Talk:Relativistic beaming: Difference between revisions

Physics Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Astronomy C‑class Mid‑importance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copyright Violation:

All 5 illustrations in this article do not have the permission of the other authors of the scientific paper they were previously published in to be published here.

AGN_Jet_Simple-Sphere-Model.png

AGN_Jet_Synchro-Spectrum.png

AGN_Jet_Aberration.png

AGN_Jet_Dilation.png

AGN_Jet_Blueshift.png

Mr Brak 19:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say, I like that in this article. I assume it will eventually be removed, but I wish I saw it in more of these articles, because half of it, I have no clue what the article is talking about. I do have an account here, but didn't feel like signing in 68.202.196.130 (talk) 03:38, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the "Copyvio" talk section above, I guess the text was lifted or lightly rewritten from some other source.

"The figure of the sample spectrum" doesn't exist.

${\displaystyle \nu }$ isn't defined ... but that's just the start: the use of terms and variables which are either undefined or used-before-defined is confusing and unclear.

The partial clarification of some terms and variables in the odd and un-Wikipedia-like "Terminology" end section is odd and un-Wikipedia-like.

There are few links to Wikipedia articles (many of them good!) for most of the "Terminology" section terms.

There are too few links to Wikipedia articles in general.

Much but not all of this mess is covered in detail in Relativistic Doppler effect but there would still be value in something like this "A simple jet model" section with more direct astronomical relevance and use of some customary astronomical/astrophysical terminology and approximations.

Sadly, I'm not in the field and can't help with that. 50.0.193.12 (talk) 18:38, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]