Its History and Use in Rinzai Zen'', p. 13 [[ISBN 0-15-699981-1]]</ref> Koan practice was prevalent in the Linji school, to which [[Yuanwu Keqin|Yuanwu]] and Ta-hui ([[pinyin]]: Dahui) belonged, but it was also employed on a more limited basis by the Caodong school. The teaching styles and words of the classical masters were collected in such important Zen texts as the ''[[Blue Cliff Record]]'' ([[1125]]) of Yuanwu, ''[[The Gateless Gate]]'' ([[1228]]) of [[Wumen]], both of the Linji lineage, and the ''[[Book of Serenity|Book of Equanimity]]'' ([[1223]]) of [[Wansong]], of the Caodong lineage. These texts record classic koan cases, together with verse and prose commentaries, which would be studied by later generations of students down to the present. |
Over the course of Song Dynasty ([[960]]–[[1279]]), the Guiyang, Fayan, and Yunmen schools were gradually absorbed into the Linji. During the same period, the various developments of Zen teaching methods crystallized into the [[koan]] practice which is unique to Zen Buddhism. According to Miura and Sasaki, "it was during the lifetime of [[Yuanwu Keqin|Yüan-wu]]'s successor, [[Ta-hui Tsung-kao]] 大慧宗杲 (Daie Sōkō, 1089-1163) that Koan Zen entered its determinative stage."<ref>Isshu Miura and Ruth Sasaki, ''The Zen Koan: Its History and Use in Rinzai Zen'', p. 13 [[ISBN 0-15-699981-1]]</ref> Koan practice was prevalent in the Linji school, to which [[Yuanwu Keqin|Yuanwu]] and Ta-hui ([[pinyin]]: Dahui) belonged, but it was also employed on a more limited basis by the Caodong school. The teaching styles and words of the classical masters were collected in such important Zen texts as the ''[[Blue Cliff Record]]'' ([[1125]]) of Yuanwu, ''[[The Gateless Gate]]'' ([[1228]]) of [[Wumen]], both of the Linji lineage, and the ''[[Book of Serenity|Book of Equanimity]]'' ([[1223]]) of [[Wansong]], of the Caodong lineage. These texts record classic koan cases, together with verse and prose commentaries, which would be studied by later generations of students down to the present. |
||
Zen, which had developed into a distinctively Chinese school of Buddhism, became an international phenomenon early in its history. This first occurred in Vietnam, according to the traditional accounts of that country, and later in other countries including Korea, Japan and Western countries. |
|||
== Zen in China == |
|||
{{see also | Buddhism in China}} |
|||
During the Tang dynasty, Chan Buddhism grew to become the largest sect in Chinese Buddhism and has over the years, and, despite its "transmission beyond the scriptures", produced the largest body of literature in Chinese history of any sect or tradition. |
|||
Chan continued to be influential as a religious force in China, although some Japanese scholars have argued that some energy was lost with the syncretist [[Neo-Confucian]] revival of [[Confucianism]] starting in the Song period. The Zen school however thrived |
Chan continued to be influential as a religious force in China, although some Japanese scholars have argued that some energy was lost with the syncretist [[Neo-Confucian]] revival of [[Confucianism]] starting in the Song period. The Zen school however thrived |
Revision as of 01:37, 1 June 2007
Template:Zen Infobox Zen is a school of Mahāyāna Buddhism notable for its emphasis on practice and experiential wisdom—particularly as realized in the form of meditation known as zazen—in the attainment of awakening. As such, it de-emphasizes both theoretical knowledge and the study of religious texts in favor of direct individual experience of one's own true nature.
The emergence of Zen as a distinct school of Buddhism was first documented in China in the 7th century CE. It is thought to have developed as an amalgam of various currents in Mahāyāna Buddhist thought—among them the Yogācāra and Madhyamaka philosophies and the Prajñāpāramitā literature—and of local traditions in China, particularly Daoism and Huáyán Buddhism. From China, Zen subsequently spread southwards to Vietnam and eastwards to Korea and Japan. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Zen also began to establish a notable presence in North America and Europe.
Etymology
"Zen", pronounced [zeɴ] in Japanese, is the Sino-Japanese reading of the Chinese character 禅, which is pronounced [tʂʰán] (Chinese: chán) in modern Standard Mandarin Chinese, but was likely pronounced [d͡zʲen] in Middle Chinese.[1] The term "zen" is in fact a contraction of the seldom-used long form zenna (禅那; Mandarin: chánnà), a derivation from the Sanskrit term dhyāna (Pāli: jhāna), which refers to a specific type or aspect of meditation. While "Zen" is the name most commonly known worldwide, it is also known as Chán in China, Seon in Korea, and Thiền in Vietnam.
Zen teachings and practices
Basis
In Zen, philosophical teachings and textual study are given less emphasis than in other forms of Buddhism. Nonetheless, Zen is deeply rooted in both the teachings of the Buddha Siddhārtha Gautama and Mahāyāna Buddhist thought.
The fundamental Zen practice of zazen, or seated meditation, recalls both the posture in which the Buddha is said to have achieved enlightenment under the Bodhi tree at Bodh Gaya, and the elements of mindfulness and concentration which are part of the Eightfold Path as taught by the Buddha. All of the Buddha's fundamental teachings—among them the Eightfold Path, the Four Noble Truths, the idea of dependent origination, the five precepts, the five aggregates, and the three marks of existence—also make up important elements of Zen. Certain other elements emerging from Theravāda Buddhist thought, such as the perfections, also have a place in Zen.
