Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vyborg June2012 View from Olaf Tower 06.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2012 at 20:14:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Vyborg June2012 View from Olaf Tower 06.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vyborg June2012 View from Olaf Tower 06.jpg

•  Info No panorama, all by A.Savin 20:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- JDP90 (talk) 16:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose -- A very nice composition and an almost certain winner if it weren't for the hypersaturation. Maybe it can be solved. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose -- Per Alvesgaspar. Kleuske (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info Author reduced saturation. - Benh (talk) 18:54, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Better, but not quite there, yet. The fact that it's a Danish town doesn't mean it's gotta look like Lego. Kleuske (talk) 09:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Please be more careful in comments, and read the file description page before assessing: it is not Viborg in Denmark, but Vyborg in Russia...--Jebulon (talk) 11:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support very nice, the colours look for me natural. I know such colours from Lunenburg, Canada --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support very nice, and wow. --Gzzz (talk) 21:28, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 22:03, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support now. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 06:57, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Could author let know which lens exactly was used? I'm surprised by the lack of distorsion for 8mm (but of course it could have been straightened afterwards). - Benh (talk) 15:37, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is Sigma 8-16mm F4.5-5.6, the file is included in this category. With some effort, you can get the distortion weaker than usual, but I've also corrected afterwards a little bit. - A.Savin 16:45, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And sorry for not having looked carefully before asking. - Benh (talk) 20:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And I didn't know a rectilinear 8mm lens exists... hence my question. - Benh (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Per Alvesgaspar... and also, the building in the foreground occupies too much space and does not contribute to the overall image, it alters the scale relationship of the elements. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 21:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Alves for me too. Sorry. Can you fix the problem without extra saturation? And please eliminate the CA (red/green). --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:08, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --JT Curses (talk) 00:57, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support, definitely. Very good composition; colour balance and saturation are normal. --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:56, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]