Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bonduelle.tin.cans.JPG

marked as speedy by user:Jodo, reason: "Derivative" --Julo (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

•  Keep fifteen hundred pictures from Category:With trademark (also many other categories, for instance Category:Carrefour, Category:E.Leclerc) are "derivative" in Jodo's meaning.
  It is special notice for "with trademark" pictures:
  This work contains material which may be subject to trademark laws in one or more jurisdictions. Before using this content, please ensure that you have the right to use it under the laws which apply in the circumstances of your intended use. You are solely responsible for ensuring that you do not infringe someone else's trademark. See our general disclaimer.
  Wikimedia Commons accept this kind of pictures, with ® mark. Julo (talk) 21:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
•  Delete I did not mark the pictures as Derivative because of the trademarked logo. There is a picture made by product photographer on the tin. This is a obvious copyright violation --Jodo (talk) 22:04, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

   Comment photographs on the cans are not main object of this picture and is less than few percent of whole surface of picture. And what about photographs on packets in: Category:Instant soups, Category:Instant noodles (and many other "derivatives")? Julo (talk) 22:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

•  Delete Label design is complex enough to be copyrighted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
•  Keep I don't see nothing wrong --Adamt 20:27, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
•  Keep - an image of a product not focused on a logo or any specific part of its design that could be copyrighted. Sth like "freedom of panorama". If we start to screen images looking for derivative works included in those, probably we'll need to delete all city panoramas (logos, commercial banners), or street views (as above) and many other. Of course I'd suggest to delete those picture if they were clearly focused on possible non-free parts of them Masur (talk) 20:45, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per Jodo. Copyvio of the printed design on the cans. This is nothing to do with trademarks: there is copyright in the printed pictures. MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per Masur and per arguments in " Comment" above. This is not a copy of printed pictures, but just partly view at them (you can not make an usual copy), like here, here, or here Julo (talk) 15:38, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by User:Martin H.. Please do not restore images without discussion, list them on COM:UNDEL instead and don't override the closing admin's decision. Regards, -- ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 18:37, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]