Callanecc

:::It was not just Battle of Chawinda, but many other articles. On [[Operation Dwarka]] he continued to edit war over results and never discussed them. On [[Inter-Services Intelligence activities in India]] he edit warred over making a conspiracy theory look clean. On [[Operation Chengiz Khan]] he restored the statements that were removed a year ago because they were unsourced since 2012, and his edit summary reads "Restored consensus version.. no intermediate useful edits"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Operation_Chengiz_Khan&diff=631345245&oldid=628608798], misleading indeed because he had never discussed them. And a few others. Even if the topic ban is limited to Battle of Chawinda, I am certain that we will still have a number of unnecessary edit conflicts. Since the topic ban, TopGun has not made even 75 edits to main article space, I doubt that how he proved that he can edit without conflicting. [[User:OccultZone|'''<span style="color:DarkBlue;">Occult</span><span style="color:blue;">Zone</span>''']] <small>([[User talk:OccultZone#Top|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/OccultZone|Contributions]] • [[Special:Log/OccultZone|Log]])</small> 06:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

::::[[WP:VOLUNTEER]] is all I have to say to you, I don't have the time to edit that much neither should I be expected to have to satisfy your arbitrary criteria of edit count. About the sanction, I'm not going to debate my reverts to proven socks and other disruptive editors with you. I've said all I had to.. it's for Callanecc to decide. --<span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:TopGun|<b style="color:#060">lTopGunl</b>]] ([[User talk:TopGun|<b style="color:#000">talk</b>]])</span> 07:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)