View source for User talk:Capitals00

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 206.189.32.0/20 has been blocked by ‪ST47‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a web host's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 07:33, 6 August 2027. Your current IP address is 206.189.44.186.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 206.189.0.0/16 has been blocked by ‪ST47‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a web host's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 07:37, 6 August 2027. Your current IP address is 206.189.44.186.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
This IP address range has been globally blocked.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

This block affects editing on all Wikimedia wikis.
The IP address or range 206.189.32.0/20 has been globally blocked by ‪EPIC‬ for the following reason(s):

Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected

This block will expire on 08:48, 2 July 2025. Your current IP address is 206.189.44.186.

Even while globally blocked, you will usually still be able to edit pages on Meta-Wiki.

If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

Other useful links: Global blocks · Help:I have been blocked
You can view and copy the source of this page:
{{message}}

== [[Hinduism]] page ==

I clarified the relevance to Hindu practice per the reference.[[User:VictoriaGrayson|VictoriaGrayson]]<sup>[[User talk:VictoriaGrayson|<b style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;color:#707">Talk</b>]]</sup> 17:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

== [[WP:ACE2015|ArbCom elections are now open!]] ==

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current [[WP:ACE2015|Arbitration Committee election]]. The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia [[WP:RFAR|arbitration process]]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[WP:ARBPOL|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to [[WP:ACE2015/C|review the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on [[Special:SecurePoll/vote/398|the voting page]]. For the Election committee, [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692261863 -->

== dispute resolution ==

I requested dispute resolution [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Template_talk:Criticism_of_religion_sidebar.23Non-religion_critics_entries here]. Please give your input [[User:FreeatlastChitchat|FreeatlastChitchat]] ([[User talk:FreeatlastChitchat|talk]]) 06:45, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

==Declined G10==
Hi Capitals00. I have declined the G10 tagging at the SPI report. By doing so, I am in no way indicating it has any validity. On the other hand, it's totally opaque to a responder like me – just a tagging as if the filing of a report self-proves an attack, and without any pointer to a previous finding to corroborate that notion. Absolutely, this could be have no validity, but it also could be absolutely correct. If it was possible for a person accused to foreclose the investigation itself by just deeming it an attack ''before investigation took place'', that would destroy the whole point of the process.--[[User:Fuhghettaboutit|Fuhghettaboutit]] ([[User talk:Fuhghettaboutit|talk]]) 14:54, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

== February 2016 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]] with one or more editors according to your reverts at [[:Criticism of Hinduism]]. Although repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:Criticism of Hinduism|talk page]].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|editing privileges]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]].

''Hi Capitals, No edit summary or justification on your edits, and reinstatement after a revert without any discussion. This is no good!''<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Kautilya3|you]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 17:06, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
::I was not reverting [[User:Kautilya3|you]]. I made this edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Criticism_of_Hinduism&diff=703771241&oldid=703751587] because [[caste system among Muslims]] is about muslims of numerous regions around the world, thus labelling that article as limited to "Indian Muslims" is underestimation. Since there is no separate article for the caste system of [[Sikhs]], it shouldn't be mentioned, but since their communities have a caste system as well as others like Zoroastrians, Jains, I mentioned "among others", instead. I changed a section title to "Widows", because provided [http://www2.soe.umd.umich.edu/rpkettel/NY_Times_article.pdf source] has not used the word "discrimination" anywhere or anything similar. Is that enough for a explanation? [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 04:27, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
::: Ok, note that these are all subtle and contentious points. They need to be stated and, if necessary, debated. It doesn't help to resort to edit-warring. I will copy your post to the article talk page and continue there. Cheers, [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 09:01, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

==Mediation for dispute on Indo-Pakistani War of 1971==
There is an open mediation request involving you over here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation/Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971] in regards to our disagreement on [[Indo-Pakistani War of 1971]]. [[User:Xtremedood|Xtremedood]] ([[User talk:Xtremedood|talk]]) 02:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

== Formal mediation has been requested ==
{{Ivmbox
| <!---MedComBot-Do-not-remove-this-line-Notified-Indo-Pakistani War of 1971--->The [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Indo-Pakistani War of 1971". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. [[Wikipedia:Mediation|Mediation]] is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Indo-Pakistani War of 1971|request page]], the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy|formal mediation policy]], and the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide|guide to formal mediation]], '''please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.''' Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 16 February 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.<br>
<small>Message delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]] ([[User talk:MediationBot|talk]]) on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|behalf]] of the Mediation Committee. 02:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)</small>
}}

== Request for mediation rejected ==
{{Ivmbox
| The [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|request for formal mediation]] concerning Indo-Pakistani War of 1971, to which you were listed as a party, has been [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide#Rejected requests|declined]]. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Indo-Pakistani War of 1971|mediation request page]], which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#Chair|Chairman]] of the Committee, or to the [[User:Mediation Committee|mailing list]]. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]].

For the Mediation Committee, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size:x-small;">TALK</span>]]) 20:33, 19 February 2016 (UTC)<br>
<small>(Delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]], [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|on behalf of]] the Mediation Committee.)</small>
}}

== Edit warring at [[Indo-Pakistani war of 1971]] ==

*{{pagelinks|Indo-Pakistani War of 1971}}
It looks you are reverting against the talk page consensus at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Capitals00 reported by User:Xtremedood (Result: )]]. in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971&diff=703728178&oldid=703721824 this edit] you revert mention of Bangladesh forces in the military victory, though [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971#RFC.2C_Should_.22Decisive_victory_of_Provisional_Banlgladesh_Government.22_be_written_in_result.3F an RfC about that] is still visible on the article talk page. You were offered a chance for mediation but you did not accept. There may still be time for you to respond at the noticeboard to avoid a block. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 03:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
:Responded, keep in mind that I am not reverting on that article for a long time, nor I am going to revert the recent edit. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:59, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

==Arbitration==
You are mentioned here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Converts_to_Hinduism] in the arbitration request noticeboard. [[User:Xtremedood|Xtremedood]] ([[User talk:Xtremedood|talk]]) 01:38, 5 March 2016 (UTC)


==Arbitration 2==
You are mentioned here [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Indo-Pakistani_War_of_1971], in regards to the dispute in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 in the arbitration request noticeboard. [[User:Xtremedood|Xtremedood]] ([[User talk:Xtremedood|talk]]) 02:20, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

== Request for arbitration declined ==

A [[Special:Permalink/708821842#Converts to Hinduism|request for arbitration]] you were party to has been declined.

The request has been declined as alternate methods of dispute resolution specifically a [[WP:RFC|RFC]] have not yet been undertaken.

For the Arbitration Committee. [[User:Amortias|Amortias]] ([[User talk:Amortias|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Amortias|C]]) 20:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

== Request for arbitration declined ==

A [[Special:Permalink/708823981#Indo-Pakastani War of 1971|request for arbitration]] you were party to has been declined.

The request has been declined as the request should be made as an [[WP:AE|Arbitration Enforcement]] request.

For the Arbitration Committee. [[User:Amortias|Amortias]] ([[User talk:Amortias|T]])([[Special:Contributions/Amortias|C]]) 20:31, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

== Hi Capitals00! ==

Please reply to the on-gooing dispute at [[Talk:Indo-Pakistani War of 1971]]. [[Special:Contributions/14.98.84.194|14.98.84.194]] ([[User talk:14.98.84.194|talk]]) 05:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.  
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> [[User:SheriffIsInTown|'''<span style="color:blue;">Sh</span><span style="color:red;">eri</span><span style="color:blue;">ff</span>''']] | [[User talk:SheriffIsInTown|'''<span style="color:black;">☎ 911</span>''']] | 14:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

==Libyan-Egyptian War==
Why exactly did you refer me to this page? The user in question added a sourced statement for what is actually the truth - that the war ended in a Egyptian victory (in addition to return to prewar lines). Why did you think this merited administrator attention? [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 12:34, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
:I asked you to check, because you had agreed that Mikrobølgeovn is misrepresenting sources[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libyan%E2%80%93Egyptian_War&diff=687009820&oldid=686855958][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Libyan%E2%80%93Egyptian_War&diff=687364737&oldid=687185917] and committing [[WP:OR]]. {{ping|Buckshot06}} can you point out where did the source mention that the outcome Egyptian '''victory'''? There was no change in territory and there was official ceasefire that stopped the war, reliable sources must state that it was victory of Egypt then only we can state it. All sources only state that it was a ceasefire,[https://books.google.com/books?id=qTDfAQAAQBAJ&pg=PA273&dq=+ceasefire&hl=] or mediation that was first accepted by Egypt.[https://books.google.com/books?id=wiVzAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA288&dq=], "Four days later, Egypt declared a unilateral cease-fire, which Libya accepted."[https://books.google.com/books?id=hP7jJAkTd9MC&pg=PA428&dq=Four+days+later,+Egypt+declared+a+unilateral+cease-fire,+which+Libya+accepted.&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiw0PzHpLTNAhWKqY8KHeWUCCcQ6AEIIDAA#v=onepage&q=Four%20days%20later%2C%20Egypt%20declared%20a%20unilateral%20cease-fire%2C%20which%20Libya%20accepted.&f=false] There was no victory. 14:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

::The point I've been trying to make is that 1) Gaddafi initiated the war to hamper Egypt's negotiations with Israel, 2) Libya's invasion of Egyptian territory was repelled, and 3) Egypt held land on the Libyan side of the border when the war ended, and only withdrew after the guns fell silent. The source specifically mentions Gaddafi ''gave up'' on his war aims. This being said, this discussion should preferably take place on the relevant discussion page, and there only. --[[User:Mikrobølgeovn|Mikrobølgeovn]] ([[User talk:Mikrobølgeovn|talk]]) 22:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
:::Please do not take part in this discussion, Mikrobolgeovn, especially after the undertaking you gave me on your talk page. This is an administrator-action, rather than content, query to try and clarify why this user called me in. 
:::Capitals00, the other user added a dead-tree, hardcopy source, which no doubt he had to do some looking for, but substantiates what is reasonably obvious: the Egyptians defeated the Libyans on the battlefield. Thus you might have trouble finding this source. None of the other formulations you've advanced '''rule out''' military victory. That some authors say that is the measure of the sources: you've quoted three conflict-resolution books, and Cooper et al is a military researcher/writer: they will naturally emphasise different things. Anyway, I understand more where you're coming from now, but please remember that you may not necessarily be able to verify dead-tree sources, and one needs to assume good faith that what editors reproduce from those sources is indeed what one would find in the printed book. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 00:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Buckshot06}} doesn't seem like Mikrobolgeovn brought anything new really and he is still misrepresenting source. If you check his earlier edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libyan%E2%80%93Egyptian_War&diff=686227502&oldid=685345176] you would find that link[http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_353.shtml] (unreliable [[WP:SELFPUB]]) was available in those days, but now its dead and available only from archive website[https://web.archive.org/web/20130321091100/http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_353.shtml], it is not showing anywhere that the war was Egyptian victory, then on this edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libyan%E2%80%93Egyptian_War&diff=686855958&oldid=686789812] he presents a quote that says: "Understanding that his military was too hopelessly outclassed and out of condition to instigate any political changes in Cairo, Gaddafi subsequently gave up his pressure upon Egypt." Again, it is not saying anywhere that war was Egyptian victory. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
:::::Well no, and yes. Take a look at https://books.google.com/books?id=wELdCQAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=Cooper,+T.,+%26+Grandolini,+A.+Libyan+Air+Wars:+Part+1:+1973-1985&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj-iaTK0bfNAhXDHB4KHQiRBSgQ6AEIJzAA#v=onepage&q=Cooper%2C%20T.%2C%20%26%20Grandolini%2C%20A.%20Libyan%20Air%20Wars%3A%20Part%201%3A%201973-1985&f=false. Look closely and you'll see it's one of Cooper's published works, a WP:V by our standards. I cannot yet figure out a way to access pages 21-25, though. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 22:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

