Talk:Gundulić family: Difference between revisions

Biography Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Croatia Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

What this page is about ? I see usual Greater Serbian stuff with regard to some Serbian themes mentioned in Gundulić's "Osman" (as I recall, one chapter-10th or 11th). This is, in the ordinary repertory of Serbian cultural possessiveness, a try to "prove" that Gundulić was a "Serb". One could argue better that he was a "Pole", since "Osman" is about Turks and Poles. Or Ivan Mažuranić a Montenegrin, according to the theme of his epic poem. Usual rubbish. Mir Harven 11:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mother family, comes directly of Gondola family, (Ghetaldi-Gondola), and were NOT Serv!! and Croats!!, the origin is in Lucca Italy, and the Ghetaldi family was in Trento Italy (Tirol), and since XVII century, most marriages weres with the austrian nobility. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragusino (talk • contribs) 14:05, 14 April 2006

why u translate italians names in croatian names??? The Ghetaldi-Gondola family never feeled itself like a slavic family and they were the leaders of the proitalian faction in Ragusa, so it' an injury against their memory change their names and famili name in croatian.Respect them please|

While the factual information that the unnamed IP address folks have been giving seems top notch, the grammar has been a bit lacking. I'm watching this page, because I think it's great to have this information coming in -- even from users in Austria or Italy or Serbia, whose English may not be as strong as their native tongue -- and I'm willing to continue to re-organize and repair grammar issues on this topic. But please don't revert my grammar corrections. I'm certain that sentence structures like "in 1634 he becoming a senator", "Catterina married with Matheo Ghetaldi", "date of born unknown", and "He fight in Franco-Prussian War" are gramattically incorrect. Travisl 20:57, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Johanna Maria (March 6, 1865–February 17, 1902), was born in Cattaro, and died in Graz. He married Francesco (Fery) Fedrigoni Edler v. Etschthal (c. 1858–August 8, 1914), who died in Savlaka, Servia in World War I. They had a son, Giulius, and a daughter, Adele.

Giulius Fedrigoni Edler v. Etschthal, (May 5, 1893–November 17, 1917), died in the same war as his father ...

So is Anna a male or female? Frencesco: male or female? Which one died in the war in Savlaka, and which one in Graz? Travisl 02:14, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna was a female and Francesco was a male. please i need obtain info about Maria Ghetaldi-Gondola (Maria Gondola), date and place of death. Ragusino

Google suggests it might be. The figures all appear questionable and User:Ragusino appears to have created other suspect articles. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ephrosinia Lukarevic. ---CH 08:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone using IP 200.30.245.208 (talk · contribs) (aka the metropolis-inter.com anon geolocated near Santiago, Chile) deleted the above query. Be aware, metropolis-inter.com anon, that deleting talk page comments by other users is considered vandalism. ---CH 18:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to a posting at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ephrosinia_Lukarevic, it looks like there may be some falsehoods in here, as well as significant facts:

• Delete Ephrosinia Lukarevic as a copyright violation and fiction, but keep Trojan Gundulić, House of Gondola, and House of Ghetaldi and move them to userspace awaiting better references. As already pointed out Trojan Gundulić is clearly real, and there is enough both in House of Gondola and House of Ghetaldi that appear real that there is a good reason not to just summarily delete them just because little can be found through Google. Ivan Gundulić, mentioned in one of the articles, is certainly a real and very notable poet. A Joseph Sigismund Reichsgraf von Gondola, "auch: Gundulic", apparently a Benedictine author, has an entry in WBIS Online, as do a number of people named Gondola with given names such as Francesco and Sigismondo, who appear to be members of the family of this article. These Italian/Croatian noble families ought to be verifiable in Austro-Hungarian printed sources or other references covering Central European nobility, as well as possibly Italian biographical reference works. There is no reason to assume that they are "unverifiable" until these works have actually been checked. We clearly have a problem in this case with systemic bias in both the most easily available, googlable sources and in some of the databases I have access to, but there are enough indications that these are real historical people of some importance in their own time and place. Let the author work on them a bit more in his userspace and present good printed sources that readers can check. u p p l a n d 12:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's no indication at all that User:Ragusino intentionally introduced falsehoods. Rather, in the case of Ephrosinia_Lukarevic , he may have lifted text from the Dictionary_of_the_Khazars, but neglected to note that Ephrosinia was a fictional character. Her article obviously needed a lot of work to bring up to standard. It doesn't appear that he's used the same source material on this page.