Additionally, as a school of Mahāyāna Buddhism, Zen draws many of its basic driving concepts, particularly the bodhisattva ideal, from that branch. Uniquely Mahāyāna figures such as Guānyīn, Mañjuśrī, Samantabhadra, and Amitābha are venerated alongside the historical Buddha. Despite Zen's lack of emphasis on textual study, it has drawn heavily on the Mahāyāna sūtras, particularly the Heart of Perfect Wisdom Sūtra, the Sūtra of the Perfection of Wisdom of the Diamond that Cuts through Illusion, the Lankavatara Sūtra, and the "Samantamukha Parivarta" section of the Lotus Sūtra.
Zen has also itself produced a rich corpus of written literature which has become a part of its practice and teaching. Among the earliest and most widely studied of the specifically Zen texts, dating back to at least the 9th century CE, is the Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch, sometimes attributed to Huìnéng. Others include the various collections of kōans and the Shōbōgenzō of Dōgen Zenji.
Zen training emphasizes daily life practice, along with intensive periods of meditation. Practicing with others is an integral part of Zen practice. In explaining Zen Buddhism, Japanese Zen teachers have made the point that Zen is a "way of life"[citation needed]. D.T. Suzuki wrote that aspects of this life are: a life of humility; a life of labor; a life of service; a life of prayer and gratitude; and a life of meditation[citation needed]. The Chinese Chan master Baizhang (720–814 CE) left behind a famous saying which had been the guiding principle of his life, "A day without work is a day without food."[2]
D.T. Suzuki asserted that satori (awakening) has always been the goal of every school of Buddhism, but that which distinguished the Zen tradition as it developed in China, Korea, and Japan was a way of life radically different from that of Indian Buddhists. In India, the tradition of the mendicant (bhikkhu) prevailed, but in China social circumstances led to the development of a temple and training-center system in which the abbot and the monks all performed mundane tasks. These included food gardening or farming, carpentry, architecture, housekeeping, administration, and the practice of folk medicine. Consequently, the enlightenment sought in Zen had to stand up well to the demands and potential frustrations of everyday life.[citation needed]
Zazen
Zen sitting meditation, the core of zen practice, is called zazen in Japanese (坐禅; Chinese tso-chan [Wade-Giles] or zuochan [Pinyin]). During zazen, practitioners usually assume a sitting position such as the lotus, half-lotus, Burmese, or seiza postures. Awareness is directed towards one's posture and breathing. Often, a square or round cushion (zafu, 座蒲) placed on a padded mat (zabuton, 座布団) is used to sit on; in some cases, a chair may be used. In Rinzai Zen practitioners typically sit facing the center of the room; while Soto practitioners traditionally sit facing a wall.
In Soto Zen, shikantaza meditation ("just-sitting", 只管打坐) that is, a meditation with no objects, anchors, or content, is the primary form of practice. The meditator strives to be aware of the stream of thoughts, allowing them to arise and pass away without interference. Considerable textual, philosophical, and phenomenological justification of this practice can be found throughout Dōgen's Shōbōgenzō, as for example in the "Principles of Zazen"[3] and the "Universally Recommended Instructions for Zazen"[4]. Rinzai Zen, instead, emphasizes attention to the breath and koan practice (q.v.).
The amount of time spent daily in zazen by practitioners varies. Dogen recommends that five minutes or more daily is beneficial for householders. The key is daily regularity, as Zen teaches that the ego will naturally resist, and the discipline of regularity is essential. Practicing Zen monks may perform four to six periods of zazen during a normal day, with each period lasting 30 to 40 minutes. Normally, a monastery will hold a monthly retreat period (sesshin), lasting between one and seven days. During this time, zazen is practiced more intensively: monks may spend four to eight hours in meditation each day, sometimes supplemented by further rounds of zazen late at night.
Meditation as a practice can be applied to any posture. Walking meditation is called kinhin. Successive periods of zazen are usually interwoven with brief periods of walking meditation to relieve the legs.
The teacher
Because the Zen tradition emphasizes direct communication over scriptural study, the Zen teacher has traditionally played a central role. Generally speaking, a Zen teacher is a person ordained in any tradition of Zen to teach the dharma, guide students of meditation, and perform rituals. An important concept for all Zen sects is the notion of Dharma transmission the claim of a line of authority that goes back to Śākyamuni Buddha via the teachings of each successive master to each successive student. This concept relates to the ideas expressed in a description of Zen attributed to Bodhidharma:
- A special transmission outside the scriptures; (教外別傳)
- No dependence upon words and letters; (不立文字)
- Direct pointing to the human mind; (直指人心)
- Seeing into one's own nature and attaining Buddhahood. (見性成佛)[5]
The idea of a line of descent from Śākyamuni Buddha is a distinctive institution of Zen which D.T. Suzuki contends was invented by hagiographers to grant Zen legitimacy and prestige.[6]
John McRae’s study “Seeing Through Zen” explores this assertion of lineage as a distinctive and central aspect of Zen Buddhism. He writes of this “genealogical” approach so central to Zen’s self-understanding, that while not without precedent, has unique features. It is “relational (involving interaction between individuals rather than being based solely on individual effort), generational (in that it is organized according to parent-child, or rather teacher-student, generations) and reiterative (i.e., intended for emulation and repetition in the lives of present and future teachers and students.”
McRae offers a detailed criticism of lineage, but he also notes it is central to Zen. So much so that it is hard to envision any claim to Zen that discards claims of lineage. Therefore, for example, in Japanese Soto, lineage charts become a central part of the Sanmatsu, the documents of Dharma transmission. And it is common for daily chanting in Zen temples and monasteries to include the lineage of the school.