== [[WP:ACE2016|ArbCom Elections 2016]]: Voting now open! ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Capitals00. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2016|2016 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2016/Candidates|the candidates' statements]] and submit your choices on '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/399|the voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/44&oldid=750786920 -->

== DS alerts ==

Hi Capitals00, please note that, before giving a DS alert on a topic, you are supposed to check if the user has already received an alert for that topic. It is not appropriate to give another alert within 12 months. Frequent DS alerts constitute hounding. Please don't do it. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 21:31, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
:Yes, I understood that he was already notified recently after I had already left the notification, his talk page is way too long that I stopped loading the page in middle and left the notice. Otherwise its not usual. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 07:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

== Kashmir conflict, Ragging etc ==

Hi there, Thanks for doing the Ragging mergers.  As for the sexual violence in Kashmir bit, it was clear to me that there was no consensus for merger to the Human rights pages.  That is why I withdrew from the process, and really have no wish to go back.  It is not fair to me when you include me in an RfC announcement, even if indirectly.  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B;">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090;">«Talk»</span>]] 08:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
:Thanks for informing, I am fine with that. Just letting you know {{ping|Fowler&amp;fowler}} that I had again pinged you on the article, but you can ignore it since it was purely accidental. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 11:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
::Please also note that you can't change a post you made on [[WT:INDIA]] after people have already responded to it by voting at the AfD site.  You may open a new section at [[WT:INDIA]].  [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B;">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090;">«Talk»</span>]] 11:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Southeast Asian religion: disruptive forumshopping|Southeast Asian religion: disruptive forumshopping]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 15:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

== Gaming 3RR ==

Hi there. After the last few days, I feel I should advise you that you may not revert an editor just because ''you suspect'' they are a sockpuppet. The [[WP:BANREVERT|banning policy]] permits removal of comments by ''confirmed'' sockpuppets, only after it is proven that the account is operated by a blocked or banned editor, but removing such comments is not ''required'' and is often frowned upon if removing the comment alters the context of a conversation. Also, I think I should advise you that if you find yourself needing to justify your reverts with guidelines like [[WP:BLPREMOVE]], it's probably better to ''stop reverting'' and file a complaint at [[WP:EW|the appropriate noticeboard]]. The [[WP:3RRNO]] exceptions are meant to protect the encyclopedia from blatant vandalism and urgently libelous content, not an excuse to revert any edit you disagree with, and I think you are quickly running out of administrators who will only ''warn'' you about this. Thanks. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 19:44, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
:I seemed to have mistaken there at the time when I did removed the comment from article thinking "its obvious sock", but you are right. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
::Building on this: Capitals00, G5 only applies to pages created by a block-evading editor. It does not apply to pages created before they were blocked. More generally, I strongly suggest you abandon your vendetta against Terabar and ProudIndian007, and focus on building content. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
:::Yes that's why I have been only tagging those articles that were created with a sock after indef block on main account. I don't have any "vendetta" against Terabar and ProudIndian007 unless there was some formality [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
::::Several of your tags were removed a few days ago, IIRC. There is no formal vendetta, I hope. All I am saying is that you are spending too much time in activities related to ProudIndian, and I am suggesting that you focus your energies elsewhere, as that is likely to be more productive. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 07:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Vanamonde93}} That's correct and yes I got it. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 07:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
===Updates===
::{{ping|Ivanvector}} I was thinking that similar to [[Bhumihar]], [[Jat people]]. These 2 articles that caused this conflict can be protected under 30/500 per [[WP:AC/DS]]. It is certainly agreeable that per [[WP:BRD]], other editor who was disagreeing with the stable version while violating the policy ([[WP:V]], [[WP:BLPCAT]]) had to follow [[WP:BRD]], even after all that, the consensus on talk page is clearly supporting my edits. Now that Terabar is going to get blocked anytime and probably not stop socking since its on-going for 9 years already, I believe that solution would be to protect article under 30/500. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Ivanvector}} It seems that Drivarum is still not dropping the [[WP:STICK]], during unblock request he had said "Lastly, after reading "Wikipedia:Edit warring" and "Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding" I admit I did "Wikipedia:Harassment#Wikihounding" and I won't do it again."[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drivarum&diff=780868403&oldid=780863821] But he is back to it now,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=781139907&oldid=781139406] asking same questions for which Terabar got blocked.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ivanvector&diff=prev&oldid=780877500][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=780871963] [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 10:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
::::I think your ping didn't work, I was just coming by here to check an entry on my watchlist when I saw your note. I've left a note at the ANI thread. I assume you've replied to {{ul|Bbb23}}'s question about your IP connection and he would have acted on it if he saw a need to do so, and none of the rest of us need to know what's going on there. Thanks. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 13:11, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
:::::Ping is not working now. I just saw I had been pinged at WP:AN[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=781172689&oldid=781172165] but never got notified. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 15:16, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

== Copyright problem on [[Zaid Hamid]] ==

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://tribune.com.pk/story/11701/will-the-real-zaid-hamid-please-stand-up. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 00:02, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Diannaa}} This goes back, few years ago:- [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Zaid_Hamid&diff=663520236&oldid=663519867].

Do you think the following version would be better?

# Indian Sikhs of Punjab are Muslims under cover, and they are allied with [[Pakistan]].
# Embracement of [[gold standard]] was a [[Zionist]] plot
# Hindus are the actual suicide bombers in Pakistan, because they are uncircumcised
# Pakistan's will fly on Delhi Red Fort anytime soon
# Nuclear weapons possessed by the non-Muslim nation will either become obsolete or explode on their own regions.
# In Islamabad,  the Pakistan’s elected leaders share same fate as [[Mohammad Najibullah]], dead bodies being hanged on poles.

[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 00:45, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
:No, it's not much better, as it presents the same material in the same order using almost identical wording. See [[Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing#Substantial similarity]] — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]]&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 11:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
::You are correct I will find other sources for each of these points instead, will make it easier to include. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 12:30, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

== Lynching of Mohammed Ayub Pandith or 2017 Nowhatta lynching ==

[https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=in&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q=Mohammed+Ayub+Pandith&oq=Mohammed+Ayub+Pandith&gs_l=news-cc.12..43j43i53.12672.12672.0.13147.1.1.0.0.0.0.174.174.0j1.1.0...0.0...1ac.2.36mj8nOd3ck Since important political  leaders have condemned this lynching, it can be an article] as the articles about cow lynching. --<strong><span style="font-family: 'Tempus Sans ITC'">[[User:Marvellous Spider-Man|<b style="color:Red">Marvellous</b>]] [[User talk:Marvellous Spider-Man|<span style="color:OrangeRed;">Spider-Man</span>]]</span></strong> 13:08, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
:Guess that's the next stop of the concerning editor. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 13:16, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

== Please do not add any material ... ==

... to [[Violence related to cow protection in India]].  The page is under dispute.  There is an admin who has been editing the page and engaging in discussions on the talk page.  He, [[user:Vanamonde93]] is away until July 5.  Please do not make any edits to the article.  And I do mean ''any'' edits.  It would be best if you self-reverted the ones you made recently.  Best regards, [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B;">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090;">«Talk»</span>]] 14:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard ==

U can reply to the report [[Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:Nathu_La_and_Cho_La_clashes.23Discussion_about_improving_this_page]] -- [[User:Fenal Kalundo|Fenal Kalundo]] ([[User talk:Fenal Kalundo|talk]]) 09:02, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

== 2002 Godhra page ==

Hello,

I agree with your comment regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:2002_Gujarat_riots#Undue_quote_of_Martha_Nussbaum_on_lead

I have mentioned the same on the talk page.
Do let me know how you wish to resolve this.
[[User:Notthebestusername|Notthebestusername]] ([[User talk:Notthebestusername|talk]]) 02:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

== Lahore page ==

Please stop your disruptive editing on the [[Lahore]] page. Consensus has NOT been reached. [[User:Willard84|Willard84]] ([[User talk:Willard84|talk]]) 00:52, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
:Consensus was reached on talk page, despite your continued edit warring and sockpuppetry with IP address. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 00:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

== Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.  
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> [[User:Robert McClenon|Robert McClenon]] ([[User talk:Robert McClenon|talk]]) 03:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

== Please stop criticizing other ideologies which are different from so called "islam" ==

You've been specifically targeting edits made by members of other religions and been reporting it to the admins by twisting the facts that suit your own extremist ideologies. I hope to see this stopped immediately. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Aisha666|Aisha666]] ([[User talk:Aisha666#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Aisha666|contribs]]) </small>
:{{tps}} This is your first edit on Wikipedia. Who are you? [[User:My name is not dave|<sup style="color:#093">My name is</sup><small style="color:#4000FF">not</small><sup style="color:#093">dave</sup>]] <small>([[User talk:My name is not dave|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/My name is not dave|contribs]])</small> 13:10, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

== RfA ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:New Zealand road sign W7-7A.svg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">) [[User:Cullen328|<b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328</sup>]] [[User talk:Cullen328|<span style="color:#00F">''Let's discuss it''</span>]] 00:28, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
|}

== Curiosity ==

Hi Capitals00. Just out of curiosity, and as a friendly, interested question: why the shift to the Dravidians as the 'Ur-culture' of India, while Indians have so long emphasized the Aryan heritage? Doesn't that raise a lot of problems for the Indian narratives on the Aryan identity ("Aryan" not as "race" or whatever, but as culture, language, religion, etc.)? Best regards, [[User:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:small;"><span style="font-family:Forte;color:black">Joshua Jonathan</span></span>]] -[[User talk:Joshua Jonathan|<span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;color:black">Let's talk!</span></span>]] 09:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

== Be warned ... ==

... that India is a [[WP:Featured article]], per [[WP:OWN#Featured_articles]] please discuss and gain consensus on an article's talk page before making any significant edit, especially in this case, making on-the-fly changes to an edit that was made at the time of an FAR six years ago when dozens of eyes were watching.  Hand-waving that some people somewhere allegedly arrives at a consensus doesn't do diddly squat for your edit.  Either you make the argument, or they make the argument, but it has to be made in the current thread in Talk:India.  The text doesn't say anything about slaves anyway.  Be warned again to stop this nonsense.  Best regards, [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B;">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090;">«Talk»</span>]] 06:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Fowler&amp;fowler}} Seems like a misunderstanding here, because the edits I made today are not about "the text" regarding slaves, in Ancient India section of the article but some other section. According to [[WP:OWN#Featured_articles]], "it is considerate to discuss significant changes of text or images on the talk page first" and I am clearly following it. I had only removed the problematic edits today that were made not only without consensus and in fact after total rejection on talk page.([[Talk:India/Archive 38#Society section]]) I have already described it on [[Talk:India#Challenges]]. You have restored the problematic content in question, probably after thinking that I was altering [[India#Ancient India]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:57, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

== Removal of category ==

Hello Capitals00, as you know, in the years before the 1962 war, there were many clashes between India and China with regards to posts and patrolling in the disputed area, the most prominent being the incident at the Kongka Pass in 1959. Before around 1959, both Indian and Chinese personnel used to patrol the area, but after the war, India was not able to patrol the area as China has complete control. The category [[:Category:Areas_occupied_by_China_after_the_Sino-Indian_War]] is intended for these kinds of places that India was able to access before 1958-1959, but unable to access after the 1962 war. This is also mentioned in the Category discussion. Hence, I am adding the pages back to the category. I request your understanding in not removing them. Thank you, [[User:The Discoverer|The Discoverer]] ([[User talk:The Discoverer|talk]]) 15:39, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|The Discoverer}} evidently you are the creator of this category, the only promoter as well as the only one to edit war over inserting it. Unless a [[WP:RS]] says that these were the regions that came under control of China after [[Sino-Indian War]], then only you can insert them. Otherwise you should stop already. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:03, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
::Maybe the category is badly named, in that case you can request for renaming. But there is no other category to classify areas that were accessible to both countries before 1959, but completely controlled by China after the war. [[User:The Discoverer|The Discoverer]] ([[User talk:The Discoverer|talk]]) 16:12, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
:::I would prefer to continue this discussion on your talk page. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

== ‎G5 decline ==

Robot editing and script editing is indeed exceptable from the criterion, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=762460608 here] we have content editing too: the removal of the birth date from the infobox in particular is relevant.  The criterion's meant to get rid of content that's essentially untouched by another human (basically, would we delete this under G7 if it were requested?), not to cut off our noses and spiting our faces by deleting every page that the evading editor created.  [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 17:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
:Posted on [[WP:AN]] for clarification. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 04:00, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

== Discretionary sanctions ==

{{Ivm|2=''This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia.  It does '''not''' imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.''

