Talk:Amy Shira Teitel

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 73.170.88.70 (talk) at 05:26, 15 May 2017 (Article proposed for deletion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 7 years ago by Bt10ant in topic Article proposed for deletion
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconWomen writers Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article proposed for deletion

Appears to be a self-promoted page without requisite notability. Without noteworthy accomplishments or coverage, I nominate this page for deletion.

Horsewhipser (talk) 17:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree with Horsewhipper. When are these You Tube hacks going to stop making pages promoting themselves and their channels using Wikipedia as an advertising hoarding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.31.98.75 (talk) 01:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I agree...should a section also be added regarding her plagiarism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bt10ant (talkcontribs) 16:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

I would leave the page, and then a description of the documented plaigarism from The Space Review.