In Japan during the Tokugawa period (1600–1868), some came to question the lineage system and its legitimacy. The Zen master Dokuan Genko (1630–1698), for example, openly questioned the necessity of written acknowledgment from a teacher, which he dismissed as "paper Zen." An occasional teacher in Japan during the Tokugawa period did not adhere to the lineage system; these were termed mushi dokugo (無師獨悟, "independently enlightened without a teacher") or jigo jisho (自悟自証, "self-enlightened and self-certified"). They were generally dismissed and perhaps of necessity leave no independent transmission. Nevertheless, modern Zen Buddhists also consider questions about the dynamics of the lineage system, inspired in part by academic research into the history of Zen.
Honorific titles associated with teachers typically include, in Chinese, Fashi (法師) or Chanshi (禪師); in Korean, Sunim (an honorofic for a monk or nun) and Seon Sa (선사); in Japanese, Osho (和尚), Roshi (老師), or Sensei (先生); and in Vietnamese, Thầy. Note that many of these titles are not specific to Zen but are used generally for Buddhist priests; some, such as sensei are not even specific to Buddhism.
The English term Zen master is often used to refer to important teachers, especially ancient and medieval ones. However, there is no specific criterion by which one may be called a Zen master. The term is less common in reference to modern teachers.
Koan practice
Zen Buddhists of the Rinzai school practice meditation on koans during zazen. A koan (literally "public case") is a story or dialogue, generally related to Zen or other Buddhist history; the most typical form is an anecdote involving early Chinese Zen masters. Koan practice is particularly emphasized by the Japanese Rinzai school, but it also occurs in other forms of Zen.
These anecdotes involving famous Zen teachers are a practical demonstration of their wisdom, and can be used to test a student's progress in Zen practice. Koans often appear paradoxical or linguistically meaningless dialogues or questions. Answering a koan requires a student to let go of conceptual thinking and of the logical way we order the world.
The Zen student's mastery of a given koan is presented to the teacher in a private interview, referred to as dokusan (独参), daisan (代参), or sanzen (参禅). Zen teachers advise that the problem posed by a koan is to be taken quite seriously, and to be approached as literally a matter of life and death. While there is no unique answer to a koan, practitioners are expected to demonstrate their understanding of the koan and of Zen through their responses. The teacher may approve or disapprove of the answer and guide the student in the right direction. There are also various commentaries on koans, written by experienced teachers, that can serve as a guide. These commentaries are also of great value to modern scholarship on the subject.
Chanting and Liturgy
A practice in many Zen monasteries and centers is a daily liturgy service. Practitioners chant major sutras such as the Heart Sutra, the Avalokiteshvara Sutra, the Song of the Jewel Mirror Awareness, the Great Compassionate Heart Dharani (Daihishin Dharani)[7], and other minor mantras.
The Butsudan is the altar in a monastery where offerings are made to the images of the Buddha or Bodhisattvas. The same term is also used in Japanese homes for the altar where one prays to and communicates with deceased family members. As such, reciting liturgy in Zen can be seen as a means to connect with the Bodhisattvas of the past. Liturgy is often used during funerals, memorials, and other special events as means to invoke the aid of supernatural powers.
Chanting usually centers on major Bodhisattvas like Avalokiteshvara and Manjusri (Japanese: Monju). These celestial beings have taken extraordinary vows to liberate all beings from Samsara (the cycle of birth, death, and rebirth), while remaining in Samsara themselves. Since the Zen practitioner’s aim is to walk the Bodhisattva path, chanting can be used as a means to connect with these beings and realize this ideal within oneself. By repeatedly chanting the Avalokiteshvara sutra, for example, one instills the Bodhisattva's ideals into ones mind. The ultimate goal is given in the end of the sutra, which states, "In the morning, be one with Avalokiteshvara, In the evening, be one with Avalokiteshvara,"[8], Through the realization of the Emptiness of oneself, and the Mahayanist ideal of Buddha-nature in all things, one understands that there is no difference between the cosmic bodhisattva and oneself. The wisdom and compassion of the Boddhisattva one is chanting to is seen to equal the inner wisdom and compassion of the practitioner. Thus, the duality between subject and object, practitioner and Bodhisattva, chanter and sutra is ended.
One modern day Roshi justifies the use of chanting sutras by referring to zen master Dogen.[9], Dogen is known to have refuted the statement "Painted rice cakes will not satisfy hunger". This means that sutras, which are just symbols like painted rice cakes, cannot truly satisfy one's spiritual hunger. Dogen, however, saw that there is no separation between metaphor and reality. "There is no difference between paintings, rice cakes, or any thing at all" [10]. The symbol and the symbolized were inherently the same, and thus only the sutras could truly satisfy one's spiritual needs.
To understand this non-dual relationship experientially, one is told to practice liturgy Intimately [11]. In distinguishing between ceremony and liturgy, Dogen states, "In ceremony there are forms and there are sounds, there is understanding and there is believing. In liturgy there is only intimacy." The practitioner is instructed to listen to and speak liturgy not just with one sense, but with one's "whole body-and-mind". By listening with one's entire being, one eliminates the space between the self and the liturgy. Thus, Dogen's instructions are to "listen with the eye and see with the ear". By focusing all of one's being on one specific practice, duality is transcended. Dogen says, "Let go of the eye, and the whole body-and-mind are nothing but the eye; let go of the ear, and the whole universe is nothing but the ear." Chanting intimately thus allows one to experience a non-dual reality. The liturgy used is a tool to allow the practitioner to transcend the old conceptions of self and other. In this way, intimate liturgy practice allows one to realize Sunyata, or emptiness, which is at the heart of Buddhist teachings.