'''Please carefully read this information:'''

The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]] has authorised [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] to be used for pages regarding [[pseudoscience]] and [[fringe science]], a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience|here]].

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics.  This means [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved]] administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], our [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standards of behavior]], or relevant [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies]]. Administrators may impose sanctions such as [[Wikipedia:Editing restrictions#Types of restrictions|editing restrictions]], [[Wikipedia:Banning policy#Types of bans|bans]], or [[WP:Blocking policy|blocks]]. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> [[User:Jytdog|Jytdog]] ([[User talk:Jytdog|talk]]) 22:34, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

== [[Masanobu Shinozuka]] ==

You reverted me over at [[Masanobu Shinozuka]]. Why? ((([[User:The Quixotic Potato|The Quixotic Potato]]))) ([[User talk:The Quixotic Potato|talk]])  20:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|The Quixotic Potato}} I reverted Freensac's edits, a blocked sock. Your one edit[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Masanobu_Shinozuka&diff=789823269&oldid=782384079] got reverted during the rollback, I have restored it. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 02:58, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
::Thank you. &#40;&#40;&#40;[[User:The Quixotic Potato|The Quixotic Potato]]&#41;&#41;&#41; ([[User talk:The Quixotic Potato|talk]])  09:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for October 9==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[List of Punjabi-language poets]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Punjabi]] ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Punjabi-language_poets check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Punjabi-language_poets?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

== Mercury poisoning ==

Please consider adding the word "may" before "contain."  My understanding is that in TCM and Ayurvedic products, the problem is an inadvertent contamination of botanical ingredients grown in soil contaminated with heavy metals. I would make the edit, but because I consult to the dietary supplement industry, may be seen as conflict of interest. In homeopathy, the use of a diluted mercury ingredient is deliberate. [[User:David notMD|David notMD]] ([[User talk:David notMD|talk]]) 15:54, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

"Traditional and alternative medicines such as Homeopathy,[18] Traditional Chinese medicine,[19] Ayurvedic medicine, and others contain mercury and other heavy metals.[20]"
:{{ping|David notMD}} you can propose the edit here. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
::I thought I just did. Anyway, I would be happy with below, which added "may" and removed "and others" after Ayurvedic medicine, as there is no citation for other schools of traditional medicine. By the way, the citation below makes it clear that for certain Ayurvedic products, the introduction of lead, mercury and arsenic is a deliberate part of manufacture. [[User:David notMD|David notMD]] ([[User talk:David notMD|talk]]) 17:45, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
"Traditional and alternative medicines such as Homeopathy,[18] Traditional Chinese medicine[19] and Ayurvedic medicine[20] may contain mercury and other heavy metals."

Saper RB, Phillips RS, Sehgal A, Khouri N, Davis RB, Paquin J, Thuppil V, Kales SN. Lead, mercury, and arsenic in US- and Indian-manufactured Ayurvedic medicines sold via the Internet. JAMA. 2008 Aug 27;300(8):915-23. {{doi|10.1001/jama.300.8.915}}. Erratum in: JAMA. 2008 Oct 8;300(14):1652. {{PMID|18728265}}
::You need a better ref for homeopathy. Best [[User:Doc James|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Doc James|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Doc James|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Doc James|email]]) 07:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Doc James}} Found few: [http://www.homeopathyjournal.net/article/S1475-4916(03)00043-2/fulltext],[https://books.google.com/books?id=spTGldo_XmIC&pg=PA25&dq=mercury], [https://books.google.com/books?id=xJkyN0xsBJwC&pg=PT31&dq=mercury] [https://books.google.com/books?id=JJ_KsYUQqfQC&pg=PA219&dq=mercury][https://books.google.com/books?id=1oD0RUqBGsAC&pg=PA4&dq=mercury], [https://books.google.com/books?id=PyVvpbwCjZ4C&pg=PA159&lpg=PA159&dq=mercury] [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:11, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

==[[List of converts to Christianity from Hinduism]]==
Hi Capitals00, in regards to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_converts_to_Christianity_from_Hinduism&diff=809601018&oldid=809552714 this edit] [[Tulsi Giri]] is quite clearly a convert to the [[Jehovah's Witness]]. The source that mentions his conversion was dead due to link rot but I have recently archived the url. Also in regards to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_converts_to_Christianity_from_Hinduism&diff=780700575&oldid=772253309 this earlier edit] I re-added the articles for which I could find reliable third-party sources. If you have a dispute with my usage of citations please send me a message so that the issue can be resolved in a productive way. Thanks [[User:Inter&#38;anthro|Inter&#38;anthro]] ([[User talk:Inter&#38;anthro|talk]]) 06:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|In}} your two sources[http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/4304001.stm][https://web.archive.org/web/20141022091552/http://www.nepalstory.com/engelsk/e-02-17.html] regarding the conversion of [[Tulsi Giri]], doesn't mention "Hindu" or "Hinduism" or "convert" or "conversion". For [[Vinod Kambli]] you provided [http://www.cricketcountry.com/articles/vinod-kambli-16-facts-about-one-of-the-biggest-waste-of-talents-in-cricket-history-498925][https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/spotlight/Christ-has-come-home/articleshow/6999985.cms] mentions no "Hindu" or "Hinduism", and 2nd one mentions no "conversion". Regarding [[Anju Panta]] you provided an unreliable source.[https://web.archive.org/web/20141020112446/http://nepaltoronto.com/2014/09/09/durga-gharti-magar-sings-anju-pantas-denial-dasain-song/] [[Rakesh Rajani]] doesn't mention his own admission.[http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/national/Rakesh-Rajani---Changing-the-world--one-challenge-at-a-time/-/1840392/2497500/-/mj02nu/-/index.html]
:You should familiarize yourself with [[WP:BLPCAT]], we need '''admission of conversion''' by the subject. Your sources are really far from that. I have posted a warning on your talk page over this BLP violation. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:13, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
::In [http://www.thecitizen.co.tz/News/national/Rakesh-Rajani---Changing-the-world--one-challenge-at-a-time/-/1840392/2497500/-/mj02nu/-/index.html this source] it says "Born a Hindu in Mwanza, he went to Isamilo Primary School—which was managed by the Anglican church. He later converted to Christianity as an adult". Now I am no logical mastermind, but if someone says they use to belong to X and now belong to Y, it is completely reasonable to say they went from X to Y. Of course Rajani might have become irreligious or belonged to something else in the in-between time, or maybe deep down secretly never considered himself a Hindu, but there is no mention of that in the article and that is pure speculation. I'm sorry that you don't find the source of [[Anju Panta]] reliable but there are plenty more [https://world.wng.org/2014/10/christianitys_growth_in_nepal_includes_celebrity_convert 1] [http://www.asianews.it/news-en/Nepal,-Hindu-radicals-target-celebrity-pop-star-for-converting-to-Christianity-32215.html 2] that address this topic. Regarding [[Tulsi Giri]] during his tenure Nepal was ruled by the [[Shah dynasty]] dynasty and by definition was a Hindu state where the King and Government officials had to be Hindu. If Giri was not Hindu there would have been no way he would be able to be appointed to office. Also Jehovah Witnesses are not allowed to sever governments so it would be incredibly unlikely that he was a JW all along. I apologize for the [[Vinod Kambli]] article (although both citations clearly mention conversion, you must not have read the second one closely enough) it must have been a confusion with the subject and [[The Hindu]], but either way I was not the one who had added the categories in that case I had just added the citations to the article. I cannot thank you enough for the talk page warning, it has helped advance this discussion beyond words. [[User:Inter&#38;anthro|Inter&#38;anthro]] ([[User talk:Inter&#38;anthro|talk]]) 15:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
:::That's something he has to tell himself. That he was born as a Hindu and remained Hindu until he converted to Christianity. Don't do [[WP:SYNTH]], don't create relationship between X and Y unless the source clarifies it. Tulsi Giri is also a subject to [[WP:BLPCAT]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:54, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
::::That's fine, is it ok if I add the [[Anju Panta]] article back to the [[List of converts to Christianity from Hinduism|list]]? The sources seem to be more clear on that subject, there are more that I didn't provided. Sorry about the sarcasm in the last post, I was a bit mad. Happy editing [[User:Inter&#38;anthro|Inter&#38;anthro]] ([[User talk:Inter&#38;anthro|talk]]) 17:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
:::::I will post about Anju Panta on [[WP:BLPNB]] soon. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

== Eulalefty ==

I've rangedblocked the range Norm was using. [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 17:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

== Babri Masjid ==

You may want to join the discussion at [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Babri_Masjid#/editor/25] - [[User:IvankaTr|IvankaTr]] ([[User talk:IvankaTr|talk]]) 15:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC) [[User:IvankaTr|IvankaTr]] ([[User talk:IvankaTr|talk]]) 15:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

==Caste system in India==
Reference you reversion, I've asked for [[File:Peacedove.svg|60px|left]]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard]] regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.  
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!<!--Template:DRN-notice--> 
[[User:A.j.roberts|A.j.roberts]] ([[User talk:A.j.roberts|talk]]) 07:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

== Formal mediation has been requested ==
{{Ivmbox
| <!---MedComBot-Do-not-remove-this-line-Notified-Caste system in India--->The [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee|Mediation Committee]] has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Caste system in India". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. [[Wikipedia:Mediation|Mediation]] is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Caste system in India|request page]], the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy|formal mediation policy]], and the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide|guide to formal mediation]], '''please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.''' Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 4 December 2017.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.<br>
<small>Message delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]] ([[User talk:MediationBot|talk]]) on [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|behalf]] of the Mediation Committee. 08:03, 27 November 2017 (UTC)</small>
}}

== November 2017 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Kashmir conflict]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon">'''fortuna'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy">'''''velut luna'''''</span>]]<sup>Rarely receiving (many) pings. Bizarre.</sup> 13:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
:{{ping|Fortuna Imperatix Mundi}} I had provided an edit summary if you had checked. Read the whole [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kashmir_conflict#KA.24HMIR_revert_justifications], the "recently removed content" was discussed for weeks because it has too many NPOV and sourcing problems, and also read [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kashmir_conflict#NadirAli_edits]  [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 13:53, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

== Request for mediation rejected ==
{{Ivmbox
| The [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation|request for formal mediation]] concerning Caste system in India, to which you were listed as a party, has been [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Guide#Rejected requests|declined]]. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the [[Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Caste system in India|mediation request page]], which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#Chair|Chairman]] of the Committee, or to the [[User:Mediation Committee|mailing list]]. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]].

