User talk:Mountmiey

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article WIRQ, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:WIRQ. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - TexMurphy 14:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Jarrett fox, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 02:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:7517.jpg, by Enviroboy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:7517.jpg is pure vandalism; this includes redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:7517.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:56, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself, as you did with Jarrett fox. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ~Enviroboy^Talk_Contribs - 03:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:H000747.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:27, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Maggie-Brooks.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2009 Rochester mayoral election has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uncontested election; fails WP:NEVENT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 19:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]