Other techniques
There are other techniques common in the Zen tradition which seem unconventional and whose purpose is said to be to shock a student in order to help him or her let go of habitual activities of the mind. Some of these are common today, while others are found mostly in anecdotes. These include the loud belly shout known as katsu. It is common in many Zen traditions today for Zen teachers to have a stick with them during formal ceremonies which is a symbol of authority and which can be also used to strike on the table during a talk.
Mythology
Within Zen, and thus from an emic perspective, the origins of Zen Buddhism are ascribed to what is called the Flower Sermon, in which Śākyamuni Buddha is supposed to have passed on special insight to the disciple Mahākāśyapa. The sermon itself was a wordless one in which Śākyamuni merely held up a flower before the assembled disciples, among whom there was no reaction apart from Mahākāśyapa, who smiled. The smile is said to have signified Mahākāśyapa's understanding, and Śākyamuni acknowledged this by saying:
I possess the true Dharma eye, the marvelous mind of Nirvana, the true form of the formless, the subtle dharma gate that does not rest on words or letters but is a special transmission outside of the scriptures. This I entrust to Mahākāśyapa.[12]
Thus, a way within Buddhism developed which concentrated on direct experience rather than on rational creeds or revealed scriptures. Zen is a method of meditative religion which seeks to enlighten people in the manner that the Mahākāśyapa experienced.[13]
In the Song of Enlightenment (證道歌 Zhèngdào gē) of Yǒngjiā Xuánjué (665-713)[14]—one of the chief disciples of Huìnéng, the 6th patriarch of Chan Buddhism—it is written that Bodhidharma was the 28th patriarch in a line of descent from Mahākāśyapa, a disciple of Śākyamuni Buddha, and the first patriarch of Chan Buddhism:
- Mahākāśyapa was the first, leading the line of transmission;
- Twenty-eight Fathers followed him in the West;
- The Lamp was then brought over the sea to this country;
- And Bodhidharma became the First Father here:
- His mantle, as we all know, passed over six Fathers,
- And by them many minds came to see the Light.[15]
The idea of a line of descent from Śākyamuni Buddha is a distinctive institution of Zen which D.T. Suzuki contends was invented by hagiographers to grant Zen legitimacy and prestige.[16] Some scholars also argue that the legend of the "Flower sermon" is not based on actual historical events [17].
Early history of Zen
| |||||||||||||
|
Zen developed as an amalgam of Mahāyāna Buddhism and Taoism.[18] Dumoulin (2005) argues that Zen also has roots in the practices of yoga, specifically kammaṭṭhāna, the consideration of objects, and kasiṇa, total fixation of the mind.[19]
The entry of Buddhism into China was marked by interaction and syncretism with Taoic faiths, Taoism in particular.[20] Buddhism's scriptures were translated into Chinese with Taoist vocabulary, because it was originally seen as a kind of foreign Taoism.[21] In the Tang period Taoism incorporated such Buddhist elements as monasteries, vegetarianism, prohibition of alcohol, the doctrine of emptiness, and collecting scripture into tripartite organisation. During the same time, Chan Buddhism grew to become the largest sect in Chinese Buddhism.[22]
The establishment of Zen is traditionally credited to the monk Bodhidharma (ca 500 CE), who is recorded as having come to China to teach a "special transmission outside scriptures" which "did not rely upon words". Bodhidharma settled in the kingdom of Wei where he took as disciples Daoyu and Huike. Shortly before his death, Bodhidharma appointed Huike to succeed him, making Huike the first Chinese patriarch and the second patriarch of Zen in China. The transmission then passed to the second patriarch (Huike), the third (Sengcan), the fourth patriarch (Dao Xin) and the fifth patriarch (Hongren). The sixth and last patriarch, Huineng (638–713), was one of the giants of Zen history, and all surviving schools regard him as their ancestor. However, the dramatic story of Huineng's life tells that there was a controversy over his claim to the title of patriarch: after being chosen by Hongren, the fifth patriarch, he had to flee by night to Nanhua Temple in the south to avoid the wrath of Hongren's jealous senior disciples. In the middle of the 8th century, monks claiming to be the successors to Huineng, calling themselves the Southern school, cast themselves in opposition to those claiming to succeed Hongren's student Shenxiu (神秀). It is commonly held that at this point—the debates between these rival factions—that Zen enters the realm of fully documented history. The Southern school eventually became predominant and their rivals died out. Modern scholarship, however, has questioned this narrative.
The following are the six Patriarchs of Zen in China as listed in traditional sources:
- Bodhidharma (達摩, Chinese: Damo, Japanese: Daruma) about 440 - about 528
- Huike (慧可, Japanese: Eka) 487 - 593
- Sengcan (僧燦, Japanese: Sōsan) ? - 606
- Daoxin (道信, Japanese: Dōshin) 580 - 651
- Hongren (弘忍, Japanese: Kōnin) 601 - 674
- Huineng (慧能, Japanese: Enō) 638 - 713
Zen in China
In the following centuries, Zen grew to become the largest sect in Chinese Buddhism and, despite its "transmission beyond the scriptures", produced the largest body of literature in Chinese history of any sect or tradition.. The teachers claiming Huineng's posterity began to branch off into numerous different schools, each with their own special emphasis, but all of which kept the same basic focus on meditational practice, personal instruction and personal experience.
During the late Tang and the Song periods, the tradition truly flowered, as a wide number of eminent teachers, such as Mazu (Wade-Giles: Ma-tsu; Japanese: Baso), Shitou (Shih-t'ou; Japanese: Sekito), Baizhang (Pai-chang; Japanese: Hyakujo), Huangbo (Huang-po; Jap.: Obaku), Linji (Lin-chi; Jap.: Rinzai), and Yunmen (Jap.: Ummon) developed specialized teaching methods, which would variously become characteristic of the five houses (五家) of mature Chinese Zen. The traditional five houses were Caodong (曹洞宗), Linji (臨濟宗), Guiyang (潙仰宗), Fayan (法眼宗), and Yunmen (雲門宗). This list does not include earlier schools such as the Hongzhou (洪州宗) of Mazu.
