File talk:Saltmarsh sharp tailed sparrow.jpg

The following websites contain[ed] version of this images and were not in compliance with the GFDL:

• http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1130/p02s01-usgn.html, image http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/1130/csmimg/ATWEET_P3.jpg

wrong attribution, no reference to GFDL, (C) by christian science monitor, not contacted, yet Wwcsig 14:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sent email via their website on Wwcsig 22:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• http://web1.audubon.org/science/species/watchlist/priorityContSpecies.php, image http://web1.audubon.org/filerepository/science/speciesprofiles/fck/image/Th_Saltmarsh_sharp_tailed_sparrow_WolfgangWander.jpg\

No attribution, no reference to GFDL, (C) statement 'Copyright 2008 by National Audubon Society', and given the csmonitor article above audobon seems to sell (or at least give away) the right to the image. Wwcsig 19:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Actually this page (http://www.audubon.org/news/pressroom/WatchList2007/BirdList.html) is a press kit for reporters to download high resolution (yet badly compressed) versions of the images from. The high-res image they took in violation of the GFDL from wikipedia and are distributing to the press is here: http://audubon.org/news/pressroom/watchlist2007/images/Saltmarsh_sharp_tailed_sparrow_WolfgangWander.jpg Wwcsig 20:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]