For the Mediation Committee, [[User:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; color:blue; font-variant:small-caps;">'''TransporterMan'''</span>]] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS; font-size: x-small;">TALK</span>]]) 16:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)<br>
<small>(Delivered by [[User:MediationBot|MediationBot]], [[Wikipedia:Mediation Committee#MediationBot|on behalf of]] the Mediation Committee.)</small>
}}

== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Capitals00. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2017|2017 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2017/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/400|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=813406680 -->

== Speedy deletion declined: [[:LeMel Humes]] ==
Hello Capitals00. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:LeMel Humes]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Previous AfD was a G7, not a deletion discussion.'''  Thank you.  [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 01:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
:I went ahead and G5'd this because for some reason that tag wasn't showing up when I initially reviewed. Just as an FYI though, if an AfD closes before the 7 days are up or as G7, it isn't G4 eligible. [[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 01:03, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
== Article on Love Jihad==
The article on [[Love Jihad]] doesn't seem to be NPOV. Can you add some sentences citing appropriate references? Thanks!  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2405:204:54A1:76A2:98FB:A08A:93A2:EB71|2405:204:54A1:76A2:98FB:A08A:93A2:EB71]] ([[User talk:2405:204:54A1:76A2:98FB:A08A:93A2:EB71#top|talk]]) 12:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Ramayana ==

There is actually a stalemate in the discussion page after reviewing the conversation, even some who oppose to it. Only two editors showed up with some hazy sources still yet to be reviewed and most disagreed with the additional edits in a conversation that reached no consensus, one editor tried to clean up after JournalmanManila's sockpuppet's edits. So this is basically an edit made by a block-evading vandal whose edit topic was mostly rejected by a majority without consensus. I wan't to thank you for indicating the talk page though. ([[User:N0n3up|N0n3up]] ([[User talk:N0n3up|talk]]) 06:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC))

== Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | [[File:Wikipedia Happy New Year.png|211px]]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello Capitals00, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this [[Christmas and holiday season|seasonal occasion]]. Spread the [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] by wishing another user a [[Christmas|Merry Christmas]] and a [[New Year|Happy New Year]], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. <br>
Happy editing,<br>
&mdash;[[User:MBlaze Lightning|<span style="color:#0000f1; font-family:Algerian; text-shadow:1px 1px 1px #CC4E5C">'''<big>MBL</big>''' </span>]]<sup>[[User talk:MBlaze Lightning|'''Talk''']]</sup> 05:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
|}

== Is your account secure? ==

I saw [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=819284593&oldid=819284217&title=User_talk:Bishonen this edit]? [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''' >SerialNumber'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:dark blue">'''54129'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<sup>...speculates</sup>]] 14:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
:{{ping|Serial Number 54129}} I just accidentally clicked some buttons on browser while writing a lengthy message. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 14:39, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
::I do apologise, I think I reverted your main message too. Sorry about that, you might want to go and restore it? Take care! [[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''' >SerialNumber'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:dark blue">'''54129'''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<sup>...speculates</sup>]] 14:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

== Warning ==

You appear to be repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] other editors' contributions at [[:Kashmiris]]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]" and is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:Lashkar-e-Taiba|talk page]].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 09:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

== Pending changes reviewer granted ==

[[File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg|right|130px]]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "{{mono|pending changes reviewer}}" userright, allowing you to [[WP:RVW|review other users' edits]] on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at [[Special:PendingChanges]], while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at [[Special:StablePages]].

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

''See also:''
*[[Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes]], the guideline on reviewing
*[[Wikipedia:Pending changes]], the summary of the use of pending changes
*[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection]], the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.<!-- Template:Pending changes reviewer granted --> <br>
[[User:TonyBallioni|TonyBallioni]] ([[User talk:TonyBallioni|talk]]) 18:47, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

== Similar username ==

Hi {{u|Capitals00}}, just FYI, a new user was created recently(2-3 hours) which has a username quite similar to yours - {{user|Capitalists008}}. The user was disrupting some pages on my watchlist. I am not sure what is the Wikipedia policy on User names which are quite similar to other long term editors. This could also be a potential blow-back from the recent SPI investigation against Nangparbat. {{ping|Bbb23}} for additional guidance. Thanks. [[User:Adamgerber80|Adamgerber80]] ([[User talk:Adamgerber80|talk]]) 08:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

== February 2018 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Mar4d|Mar4d]]. I noticed that you recently removed content from [[:Rape in India]]&nbsp;without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[WP:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:Mar4d|my talk page]]. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-delete1 --> '''[[User:Mar4d|<span style="color: green;">Mar4d</span>]]''' ([[User talk:Mar4d|<span style="color: green;">talk</span>]]) 04:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
:I should describe my changes[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rape_in_India&diff=823750156&oldid=823737918] with "''an accurate [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]''", despite I already have. This frivolous notification is just another example of your [[WP:IDHT]] and [[WP:DE]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

== Corrected edits ==

Hello, on [[Muslim conquests of Afghanistan]], you had made numerous mistakes. This includes for practice of ancient Hinduism by Kafirs, using a source "Ethnic Groups of North, East, and Central Asia: An Encyclopedia" p. 205 which wrongly mentions Ghaznavid raids into Kafiristan with capture of Nardain in 10th century, however it took place in the 11th century. On p. 217 it also wrongly describes Sabuktigin attacking it in 1020-21 though he died long before in 998. In addition, you wrongly mentioned Al-Beruni describing the Afghans/Pashtuns in 8th century, though his work is from the 10th century as clearly stated by your quote from "The Afghans" by Willem Vogelsang. You also wrongly stated Ferishta as describing them in 10th century, though he was talking about them in 12th century per
your source "E.J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam". He also didn't live until 16th century. In addition, the qutoes you added did not talk about the Afghans ever facing Arab conquests.

As such I've corrected the mistakes. After reverting, I added back your content. I used a reliable author [[Richard Strand|Richard F. Strand]] as source for the practice of ancient Hinduism by the Kafirs. Also, I shifted the quotes regarding Afghans to a separate section title "Conversion of Pashtun-Afghan people" as much of it doesn't directly concern the Arab or later Ghaznavid conquests. In future, please check your sources before adding so that it isn't as factually wrong information or is content not in source. As your contribution is still quite helpful, so I've preserved it and only corrected poorly sources content or claims not from source. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 23:58, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

:I've also shifted parts of Afghanistan as a political and cultural part of India to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Muslim_conquests_of_Afghanistan&diff=827662391&oldid=827653815 the article lede] as well as the lede/summary of the Arab conquests. Since the Arabs couldn't permanently conquer the Indian kingdoms in Afghanistan and only the Saffarids and Ghaznavids defeated them, which I added in the Arabs conquest, it seems suitable there to provide background on them. Also as it concerns the overall situation especially in eastern Afghanistan, it is more suited in the lede. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 00:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

::Thanks for keeping my content and correcting a couple of dates. Looks like I accidentally counted back instead of forward with the century or my device autocorrected to wrong dates. I also had some doubts and I was going to recheck as well as add additional source today and this is why I had also left a note on talk page[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Muslim_conquests_of_Afghanistan&diff=prev&oldid=827521687] so that you  can review these edits since you had removed them in first place.

::It's good to know that keeping  these important historical aspects of the article is no longer an issue. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

== query about an ebook ==

In an article i saw you mentioning about a book by Prof. Mathpal, Yashodhar , titled "Prehistoric Painting Of Bhimbetka". Abhinav Publications
This is a rare book. Do you have an ebook version of this book which you would like to share?
Or if you have online library access, would you like to share it?  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Sadashivamadhavada|Sadashivamadhavada]] ([[User talk:Sadashivamadhavada#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Sadashivamadhavada|contribs]]) 16:58, 18 March 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Here's the link for online preview: https://books.google.com/books?id=GG7-CpvlU30C [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 14:44, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

== Notice ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.&nbsp;The thread is [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Article redirect|Article redirect]]. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:NeilN|<b style="color:navy">Neil<span style="color:red">N</span></b>]] <sup>[[User talk:NeilN|<i style="color:blue">talk to me</i>]]</sup> 11:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

== Just asking  for An insight  : Kinnara ==

Hello @Capitals00, i just like to give me an insight about this sources i will show tge references are for the Philippine section of [[Kinnara]]. In Philippines, there was a statue of gold kinnara at surigao dated back to 10th-13th century supported by citation from that source.  Although it was comr from a valid source  the user named  N0n3up keeps reverting the article on the version  s/he preferred. I dont want to get involve on to an edit war ,so i need some more famillar  in wiki policies please treat this as a legal assistance , that n0n3up is the friend of gunkarta  which you previously given a warning  about edit warring. Also n0n3up is deleting every Philippine sections  in India-related articles. I hope your answer will help.  Thank you!  ([[User:Kufarhunter|Kufarhunter]] ([[User talk:Kufarhunter|talk]]) 03:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC))


( Laszlo Legeza, "Tantric Elements in Pre-Hispanic Gold Art," Arts of Asia, 1988, 4:129-133.)
([[User:Kufarhunter|Kufarhunter]] ([[User talk:Kufarhunter|talk]]) 03:39, 1 April 2018 (UTC))

== Stop censorship ==

If two people are disagreeing and reverting, then the solution to that is not to add to the mix revert yourself. If you disagree with me, it is better you discuss. I gave many chances to Kautilya3, but all you and he have done is make excuses that have little base in reality. My edits are due. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 13:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

== Notification ==

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice-->[[User:Farawahar|Farawahar]] ([[User talk:Farawahar|talk]]) 15:35, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

==[[Insurgency in Balochistan]] and [[Kulbhushan Jadhav]]==
You undid my edits ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insurgency_in_Balochistan&oldid=prev&diff=837179284], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kulbhushan_Jadhav&oldid=prev&diff=837178995] ) saying that in both articles, RAW's involvement in Pakistan is not proven. I am not sure should we discuss this separately or in same section, but they look similar so I have added them together. In both cases Pakistan is raising concern that India's spy agency [[Research and Analysis Wing|RAW]] is involved in Pakistan. In case of  [[Kulbhushan Jadhav]], he confessed that he was working with RAW and other agencies in India. Then there was a story by  The Quint, which was retracted later by Quint. Story talks about the link between RAW and Kulbhushan . Story and its retraction was covered widely ([https://www.dawn.com/news/1381184] , [https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/what-the-kulbhushan-jadhav-saga-reveals-about-india-and-pakistans-balochistan-problems/] ). This clearly links RAW with Jadhav. If you read article, there is no confusion, that he was RAW's agent. In case of [[Insurgency in Balochistan]], article is full of India's help provided to Baloch insurgent. If you read [[Insurgency_in_Balochistan#India]], it details sources from Pakistan and from abroad how India is helping insurgent. Read what Wright-Neville, British intelligence, and others. Kulbhushan  himself was involved in Balochistan. Let me know your thoughts. --[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 16:12, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:A fake video proves nothing. Nor the allegations reported by unreliable sources. By making false allegations about a living person, you are violating [[WP:BLP]]. I am sending you a warning for this BLP violation on your talk page now. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:20, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:: Not sure why you are sending warnings, I picking up from the article. There is whole section talking about confession video which you are saying is fake [[[Kulbhushan_Jadhav#Confession_video]]. Secondly, you are considering [https://www.dawn.com/news/1381184] , [https://thediplomat.com/2018/01/what-the-kulbhushan-jadhav-saga-reveals-about-india-and-pakistans-balochistan-problems/] ) as unreliable or fake.--[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 16:33, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:::I said the video was fake and these sources are not enough for proving any involvement. Do you know that [[International Court of Justice]] had refused to play that video?[https://www.yahoo.com/news/kulbhushan-jadhav-death-sentence-hearing-082725445.html] [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 17:06, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:::: I was unable to find any reliable source which says that ICJ refused to see video because it was fake. ICJ can have other reasons to refuse to see video. What is your opinion on story by Quint. Is it unreliable as well. What is your opinion on Balochsitan insurgency and RAW's involvement. --[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 17:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:::::I think you guessed it because I made no mention of such association. You should be able to find the "other reasons" or just agree that the video lacks any credibility. Few allegations made by Pakistan are not fit enough for inclusion in form of categories. You need neutral sources to confirm the allegations. Why do you think that you are the only person to bother about it? It's because others are aware of [[WP:CATDEF]], but you aren't. Policy says that "''Categorization must also maintain a neutral point of view.''" Your categorizations lacked neutrality that's why I reverted them. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 18:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:::::: It is easy to point fingers. Articles go in category where they belong to. I asked you, do you agree with story of Quint. --[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 19:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
:::::: Lets close the discussion for now. I request you to remove the tag which you have put in my talk page. Thanks.--[[User:Spasage|Spasage]] ([[User talk:Spasage|talk]]) 19:54, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