Over the course of Song Dynasty (960–1279), the Guiyang, Fayan, and Yunmen schools were gradually absorbed into the Linji. During the same period, the various developments of Zen teaching methods crystallized into the koan practice which is unique to Zen Buddhism. According to Miura and Sasaki, "it was during the lifetime of Yüan-wu's successor, Ta-hui Tsung-kao 大慧宗杲 (Daie Sōkō, 1089-1163) that Koan Zen entered its determinative stage."[23] Koan practice was prevalent in the Linji school, to which Yuanwu and Ta-hui (pinyin: Dahui) belonged, but it was also employed on a more limited basis by the Caodong school. The teaching styles and words of the classical masters were collected in such important Zen texts as the Blue Cliff Record (1125) of Yuanwu, The Gateless Gate (1228) of Wumen, both of the Linji lineage, and the Book of Equanimity (1223) of Wansong, of the Caodong lineage. These texts record classic koan cases, together with verse and prose commentaries, which would be studied by later generations of students down to the present.
Chan continued to be influential as a religious force in China, although some Japanese scholars have argued that some energy was lost with the syncretist Neo-Confucian revival of Confucianism starting in the Song period. The Zen school however thrived in the post-Song; with a vast body of texts being produced up and through the modern period. While traditionally distinct, Chan was taught alongside Pure Land Buddhism in many Chinese Buddhist monasteries. In time much of this distinction was lost, and many masters taught both Chan and Pure Land. Chan Buddhism enjoyed something of a revival in the Ming Dynasty under luminaries such as Hanshan Deqing (憨山德清), who wrote and taught extensively on both Chan and Pure Land Buddhism; Miyun Yuanwu (密雲圓悟), who came to be seen posthumously as the first patriarch of the Obaku Zen school; as well as Yunqi Zhuhong (雲棲株宏) and Ouyi Zhixu (藕溢智旭).
After further centuries of decline, Chan was revived again in the early 20th century by Hsu Yun, who stands out as the defining figure of 20th century Chinese Buddhism. Many well known Chan teachers today trace their lineage back to Hsu Yun, including Sheng-yen and Hsuan Hua, who have propagated Chan in the west where it has grown steadily through the 20th and 21st century.
It was severely repressed in China during the recent modern era with the appearance of the People's Republic, but has more recently been re-asserting itself on the mainland, and has a significant following in Taiwan and Hong Kong and among Overseas Chinese.
Disputes
Recent opinions concerning the Song Dynasty have questioned the common "Period in Decline" belief. This is due to the Historiography of the Song Dynasty. Many important texts that convey Tang Dynasty stories were written during the Song Dynasty. Because of this, most scholars study Chan through the lens of Song Dynasty understandings. The Song Dynasty also produced the most stable forms of Chan practice, which are still being used today. It must also be noted that much of current scholarship, heavily influenced by Japanese Buddhology, has tended to discount the history of Zen Buddhism after it was transmitted to Japan in the Kamakura period. The study of post-Song Chan is in reality a highly uncharted area.
Zen in Japan
The schools of Zen that currently exist in Japan are the Soto (曹洞), Rinzai (臨済), and Obaku (黃檗). Of these, Soto is the largest and Obaku the smallest. Rinzai is itself divided into several subschools based on temple affiliation, including Myoshin-ji, Nanzen-ji, Tenryū-ji, Daitoku-ji, and Tofuku-ji.
Although the Japanese had known Zen-like practices for centuries, it was not introduced as a separate school until the 12th century, when Myōan Eisai traveled to China and returned to establish a Linji lineage, which is known in Japan as Rinzai. Decades later, Nanpo Jomyo (南浦紹明) also studied Linji teachings in China before founding the Japanese Otokan lineage, the most influential branch of Rinzai. In 1215, Dogen, a younger contemporary of Eisai's, journeyed to China himself, where he became a disciple of the Caodong master Tiantong Rujing. After his return, Dogen established the Soto school, the Japanese branch of Caodong. The Obaku lineage was introduced in the 17th century by Ingen, a Chinese monk. Ingen had been a member of the Linji school, the Chinese equivalent of Rinzai, which had developed separately from the Japanese branch for hundreds of years. Thus, when Ingen journeyed to Japan following the fall of the Ming Dynasty to the Manchus, his teachings were seen as a separate school. The Obaku school was named for Mount Obaku (Chinese: Huangboshan), which had been Ingen's home in China.
Some contemporary Japanese Zen teachers, such as Daiun Harada and Shunryu Suzuki, have criticized Japanese Zen as being a formalized system of empty rituals in which very few Zen practitioners ever actually attain realization. They assert that almost all Japanese temples have become family businesses handed down from father to son, and the Zen priest's function has largely been reduced to officiating at funerals[citation needed].
The Japanese Zen establishment—including the Soto sect, the major branches of Rinzai, and several renowned teachers— has been criticized for its involvement in Japanese militarism and nationalism during World War II and the preceding period. A notable work on this subject was Zen at War (1998) by Brian Victoria, an American-born Soto priest. At the same time, however, one must be aware that this involvement was by no means limited to the Zen school: all orthodox Japanese schools of Buddhism supported the militarist state. What may be most striking, though, as Victoria has argued, is that many Zen masters known for their post-war internationalism and promotion of "world peace" were open nationalists in the inter-war years.
