User talk:Nagy

Could you please add links to the Esperanto translation to the page Template:Description missing/lang and all other used in the template Information? --PAD (talk) 20:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, also Template:Author missing/lang and Template:Source missing/lang. thanks for your work :) →Na·gy 20:52, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...for the RFB support. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#I got a picture deleted twice you said "not done, nothing further heard", but the image is still here? Lupo 16:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ough, I have to be blind. Thanks for the heads-up, I removed this file again :) →Na·gy 17:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, fernando decillis (decillisfernando.com) should have sent you an email giving the permission for anybody including commercial usage as you requested. Can you check if you receive it so that I can get the picture unlocked? Regards, Giovanni

Hello Giovanni, the only permission we received from this address (in December) allows us "to use the image on Wikipedia" which is not sufficient. The copyright holder needs to specify a free license (see COM:CT). I'd be glad to restore if you could arrange such an agreement. Regards, →Na·gy 16:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nagy, the photographer of this picture sent an email yesterday giving the required permission. What should I do now? Re-upload the picture or will you unlock the old one I did upload before?

Here is forwarded the photographer's email and Wikipedia's reply.

Thank you, Giovanni

Forwarded message ----------

From: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> To: fernando decillis <decillis@fernando.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:52:16 +0000 Subject: Re: [Ticket#2009031910058622] Photo Permission Dear fernando decillis,

Thank you for your email.

03/19/2009 16:43 - fernando decillis wrote:

> > > Hello, > I own the copyright to the images found attached in this email. I grant permission to copy, distribute and/or modify these documents under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. > > > thanks, > Fernando Decillis > 404-536-0420 > www.decillisphoto.com > >

The image has been restored. Thank you, →Na·gy 18:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nagy. I saw you're an active administrator in the Commons. The user Herbythime deleted the photos File:Chuky el muñeco.jpg, File:Chucky 1.jpg, File:Chucky 2.jpg, File:Chucky 3.jpg and File:Chucky 4.jpg, because they're ou of project scope. I understand his decission, but can you make me a favor? I need those pictures for personal use only. I won't upload these pictures every time. If you can see deleted pictures, you can send it to felipelombardo86@gmail.com. Thanks and cheers! Riuk (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2009 (UTC) P.D. If you can write your message to me in Spanish, as well.[reply]

Maybe I miss the point, but why do you request files of such a bad quality (& such a weird subject)? →Na·gy 18:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the user who uploaded the photos, but with a different nickname. It's for a personal use, only. :) Riuk (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The old user has been renamed, and the account is ready for your use. Haros (talk) 18:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hei, tusen takk for det :) →Na·gy 20:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you replaced {{Logo}} with {{PD-textlogo}} on this image. However, the way the text is stylized, I believe it is eligible for copyright. For example it seems that even the Google logo is eligible, because of the way the letters are stylized. --Tryphon (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so, but opinions differ on this question sometimes. So I created a regular deletion request. Regards, →Na·gy 20:51, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Please also have a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Google wordmark.png. →Na·gy 20:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, it's a fuzzy line. Thanks for creating the DR, and for the link about Google wordmark. --Tryphon (talk) 21:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see you deleted the file I uploaded - NSLogo.png for a lack of permissions. Can you expand on this please? I am authorized by the organization to add the logo to the commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, to keep a file on the Wikimedia Commons, it is necessary to release it under valid license on COM:CT and to confirm the authorship of a file. Please send such a confirmation to COM:OTRS to get your file restored. Thank you, →Na·gy 21:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sent an email a few weeks ago. As a representative of the Corp. Relations Dept at my company, I am authorized to grant that permission. There is no central creator of this image. It was commissioned by our company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk��• contribs) 23:25, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please check you inbox :) →Na·gy 16:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my jpeg-file on Commons as "Derivative work: screenshot of copyrighted material". I hereby assure that the screenshot was taken from my own video footage, and therefore I ask you to restore the file to Commons as well as to the related article on German Wikipedia. All the best. --SJuergen (talk) 22:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I answered you here. Regards, →Na·gy 09:22, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy, was soll denn in der Mail für OTRS drinnen stehen, damit die Bilder wieder online gehen? Habe leider kein Vorlage dazu gefunden. Würde bei der Gelegenheit auch gleich die anderen, noch nicht gelöschten, mit hinzufügen. (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#Please_undelete_following_Files) --Dirk8B (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Dirk, passende Textvorlagen findest du hier. Setze einfach die Links zu den betreffenden Bildern ein und sende den Text (in dem du versicherst, dass du befugt bist eine solche Freigabe zu erteilen) an permissions-de@wikimedia.org. Meine persönliche Empfehlung hierzu wäre, dass du die Mail von einer Adresse der Domain http://www.secumem.eu/ abschickst. Damit ist die Urheberschaft besser nachprüfbar und du kannst lästige Rückfragen vermeiden. Grüße, →Na·gy 16:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy, danke für die Infos. Mach ich gleich. Viele Grüße --Dirk8B (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Thanks for reverting me here. I think it happend on the moment I placed my PDA back in my pocket. I wasn't aware I did the action.

Best regards,

Abigor talk 17:17, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You got it, no worries :) →Na·gy 20:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nagy, please restore the original content of Category:Diederichstempel you deleted for some reason. It's still required for some images I'm going to upload. Thanks. -- Ies (talk) 09:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. →Na·gy 09:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! -- Ies (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand why you deleted my page because it was out project of scope. But can you please temporarily undelete it so I can retrieve the work I put into it? Or if not, can you please copy the edit page and send it to me as a textfile? I just need the information that was on that page. Thank you for understanding! Donabel SDSU (talk) 04:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 See User:Nagy/temp. Please let me know if you're done. Regards, →Na·gy 13:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Thank you! Donabel SDSU (talk) 14:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you be more specific about what was unlawfully "derivative" about this work (and hence of File:Skunk fursuiterscropped.jpg)? I know the guy who uploaded it, and he's not the kind to intentionally violate anyone else's copyright. Photographs of costumes per-se are not derivative works according to Wikimedia counsel. GreenReaper (talk) 17:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would never accuse anyone of uploading copyvios intentionally, except it's obvious... In this case we got a complaint by the costume's creator who doesn't wish to see these images on Commons. If Mike as a pro could confirm this particular request in the OTRS to be void I'd be glad to restore. Thanks, →Na·gy 19:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If that was the reason, then I personally have no problem with the deletion, as it is common practice within the furry community to take down such photographs on request. I just feel it was just incorrectly labeled. GreenReaper (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

All the message templates should be subst'ed because this forces a new section to be created on the user talk page where the template is added, making it easier for the user to reply on the right place. This also is intended to harmonize the usage of all the message templates :)

Best regards from France,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 08:40, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have allready send it an e-mail with the autorization, I don't understand why someone are always puting the nag advise of no authorization.

File:Iberia Lgo.jpg

Já tinha enviado a confirmação da autorização, como se pode verificar aqui

de: Zorglub <Zorglub.62@gmail.com> para: permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org data: 28 de Fevereiro de 2009 15:36 assunto-: Re: Iberia enviado por: gmail.com ocultar detalhes: 28 Fev; Responder

Envio o mail de resposta a confirmar que se pode usar a imagem "Iberia_Lgo.jpg". Podem confirmar que o mail è dos ibéria através do Site Oficial (http://iberiarocks.com/)

2009/2/28 Ibéria <iberiarocks@gmail.com>

Volto a enviar, espero que agora não aja problemas.

Forwarded message ----------

From: Ibéria <iberiarocks@gmail.com> Date: 2009/2/28 Subject: Iberia To: Zorglub.62@gmail.com

Caro Francis, em primeiro lugar quero agradecer-te pela disponibilidade de arranjares o texto correctamente (eu coloquei o texto um pouco á balda, sem respeitar as regras da wikipedia, ia tentar faze-lo, mas começei logo da pior maneira..as minhas desculpas pelo facto) e pelo facto de te disponibilizares para melhorar o artigo, fico muito contente.. Claro que podes utilizar o logo, aliás estamos a criar uma imagem mais moderna para o logo, que logo te mando! Também a questão das fotos está a ser tratada, temos uma sessão de fotos marcada para daqui a 15 dias, assim que as tiver, mando-tas logo sem falta! A banda está com enorme vontade de voltar e ha muita expectativas em torno disto, vamos fazer o concerto de estreia (com esta formação) em 6 de Junho deste ano, na Moita.

Mais uma vez as minhas desculpas por ser novato nesta situação (a de colocar o artigo naquelas condições) e agradecendo-te mais uma vez a disponibilidade e a ajuda!..

Grande abraço de todos os Iberia

João Sérgio (doctorskin) (baixista)

p.s: não sei se ha algum problema com o link, mas quando copio o link do artigo e vou usa-lo para entrar, não me direciona logo para o artigo, diz-me que n ha artigo e faz-me andar as voltas para la chegar..

Não vou estar aqui até domingo, não te admires de não responder logo ao teu mail..

16:38, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

I know our proceedings are sometimes pretty hard to understand, but our resources are strongly limited. Your email has been received by the COM:OTRS, no doubt, but obviously it takes some time until an OTRS volunteer is able to process it. I kindly ask you to simply ignore the "No permission"- warning as it's just a little aid to stay on top of things, it will be removed as soon as one of our Portuguese-speaking volunteers handles your message. Regards, →Na·gy 17:08, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nagy. In this edit you altered the policy to a guideline. I think we should keep it a policy, as this isn't really a guideline, but something that should be followed. Thoughts? Thanks. --Kanonkas_(talk) 15:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have no objection in being reverted here. As both templates currently link to the same page it is a little hard to see the difference and, of course, it is all a matter of interpretation. Maybe w:Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines#Policy and guideline pages (also w:Guideline) puts it slightly better. You're given free hand on how to proceed, albeit I am still confident of this change. All the best, →Na·gy 17:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. The revocation part is kind of why I think this is justified as a policy. As that part kind of tells you what to do, and all users should follow it. Exceptions can be given, but I doubt so in the case of it being abused in an edit dispute. The rollback page is a bit more explicit if it's being abused. However, as you say above - it's not a big deal, just a bit different. Best regards, --Kanonkas_(talk) 13:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The OTRS system is looking for trusted volunteers to help staff our German-language image submission queue. I would like to invite you to look over what OTRS involves and consider signing up at the volunteering page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You deleted File:Brad Sugars.jpg without giving me sufficient time to respond to the copyvio notice. The bot has erred in filing a copyvio, and the person who marked it as a copyvio did not follow up on elementary checks.

There are three elementary reasons why the image is not a copyvio:

1. The resolution and filesize of the image higher than all that the bot listed. At almost 8 Mb, it cannot be a copyvio to low resolution images available online.
2. The images that the bot chose, and this image are similar, but not the same.
3. Permission has been obtained from the copyright holders and filed under OTRS (https://ticket.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=3017395) You can verify this independently.

Please could you restore the image? Thanks! Zithan (talk) 14:04, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh well, please excuse any inconveniences. I didn't notice the OTRS template due to some error on the image description page.  Restored. →Nagy 20:07, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Nagy! Zithan (talk) 00:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jest meilowa zgoda na wykorzystanie grafiki od Barbary Hetmańskiej. Zwiadowca ²¹ 08:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I affiliate myself to this response. Regards, →Nagy 14:03, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You just delete my jpeg, could you help me to find it back ? What's wrong with my screenshot ? How can I fix the problem ? I'm sorry but I'm a noob - Using Wikipedia is realy dificults for peoples like me. Thank you for your help Nagy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raphaelbastide (talk • contribs) 14:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Raphael, I need some information on the file in order to restore it: Are you the creator of all included images or did you just make the screenshot? →Nagy 18:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I saw you deleted files of MCE-5 Engine. This two files File:MCE-5 coupe moteur fond blanc legende.jpg ; File:Visu CR min max.jpg are also without permission. Could you delete them ? Thanks. Ascaron (talk) 13:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, thanks for notifying me. If you're getting the permission by MCE-5 anyway, please let me know. Regards, →Nagy 13:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nagy! Thank you for your help! It is working fine now! --Brandizzi (talk) 14:16, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse-me if I haven't been clear when adding No permission. This is not own work (see "Graphe : réserve naturelle Baie de Saint-Brieuc" which means "work by the réserve naturelle Baie de Saint-Brieuc)

Cheers.--Bapti ✉ 02:39, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A'ight, thanks for letting me know. →Nagy 11:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Nagy!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 21:14, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:ASDR.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Howdy,

Thank you for reverting the vandalism from my userpage.

Best regards, Huib talk 16:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you deleted my page for Bay Ridge High School? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jansi (talk • contribs) 22:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at COM:PSP for a detailed explanation. Thanks, →Nagy 09:19, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nagy,

This file, [File:Wilkins Jr. -Image -1, no date -cropped- V2 -.jpg] was at risk of being deleted soon. A new, improved letter of permission has been submitted to the OTRS Permissions e-mail account providing the requisite permissions. Best: HarryZilber 04:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Your mail has been received and will be processed shortly. Thanks and a Happy New Year, →Nagy 10:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an Admin? I haven't been on since august 2009. Apperently every single Canada Post photo I scanned and uploaded is against some policy I didn't know about when I did my original collection and research and scanning. How or who can get the entire categories or photos speedy deleted for me. This is a strong request from Canada Post Police. I told them I would try WayneRay (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wayne, I think this request by Canada Post should go directly to COM:OTRS. I don't see why they should prosecute you, especially as most files in Category:Canada Post Miscellaneous Tags appear to fit under {{PD-ineligible}}. Thanks for the heads-up and please keep me up to date, →Nagy 16:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wayne, I did already manually delete about half of your Post images. --Túrelio (talk) 20:03, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I thought I ws dealing with garbage and leftovers at the plant but the property belongs in the long run to CP and even though I had permission to take photos as long as there were no faces I failed to get permission to upload on here. I will get the CPost security guy to contact but sadly he said he hadn't heard of Commons and thought the Tags was my own website LOL LOL I may delete that comment before he reads it!Thanks again and the galleries and categories only I created are the ones I want deleted. WayneRay (talk) 21:09, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Are you still around? I haven't heard anything since 2010 when I was talking to the Canada Post Security. He was let go and Ms. Moore is now in charge of SW Ontario. I talked to her recently and this was not brought up by her. I suggest we just leave it unless Commons has an objection as you mentioned the ineligible tag. I can delete all of them singly now that I am back online WayneRay (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you deleted plantearaignée.jpg please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Empereur Day (talk • contribs) 13:17, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned on your talk page essential information such as author, source, and license of the image was missing. I'd suggest to read through COM:FS and to re-upload the file afterwards featuring all necessary information. Regards, →Nagy 18:00, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what I'm supposed to do? [1]

I sent this email weeks ago

Original Message ----- 
From: Tom Ruen 
To: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org 
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 8:14 PM
Subject: Eclipse photo


Hi,

I uploaded two pictures of the recent lunar eclipse, taken by another photographer.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_Eclipse_June2010-Clair1.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lunar_Eclipse_June2010-Clair2.jpg

He emailed me the two pictures, gave me permission to upload under the CC Attr 3.0 license.

Sincerely,
Tom Ruen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bender Rodriguez 
To: Tom Ruen 
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 4:11 PM
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse


I, Jason Clair, release these two photos to Wikipedia under the CC Attribution 3.0 license

Jason Clair

--- On Sun, 6/27/10, Tom Ruen <xxxx> wrote:

From: Tom Ruen <xxxx>
Subject: Re: Lunar Eclipse
To: "Bender Rodriguez" <xxxx>
Date: Sunday, June 27, 2010, 8:36 PM

Hi Jason,

Thank you! I uploaded both to wikipedia, shown at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_2010_lunar_eclipse#Photo_gallery

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomruen (talk • contribs) 01:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you should be receiving a confirmation from the OTRS team soon; if there are no more queries all deletion tags will be removed. Regards, →Nagy 10:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm partly concerned since I'll be going on vacation for a week! Tomruen (talk) 17:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just discovered that my own user page, atlhough empty (User:Félix Potuit), has been deleted without any special reason, although I have put dozens of pictures under that name on Commons.

So that I can't even list my own pictures any more...

Any possibility of recovering ? I'm still alive, although somehow tired... Félix Potuit (talk) 12:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Félix Potuit[reply]

Hi there, your user page has been deleted as it has been created anonymously by an IP address. Based on what you write above, I can now conclude that this edit has been made by you while not being logged into your account. A list of your uploads can still be found on Wikisense. Regards, →Nagy 19:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user talk page. I kindly appreciate it. Katarighe (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's so nice, you're very welcome! →Nagy 17:36, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the permission that I sent about many images was accepted, but it also said that I have to get a permission form the publisher or the photos will be deleted again.

The book from which I took the images is self-published. The author is also the publisher.

I got permission from the author, so shouldn't that be enough ? Shouldn't the images be safe from any deletion and shouldn't the warning message on the images information be cleared?

Please reply. Thanks. J10452M (talk) 14:54, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First I have to say that there is no need to remove your question from COM:ON, it will be archived automatically in order to keep the discussion available in the future (just in case there are any queries). Regarding your question, if the publisher is willing to give permission to make your files available under a free license, he should forward a statement to the OTRS team via email. If the publisher is also the author of the book, this will not be a problem. Please also note that any warning messages will be removed by the OTRS volunteer in charge. Thank you, →Nagy 17:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How do i know which volunteer is in charge so that he can remove the warning message from the images description ?? J10452M (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The volunteer handling the confirmation mail will also make all necessary changes to the file description pages, given that all necessary information is provided in the mail. Otherwise the OTRS team will get in touch with the author. Regards, →Nagy 19:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess by definition I do run a "Bucket Shop". However this isn't how I make my living and in the United States where there are no titles of nobility, lords, ladies or sirs, we don't take the strict rules of heraldry too seriously. This has been the trend here for more than 50 years. I have been a genealogist for over 40 years and have an extensive library of heraldry and have redrawn these coat of arms in a large size and good resolution (200dpi) so others can see and use them if they want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.73.154.77 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 21 April 2012‎ (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know, what image are you discussing? I'll try to help you as best I can. Thanks, →Nagy 07:49, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at the OTRS Noticeboard. --Tomtomn00 (talk) 21:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy, für die von Dir (zu Recht) entfernten Bilder des Künstlers Stephan Huber habe ich jetzt eine Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung. Kann ich die an Permissions Commons schicken, und die Bilder werden dann automatisch wiederhergestellt? Oder muss ich erst die Bilder nochmal neu hochladen und dann die Einwilligung einreichen? Ich freu mich, wenn Du mir Auskunft geben kannst! Danke und viele Grüße, fliegenkopf Fliegenkopf (talk) 13:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Guten Abend, die Bilder musst du nicht neu hochladen, sie werden wiederhergestellt. Die Mail sollte jedoch in der Betreffzeile '[Ticket#2011110710009697]' enthalten, damit sie gleich passend zugeordnet wird. Außerdem, und daran ist die Freigabe ja damals gescheitert, sollte sie direkt von der hier aufgeführten E-Mail-Adresse kommen. Ich würde mich freuen, die Bilder bald wieder hier zu haben. Grüße, →Nagy 19:46, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice that you deleted a file I uploaded: File:Alex_Mitchell_-_journalist.JPG saying in the edit summary: "no matching ticket found, will be restored if permission is granted". I submitted permission from the photographer twice via email to the permissions address; would it be possible to submit the permission directly to you via email? Thanks. -AndrewMitchell36 (talk) 20:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, please let me know the exact date and time the mails have been sent, I will look for them again. Correspondence via COM:OTRS is always more favorable since every volunteer will be able to track the goings-on. Thanks, →Nagy 22:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for looking into this. I sent the original permission email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org on Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:56:42 +0000 with the subject line 'Fwd: Re: Licensing photo of Alex for Wikipedia etc.'. I then resent the permission email on Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:35:44 +0000 with the subject line 'Declaration of consent for File:Alex Mitchell - journalist.JPG'. -AndrewMitchell36 (talk) 08:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Created a "blank" SVG version of the file 2d_political_spectrum.png which can be annotated with overlay text in any language and is also more accessible. Do you happen to know where I could go to get help translating the code?--Abel (talk) 12:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great work. COM:VP should be the right place for a localization request, but for a broad participation it might be necessary to bring it up on local versions such as COM:FORUM. Thanks, →Nagy 18:39, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will go to those straight away. There is already one language version in use at 諾蘭曲線 Exciting! --Abel (talk) 20:23, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:-Buster Brown-. Is it fun to be a Boy Scout Is it fun to be It's the greatest thing in the world. I'll say it is.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 17:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to inform the original uploader. →Nagy 11:22, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Djami.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Djami.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to contact an admin of the french Wikipedia to check the file's original description page. Regards, →Nagy 07:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why was my picture deleted? I provided all the correct copyright information. What's wrong with it? Mouseinphilly (talk) 12:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, you've uploaded several screenshots of a copyrighted television series. Please review COM:Screenshots for further information. Thanks, →Nagy 12:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I speak french ?

Je proteste, l'image n'est pas une violation de droit car le photographe lui-même a donné son accord et donc son autorisation à la publication de la photo sous condition qu'il soit cité dans la légende et c'est ce qui était fait.

C'est d'ailleurs le comédien français lui-même qui m'a envoyé la photo pour que je l'inscrive sur le wiki en m'expliquant ce que je viens de vous dire ci-dessus.

or else (I speak little English)

I protest, the image is not a violation of law as the photographer himself agreed and therefore permission to publish the photo as long as it is mentioned in the legend, and this is what was done.

This is also the French actor himself who sent me the photo for me to enroll on the wiki explaining what I just said above. --Skarock (talk) 09:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, files can usually be restored if the copyright holder provides his permission to COM:OTRS. Please review this page for further information. Thanks, →Nagy 17:31, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jó napot!

szerettem volna feltölteni 2db magánygyűjteményben található Magyar Mannheimer Gusztáv képet, egy festményéről, aminek nem lett kitöltve a licensze. Miután ki lett rörölve, nem tudom újból feltölteni és megadni a licensz jogokat. Mi a módja, hogy újból fel tudjam az Ön által kitörölt képet tölteni? Ksözönöm

"2013. szeptember 28., 16:58 Nagy (vitalap | szerkesztései) törölte a következő lapot: File:Mannheimer Gusztáv.jpg (In category Media_without_a_license_as_of_19_September_2013; no license) (global usage; delinker log)"

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 14:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! →Nagy 15:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Üdvözlöm!

Szerettem volna feltölteni Magyar Mannheimer Gusztáv festő képét, de törölve lett. Képtelenség feltölteni e miatt újból. A probléma, szerzői jog megjelölése nem lett megadva. A festményről a képet magam készítettem. Kérem tegye lehetővé a kép közzétételét. Köszönöm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Festo2013 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see that you've found a way to re-upload your files in the meantime. Please have a look at Commons:Licensing/hu. Did you paint the images? Regards, →Nagy 15:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy, Du hast auf meiner Benutzerseite ein Foto entfernt, da angeblich dazu kein OTRS-Ticket vorliegt. Ich habe schon vor Tagen wg. dem Baustein auf der Bildseite die gemeldete OTRS Ticket-Nummer nochmals gemailt. Seit Wochen kümmert sich scheinbar niemand mehr um die Abarbeitung der Tickets, stattdessen wird eifrig gelöscht. Habe meinen Mentor schon angeschrieben - kam zurück: wg. schönem Wetter etc. nimmt sich wohl keiner Zeit zur Bearbeitung. Finde so was demotivierend angesichts der vielen Mitarbeiter. Im Meldebaustein steht, man soll sich an Volunteers wenden, was ich hiermit als ein Weiteres tun. Es sind mehrere Fotos, die ich hochgeladen habe und im OTRS auf Bearbeitung warten, um endlich verwendet werden zu können. Kannst Du Dich drum kümmern und ggf. mitteilen, falls ich noch was unternehmen soll? --Huberbe (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Huberbe, ich habe mir die Sache nochmals angesehen. Allerdings bin ich nur auf ticket:2014021110004294 gestoßen, welches sich auf File:Monbachtal Gästehäuser.jpg bezieht - für File:Monbachtal-Kurhotel-um-1920.jpg können wir die Freigabe nicht verwenden. Hast du evtl. noch eine weitere Ticketnummer für mich? Gruß, →Nagy 07:00, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have a request regarding why this image was deleted [2].