== Wikiquote ==

You need to apologize for your false accusation of off-wiki canvassing. Perhaps before blaming me of "off-wiki canvassing", you should have read [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]]. 

There is no bar on sister wikis given in the policy. The only bar is on stealth canvassing. However, Jedi3 has seen my edits and I'm not hiding anything. I'm openly inviting the user to opinionate. I may have given my side of the story but I'm not forcing them or inviting them to influence the discussion. They can comment against me as well.

I didn't engage in anything wrong as far as I know. I don't see the policy forbidding inviting opinions from sister wikis. If anyone who knows the policy better knows I'm wrong, they may correct me. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 20:32, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
:Not sure about the policy, though people get blocked on sister wikis for importing issues from one Wiki to another. Now that action has been already taken on Wikiquote, its not worth it to discuss this any more, not even on Wikiquote. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 08:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
::Oh so you admit you were complaining on an ill-define concept? Actually no action has been taken. The interaction ban was for another issue. Besides actual canvassing has been done openly. I only invited the user to comment. Administrators haven't raised an issue against it. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 20:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

== For the Record ==

The sourced content which you initially [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Insurgency_in_Balochistan&type=revision&diff=837825803&oldid=837823243 removed by terming it as conspiracies], and later [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATripWire&type=revision&diff=837827322&oldid=837826599 claimed it to be copyvio] once you were [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ACapitals00&type=revision&diff=837826143&oldid=837751970 warned for not assuming good faith] was infact not a copyvio. I invite you to show me how the sourced content that you removed, first by citing improper reason and then by terming it as copyvio, was a copyvio?—[[User:TripWire|'''<big><em style="font-family:Calibri;color:DarkMagenta">Trip</em></big><big><em style="font-family:Calibri;color:DarkSlateGray">Wire</em></big>''']]<sup>[[User talk:TripWire|________ʞlɐʇ]]</sup> 09:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
:If you were really willing to [[WP:GAME]] system to this extent, you would've already restored the copyright violation but you know if you did you will end up getting blocked given you have been already warned for copyright violations many times,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TripWire&diff=667927014&oldid=667925377][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TripWire&diff=513907256&oldid=513537441][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TripWire&diff=837827322&oldid=837826599] but given your [[WP:CIR|incompetence]] and [[WP:IDHT]] issues you just can't understand a thing and relies upon gaming the system instead. The edit you restored as disruptive and should never be restored. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:32, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
:: I asked you a simple question, the sourced content that you removed was not a copyvio as you falsely claimed (even though you had initially removed it by citing a false reason namely ''conspiracies'' and then once you were warned you changed your stance and termed it as a copyvio when your [[WP:DE]] was caught), Please show me how that sourced content was a copyvio instead of digging my past. Also, explain how was restoring a sourced content disruptive as you are claiming?—[[User:TripWire|'''<big><em style="font-family:Calibri;color:DarkMagenta">Trip</em></big><big><em style="font-family:Calibri;color:DarkSlateGray">Wire</em></big>''']]<sup>[[User talk:TripWire|________ʞlɐʇ]]</sup> 09:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
:::I didn't even saw your frivolous warning I just went ahead to write a note on your talk page, highlighting your history of mass disruption and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TripWire&diff=prev&oldid=837827322 continued violation of copyrights as well as disruptive editing] and you reverted with a meaningless edit summary despite you are being the problematic editor. and you should not be adding them. Check the dawn.com link with what you are restoring, you were violating copyrights. You should better blame your incompetence that you can't even detect what is a copyright violation despite you have been warned enough times for your copyright violations. Making these excuses or asking [[WP:IDHT|useless questions whose answer you already know]] won't help you. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

== Stop edit-warring ==

You've reverted twice on the same article. The situation is not solved by resorting to reverts and false accusations. And don't personally attack others by calling them [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indo-Aryan_migration&diff=838928083&oldid=838926880 incompetent].

Also, the translation which you claim is outdated is still used as later as 2014. Read this: (https://books.google.com/books?id=5-i0AwAAQBAJ&pg=PA484).

The source I used is from Professor [[Irfan Habib]] and [[Aligarh Muslim University]]. They are reliable sources. If you have a contrary opinion, then you can add it with reliable sources. But don't make false accusations nor use them to edit-war. [[User:MonsterHunter32|MonsterHunter32]] ([[User talk:MonsterHunter32|talk]]) 18:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
:One can revert [[WP:NOT3RR|same edit 24x7]] as long as the edit is a copyright violation. World has moved on for more than decades and you need to know "contrary opinion"? [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 11:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
==Request==
your kind comment at my ban removal notice was really helpful. I was grateful to you at that time for a sincere assessment of you. I am in need of your views now at [[User talk:EdJohnston#User:Md iet]], where people are again pointing toward the same discussion of India to ban me further.[[User:Md iet|Md iet]] ([[User talk:Md iet|talk]]) 03:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for May 8==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation|disambiguation pages]]. Such links are [[WP:INTDABLINK|usually incorrect]], since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].)</small>
:[[Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Gujarat]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alauddin_Khalji%27s_conquest_of_Gujarat check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alauddin_Khalji%27s_conquest_of_Gujarat?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added a link pointing to [[Ranthambore]]
:[[Slavery in India]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Slavery_in_India check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Slavery_in_India?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added a link pointing to [[Ranthambore]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 11:17, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

==AE notification==
There is a report involving you at [[WP:AE]]. [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 07:12, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
{{collapse top|outdated}}
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
{{Ivmbox
|2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg
|imagesize=50px
|1=The following [[WP:TBAN|topic ban]] now applies to you:

{{Talkquote|1=You are indefinitely banned from all edits and pages related to conflict between India and Pakistan, broadly construed.  You are warned that any further disruption or testing of the edges of the ban will be met with either an indefinite topic ban from all topics related to India, Pakistan and Afghanistan or an indefinite block, without further warning.}}

You have been sanctioned per [[Special:Permalink/841340595#Capitals00|this AE discussion]].

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Involved admins|uninvolved administrator]] under the authority of the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee]]'s decision at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision]] and, if applicable, the procedure described at [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions]]. This sanction has been recorded in the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions/Log/2018|log of sanctions]]. Please go to [[WP:TBAN]] and read the information there to see what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] for an extended period, to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal against the imposition of the ban, see [[WP:AC/DS#sanctions.appeals]] which explains the ways in which you may appeal.  Additionally, you may ask for this sanction to be removed at [[WP:AE|the arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] after six months of positive contributions to Wikipedia. [[User:GoldenRing|GoldenRing]] ([[User talk:GoldenRing|talk]]) 08:17, 15 May 2018 (UTC) 
}}
:{{ping|GoldenRing}} I had planned to propose a better solution to this problem. Let me know if you would like to hear. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 08:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
{{collapse bottom}}

==Disambiguation link notification for May 15==

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:[[Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Gujarat]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alauddin_Khalji%27s_conquest_of_Gujarat check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alauddin_Khalji%27s_conquest_of_Gujarat?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added a link pointing to [[Ranthambore]]
:[[Persecution of Hindus]] ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Persecution_of_Hindus check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Persecution_of_Hindus?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
::added a link pointing to [[News Today]]

([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) --[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

== Your email ==

Hi Capitals00. Regarding your email, yes, I've been following the AE report. I haven't commented, and don't intend to get involved, because it is far better that admins unfamiliar with the area review the report and decide on what action to take. The actual sanction is not very punitive and you can continue to edit in areas that don't involve the India-Pakistan conflict. My suggestion is that you do just that and appeal the sanctions six months or an year down the road. Frankly, I think it is time that all the sanctioned editors take a break from the India-Pakistan conflict pages, for their own health as well as for the health of Wikipedia. Best wishes. --[[User:RegentsPark|regentspark]] <small>([[User talk:RegentsPark|comment]])</small> 12:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice-->  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Citytaker|Citytaker]] ([[User talk:Citytaker#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Citytaker|contribs]]) 04:55, 19 May 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Reverting and striking ==

Just because you ''can'' revert and strike stuff doesn't mean you ''should''. Your recent efforts in the ANI thread and SPI aren't a great idea, if only because you are involved. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 06:03, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

The striking at ANI has now been reverted by myself and two admins. Surely enough is enough? - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 06:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
:I am not going to revert it, but you are wrong with your interpretation. Where does [[WP:SOCKSTRIKE]] says you have to be involved or not? Sock is a sock and anyone can revert or strike. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:16, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
::That is an essay. Look, common sense and propriety would tell many people that if they're involved in something it is not a great idea to censor what their "opponents" might say. There are plenty of other people around who are not involved and can make a determination. It just looks bad and, really, doesn't achieve much of merit. - [[User:Sitush|Sitush]] ([[User talk:Sitush|talk]]) 06:20, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
:::What Sitush said. I reverted you at ANI; you proceeded to do the same thing elsewhere. All it does is to make it harder for other folks to track the sock's behavior, and to make you appear vindictive. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 06:29, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
::::Sock was the one who reverted the strike.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=841949704] Not you. Read [[WP:SOCKSTRIKE]], it was completely sensible after the sock was blocked. How does it make harder for people to realize that a sock is being [[WP:DENY|ignored]]? You can look "vindictive" towards harassment socks.
::::Sitush, well that essay that shows how things should be practiced and it happens every time. Do you have any ''essay'' for supporting your assertion? The person is no longer a "supporter" or "opponent" when he is a sock, and this sock is evading block 100s of times in a week. You need to encourage him to come clean instead, until then stick to [[WP:SOCKSTRIKE]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
:::::While I support the use of WP:SOCKSTRIKE, it is customary to allow suspected socks to contribute to SPI pages in their defence etc. As for the other aspect, the complaint was about you and a few others, so you shouldn't be the ones striking it, even after a block (note that I only said it's an obvious sock, I don't know if it was a bad hand account of a regular editor or a blocked account), and my blocking reason was more along the lines of disruption and in this case you shouldn't be striking anything. If it should have been done, I'd have done that when I blocked. Whether sockstrike includes words on involvement or not, it's plain common sense that one shouldn't revert or strike when the complaint is about them.  &mdash;[[User:SpacemanSpiff|<span style="color: #BA181F;">Spaceman</span>]]'''[[User talk:SpacemanSpiff|<span style="color: #2B18BA;">Spiff</span>]]''' 06:56, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