This openness has allowed non-Buddhists to practice Zen, especially outside of Asia, and even for the curious phenomenon of an emerging Christian Zen lineage, as well as one or two lines that call themselves "nonsectarian." With no official governing body, it's perhaps impossible to declare any authentic lineage "heretical." Some schools emphasize lineage and trace their line of teachers back to Japan, Korea, Vietnam or China; other schools do not[citation needed].
Zen in Vietnam (Thien Buddhism)
Thiền Buddhism (禪宗 Thiền Tông) is the Vietnamese name for the school of Zen Buddhism. Thien is ultimately derived from Chan Zong 禪宗 (simplified, 禅宗), itself a derivative of the Sanskrit "Dhyāna".
According to traditional accounts of Vietnam, in 580, an Indian monk named Vinitaruci (Vietnamese: Tì-ni-đa-lưu-chi) travelled to Vietnam after completing his studies with Sengcan, the third patriarch of Chinese Zen. This, then, would be the first appearance of Vietnamese Zen, or Thien (thiền) Buddhism. The sect that Vinitaruci and his lone Vietnamese disciple founded would become known as the oldest branch of Thien. After a period of obscurity, the Vinitaruci School became one of the most influential Buddhist groups in Vietnam by the 10th century, particularly so under the patriarch Vạn-Hạnh (died 1018). Other early Vietnamese Zen schools included the Vo Ngon Thong (Vô Ngôn Thông), which was associated with the teaching of Mazu, and the Thao Duong (Thảo Đường), which incorporated nianfo chanting techniques; both were founded by Chinese monks. A new school was founded by one of Vietnam's religious kings; this was the Truc Lam (Trúc Lâm) school, which evinced a deep influence from Confucian and Taoist philosophy. Nevertheless, Truc Lam's prestige waned over the following centuries as Confucianism became dominant in the royal court. In the 17th century, a group of Chinese monks led by Nguyen Thieu (Nguyên Thiều) established a vigorous new school, the Lam Te (Lâm Tế), which is the Vietnamese pronunciation of Linji. A more domesticated offshoot of Lam Te, the Lieu Quan (Liễu Quán) school, was founded in the 18th century and has since been the predominant branch of Vietnamese Zen.
The most famous practitioner of synchronized Thiền Buddhism in the West is Thích Nhất Hạnh who has authored dozens of books.
Zen in Korea (Seon)
Chan was gradually transmitted into Korea during the late Silla period (8th and 9th centuries) as Korean monks of predominantly Hwaeom 華嚴 and Consciousness-only 唯識 background began to travel to China to learn the newly developing tradition. During his lifetime, Mazu had begun to attract students from Korea; by tradition, the first Korean to study Zen was named Peomnang 法朗. Mazu's successors had numerous Korean students, some of whom returned to Korea and established the nine mountain 九山 schools. This was the beginning of Korean Zen, which is called Seon.
Seon received its most significant impetus and consolidation from the Goryeo monk Jinul 知訥 (1158–1210), who established a reform movement and introduced koan practice to Korea. Jinul established the Songgwangsa 松廣寺 as a new center of pure practice. It was during the time of Jinul the Jogye Order, a primarily Seon sect, became the predominant form of Korean Buddhism, a status it still holds. which survives down to the present in basically the same status. Toward the end of the Goryeo and during the Joseon period the Jogye Order would first be combined with the scholarly 教 schools, and then be relegated to lesser influence in ruling clas circles by Confucian influenced polity, even as it retained strength outside the cities, among the rural populations and ascetic monks in mountain refuges.
Nevertheless, there would be a series of important Seon teachers during the next several centuries, such as Hyegeun 慧勤, Taego 太古, Gihwa 己和 and Hyujeong 休靜, who continued to develop the basic mold of Korean meditational Buddhism established by Jinul. Seon continues to be practiced in Korea today at a number of major monastic centers, as well as being taught at Dongguk University, which has a major of studies in this religion. Taego Bou (1301–1382) studied in China with Linji teacher and returned to unite the Nine Mountain Schools. In modern Korea, by far the largest Buddhist denomination is the Jogye Order, which is essentially a Zen sect; the name Jogye is the Korean equivalent of Caoxi (曹溪), another name for Huineng.
Korean Zen is known for its stress on meditation, monasticism, and asceticism. Korean monks are strictly required to have no personal possessions and to cut off all relations with the outside world. They are near mendicants traveling from temple to temple practicing meditation. The hermit-recluse life is prevalent among monks and meditation practice is considered of paramount importance.[24][citation needed]
Currently, Korean Buddhism is in a state of slow transition. While the reigning theory behind Korean Buddhism was based on Jinul's "sudden enlightenment, gradual cultivation," the modern Korean Seon master, Seongcheol's revival of Hui Neng's "sudden enlightenment, sudden cultivation" has had a strong impact on Korean Buddhism. Although there is resistance to change within the ranks of the Jogye order, with the last three Supreme Patriarchs' stance that is in accordance with Seongcheol, there has been a gradual change in the atmosphere of Korean Buddhism.
Also, the Kwan Um School of Zen, one of the largest Zen schools in the West, teaches a form of Seon Buddhism.
Zen in the Western world
Although it is difficult to trace when the West first became aware of Zen as a distinct form of Buddhism, the visit of Soyen Shaku, a Japanese Zen monk, to Chicago during the World Parliament of Religions in 1893 is often pointed to as an event that enhanced its profile in the Western world. It was during the late 1950s and the early 1960s that the number of Westerners, other than the descendants of Asian immigrants, pursuing a serious interest in Zen reached a significant level.