That said, I know nothing more about the House of Gondola than what I've read here. My contributions to this article are no more than spelling, grammar, and sylistic changes. Travisl 19:20, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All the text about House of Gondola is true, check Almanac of Gotha, Freiherhause, 1864, 1941, http://home.foni.net/~adelsforschung/ggtbg.htm - Archive in Dubrovnik, Siechmacher book, Archive in Merano, Graz and Venice.

Please Traslate!!

Frano barun Gondola, sredio je sve formalnosti i još se samo čekala ona kako bi preuzela njegove stvari i kako bi, s pratnjom, bila ispraćena do Gradske luke gdje je čekao brod. Isti onaj s kojim su doputovali... Pamtila je čudan osjećaj užasa, tuge i žalosti zbog iznenadnog gubitka oca, prekoravajući neobuzdanu svoju mladost koja je, mislila je, iznevjerila njegovo povjerenje koje joj je iskazivao. Vjerujući da je upravo njezin nedolazak u dogovoreno vrijeme za zajedničku večeru bio uzrokom njegove smrti. Bez obzira što su je uvjeravali da je umro od srčane kapi. I da se sve do iznenadnog odlaska u sobu dugo zabavljao s izvjesnom gospođom ne krijući svoju naklonost i zainteresiranost za njezine ponuđene draži. Uvjeravala je sebe da su to tek glasine kojima ne treba pridavati poseban značaj. Tek ju je papirić pronađen u džepu njegove košulje s ispisanim imenom Esperanta Gondola, upućivao i na takvu mogućnost, ali u nju naprosto nije vjerovala. Prolazile su godine tišine i osame. Njezina znanstvena karijera nije bila upitna, ali sreća nikako da zakuca na njena vrata. Ljubav je ostala negdje drugdje. Daleko na jugu gdje vjetrovi mirišu na sol i ribe i neke nepoznate eterične biljke

Note that the dates in this sentence contradict each other. When fixed, the date format should also be made consistent with the rest of the article (I don't know whether 1.3.1943 is January 3 or March 1, although I suspect March 1).

Between 11.9.1942 and 1.3.1943, (Obstlt) he was commander of regiment in the French Seenotbereichskommando, the city of Cherbourg (Normandía) and the Seenotbereichskommando XIII at Berre/20 km NW of Marseille between (Dec 42 - 19 Aug 44?). Giulius had married Adele Toth de Becsö.

Travisl 15:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nekoji storoji dubrovacki pisci iz polovine XIX v. a prije toga u XVIII v. historicar Nijemac Kristijan Eugel tvrdili su, pogrjesno, ne znamo na osnovu cega, da je najposijedni Gundulic bio veoma zasluzni crkveni dostojanstvenik biskup Josip Frano Gundulic (Góndola)? Bio je sin Frana Siskova Gundulica i majke ne- Dubrovkinje ( cije nam je porodicno prezime nepoznato). Rogjen u Becu 1711 g. bio je do svoje smrti 5.III.1774 g. zupnik u Probstdorfu (Blizu Beca); nakon sto je bio posvecen za biskupa, imenovan je bio od Sv.Stolice apostolskim vikarom per septemtriomem i naslovnim biskupom od Tempe; k tome je bio i director i profesor becke bogoslovne fakultati.--- Bio je jedan od posijednjih muskih potomaka porodice Gundulica i bas po ocu praunik slavnog nam pjesnika “Osmanide”.

