User talk:Ptyx

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−

Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. abf /talk to me/ 20:54, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

S'il te plait, upload la refaite photo de nouveau sous un autre nom. Ne change pas de maniere si drastique la photo, car elle me plait comme ca. Setreset (talk) 06:51, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieux tours, escalier-galeries, 60 rue Colbert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Desprez37 (talk) 09:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieux tours, 23 rue Albert Thomas, maison XIIIe siècle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Desprez37 (talk) 09:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieux Tours, Quartier Saint-Gatien, 124,126 rue Colbert XVe,XVIe et XVIIIe siècle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Desprez37 (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vieux tours, n° 49 rue Georges Courteline.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Desprez37 (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Yufka yapımı.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Yufka yapımı.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Yufka yapımı.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found you claim ".... soit des rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage d'images d'autres contributeurs." I just wanted to edit pictures about Bosra and found you had decided to change my pictures. I want you to stop that, I do not think you are "rectifying" them, but just ruining my originals. I am good with Photoshop and do my own correcting if I find it necessary. I confess I sometimes rectify pictures by others, but only if they are, for instance, deeply underexposed, have the wrong colour, or are obviously lopsided. By the way: I will overwrite your edits, as I will put in their stead full size pictures. Don't touch them.

- After writing till here I checked some other edits that you made. I find you too brighten pictures that seem underexposed. I find that rather acceptable, but .... The point is: I visited Bosra on an overcast day and wanted to preserve the atmosphere, both inside buildings (such as in Al-Omari Mosque (Bosra)) and outside. Your edits bring out some more detail, but ruin that atmosphere. And on one of the pictures where you straightened the Bâb al-Quandil there is, in the right bottom corner, the kind of white space that appears if you use the straighten option and forget to check if you stayed within the cadre. I always fill such a white space somehow, and do think you added an error to my picture. Also: when editing the pictures I sometimes have to choose between tilting the picture and get more details of the sides in the frame, or correct that tilt. Doing so, I lose details at the edge, which is what you did. I had made my choice, and don't like you correcting. A last reason: my pictures are often used in publications (120 and counting). I get requests for them, and usually send the originals and edits through the web. But as I am now putting edits on Commons as full sized originals, I may invite such authors and photo-editors to just download them from the Commons. This may be more important once I’m dead. And I do not like the thought they might be downloading your “rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage” instead. There are plenty of pictures that need improving in Commons, but please leave mine alone. Dosseman (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Ptyx,

Je découvre la nouvelle version de ce fichier que j'ai importé et que tu as modifié. Pour ce qui concerne le cadrage, j'avais volontairement importé une image de la maison dans son environnement (j'en ai d'ailleurs importé d'autres où la maison est mieux cadrée, voir la catégorie). Donc je préférerais que la nouvelle version soit importée sous un autre nom, d'ici là je me permets de remettre la version originale. Cordialement, Floflo (talk) 09:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de problème, fais comme tu l'entends... Pour rappel tout de même, nous sommes dans le domaine de la photographie documentaire, pas de la photo d'art. Les images dans Wikipedia étant destinées à montrer les choses tout d'abord sous forme de vignette, il y a tout intérêt à réduire les marges vides. D'autre part, il n'est guère conseillé de sous-exposer à ce point les photos, même si cela a été la mode à une certaine période. Ptyx (talk) 10:01, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Temple of Apollo Epikourios at Bassae (Greece), about 420-400 BC, British Museum (14237128366).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

C messier (talk) 10:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are persistent in editing works that I requested not to be touched (two today). In July I wrote, regarding other work by me:

I found you claim ".... soit des rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage d'images d'autres contributeurs." I just wanted to edit pictures about Bosra and found you had decided to change my pictures. I want you to stop that, I do not think you are "rectifying" them, but just ruining my originals. I am good with Photoshop and do my own correcting if I find it necessary. I confess I sometimes rectify pictures by others, but only if they are, for instance, deeply underexposed, have the wrong colour, or are obviously lopsided. By the way: I will overwrite your edits, as I will put in their stead full size pictures. Don't touch them. - After writing till here I checked some other edits that you made. I find you too brighten pictures that seem underexposed. I find that rather acceptable, but .... The point is: I visited Bosra on an overcast day and wanted to preserve the atmosphere, both inside buildings (such as in Al-Omari Mosque (Bosra)) and outside. Your edits bring out some more detail, but ruin that atmosphere. And on one of the pictures where you straightened the Bâb al-Quandil there is, in the right bottom corner, the kind of white space that appears if you use the straighten option and forget to check if you stayed within the cadre. I always fill such a white space somehow, and do think you added an error to my picture. Also: when editing the pictures I sometimes have to choose between tilting the picture and get more details of the sides in the frame, or correct that tilt. Doing so, I lose details at the edge, which is what you did. I had made my choice, and don't like you correcting. A last reason: my pictures are often used in publications (120 and counting). I get requests for them, and usually send the originals and edits through the web. But as I am now putting edits on Commons as full sized originals, I may invite such authors and photo-editors to just download them from the Commons. This may be more important once I’m dead. And I do not like the thought they might be downloading your “rectifications de niveaux ou de cadrage” instead. There are plenty of pictures that need improving in Commons, but please leave mine alone.

Yet you did it again, ruining the atmosphere of approaching rain on pictures that I found true to the situatioon as I found it, not as what you think it should have been. Other "improvers" used my pictures as a copy, that would be alright with me. But do not claim to "improve" my own. You seem to be a "levels" maniac, but I can decide levels myself.Also I read your statement in answer to someone else "Pour rappel tout de même, nous sommes dans le domaine de la photographie documentaire, pas de la photo d'art." I find that pretty arrogant. Dosseman (talk) 14:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, vous avez mille fois raison : les photos sous-exposées 4 fois font de bien meilleurs documents pour notre projet encyclopédique. Merci pour vos précieux téléversements et votre gentillesse infinie. Ptyx (talk) 13:09, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Je sens une certaine ironie, mais c'est un prix que je paierai volontiers pour être débarrassé de vos interventions. Comme j'utilise un équipement professionnel et me souviens très bien des conditions météorologiques lors de la prise de vue, je laisserai la "sous-exposition quatre fois" à votre perspicacité supérieure. Dosseman (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Acropolis Museum as seen from the top of the Acropolis hill.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ^{ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ} 17:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Object : Récupération iconographie de Façade ouest de l'église abbatiale de l'abbaye aux Hommes – Chantier visitable de la basilique de Saint-Denis (Ile de France)

Madame, Monsieur,

L’association Suivez La Flèche, maître d’ouvrage de la reconstruction de la flèche de la basilique de Saint-Denis (Seine-Saint-Denis), ouvre les portes de son chantier visitable au printemps 2025, dès la pose des premières pierres de la flèche.

Afin de valoriser le chantier visitable qui retrace l’histoire de la flèche de la Basilique de Saint-Denis, nous proposons un parcours didactique illustré par des documents iconographiques historiques. Nous désirons ainsi utiliser des documents iconographiques offrant la résolution la plus élevée possible afin d'offrir une documentation de qualité optimale à nos visiteurs. Les images serviront à illustrer le parcours permanent payant.

D’après nos recherches, vous disposez de Façade ouest de l'église abbatiale de l'abbaye aux Hommes, à Caen dans le format 2000x 3000 px en 300dpi (ou supérieur) en jpeg ou tiff. Pourriez-vous nous la fournir et sous quelles conditions ? Les fonds alloués par l'État et la région soutiennent les travaux de construction en cours. Toutefois, nous sommes à la recherche de mécènes pour contribuer à la conception d'un parcours didactique, notamment l’iconographie, visant à mettre en valeur le chantier et les divers métiers qui y sont associés, au sein d'une région en plein développement.

En vous remerciant pour l’attention que vous portez à notre requête, Bien cordialement, Mme Julie PETIT j.petit@suivezlafleche.com Julie Petit (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, vous pouvez utiliser les photographies et documents contenus dans Wikipédia Commons en vous conformant aux conditions de licence indiquées. Entre autres, vous devez mentionner l'origine Wikimedia Commons et le pseudo de l'auteur utilisateur. Cordialement, avec tous mes encouragements pour votre projet, Ptyx (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

• File:Glanum P1010112mod.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 19:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La maison des antes (Glanum à Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, 13) - 08.a.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:La maison des antes (Glanum à Saint-Rémy-de-Provence, 13) - 08.a.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 20:05, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]