Zen and Western culture
In Europe, the Expressionist and Dada movements in art tend to have much in common thematically with the study of koans and actual Zen. The early French surrealist René Daumal translated D.T. Suzuki as well as Sanskrit Buddhist texts.
Eugen Herrigel's book Zen in the Art of Archery (1953),[25] describing his training in the Zen-influenced martial art of Kyudo, inspired many of the Western world's early Zen practitioners. However, many scholars are quick to criticize this book. (eg see Yamada Shoji)[26]
The British-American philosopher Alan Watts took a close interest in Zen Buddhism and wrote and lectured extensively on it during the 1950s. He understood it as a vehicle for a mystical transformation of consciousness, and also as a historical example of a non-Western, non-Christian way of life that had fostered both the practical and fine arts.
The Dharma Bums, a novel written by Jack Kerouac and published in 1959, gave its readers a look at how a fascination with Buddhism and Zen was being absorbed into the bohemian lifestyles of a small group of American youths, primarily on the West Coast. Beside the narrator, the main character in this novel was "Japhy Ryder", a thinly-veiled depiction of Gary Snyder. The story was based on actual events taking place while Snyder prepared, in California, for the formal Zen studies that he would pursue in Japanese monasteries between 1956 and 1968.[27]
Thomas Merton (1915–1968) the Trappist monk and priest [6] was internationally recognized as having one of those rare Western minds which was entirely at home in Asian experience. Like his friend, the late D.T. Suzuki, Merton believed that there must be a little of Zen in all authentic creative and spiritual experience. The dialogue between Merton and Suzuki (Wisdom in Emptiness" in: Zen and the Birds of Appetite, 1968) explores the many congruencies of Christian mysticism and Zen. (Main publications: The Way of Chuang Tzu, 1965; Mystics and Zen Masters, 1967; Zen and the Birds of Appetite, 1968).
While Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, by Robert M. Pirsig, was a 1974 bestseller, it in fact has little to do with Zen per se. Rather it deals with the notion of the metaphysics of "quality" from the point of view of the main character. Pirsig was attending the Minnesota Zen Center at the time of writing the book[7]. He has stated that, despite its title, the book "should in no way be associated with that great body of factual information relating to orthodox Zen Buddhist practice".
Western Zen lineages
Over the last fifty years mainstream forms of Zen, led by teachers who trained in East Asia and their successors, have begun to take root in the West. In North America, the Zen lineages derived from the Japanese Soto school are the most numerous. Among these are the lineages of the San Francisco Zen Center, established by Shunryu Suzuki and the White Plum Asanga, founded by Hakuyu Taizan Maezumi. Suzuki's San Francisco Zen Center established the first Zen Monastery in America in 1967, called Tassajara in the mountains near Big Sur. The San Francisco Zen Center continues to be the most influential zen organization in Northern California to this day. Maezumi's White Plum Asanga on the other hand has come to dominate in southern California. Maezumi's successors have created schools including Big Mind, founded by Dennis Genpo Merzel, the Mountains and Rivers Order, founded by John Daido Loori, the Zen Peacemaker Order, founded by Bernard Tetsugen Glassman and the Ordinary Mind school, founded by Charlotte Joko Beck. The Katagiri lineage, founded by Dainin Katagiri, has a significant presence in the Midwest. Note that both Taizan Maezumi and Dainin Katagiri served as priests at Zenshuji Soto Mission in the 1960s.
Taisen Deshimaru, a student of Kodo Sawaki, was a Soto Zen priest from Japan who taught in France. The International Zen Association, which he founded, remains influential. The American Zen Association, headquartered at the New Orleans Zen Temple, is one of the North American organizations practicing in the Deshimaru tradition.
Soyu Matsuoka, served as superintendent and abbot of the Long Beach Zen Buddhist Temple and Zen Center. The Temple was headquarters to Zen Centers in Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle, and Everett, Washington. Matsuoka-Roshi was born in Japan into a family that has a history of Zen priests dating back six hundred years. Matsuoka attended Komazawa University in Tokyo, where he graduated with a bachelor’s degree. He was sent to America to serve as a founder of temples both in Los Angeles and San Francisco. He furthered his extensive graduate work at Columbia University with Dr. D.T. Suzuki. He finally established the Temple at Long Beach in 1971 where he resided until his passing in 1998. Matsuoka-Roshi was a great dynamic influence in both America and Japan, lecturing and providing true Zen training to all people. He is registered in the book of national treasures of Japan.
The Sanbo Kyodan is a Japan-based reformist Zen group, founded in 1954 by Yasutani Hakuun, which has had a significant influence on Zen in the West. Sanbo Kyodan Zen is based primarily on the Soto tradition, but also incorporates Rinzai-style koan practice. Yasutani's approach to Zen first became prominent in the English-speaking world through Philip Kapleau's book The Three Pillars of Zen (1965), which was one of the first books to introduce Western audiences to Zen as a practice rather than simply a philosophy. Among the Zen groups in North America, Hawaii, Europe, and New Zealand which derive from Sanbo Kyodan are those associated with Kapleau, Robert Aitken, and John Tarrant.
In the UK, Throssel Hole Abbey was founded as a sister monastery to Shasta Abbey in California by Master Reverend Jiyu Kennett Roshi and has a number of dispersed Priories and centres. Jiyu Kennett, an English woman, was ordained as a priest and Zen master in Shoji-ji, one of the two main Soto Zen temples in Japan. See www.throssel.org.uk. Her book The Wild White Goose describes her experiences in Japan. The Order is called the Order of Buddhist Contemp;atives
There are also a number of Rinzai Zen centers in the West, such as the Rinzaiji lineage of Kyozan Joshu Sasaki and the Dai Bosatsu lineage established by Eido Shimano and Kyudo Nakagawi Roshi.