Un ovaj crkveni dostojanstvenik Josip Frano Gundulic nije bio najposijednji Gundulic- to je bio Sisko Dominio Gundulic, onom biskupu prvobratuced. Otac najposljednjeg Gundulica Sisko matej Gundulic, ozenjen Ursulom Frana Getaldica, imao je 4 sina, od kojih: najstarijega Siska Domenika, prije pomenutoga, te jos Frana, Frana i Incacija, Dziva Frana, i dvije kcerli: Katu, udatu, o kojoj ce ovdje biti govora, i Ursula, neudatu. Sisko Dominik Gundulic rodio se u Duvrovniku 6 februara g. 1712, ozenio se Franom Bunicevom 20 januara g. 1754. Pjesniku Osmanide bio je po ocu praunuk (Na temelju Matica zupnog ureda gra Dubrovnika iz XVII i XVIII v.). Ovdje pomenuta Kata, kci Siska Mateja i Ursule Getaldic 20 novembra 1740 god. Sisko Dominik Gundulic nije u svome braku imao potomaka, dok je sestra mu udata Getaldic imala sinove: Frana Augustina, rogjenog 30.XII.1743 g., o kome ce ovdje biti dalje govora, te Siska Dominika, i kceri: Mariju, Ursulu i Mariju Ursulu. Siska Dominika Gundulica dopala je i njega viseputa koja od mnogih sluzaba plemickih u republici, a vrsio je i mnoge druge poslove, sto ih njegov zavicaj davase svojim plemicima. Od carskog Beca dobi on velike pocasti i naslove: carskog komornika (cambelana( carskog dvornika. On se je ovim pocasnim naslovima uvelike ponosio te je uz svoje ime , i uz pocasni naslov grofa (comes) svetog rimskog carstva, uvijek vise manje potpuno ih isticao. Tako kad je koji put prisistvovao u svojstvu krsnoga kuma crkvenom obredu pri krstenju kojeg plemickog djeteta, pa kad je god. 1785 postavio nad onim grobom u kapeli Gundulica u sakristiji Male Brace novi nadgrobni natpis.

Ivan GundulićEvo nas i sa odgovorom na vazno pitanje, tko je bio sahranjen u obiteljoskok grobnici Gundulica u kapeli Trojice (Sv.Trojstva). O tome srecom imamo jesnih biljezaka u pomenutim katalozima registrima ukopa u dubrovakhoj franjevackoj Crkvi. Tu su u prvom od tih kataloga registara zabiljezeni ovi clanovi porodice Gundulica: 1) XII Marinko Gundulic, Isusovac, sahranjen 1.XII.1647 g. In Sacrestia co li suoi parenti. Bio je glasoviti osnovala isisovackog kolegija u Dubrovniku; 2) Dzivo Marina Gundulic, sahranjen 14.VIII g. 1650, in sacrestia. To je bio glasoviti kronista; sin Marina Gundulic i Vice Tudisevic; 3) Marina Gundulic sin Dziva Marinova Gundulic, sahranjen 23. V g. 1659, in sacrestia nel suo sepolcro; 4) Dzivo Marina Gundulic, sahranjen 14.VIII g. 1661, in sacrestia; 5) Don Nikola Dziva Gundulic, sahranjen 15.II g. 1665, in sacrestia nel sepolcro di Gondola; 6) Dom Sebastijan Gundulic, sahranjen 8.II g. 1666 nel sua Capella; 7) Marin, sin Dziva Marinova Gundulic, sahranjen 11.V. g. 1666 in sacristia; 8)Dom Sebastijan Gundulic, sahranjen 29.V.g. 1684, nella Sacrestia Grande nella capella si Sig.ri Gondula; O njemu je zabiljezemo ovdje i to, da je bio ubijen od hajduka kod sela Osonika; 9) Orsat Nicolina Gundulic, sahranjen 21.IV g. 1687, in sacrestia nella Capella di Gondola; 10) Pavo Nokolina Gundulic, sahranjen 14.III g. 1688 nella capella di Gondola in Sacrestia. Nacon skoro 100 godina iza ovog ukopa u onoj cakristiji one god. 1688, sacuvana nam je u drugoj i trecoj biljeska. Ta glasi, da je dana 22 februara g. 1785 preminula te ukopana sutradan Frana rogj. Bunic, supruga najposljednjega Gundulica, Siska Domenika Siskova Gundulica. Ta biljesca glasi u Il knjizi kataloga registara: 22 Fre. O Morj la Sig.ra Madama Francisca Moglie dellÈccelenza Sigismondo Góndola, ed il gior.o seg.te fu sepulta con u solemne funerale nella pro.a capella Della SS. Ma trinita nella proa.a sep.a--- 1785. U Ill onih knjiga bilsjeska glasé ovoko: Febbreio ---- 22 moej Fran(ces)ca Madama dellÈcc.mo Sigismondo Góndola, ed il gior.o seg(uen)te fu sepulta nella Capella della SS.ma trinitá nella proa.a sep.ra---1785. Je li bulo u onoj grobnici ukopano jos drugih osoba iz one grane porodice Gundulica? Sigurno je da ih je bilo, a to su sigurno bili i oni Gundulici, koje smo prije spomenuli, iz XVI Rijeka, a za koje nijesu nam sacuvani katalozi registri ukopanih ( koji su sacuvani od XVII v.) U ovaj grob Gundulica ukopana su i malena.

