Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metro MSK Line2 Novokuznetskaya.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Feb 2016 at 13:23:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Metro MSK Line2 Novokuznetskaya.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Metro MSK Line2 Novokuznetskaya.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
•  Info created + uploaded by Florstein - nominated by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info {{FoP-Russia}} for the design, {{PD-old}} for the ceiling mosaique (by Frolov †1942), COM:DM for the reliefs. --A.Savin 13:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --A.Savin 13:23, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose sorry, in full resulution you can see the severe lack of quality. --Hubertl 13:40, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Despite all possible disadvantages, I like this photo anyway. Bravo, maestro! --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The lack of details (noise, processing, DoF) mean one can't really see the mosaic or the relief along the edges. It looks like there's been a struggle to manage the dynamic range of the scene, particularly around the the wall lights. Perhaps, rather than go for a symmetrical arrangement, an off-centre view (like File:Novokuz-mm.jpg) would allow the central lamps to feature and lead the eye. -- Colin (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment - I see the problems the others are seeing, but I am not feeling inclined to oppose this photo because it's an excellent motif and well composed. However, it is a problem that whereas the photo looks good at full-page size, it suddenly is greatly damaged by toggling it to full size. As Colin addresses above, I think it must be technically quite challenging to deal with the bright lamps in the center of the floor and get good resolution on all the decorative elements simultaneously. I hope there's a good way to do it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Nice try, however, IMHO we need more DoF and less ISO, maybe using tripod. I am sorry --The Photographer (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose per Hubertl. Daniel Case (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Quality... -- Pofka (talk) 11:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]