== [[Shivaji]] ==

Hi Capitals, can you help with [[Shivaji]] GA nomination? Things are getting tricky there. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 10:35, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

==Clarification and Amendment==

See [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Amendment_request:_India-Pakistan]] regarding the ARE decision that affected you. — [[User:MapSGV|MapSGV]] ([[User talk:MapSGV|talk]]) 20:18, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

== ''India-Pakistan'' arbitration amendment request closed ==

The [[Special:Permalink/844914921#Amendment_request:_India-Pakistan|''India-Pakistan'' arbitration amendment request]] filed on 23 May 2018 (the appeal of certain arbitration enforcement actions by GoldenRing) has been closed as unsuccessful. For the Arbitration Committee, '''[[User:L235|Kevin]]''' (<small>aka</small> [[User:L235|L235]]&nbsp;'''·'''&#32; [[User talk:L235#top|t]]&nbsp;'''·'''&#32; [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]]) 02:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

== Edit summaries, yet again.  ==

For goodness sake, Capitals00. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3ACow_vigilante_violence_in_India_since_2014&type=revision&diff=845342033&oldid=845306912 this] looks like you're removing a perfectly reasonable talk page post. ''Very few people'' know it's Wikiexplorer; most of the page watchers probably don't. You're actually strengthening his hand by not displaying due courtesy in response. Do you really need to be dragged to ANI just to be compelled to use edit summaries? [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 04:43, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:Why you are the ''only'' person in the world who has to worry about it? [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cow_vigilante_violence_in_India_since_2014&diff=842909227&oldid=842733318 Everyone] who has recently edited that talk page, and so do entire [[WP:AIV]] now knows that it's Wikiexplorer13, see his [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/122.173.185.93 block log]. It was not a "perfectly reasonable" post, it was just a bunch of canvassing and harassment. No wonder that sock loves to mimic you,[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=844485151&oldid=844399826][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=843282946&oldid=842655298] since he find you to be favorable towards him. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 04:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::Claiming I favor the sockmaster is silly: I've blocked him on multiple occasions, and he knows it. Why is it so difficult for ''you'' to type "sock of Wikiexplorer13" into the edit summary? It will take you literally a second for each edit. Nobody else seems to care because it's an obscure article and because nobody wishes to wade into the morass that is south Asian politics, but trust me, if you continue to refuse to use an edit summary, I will find people who care. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:21, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::Rollback allows reverting disruptive socks. It is not to say that I ''never'' type it. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kottayam&diff=prev&oldid=844845309][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=prev&oldid=844487716], when it is not known to others and I have been doing this long before your message.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoni&diff=prev&oldid=839782361] Best you should do now is to leave it as it is, and let others object if they see the problem, though I find it unlikely that anyone will since the sock has popularized himself so much that there are hoards of admins who are ready to block him 24x7. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::::If you ''had'' used rollback, I would have been fine with it; because rollback itself is a tool meant for this sort of thing, it's use is regulated, and edits with it are tagged, allowing watchers to know that someone disruptive was being reverted. You're wrong that nobody cares: {{U|Drmies}} told MBlaze off for exactly this behavior very recently [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MBlaze_Lightning#Yoni], with the same sockmaster, too. Just use edit summaries and make life easier for everyone else. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:36, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::Yes [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cow_vigilante_violence_in_India_since_2014&diff=prev&oldid=845342033 those recent reverts] I made involved use of rollback, in fact every other editors and admins are using rollback now.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India_Gate&diff=845121174&oldid=845121076][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Henry_Miers_Elliot&diff=844368385&oldid=844368192][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Catholic_Syrian_Bank&diff=844237410&oldid=844236689] I didn't said that ''nobody cares'' I said that if someone has issue they can complain me but I haven't seen any until now and it's even more impossible because the sock is highly repetitive, making it very easy for others to identify who's sock he is and also the daily appearance of reports on WP:AIV that concerns his on-going abuse. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:46, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::That's not rollback [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Rollback] . That's twinkle rollback: they're very different. I didn't realize you didn't have the rollback flag. It's usually given out with the PC reviewer flag. In any case; if you don't have it, you can't use it, and so you should use edit summaries. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:53, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::Also "nobody has complained and so my behavior is fine" is no justification at all. [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 05:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::Well, everyone is following the same standards for socks that I have been, that's why no one has complained. Rollback and Twinkle rollback are tagged differently but policies/use of rollback is same as that for twinkle rollback as per the link and there have been proposals before to remove the default rollback for those reasons as twinkle rollback does its job. I have submitted a request for rollback.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&diff=845349593&oldid=845322017] [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 06:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::::Vanamonde, as far as I'm concerned, and I believe we've had consensus for this in ANI and other places, ''any'' kind of rollback has to meet "rollback requirements". I believe also that there was a consensus for denying editors the right to use Twinkle or whatever kind of tool was used if they failed to abide by those rules. (Note that I haven't looked at the diffs here and  have no opinion on them.) Thanks, [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 15:06, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::{{re|Drmies}} Well, it is possible that I am wrong about using rollback on socks, and best practice is just not to. The basic point here, though, is that I'm asking Capitals00 to use ''edit summaries'' when reverting a sock, which is what earned MBLaze a talking-to from you. Cheers, [[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User talk:Vanamonde93|talk]]) 15:19, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
::::::::::Those were the sockmaster's earliest days of frequent ban evasion. Situation is too different that you have to just rollback his edits[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cow_vigilante_violence_in_India_since_2014&diff=prev&oldid=845342033] and report to [[WP:AIV]] by citing necessary details[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=845342177] and he is blocked![https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3A122.173.185.93] This whole thing takes 5 minutes or less now, unlike early days when it took ages to block him. I do mention when it seems necessary.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Capitals00&diff=844487716&oldid=844487612] I used to mention that in edit summaries since the beginning when the sock was not known to others.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoni&diff=prev&oldid=839782361] Now he is well known in AIV and also in most of the articles where he carries out his revert-spree. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 16:10, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:::::::::::"well known in AIV" may be true sometimes, but I do not advocate the whole "the admins will know" kind of thing. Vanamonde is absolutely correct in saying that edit summaries, while not mandatory in all cases, are the kind of thing that help admins. If I run into a set of unexplained reverts and the AIV report says "sock", I may just skip it because I may not want to plow through all the diffs and ask around. So, the sooner you want action, the more detailed you should be. [[User:Drmies|Drmies]] ([[User talk:Drmies|talk]]) 16:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
{{od}}

Yes that is why I focus in providing the necessary details on WP:AIV[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=845342177] and it works fine, given the reason behind reverting has been already stated clearly. Although the details would be different next time as I will link the newly created LTA, mentioned in the below section. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 17:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

== Wikiexplorer13 ==

Hello. Just so you know, I've created an LTA case page for {{U|Wikiexplorer13}}, see [[Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Wikiexplorer13]]. [[User:MBlaze Lightning|<span style="color:#0000f1; font-family:Algerian; text-shadow:1px 1px 1px #CC4E5C">'''<big>MBlaze Lightning</big>''' </span>]]<sup>[[User talk:MBlaze Lightning|'''''talk''''']]</sup> 06:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:Hi, Please accept my thanks for starting the SPI on his sock harassing me. where did u notice him ? [[WP:AN3]] ?--''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>]]</span>'' 20:17, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
::{{ping|DBigXray}} I had indeed noticed him on [[WP:AN3]] for the first time. His behavior including the style of writing, edit warring, reminded me of none other than Wikiexplorer13. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 14:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
:::Good call. I am sure he will be back, I will act accordingly next time. --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>]]</span>'' 14:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

== Rimutaka/Remutaka Range move issue ==
Note that I created a section on [[Talk:Rimutaka Range]] to discuss whether/when it should be moved to "Remutaka Range".
[[User:Rsfinlayson|Ross Finlayson]] ([[User talk:Rsfinlayson|talk]]) 14:53, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

== What topic you need help? ==

You have emailed me that you need my help..please free to discuss here or talk on my page.Thankyou! [[User:Binamra Deb|Binamra Deb]] ([[User talk:Binamra Deb|talk]]) 11:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
:I was willing to discuss something I felt I can't here because your possible COI with the subject. I shortly discovered that you have been socking thus I have opened [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Binamra Deb]]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 12:41, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

== Hello Capitals00!! ==

I registered to Wikipedia in order to edit [[Zhu Zhengting]] , could you please don't redirect this term to [[NEX7]] ? <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:一米八的米八|一米八的米八]] ([[User talk:一米八的米八#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/一米八的米八|contribs]]) 10:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)</small>

== Arbitration enforcement request ==

Please see [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Capitals00 - July 2018]]. [[User:Ivanvector|Ivanvector]] (<sup>[[User talk:Ivanvector|Talk]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Ivanvector|Edits]]</sub>) 14:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

== Locus.sh ==

Note that per [[User talk:Northamerica1000#Request for Page Restoration|this discussion]] on my talk page, I have restored the [[Locus.sh]] article and relisted its [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Locus.sh|deletion discussion]]. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<span style="font-size: x-small;">1000</span>]]</sup></span> 12:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

== Margaret Workman ==

I'm not entirely sure why you referred to the edits I made to [[Margaret Workman]] as unhelpful. I was attempting to clean up the article. If you notice where you reverted my edits, the article format is now completely messed up (for example Justice Workman's name is on a separate line from the first line of the article). In addition, the article as you restored it has information, while sourced, that has absolutely nothing to do with Justice Workman specifically. Finally, information about Justice Workman's impeachment should be under the impeachment category, not the top of the article. Please explain. [[Special:Contributions/2607:FCC8:FE0A:8E00:ED9C:4F14:4B22:6190|2607:FCC8:FE0A:8E00:ED9C:4F14:4B22:6190]] ([[User talk:2607:FCC8:FE0A:8E00:ED9C:4F14:4B22:6190|talk]]) 18:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
:Just made a deeper revert to solve the wider problem.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Margaret_Workman&diff=862416548&oldid=862387301] [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 07:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

== October 2018 Reply ==

Hello Capitals00,

I am [[User:tokyloop|tokyloop]]. Thank you for your helpful feedback. 

I’d like to add some useful content. This is one example:

Tāranātha’s complete works in 45 volumes, Pe Cin edition

[https://jonangdharma.com/dolpopa-pe-cin-edition-complete-13-volumes| https://jonangdharma.com/dolpopa-pe-cin-edition-complete-13-volumes]

[https://jonangdharma.com| Jonang Dharma Association]

The link provides complete access to the entire work of the character of the Wiki entry, and therefore the contribution is constructive, in my humble opinion. 

If I misplaced the link, please let me know the correct position. Thank you.

Best,[[User:Tokyloop|Tokyloop]] ([[User talk:Tokyloop|talk]]) 07:45, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

== Invitation to join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Indian military history task force]] ==

Hi, I invite you to join the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Indian military history task force|Indian military history task force]], an initiative of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|Military history WikiProject]]. This task force is created to deal exclusively with the topics related to Indian military. If you are interested, please add you name in alphabetical order to the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Indian_military_history_task_force#Participants|participants list]]. In addition, you can also indicate areas of special interest across your name. Please free to ping me if you have further questions. Thanks. [[User:Adamgerber80|Adamgerber80]] ([[User talk:Adamgerber80|talk]]) 03:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

== Edit to Shivaji article ==

Please explain your reversion in detail and what is exactly needed so this back and forth reversion is arrested. Cryptic messages do not help. 