Marija Ghetaldi-Gondola

....Nabrzo zatim dubrovacke vladike dodu, da se prikazu; caru ih predstavi grofica Giorgi, zena Mihova; carici predstavi vladike grofica Marija Ghetaldi-Gondola, sestra Dziva Natali. Vladari su bili vrlo ljubazni s vlastelom, a kako s njima, tako i sa svakim bez razlike. ( pag 76, Dubrovacke Slike i Prilike, Josip Bersa)

Marginalizacija poræene struje - primjer Ivana GunduliÊa JednoznaËno tumaËenje sukoba vlastele pomoÊu Zlatarova “pro” i “protu” - osmanskog modela u analizi kasnijeg tijeka stalepkog raskola iziskuje bitne modifikacije. U tom je pogledu znakovit sluËaj casate kojoj je pripadao pjesnik Ivan Gundulic (1589-1638). Naime, otac i stric pjesnikov, Frano Ivanov i Toma Ivanov Gondola, svrstali su se tijekom su.enja urot-Anali Dubrovnik 39 (2001) 320 nicima na stranu “Ëuvara Republike” kojoj je na Ëelu bio Marko Bassegli. Na drugu, zavjereniËku tj. “protuosmansku” stranu, koju je vodio Vladislav Menze, stao je njihov ro.ak Jero Franov Gondola (tablica 1).25 U Velikoj je zavjeri, dakle, doplo do rascjepa roda Gondola. Genealogije pjesnikovih nasljednika u vrijeme i nakon agregacije “nove” vlastele potvr.uju pripadnost njegove casate sorbonepkoj grupaciji dubrovaËke vlastele. Sa svojom æenom, Nikom Siska Petrova Sorgo (+1644), Gundulic je imao tri sina. Najstariji, Frano (1630-1700), carski marpal i komornik na dvoru Leopolda Habsburpkog, odstupio je od naËela endogamije oæenivpi se 1674. strankinjom, groficom Oktavijom Margaritom Strozzi, te u Dubrovniku nije imao potomstva. Najmla.i, Mato (1636-1684), s bratom je nekoliko godina proveo u vojnoj sluæbi ppanjolskih Habsburgovaca. Nakon povratka u Grad, Mato se ozenio gra.ankom ali nije imao potomaka.26 Srednji Gundulicev sin Sisko(1633-1682) tako.er se 1668. po drugi put oæenio gra.ankom iz ugledne antuninske obitelji, Katom Jerovom Nale, pto je nepobitan dokaz njegove pripadnosti sorbonezima. 27 Za æivota Ivana Gundulica i njegovih sinova, tijekom biolopke krize i nedovrpenog procesa “krvnog” zatvaranja vlasteoskih skupina, njihova je casata jop uvijek zauzimala relativno znaËajno mjesto u politiËkom æivotu. Naime, i Mato i Sisko Gondola birani su za kneæeve Republike, a sluËaj je htio da su obojica i umrla na toj funkciji. No, sa Siskovim nasljednicima, pjesnikom Ivanom (1678-1721) i Siskom (1682-1758) situacija se potpuno izmijenila.28 Kao sorbonezi, oni su na politiËkom planu drastiËno osjetili 25 Jero Franov Gondola bio je jedan od skrbnika koje je Frano Gondola 1592. ovlastio da upravljaju imovinom trogodipnjeg pjesnika. –uro Körbler zamijenio ga je s Jerom Ivanovim Gondolom, drugim pjesnikovim “dundom” kojemu su posveÊene Suze sina razmetnoga. Usp. Djela Giva Frana Gundulica. (ur. –uro Körbler), Stari pisci hrvatski, knjiga 9, Zagreb: JAZU, 1919: III. 26 O vojnoj sluæbi Frana i Mata Gondole vidi: Mirko DeanoviÊ, ˜Frano Dæiva GunduliÊa i njegov put u Moskvu.« Starine 41 (1948): 7-59. Zbog nedostatka matiËnih knjiga podaci o æenidbi Mata Gondole nisu nam poznati. Da je i Mato, poput ©ipka, bio oæenjem gra.ankom, doznajemo iz jednog od Franovih pisama. (M. Deanovic, ˜Frano Dæiva Gundulica«: 12). 27 Obitelj Nale (Naljepkovic) nikada nije primljena me.u dubrovaËku vlastelu, kako pogrepno navodi –uro Körbler (Djela Giva Frana GunduliÊa: XI). Poput brata Frana, koji se oæenio strankinjom, Mato i Sisko Gondola iskoristili su kratkoroËno vaæeÊe odredbe o liberalizaciji æenidbe kojima su ublaæeni strogi endogamijski zakoni. 28 SlijedeÊi uspostavljenu unutarstalepku endogamiju, pjesnikovi su unuci Ivan i Sisko Gondola, naravno, ozenili sorbonezice Lukreciju Bona i Oru Ghetaldi. I njihova se sestra Nika udala 1697. za sorboneza Petra Franova Sorga, a upravo je njezin unuk bio poznati dopunitelj Gunduliceva Osmana Petar Ignjat Sorgo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragusino (talk • contribs) 01:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw it had been moved several time by the same user. Now it need to be moved again, according to the Almanac de Gotha and to the international heraldic register, which stated this article in english should have different title.--Theirrulez (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theirrulez, regardless of whether you are a sock or not, you need to understand what it is you are doing. This is not itWiki. Here we look at English language, not Italian language usage or some source you happen to choose, and "Gundulić" is the English name for this family. That's one thing. The second thing you must understand is that what you suggesting is highly offensive nationalist/irredentist POV which had already gotten a large number of users banned from enWiki. The same users you are likely now in contact with, I might add, judging from some of your posts.

