Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Meistersaal KoethenerStr asv2018-06 img1.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2019 at 16:12:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Meistersaal KoethenerStr asv2018-06 img1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Meistersaal KoethenerStr asv2018-06 img1.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
•  Info Interior of former Hansa Studio a.k.a. Meistersaal in Berlin-Kreuzberg ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 16:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --A.Savin 16:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --XRay ^talk 09:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Ordinary room, nothing special -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Thought-terminating cliché? --A.Savin 10:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose I agree with Basile, the scene isn't very impressive to me. I also find it a bit noisy.--Peulle (talk) 10:59, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Noise, per Peulle; also it gets distorted near the corners, and frankly it seems like this image is another that saw a lot of potential and tried to capture it in one image where two or three smaller ones might have done. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose In the left part the room looks higher than in the right part, the floor is leaning upwards and the ceiling is leaning down. --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:50, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose With that ceiling, I could not call the room ordinary, but the photo is taking in too much. Another angle (perhaps along the chair lines with the windows in the back and the lamps hanging in front of them, excluding the tech equipment at the sides) might have been better. Please try again if you have the opportunity. It's a good documentation though. --Cart (talk) 10:06, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
•  Neutral The image quality is very good except for slight distortions in the corners, but I'm not convinced the room is interesting enough to merit an FP. Some subjects probably aren't FP material, however well-captured. Cmao20 (talk) 20:47, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]