My previous question has gone unanswered and I made a note of that in my edit notes too.

If you interested in helping improve the article as a reviewer - do so with a sense of hand-holding not with that of sitting on a high-chair.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mkarja|Mkarja]] ([[User talk:Mkarja#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mkarja|contribs]]) 19:47, 4 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:This seems resolved. Thanks for acknowledging [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&oldid=867513372#Edit_to_Shivaji_article here], about your content removal. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 07:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2018 election voter message ==

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Capitals00. Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2018|2018 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2018/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/710|voting page]]'''. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=866997930 -->

== ???? ==

not sure what this is.. never made any wiki contributions.  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/172.254.82.67|172.254.82.67]] ([[User talk:172.254.82.67#top|talk]]) 01:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== ANI notice ==

[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice-->

== ITN recognition for [[Maidan Shar attack]] ==

{{ivmbox
  |1=On 22 January 2019, '''''[[:Template:In the news|In the news]]''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''[[Maidan Shar attack]]''''', which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the [[Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates|candidates page]]. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 21:15, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  |2=Ambox current red.svg
  |imagesize=50px
 }}

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=926750390 -->

== You were indirectly mentioned ==

You were apparently the person who who redirected [[Delta Meghwal]] to [[Crime in India]]. You were mentioned by a concerned party in an article in the press. You might want to [https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/columnists/151219/how-wikipedia-cancels-dalit-icons.html read the article]. The author seems somewhat justifiably upset. - [[User:Chris.sherlock|Chris.sherlock]] ([[User talk:Chris.sherlock|talk]]) 06:22, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

== !vote at AfD Religious violence in Orissa ==

Hi - I may be wrong, hence this note, but as far as I can see you are still subject to a topic ban on India-Pakistan conflict, broadly construed.  If that is correct, you will need to strike your !vote in the [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Religious_violence_in_Odisha|AfD on Religious violence in Orissa]].  The 1964 Rourkala riots in Orissa had their origins in the  treatment of Hindus during the East Pakistan riots at that time.  I assume in good faith you were not aware of this event, it's not discussed in the article at present and and I have only raised this in the AfD discussion subsequent to your !vote. If the topic ban no longer applies, my apologies and please ignore my comment. Regards,--[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]] ([[User talk:Goldsztajn|talk]]) 16:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
:Hi - I see you have continued editing after I left this message without responding here.  Please reply. Thanks, --[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]] ([[User talk:Goldsztajn|talk]]) 18:14, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
::Why do you expect a response when you have already said that "{{tq|If the topic ban no longer applies, my apologies and please ignore my comment}}"? [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 09:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
:::I expect a response because as far as I can see you still have a topic ban in place.  I am assuming good faith and giving you the benefit of the doubt that you made a mistake with your !vote. You can also assume good faith on my part and answer the question; do you still have a topic ban in place? If you don't have a topic ban in place, please just show me where it was removed.  If you do have a topic ban in place, the demonstration of me giving you the benefit of the doubt was not bringing this up elsewhere. Regards, --[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]] ([[User talk:Goldsztajn|talk]]) 14:43, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
::::I was only showing that nowhere your message said that it is necessary to reply you. The topic ban was removed [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive307&diff=893291373 more than a year ago]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 07:51, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
:::::I did not say "do not reply"; by writing "ignore my comment" I was indicating that I did not expect you to strike your !vote. Thanks for providing the link to the topic ban removal.  Regards, --[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]] ([[User talk:Goldsztajn|talk]]) 08:45, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

== Notice ==

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text  = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in [[complementary and alternative medicine]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Acupuncture|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->
[[User:Alexbrn|Alexbrn]] ([[User talk:Alexbrn|talk]]) 17:25, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/05&oldid=990308339 -->

== RfC:Mentioning of Narendra Modi's marriage ==

Greetings,

For your information, a RfC discussion has been initiated (One point in discussion is in relation to discussion topic [[Child marriage in India]] which you were previously involved in editing.) 

'''Request for Comment''' has been started  @ [[Talk:Narendra Modi#RfC:Mentioning of Narendra Modi's marriage]]



Thanks for inputs

[[User:Bookku|&#32;Bookku, &#39;Encyclopedias are for expanding information and knowledge&#39;]] ([[User talk:Bookku|talk]]) 15:38, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

==Notice==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> [[User:Bringtar|Bringtar]] ([[User talk:Bringtar|talk]]) 09:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

== List of conversions ==

I am sending this to everyone involved in the dispute.  Can we please ''all'' stop adding or removing entries from these lists, ''unless'' there is an obvius BLP issue (which for most of them, there isn't).  Please let editors who are neutral on the subjects look at them instead.  I have made a start on [[List of converts to Christianity from Hinduism]] and have re-added some entries with sources, and ''not'' re-added them where sources are flimsy. Thank you. [[User_talk:Black Kite|Black Kite (talk)]] 16:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/05&oldid=1056563328 -->

==[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Nadia riots (2nd nomination)]]==
FYI.  You had voted before.  Happy editing.  <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&amp;6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 14:37, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1124425184 -->

== Merry Christmas! ==

<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">[[File:Christmas_tree_sxc_hu.jpg|70px|left]]
[[User:MBlaze Lightning|MBlaze Lightning]] ([[User talk:MBlaze Lightning|talk]]) is wishing you a [[Mary Poppins (character)|Merry]] [[Christmas]]! This greeting (and season) promotes [[Wikipedia:WikiLove|WikiLove]] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a [[Christmas|Merry Christmas]], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 

''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''
</div> [[User:MBlaze Lightning|MBlaze Lightning]] ([[User talk:MBlaze Lightning|talk]]) 09:21, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

== Source seems reliable ==

[[Dilli Raman Regmi]] is the author of one of their books, publisher [https://www.firmaklm.net/about-us/<nowiki>] JSTOR[</nowiki>https://www.jstor.org/stable/1177635<nowiki>]</nowiki> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 11:19, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

== Dashavatar  ==

there is a depiction in the title which says interpretation of evolution.Tge claim that dashavatar is Darwin theory of evolution is deemed as pseudoscience is it necessary to remove it [[User:Ppppphgtygd|Ppppphgtygd]] ([[User talk:Ppppphgtygd|talk]]) 21:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

== Edit to Hinduism and Sikhism ==

Could you please explain you recent edit to [[Hinduism and Sikhism]]? You removed two section which appear to have been well sourced without any explanation. The sections in question were "Sutak and Patak" and "Demonic possession". 
You also removed the section title for "Guru Tegh Bahadur", as well a paragraph on Sikh's defending persecuted Hindus during the Mughal era. 
All the above content appears to have been well sourced, and was removed with explanation or discussion. 
[[User:Boardwalk.Koi|Boardwalk.Koi]] ([[User talk:Boardwalk.Koi|talk]]) 23:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Boardwalk.Koi}} "Sutak and Patak" lacks proper sourcing. Unistar Books is a pro-Sikh source and another source by UNC press only made a passing mention but no mention of Sikhism.
:Demonic possession too involved only passing mention about Sikhism with the words that it "do not allow for the possibility of spirit possession".
:The sub-heading about Guru Tegh Bahadur was limiting the scope of the section, that's why removed. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 03:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

== Sock ==

Hey, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/182.163.96.93&target=182.163.96.93&offset=&limit=500 this IP] appears to be a sock of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions/Solomon_The_Magnifico&target=Solomon+The+Magnifico&limit=500 this user]. Since I don’t have much of experience dealing with socks, could you take a look at this? [[User:UnpetitproleX|UnpetitproleX]] ([[User talk:UnpetitproleX|talk]]) 09:35, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

== May 2023 ==

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#In talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[WP:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[WP:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[WP:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to [[WP:Requests for page protection|request temporary page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.''' ''Read [[WP:STONEWALLING]].''<!-- Template:uw-ew -->  [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 23:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
:Copy pasted retaliation that even my signature was not ommitted from the copy paste. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 03:53, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
::Yup, sorry about that! [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 14:31, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

== Jawaharlal Nehru == 
Hi, please see [[Talk:Jawaharlal_Nehru]] for a discussion on editing and reverts. I have made changes to what the other user was finding objectionable and hope there will be no more difficulties. [[User:Exdg77|Exdg77]] ([[User talk:Exdg77|talk]]) 06:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

==  Edit warring & Removal of content ==

Removing content without providing sources [[User:Aryan330|Aryan330]] ([[User talk:Aryan330|talk]]) 13:18, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

== Mughal - Maratha Wars ==

As i observed that you removed content and also removed sources which referes to page of Mughal - Maratha Wars but you didn't provided any single source.This edit can be of personal hate or agenda.so stop this. [[User:Aryan330|Aryan330]] ([[User talk:Aryan330|talk]]) 13:21, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

== https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Uw-delete1 ==

As you are not answering about your removal of content,you are continuosly blanking the pages by knowing that that discussion is going on talk page as you done on the page of "Mughal-Maratha wars". [[User:Aryan330|Aryan330]] ([[User talk:Aryan330|talk]]) 03:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

== Introduction to contentious topics ==
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text  = You have recently edited a page related to '''articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles''', a topic designated as '''[[WP:AC/CT|contentious]]'''. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully</strong> and <strong>constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
*adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
*comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
*follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
*comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
*refrain from gaming the system.

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'' you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks' noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.  </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> — [[User:DaxServer|DaxServer]] ([[User talk:DaxServer|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/DaxServerOnMobile|m]] · [[Special:Contributions/DaxServerEverywhere|e]] · [[Special:Contributions/DaxServer|c]]) 06:43, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

== ANI notice on behalf of someone who didn't do it ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> '''''[[User:LilianaUwU|<span style="font-family:default;color:#246BCE;">Liliana</span><span style="font-family:Comic Sans MS;color:#FF1493;">UwU</span>]]''''' <sup>([[User talk:LilianaUwU|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/LilianaUwU|contributions]])</sup> 12:04, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

== Dani Alves ==

I presented [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 132|the consensus]]. The problem is that someone like [[User: CharlesWain|CharlesWain]] doesn't know how to count. Lionel Messi and Dani Alves have the same amount of senior trophies (including from youth national teams): 43. [[User:NextEditor123|NextEditor123]] ([[User talk:NextEditor123|talk]]) 16:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

:{{u|NextEditor123}}, The phrase "senio titles" was contentious, and I have modified it as per discussion on talk page and reliable sources.[[User:CharlesWain|CharlesWain]] ([[User talk:CharlesWain|talk]]) 05:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

==ANI Notice==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Father of the Nation article]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> '''[[User:Shaan Sengupta|<span style="color: #FF7518;">Shaan Sengupta</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Shaan Sengupta|<i style="color:#FF7518;">Talk</i>]]</sup> 02:38, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