The third point I must make is that, even if you are not an actual WP:SOCK, you are currently acting as a WP:MEATPUPPET for a clique of banned users. That is an actual real breach of Wiki policy, not an honest good-faith mistake you "chose" to consider a "personal attack". --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 12:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are keeping on public accusing me to be a sock or a meat puppet. I will notice as adviced before--Theirrulez (talk) 15:28, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be certain that you have indeed engaged in WP:MEATPUPPETRY [1] [2] [3] [4], i.e. in "the recruitment of editors as proxies to sway consensus". Feel free to "notice as adviced before." --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 01:38, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If Austria-Hungary was established in 1867, how is possible that is the name of a country in which lived family finished in 1800?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.156.61 (talk) 07:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it's ok. --93.136.156.61 (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For the 19th century, it would seem that upper class Dalmatians' names and first language were (in) some sort of Romance language. The note in the Gallery section labeled in Croatian is, in fact, written in Italian! Can someone who has the time and knowledge please make this article historically accurate? All articles about Dalmatia are, at this point, Croation nationalist talking points. There can be no doubt that Dalmatia is fully Croatian in governance & culture in 2011. Are some Croations, like the ones conducting a scorched earth campaign over Dalmatia, so insecure that they need to rewrite the facts of history? Tapered (talk) 07:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--Dalmatians all had italian names, because a) dalmatia was under venice from 1409. untill its fall in 1797. b) dubrovnik was independendt but like the rest of the dalmatia it was under influence of italy and most of nobility studied in italian university's. croatian language was standardise only in the 19th century and it was at that time that the names and surnames of the croatians from the earlier periods were transcribed to their "croatian" form. it is not a 20th century thing. Adriatic_HR (talk) 22:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have references, documentation? Tapered (talk) 20:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duh! This article has no English language sources. As such, it deserves near-blanking. I'll consider this and probably add a 'lacks credible sources' attachment to it. Cheers. Tapered (talk) 01:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It looks the name of this noble family (and the related descendency) have been abusively croatised. Absolutely unacceptable. Also because all the sources (including the sources used in the present article!) use the orginal version of the name (the Italian) even for the Coat of Arms. This has nothing to do with the ethnicity of the family. Noble families in Dubrovnik were characterised by a strong duality in terms of culture (Slavik and Romance). The issue here is that it should be used the version of the name prevalent in the sources and definitely the one used by the Herladry. Also some sources require attention, because might not comply with WP. I have started with some obvious modifications, all comments are welcome.--Silvio1973 (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense [5][6]. This is the English-language Wikipedia, please refrain from "abusive italianizing" of Croatian noble families, to paraphrase your post. That's what's "Absolutely unacceptable". -- Director (talk) 15:58, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]