User talk:Gerddanigel

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gerddanigel!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo & Danke

Hallo Gerd,
vielen, vielen, vielen Dank für all' deine tolle Fotos, die Du hier hochgeladen hast! Das ist tatsächlich ein unglaublicher Schatz, der Wikipedia sehr bereichern wird.

Ich hab gesehen, dass Du das noch nicht so lange machst und wollte Dir zur Seite stehen, falls Du (technische) Unterstützung hier brauchst. Wikimedia Commons ist nicht immer so einfach und vor allem nicht immer so benutzerfreundlich.

Ich habe zahlreicher deiner Bilder bereits kategorisiert (damit sie leichter zu finden sind) und teilweise die Beschreibungen ergänzt. Außerdem hast du mehrere Bilder doppelt hochgeladen, ich hab die Dubletten dann entfernt. Wie gesagt, wenn du Hilfe / Unterstützung brauchst, kannst Du jederzeit hier oder mir per Mail (jckibelka at gmail com) Bescheid geben. Viele herzliche Grüße, --Jcornelius (talk) 14:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Zeitliche Einordnung

Hallo Gerd, danke für die großartigen Fotos! Beim Anschauen habe ich mir aber gerade eine Frage zu den Fotos vom Bahnhof Schönhauser Allee gestellt:

1961, Foto vom Bundesarchiv
1984, Foto von dir
1985, Foto von dir

Am Altbau vor dem Bahnhofsgebäude ist bei dem Foto von 1961 und beim Foto von 1985 eine Leuchtreklame aus Dreiecken zu sehen, beim mittleren Foto fehlt diese. Da sie auf dem Bild von 1985 nicht frisch saniert aussieht, frage ich mich, ob die Jahreszahlen so stimmen. Kannst du dich diesbezüglich erinnern? Danke :) --APPER (talk) 08:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orte der Fotos

Hallo Gerd Danigel, ich hab mir erlaubt, deine hochgeladenen Bilder im Wikipedia-Artikel über dich einzubinden. Auch von mir herzlichen Dank für die tollen Fotos. Kannst du bei File:Motorrad MZ 1982.jpg und bei File:Telefonzelle DDR 1988.jpg noch den Ort mit eintragen. Wenn du Hilfe benötigst, melde dich einfach. -- sk (talk) 12:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:30, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg

File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PaterMcFly (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lizenzänderung

Hallo Gerd,

gerade sehe ich, dass du heute bei etlichen deiner Fotos die Lizenz von {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} auf {{Cc-by-nc-nd-4.0}} änderst. Da ergeben sich allerdings zwei Probleme:

Letztere Lizenz gilt hier nicht als freie Lizenz. Dateien, die nur unter dieser Lizenz bereitgestellt werden, werden daher auf Wikimedia Commons gelöscht.
Die bisherige Lizenz ist unwiderruflich. Wenn du einmal erlaubt hast, ein Bild auch zu kommerziellen Zwecken und auch in abgewandelter Fassung zu benutzen, dann kannst du diese Erlaubnis nicht zurückziehen.

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, danke für die Info.

Auch nicht wie z.B. in folgendem Fall?

This file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion.

This file is a copyright violation because it is copyrighted and not published under a free license.
The file is subject to speedy deletion unless it is relicensed according to the Commons licensing policy. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: http://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/71217057/df_dat_0007259

Appeal: If you think that the talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please open a regular deletion request and remove this template.

Page last edited 3 years ago by Gerddanigel (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) • Page information: deletion log • What links here

Before deleting, please check the talk page, where information pertaining to copyright might have been added.

Canadian English ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ ślůnski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

So stellt es nämlich eine Urheberechtsverletzung der Fotothek Dresden dar.

User talk:Gerddanigel

Contents

Hallo & Danke

Zeitliche Einordnung

Orte der Fotos

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg

File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg

Lizenzänderung

Navigation menu

User talk:Gerddanigel

Hallo & Danke

Zeitliche Einordnung

Orte der Fotos

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Almstadtstraße 1987.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Berlin Wilhelm-Pieck-Straße 1987.jpg

File:FKK-Strand Hiddensee.jpg

Lizenzänderung

Navigation menu

Search