User talk:Gridge/Archive1
Image Tagging Image:Perry1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Perry1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 09:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Gov Romneyfree image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Oden 02:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:CageN02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass demandez 18:50, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Agam-DA01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Agam-DA01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Yonatanh 02:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please delete the image. Gridge 14:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
היי
ראיתי את התמונה שהוספת והוספתי לה תבנית {{SVG}} כי עדיף ליצור דברים כאלה בפורמט הזה. "# PNG or JPEG images that should be SVG
Images composed of simple shapes, lines, and letters are often better expressed using vector graphics. These have a number of advantages such as making it easier for subsequent editors to edit them, enabling arbitrary scaling at high quality, and sharp high-resolution renderings for print versions. If you see an image like this, add {{Convert to SVG}} to it, which adds it to Category:Images that should use vector graphics. What to do: using vector graphics production software, remake the image. The original image can often be used as a template."
אתה יכול לנסות לעשות זאת בעצמך בשימוש בתוכנה en:Inkscape או לתת למישהו אחר לעשות את זה. אני אישית ממש גרוע עם התוכנה הזו אז אני רק מוסיף את התבנית ונותן למישהו אחר להפוך את זה לSVG. Yonatanh 17:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- אני מבין שעכשיו זה בסדר? תוכנות זה לא הצד החזק שלי. אם אתה לא יכול לסדר, שיישאר כך
- Gridge 17:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC).
- כן, זה בסדר גמור. Yonatanh 00:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
תהיתי אם תוכל לעזור למצוא תמונה טובה לערך סנטה קלאוס בוויקיפדיה העברית (ראיתי שאתה עושה את זה להרבה ערכים אחרים אז נראה לי שתוכל לבחור יותר טוב ממני) כי התמונות שנמצאות שם כרגע (בעיקר זו של משהו שנמכר באיזשהי חנות) ממש לא משהו. תודה מראש, Yonatanh 00:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- עברתי על ההיצע פה בשיתוף, וגם בוויקיפדיות זרות ולא מצאתי אף תמונה מדהימה ממש ששווה לשים בוויקי העברית במקום התמונה הקיימת. תגיד לי משהו יונתן, איך אני יכול לדעת באלו ערכים במיזמי ויקי השונים מופיעה תמונה זו או אחרת שמופיעה בוויקישיתוף? Gridge 19:58, 1 March 2007 (UTC).
- Such as:
- אתה יכול ללחוץ על הכפתור "check usage" ליד "watch" וזה יוביל אותך לכלי שבודק את זה בשבילך. הלינק הישיר לתמונה הספציפית ששמת פה הוא זה. Yonatanh 16:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- חיים ולומדים :-) ביי בינתיים Gridge 00:03, 3 March 2007 (UTC).
- I think that User:Yonatanh fix the problem. Gridge 06:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC).
Image deletion warning | Image:Nellie Tayloe Ross.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
This is an automated message from User:DRBot. 02:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fine, thanks. Gridge 06:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:Moxy02.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Moxy02.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. D-Kuru 14:04, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Gat_garden03.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gat_garden03.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 16:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now it's O.K. Gridge 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:Gat_garden02..jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gat_garden02..jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 16:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now it's O.K. Gridge 18:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:Gat_garden01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Gat_garden01.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 16:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks. Now it's O.K. Gridge 18:11, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:Rivlin_Street.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rivlin_Street.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Siebrand 20:30, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- The authur is a sysop at the hebrew wikipedia. Please talk to him. Gridge 20:33, 30 May 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:Fordstheater01.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fordstheater01.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 14:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
- The year is about 1860, but I have no proof. Delete it. Gridge 19:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC).
Re: Technical help
If you don't want the categories, you shouldn't use the Babel templates. That's what they do. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you. Gridge 11:46, 5 June 2007 (UTC).
Image Tagging Image:SpecialGS.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:SpecialGS.PNG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:14, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Your'e kidding, right? delete it. Gridge 22:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC).
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 19:43, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I know. I will fix it today. Gridge 06:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC).
- O.K., this is the source [1], and this is the original source [2], but now there's no need. Delete it, please. Gridge 08:32, 17 June 2007 (UTC).
Image deletion warning | Image:The_Muppet_Show_Pez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Yonatan talk 15:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Noted. Gridge 19:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC).
Hi, if you are going to use this category, please take the time to also put "real" categories that describe the content. This kind of "meta" category makes it look (to our tools) like it is categorised, when in fact it's really not. thanks --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 13:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind. Thanks. Gridge 15:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC).
Image deletion warning | Image:Gat garden01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
--User:G.dallorto 13:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Noted. Gridge 14:11, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
Bonjour,
Peux-tu faire suivre les permissions sur OTRS à permissions-commons at wikimedia.org afin de confirmer ces autorisations.