I do not see any explanation on the users talk page [3]

What permission are you looking for? James Heilman, MD (talk) 10:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear James, thanks for your message. Please review the comment provided along with the deletion: We've been in touch with the uploader, but the permission we have is not sufficient. Please also note the permission is missing since the file was uploaded back in March. But it won't be a problem to restore this image if we receive the information we need. Regards, →Nagy 16:51, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks yes see the problem. Am seeing if we can get the permission that is needed. Best James Heilman, MD (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide me with the image description and other file information for the deleted image, File:Barelylegal.jpg? I have restored this as an image under fair use at en.Wikipedia, and would like to be sure that the description there is accurate. Cheers! BD2412 T 15:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There you go. Please let me know once you have finished. Regards, →Nagy 17:51, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. BD2412 T 00:22, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		Boooo !!!! We miss you!! We wish you were more active, please log in soon and help us with the backlog!!
		Hope to see you around soon! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandiacre Lock Up.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kelly (talk) 15:10, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Nagy, a new year is like a blank book, the pen is in your hands. It is your chance to write a beautiful story for yourself! Happy New Year 2017. Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 18:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Hedwig. I wish you all the best. Best, →Nagy 16:57, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nagy, I would like to let you know, I had downloaded my friend's picture (Miss Nazanin Boniadi) in Wikimedia Commons and used it in her English and Persian topic's page. During download process , probably wrong licence type has been choosen ( I am not familiar with rules ) and it get deleted by you. As I explained before in that picture's talk page I have permission to use it in Wikis by owner of picture and also she knew very well that picture would be contribute and anyone can use it after. She is famous actress and well known so has million pictures but This picture have been used in her personal website in internet. by above information could you please kindly help me to restore that. regards Farid69 (talk) 18:56, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nagy! Firstly, I have emailed the author of the image and he gave me explicit permission to use his work and he emailed a copyright permission declaration to OTRS to make his work free to use under licence Creative Commons Attribution/Share alike 4.0, Secondly, the source link has the copyright owner's name credited at the end of the article. Fault Magazine is not the copyright holder of the image so I did not contact them. The image does not appear on the copyright owner's own website so I used the Fault Magazine link which explicitly shows the creator/author of the image. Thirdly, I forgot to add Template:Nonfree with permissions tag when I uploaded the image to Wiki Commons to signify the image was for publicity by the copyright owner on a website other than his own and he gave me permission to use that image seen on Fault Magazine website. Please let me know what else needs to be done to have this image accepted by OTRS. Cheers! (KittyLover (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Good morning KittyLover! Adding the "OTRS received" template does not necessarily mean we cannot process a permission. But I have to admit the template is quite unprecise as it states the message was not sufficient. Basically my intention was to create a link between the file and the ticket in OTRS. However there were issues that prevented me from handling the ticket straightaway: I was unable to check Fault Magazine's website, but the wording of the permission required me to do so. Indeed I can access the link now, so I will go ahead, close the ticket and place the regular {{PermissionOTRS}} on the description page. Best regards, →Nagy 07:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Nagy! Cheers! (KittyLover (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Dear Nagy

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nagy,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy,

gibt's was neues zu dem Ticket von u.a. der Datei: File:Lage Brotwasser.jpg?

Laut Nutzungsinhaber müsste was verschickt sein (seit 15.09.)?

Liebe Grüße --Laserlicht (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Laserlicht, da ist unter einer anderen Ticketnummer tatsächlich etwas eingegenagen. Wir warten allerdings noch auf die Klärung einer Rückfrage. Viele Grüße, --Nagy (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Nagy,

super. Vielen Dank für eure Arbeit!

Liebe Grüße --Laserlicht (talk) 18:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:11, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello,

I am messaging you because a contest for a sound logo for Wikimedia is being developed and your opinion as a Wikimedia Commons admin is appreciated. My team would like to know if it is possible for the top finalist sound logos in the contest to have attribution temporarily hidden from public view until all the votes are final? The idea is to let the public judge the sound logo contestants based on the merit of the logo, not the person or people who made it. Again, any feedback is appreciated.

Thank you,

VGrigas (WMF) (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]