Not all the successful Zen teachers in the West have been from Japanese traditions. There have also been teachers of Chan, Seon, and Thien Buddhism.
The first Chinese Buddhist priest to teach Westerners in North America was Hsuan Hua, who taught Zen, Chinese Pure Land, Tiantai, Vinaya, and Vajrayana Buddhism in San Francisco during the early 1960s. He went on to found the City Of Ten Thousand Buddhas, a monastery and retreat center located on a 237 acre (959,000 m²) property near Ukiah, California. Another Chinese Zen teacher with a Western following is Sheng-yen, a master trained in both the Caodong and Linji schools (equivalent to the Japanese Soto and Rinzai, respectively). He first visited the United States in 1978 under the sponsorship of the Buddhist Association of the United States, and, in 1980, founded the Chan Meditation Center in Queens, New York.[8].
The most prominent Korean Zen teacher in the West was Seung Sahn. Seung Sahn founded the Providence Zen Center in Providence, Rhode Island; this was to become the headquarters of the Kwan Um School of Zen, a large international network of affiliated Zen centers.
Two notable Vietnamese Zen teachers have been influential in Western countries: Thich Thien-An and Thich Nhat Hanh. Thich Thien-An came to America in 1966 as a visiting professor at UCLA and taught traditional Thien meditation. Thich Nhat Hanh was a monk in Vietnam during the Vietnam War, during which he was a peace activist. In response to these activities, he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1967 by Martin Luther King, Jr. In 1966, he left Vietnam in exile and now resides at Plum Village, a monastery in France. He has written more than one hundred books about Buddhism, which have made him one of the very few most prominent Buddhist authors among the general readership in the West. In his books and talks, Thich Nhat Hanh emphasizes mindfulness (sati) as the most important practice in daily life.
Pan-lineage organizations
The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. |
In the United States, two pan-lineage organizations have formed in the last few years. The oldest is the American Zen Teachers Association which sponsors an annual conference. North American Soto teachers in North America, led by several of the heirs of Taizan Maezumi and Shunryu Suzuki, have also formed the Soto Zen Buddhist Association.
Zen Authors
Modern
Adam Genkaku Fisher
Charlotte Joko Beck
Traditional
Zen Master Linji (Rinzai)
Notes
- ^ Baxter, William H. (1992). A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ISBN 3-11-012324-X., 52–3; Template:PDFlink, Baxter 13.
- ^ "Baizhang Huaihai", in Digital Dictionary of Buddhism
- ^ "Principles of Zazen" (Zazen gi); tr. The Soto Zen Text Project
- ^ "Universally Recommended Instructions for Zazen" (Fukan zazengi); tr. The Soto Zen Text Project
- ^ Welter, Albert. "The Disputed Place of "A Special Transmission" Outside the Scriptures in Ch'an". Retrieved 2006-06-23.
- ^ Suzuki, D.T. Essays in Zen Buddhism. New York: Grove Press. p. 168. ISBN 0-375-70510-4.
- ^ "[1]", in Upaya Zen Center Liturgy
- ^ "[2]", in Upaya Zen Center Liturgy
- ^ "[3]", in Loori, John Daido. "Symbol and Symbolized." Mountain Record: The Zen Practitioner's Journal, XXV, No. 2 (2007):
- ^ "[4]", in Translation of Dogen's Gabyo, by Yasuda Joshu roshi and Anzan Hoshin roshi"
- ^ "[5]", in Zen Mountain Monastery Dharma Talk by John Daido Loori, Roshi
- ^ Zen Buddhism: A History (India & China) By Heinrich Dumoulin. Translated by James W. Heisig, Paul F. Knitter. Contributor John McRae. Published 2005. World Wisdom, Inc. Religion / World. Religions. 387 pages. ISBN 0941532895. page 9
- ^ Template:PDFlink
- ^ Chang, Chung-Yuan (1967). "Ch'an Buddhism: Logical and Illogical".
- ^ Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro (1948). Template:PDFlink, 50.
- ^ Suzuki, D.T. Essays in Zen Buddhism. New York: Grove Press. p. 168. ISBN 0-375-70510-4.
- ^ The Gateless Barrier: Zen Commments on the MuMonkan by Zenkei Shibayama
- ^ Dumoulin 2005:68 "the Taoist influence on Buddhism was later to culminate in the teachings of the Zen school."
- ^ Dumoulin 2005:17–18
- ^ Maspero, Henri. Translated by Frank A. Kierman, Jr. Taoism and Chinese Religion. pg 46. University of Massachusetts, 1981.
- ^ Prebish, Charles. Buddhism: A Modern Perspective. Pg 192. Penn State Press, 1975. ISBN 0271011955.
- ^ Dumoulin, Heinrich, Heisig, James W. & Knitter, Paul. Zen Buddhism: A History (India and China). Pp 166-167, 169-172. World Wisdom, Inc, 2005. ISBN 0941532895.
- ^ Isshu Miura and Ruth Sasaki, The Zen Koan: Its History and Use in Rinzai Zen, p. 13 ISBN 0-15-699981-1
- ^ Jogye order of Korean Buddhism
- ^ Zen in the Art of Archery, (ISBN 0-375-70509-0)
- ^ Shoji, Yamada. "The Myth of Zen in the Art of Archery" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-01-03.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help) - ^ Heller, Christine. "Jack Kerouac and Gary Snyder: Chasing Zen Clouds" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-01-07.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|1=
(help)
References
- Hori, Victor Sogen, Zen Dust
- Miura & Sasaki, Zen Koan
- An Introduction to Zen Buddhism by D.T. Suzuki
- Japanese Zen Buddhist Philosophy in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
See also
|