:Hello @[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]]. I am writing to you so that we can avoid another dispute regarding content on [[Father of the Nation]]. Don't revert me before discussing as that was added by a third user not a party in dispute. You removed Unofficial from Gandhi saying that was agreed on talk page which never was. Rather Toddy added unofficial and then the discussion ended without a proper close. Although I have closed it now since last was was 3 days ago that too by me. I have mentioned in the result to remove Lukashenko as you did. Since you said that the title is an honorific one but at the same time it has been conferred upon some individuals officially by countries like Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and some are called by people like M.K. Gandhi. So my suggestion is that people should know the difference between two. I would request you to put official and unofficial against every name. This will make the list more authentic and would avoid any future disputes. Hope you take this in good faith. '''[[User:Shaan Sengupta|<span style="color: #FF7518;">Shaan Sengupta</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Shaan Sengupta|<i style="color:#FF7518;">Talk</i>]]</sup> 04:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
::{{ping|Shaan Sengupta}} The problem now is that your summary when closing the discussion ("Remove Lukashenko and try to add official and unofficial against every name mentioned in the list to avoid the feeling of someone being singled out. That will make list more authentic and would end future problems.") in no way reflects the consensus at that discussion. It's simply you repeating your own view. As such a further dispute is almost inevitable I'd have thought. [[User:Nigej|Nigej]] ([[User talk:Nigej|talk]]) 05:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Nigej|Nigej]] No consensus had been reached there. @[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] told to remove Lukashenko and no one objected. So that is justified. As for Gandhi I gave the best solution I could give. ''You said that Rehman was given the title offically didn't mean that it is not Honarary.'' It means that Honarary doesn't differentiate in official and unofficial. It can be both at the same time. So what is better way to differentiate between the two. If you have some other idea please give. If it is better then we can surely implement. '''[[User:Shaan Sengupta|<span style="color: #FF7518;">Shaan Sengupta</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Shaan Sengupta|<i style="color:#FF7518;">Talk</i>]]</sup> 06:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Shaan Sengupta}} The reality is that you want something but no one else agreed with you. To me there's consensus for exactly the opposite of what you said in your closure. I'd recommend undoing your close, as a first stage, if you really want to avoid further dispute. [[User:Nigej|Nigej]] ([[User talk:Nigej|talk]]) 06:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
:::::Toddy somewhat aggreed to what I said. That's why he did that. I will remove the result at the top. I am out of this. You guys can do what you want. Its been so long now. I don't want to be stuck here any longer. I thought this might end today. Because I give a total neutral suggestion but it simply won't. If you want to reopen that discussion please go ahead. I won't interfere and have no problem. '''[[User:Shaan Sengupta|<span style="color: #FF7518;">Shaan Sengupta</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Shaan Sengupta|<i style="color:#FF7518;">Talk</i>]]</sup> 06:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
::::::Wait I shall just undo the close. So that noone drags me again. I am also withdrawing my concern. Consider this so. '''[[User:Shaan Sengupta|<span style="color: #FF7518;">Shaan Sengupta</span>]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Shaan Sengupta|<i style="color:#FF7518;">Talk</i>]]</sup> 06:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
:::::::I already pointed out there are many names there who are not "official father of the nation" so it is useless to add "unofficial" for anyone on that article.  [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 13:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1187132222 -->

== Administrator's Noticeboard ==
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.<!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> 
[[User:MrGreen1163|MrGreen1163]] ([[User talk:MrGreen1163|talk]]) 13:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC) MrGreen1163

== CT alert for the topic area covering India, Pakistan and Afghanistan ==
[[File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] You have recently made edits related to [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. This is a standard message to inform you that [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]] is a designated contentious topic. This message <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see [[Wikipedia:Contentious topics]]. <!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert --> [[User:Doug Weller|<span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span>]] [[User talk:Doug Weller|talk]] 19:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

== February 2024 ==
Hi, I have seen your edits on the page [[Bharat Ratna]]. You being an experienced editor, let us discuss and come to a conclusion on what needs to be kept rathern than going back and forth. I was making intermediate changes and for now, have published the section as is. I believe that the award to Nehru and Gandhi might need a mention as it has been raked up in the past by others as well. Though the recent happening was due to the issue raised by a party and the sources (Wire, Quint) are also not so impartial, we can skip this with a single line of mention rather than detail. Let me know your comments and let us make the changes accordingly. Thanks! [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 05:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Magentic Manifestations}} Your edit is still not providing accurate information. It is trying to show as if there was any criticism at the time when they got Bharat Ratna, but in actual, only Hindutva supporters are spreading misinformation in the 21st century as clearly noted by The Wire and Quint. There is no serious disagreement over it. Your Wikipedia edit looks nothing more than giving undue weight for Hindutva propaganda. You should remove it. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
::I have shortened it to a one-liner as a statement. Removed the criticism part and the excessive explanation and text, which is fine enough as a mention. [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 05:38, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Magentic Manifestations}} Your write up still seemed as if you are addressing Hindutva propaganda of 21st century. I would say let some serious source criticize the said decision then we will see how to cover it. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 17:30, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

== BAPS Hindu Mandir Abu Dhabi page ==

Hi @[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] I saw you re-added the content related to the land donation. I actually read the two sources before I removed and seems it doesn't sound correct. Not sure if you have read the two cited sources, but the two sources says:

# "It is not clear if Sunday's announcement referred to the same land" - which means this source is not sure about what they are saying?
# "businessman donated five acres of land adjoining a mosque" - seems this land is 27 acres and don't think there is adjoining mosque reference in any recent sources, so was wondering if this was indeed true, then probably was some other land they were going/planning to donate in 2013 and not this one?

And all other recent and past sources says that UAE govt. donated. So was wondering what you think about the only 2 sources cited there saying differently than all other sources could be considered reliable? [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 03:36, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
:Removed. I agree that the relevance is doubtful. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] 03:46, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
::@[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] thanks, yes definitely relevance is doubtful. Regarding the other change I had removed and you had added back - ".. the third Hindu temple in the UAE ...was created in 1958 ..second temple was created in 2022" - I had removed that because lead usually includes major things from the body of the page and didn't see such details on the page. I was wondering if we should add such detail on maybe the Hinduism in UAE or Hinduism in Middle East pages or other related page because this page is about this specific one. What do you think? [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 04:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
:::Addressed with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=BAPS_Hindu_Mandir_Abu_Dhabi&diff=prev&oldid=1207589489 this edit]. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:50, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
::::@[[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] Yes thanks, though I am not completely sure if it fits in the Construction section and also considered significant enough to include in lead. But do want to make sure that by saying "third Hindu temple" (which the source doesn't say), we are not doing something that is [[WP:OR]]. [[User:Asteramellus|Asteramellus]] ([[User talk:Asteramellus|talk]]) 12:09, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

== Revert on an article. ==

Hey [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]], you reverted an edit of mine on [[List of converts to Islam from Hinduism]] article saying that "Fails self admission" but I don't understand what does it mean. Was there a problem with the sourcing? Can you guide me? [[Special:Contributions/182.183.46.164|182.183.46.164]] ([[User talk:182.183.46.164|talk]]) 13:44, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
:See [[WP:BLPCAT]]. The living person is required to verify that they converted from one religion to another. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 14:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

== Invalid CTOP alert on [[User talk:An Asphalt]] ==

Hello. I saw you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:An_Asphalt&diff=prev&oldid=1212332846 gave CTOP alert] to {{noping|An Asphalt}}. But based on the log of CTOP alerts, since the user didn't receive the required first CTOP alert of any topic using {{tlsx|Contentious topics/alert/first}}, nor received previous DS alert, the alert is invalid. Thus the user is not considered aware of CTOP restrictions. Therefore, I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:An_Asphalt&diff=prev&oldid=1212335877 given] the user proper CTOP alert. [[User:Stylez995|Stylez995]] ([[User talk:Stylez995|talk]]) 09:38, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you for the fix. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 14:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

== Regarding [[2024 Indian general election]] ==
Hi, please stop reverting the edits without due reason. I have been working on the article with due comments and discussion on the talk page. If you have concerns on specific issues, will be happy to address and I request to engage in discussion rather than a blind roll back. [[User:Magentic Manifestations|Magentic Manifestations]] ([[User talk:Magentic Manifestations|talk]]) 05:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

== [[Mahatma Gandhi]] ==

I suggest that you not edit war.  I have added new sources, all published after 2022, including the comprehensive book of [[Joya Chatterji]], Yale, November 2023. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 02:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

:I have added the blurb from her book.  I recommend that you read it carefully before attempting to engage in hermeneutics of modern South Asian history. [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 03:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
::These sources don't discuss the credibility of this false claim. [[User:Capitals00|Capitals00]] ([[User talk:Capitals00#top|talk]]) 05:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
:::Later tonight, I will be adding a different, and more comprehensive, version of the disputed lead sentences on Gandhi's last fast in [[Mahatma Gandhi]], which will be supported by different sources, all published after 2022 by internationally recognized university presses.  I will put up an "inuse" sign before I make my edits, which will not take me more than half an hour.  I trust that you will not make any edits to he lead during  this time, let alone revert my edits, as you did [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mahatma_Gandhi&diff=prev&oldid=1239871005 here].  Best regards, [[User:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#B8860B">Fowler&amp;fowler</span>]][[User talk:Fowler&amp;fowler|<span style="color:#708090">«Talk»</span>]] 00:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

== RFC formatting ==

Hello, Capitals, 

Just so you know, the actual [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mahatma_Gandhi&diff=prev&oldid=1241829792 "standard RfC format"] is to have no subsections at all.  Four out of five RfCs don't use separate sections for survey and discussion.  

If you're interested in RFCs, you might look over [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example formatting]].  This is not a big deal, but I thought you might be interested in knowing more about what's actually standard.  [[User:WhatamIdoing|WhatamIdoing]] ([[User talk:WhatamIdoing|talk]]) 22:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

== Cradles of civilization  ==

The word India didn't exist back then and even after it did it only applied to lower Indus (Sindh), the true English name of Indus IS indus which has nothing to do with modern "Republic of India" [[User:Qaiser-i-Mashriq|Qaiser-i-Mashriq]] ([[User talk:Qaiser-i-Mashriq|talk]]) 02:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

== Vandalism  ==

sindhi in Pakistan is written in nastaliq and devanagari script is NEVER used, please refrain from reverting or you will be reported [[User:Qaiser-i-Mashriq|Qaiser-i-Mashriq]] ([[User talk:Qaiser-i-Mashriq|talk]]) 02:32, 25 October 2024 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''.  If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 -->
Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):
Template:* (view source) (protected)
Template:Arbitration Committee candidate/data (view source) (protected)
Template:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Collapse bottom (view source) (protected)
Template:Collapse top (view source) (protected)
Template:Collapse top/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Doi (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Edit (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Encodefirst (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ifsubst (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ivm (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ivm/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ivmbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ivory messagebox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ivory messagebox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Mbox (view source) (protected)
Template:Message (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Mono (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Mono/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:No ping (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Noping (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Nowrap (view source) (protected)
Template:Od (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Outdent (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:PMID (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Pagelinks (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ping (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Re (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Reply to (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Resize (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talk page stalker (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talk quote block (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talk quote block/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talk quote inline (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talk quote inline/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Talkquote (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template link (view source) (protected)
Template:Template link expanded (view source) (protected)
Template:Template link expanded with subst (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template link with subst (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Tl (view source) (protected)
Template:Tls (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Tlsx (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Tlx (view source) (protected)
Template:Tps (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Tq (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Trim (view source) (protected)
Template:U (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ul (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:User (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:User link (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Template:Yesno-no (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:• (view source) (protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Catalog lookup link (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:GetParameters (view source) (protected)
Module:InfoboxImage (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/tmbox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:MultiReplace (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:No ping (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Outdent (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:PageLinks (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Reply to (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:String2 (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:TableTools (view source) (protected)
Module:Template link general (view source) (protected)
Module:Toolbar (view source) (protected)
Module:User (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:UserLinks (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:UserLinks/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:UserLinks/shared (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)
Return to User talk:Capitals00.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Capitals00"
Category:
Open proxies blocked on Wikipedia