Merci d'avance.--Bapti 16:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- I do not understand french. watch this :) Gridge 16:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- Oh sorry...
- Hello,
- Can you forward yours permissions on OTRS at permissions-commons at wikimedia.org in order to confirm them.
- Thanks--Bapti 16:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please adress the author directly. Gridge 16:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- Oh, he gave permission for this Image:Melanie Betancourt 2007.jpg. The other one I made my self :) Gridge 16:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- But can you forward his permission to permissions-commons at wikimedia.org ?--Bapti 16:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bapti, look at the license tag. If that's not sufficient, adress him. I didn't kept the permission. Gridge 16:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- Oo but why did you write "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email." so ?--Bapti 06:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- What is the difference? Frcnçois and I had a personal conversation by mail. I asked for a permission ("cc-by or cc-by-sa, must not prohibit commercial use"), and he gave one (by changing the license). Gridge 10:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- This picture is already on Cc-by-sa-2.5, isn't it ? Then, that isn't worth specifing "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email.".--Bapti 11:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- The picture is on Cc-by-sa-2.5 thanks to me. Gridge 11:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- François change the licence here after your conversation by mail ? So that isn't worth specifing "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email.". You can write "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given after a conversation by mail with User:Gridge."--Bapti 11:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. In the other case you expect me to provide a screenshot? Gridge 12:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks ! In the other case, I expect you to provide at OTRS that François gave you permission.
- Goodbye ;)--Bapti 12:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. In the other case you expect me to provide a screenshot? Gridge 12:02, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- François change the licence here after your conversation by mail ? So that isn't worth specifing "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email.". You can write "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given after a conversation by mail with User:Gridge."--Bapti 11:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- The picture is on Cc-by-sa-2.5 thanks to me. Gridge 11:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- This picture is already on Cc-by-sa-2.5, isn't it ? Then, that isn't worth specifing "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email.".--Bapti 11:32, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- What is the difference? Frcnçois and I had a personal conversation by mail. I asked for a permission ("cc-by or cc-by-sa, must not prohibit commercial use"), and he gave one (by changing the license). Gridge 10:41, 3 October 2007 (UTC).
- Oo but why did you write "Permission for {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} was given to me by email." so ?--Bapti 06:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bapti, look at the license tag. If that's not sufficient, adress him. I didn't kept the permission. Gridge 16:51, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- But can you forward his permission to permissions-commons at wikimedia.org ?--Bapti 16:43, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, he gave permission for this Image:Melanie Betancourt 2007.jpg. The other one I made my self :) Gridge 16:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
- Please adress the author directly. Gridge 16:36, 2 October 2007 (UTC).
Jules Verne
Hi Gridge,
I'm not a great specialist :p Jules Verne books are in the public domain (see Wikisource). About the covers, see Help:Public domain. If it's the original cover, I think it's Ok. Can you be more precise ?--Bapti 15:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe later. Gridge 16:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC).
תודה
תודה על עזרתך. Geagea 23:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- זרקתי הערה כדי שלא תרגיש בודד בוויקישיתוף הגדולה. אני מניח שלא ייחסת לעצמך אלא לצלם המקורי, מה שמרוקן את הטיעון שלי מתוכן. ובכל זאת
- Gridge 00:34, 17 October 2007 (UTC).
Image deletion warning | Image:Bottom_OLS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Megapixie 13:29, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
- Noted. Gridge 17:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC).
Image:TelAviv-Founding.jpg
Hi. Please be more descriptive in which law it is that states that the above image is PD. Just stating Local Law is not enough. /Lokal_Profil 21:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- Fine, give me a day or two. Gridge 21:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC).
- No problems. /Lokal_Profil 21:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- I did the best I could. Gridge 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC).
- Info looks fine now. Thanks/Lokal_Profil 10:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- Great. Gridge 15:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC).
- Info looks fine now. Thanks/Lokal_Profil 10:36, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
- I did the best I could. Gridge 22:10, 2 December 2007 (UTC).
- No problems. /Lokal_Profil 21:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Moshe_Katsav,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Moshe_Katsav,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 02:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Moshe_Katsav_2,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Moshe_Katsav_2,_by_Amir_Gilad.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Thuresson 02:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:The_sexiest_woman_in_the_Roosevelt_hotel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
Ecemaml (talk to me/habla conmigo) 21:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:GSXX.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:GSXX.JPG. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. GeorgHH • talk 13:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
- You can delete this image. Gridge 16:32, 8 February 2008 (UTC).
Pay attention to copyright | Image:A Bart Simpson Pez.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.
|
Jodo 17:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Melanie_Betancourt_2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
88.65.123.237 20:54, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:WaltAndMickey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--dave pape (talk) 02:30, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pisa Paint01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto (talk) 15:44, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
File:Skazka o rybake i rybke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |