User talk:IsadoraofIbiza

Archives 1, 2, 3, 4

Kelvin, your graphic for plant cell types is fabulous! I noticed that there is a mistake in labeling primary and secondary cell walls in the xylem image (they're switched). Not the image with all the cell types, but rather the one only featuring xylem. Thank you for supplying such beautiful and clear images. Doppelbrau (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Saturn diagram.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saturn diagram.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvin, see my comments on your nomination of the image of Saturn for Featured Picture status... (Liquidier?? Yikes!) KDS444 (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Sorry I didn't respond the last three days have been kinda hecticcc … but I don't really see what's wrong with liquidier? Everyone's going to get what it means & there's really no other word to distinguish supercritical materials. && "more-liquid" with a hyphen is probably even more confusing—Love, Kelvinsong talk 23:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Try "Gaseous hydrogen" "Condensed liquid hydrogen" StereoTypo (talk) 17:31, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah but the problem is that a lot of the gas in Saturn isn't "gaseous", it's actually some strange state between a liquid and a gas. The hydrogen is more gas-like near the top of the atmosphere and becomes more liquid-y as you go down. So "Gaseous hydrogen" & "Liquid hydrogen" a little misleading since it implies that you splash from air into an ocean of hydrogen when you go below the Frenkel line—Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the unusual state of the matter in question. What do planetary astronomers call it? Can we use that term rather than "liquidier"? I think that making up a word is probably more confusing than using a word that doesn't quite apply but is nevertheless close. KDS4444 (talk) 09:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just did a quick look at some literature on hydrogen and Saturn. It looks like planetary astronomers just use the terms "liquid hydrogen", "hydrogen gas", "solid hydrogen", and "metallic hydrogen liquid", and "metallic hydrogen solid" when discussing Saturn's hydrogen states, even as they acknowledge that the hypothetical reaction path of hydrogen is continuous and circular. If these are the terms used in the scientific literature, doesn't it seem like we should be using them here? (although I agree that the "splashdown" concept is to be avoided if at all possible). KDS4444 (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whatevvs. Uploaded new version with "Gassy hydrogen" & "Liquid hydrogen"—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:52, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted an astronomer at UCLA regarding this question. Here is his response: "This is far from my area of expertise, but my feeling is that the best phrase might just be “denser” as it doesn’t imply anything wrong. I consulted a colleague in planetary sciences and he confirmed this: 'Denser sounds about right to me. There are most definitely phase changes in Saturn, and therefore stratification, even though there may be vertical mixing as well.' I hope that helps! Cheers, Steve Furlanetto" KDS444 (talk) 02:06, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Kelvin, I have recently come to discover that graphical depictions of mitochondria are from single-celled organisms. Most images incorrectly depict the mitochondria found in mutlicellular eukaryotes, as elegantly demonstrated in this paper. I was wondering if you would be willing to edit or have someone edit "Animal Cell.svg"? I feel that it is important to show how many cells, (especially those found in differentiated tissues), have networks of mitochondria. Even during my undergraduate degree in biology, not a single professor, TA or textbook ever mentioned the concept of mitochondrial networks/fusion! — Preceding unsigned comment added by StereoTypo (talk • contribs)

Huh. I did not know they did that... I've honestly never seen mitochondria drawn as networks ever. I'll look into it though I'm actually kinda busy rn—Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:48, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelvinsong. More good news for you!!! On Day 2 of the Astrigue yesterday, certain selected teams had to do a presentation on a topic of their choice. One of the teams from another school used your diagram of the Moon in their presentation!!! Well done and keep up the good work!!! ;) --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 23:45, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

that's so cool!—Love, Kelvinsong talk 16:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	For everything you have done for Wikipedia, and to thank you on everyone's behalf, I hereby award you this barnstar! Jjamesryan (talk) 10:22, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Kelvinsong! Regarding File:Supercell.svg, I've nominated for Featured Picture on the English Wikipedia, I was wondering if you can remove those transparent rectangle things on the back of the title heading. If possible, change 'anatomy' to 'Structure'. Best, --///EuroCarGT 15:48, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --///EuroCarGT 23:19, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Could you translate the Moon diagram to Catalan please? I'm trying to promote the article to FA :)

• the Moon - la Lluna
• drawn to scale - dibuixada a escala
• crater - cràter
• Lunar terrae - Terres lunars
• Lunar maria - Mars lunars
• Crust - Escorça
• Outer core - Nucli extern
• Inner core - Nucli intern
• liquid - líquid
• solid - sòlid
• Mantle - Mantell
• Partial melt - Magma

I tried to do it myself but the text is not editable :(--Arnaugir (talk) 16:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Kelvin, you are converting your text to outlines! Tsk, tsk! KDS444 (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, yes I do. There's really no way around it with the way mediawiki renders svgs. Most of my pictures have the text data in a hidden svg layer tho—Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:44, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey once again Kelvinsong! Regarding the supercell diagram, you've uploaded a newer version of the vector graphic of it. It should have been uploaded as a different file as it is a FP locally here at Commons, so by guidelines uploading it separately would be ideal. Best and regards, --///EuroCarGT 02:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why this is a problem I'm not really changing the content. I doubt anyone would actually object—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:12, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelvin: I would love it if you would weigh in on the consideration of one of my images for Featured Picture status over on the English Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Annelid diagram. And if you have more than trivial suggestions for improvement (I am hoping you at least have a few of those!) please leave me a note on my talk page so I can take a stab at them. I worked pretty hard on the image as it is now available, and used many of the techniques you taught me to do so— please consider this an invitation from a journeyman graphic artist to have a master review his progress. Thanks! (Oh, also, before you even go there, I know the file is really big, but have had some difficulty figuring out exactly which elements are the space hogs; if you know of an easy way to somehow sort layers based on size, please tell me. If I knew where to direct the paring knife, I could make better use of my time applying it!). KDS444 (talk) 11:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That page doesn't exist...¿—Love, Kelvinsong talk 02:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kelvinsong, You work is awsome a friend of mine needs charactors he has already drawn up for a childrens book and has been sadly dissapointed in trying to find an artist to make the charactors come to life. If interested please contact John Williams from Key West at (305)797-2089 he will let you know what he needs for you to give him a price.

I also have another customer who is getting ready to process a historic property called Winfield Farms in Northern Virginia I see you do alot of writing on historic postings.

Sincerely Jeanne Silvey (webdesigner)

jeanslvy@msn.com    305-766-3731

Emailed you && still waiting for a response?—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:12, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelvin, I have added, to the FP nomination page, several links to examples of similar photographs taken by professionals. The dark lighting style is popular for glossy brochures and adverts. Nikon's class-leading new camera has a publicity photograph (http://www.dpreview.com/previews/nikon-d810/images/shuttercutaway.jpg) that is very similar to the FP candidate. I also gave links to a couple of websites that help calibrate your monitor to ensure it is capable of displaying and distinguishing the full range of dark to light. I wonder if, if the light of this, you might reconsider your opposition. Thanks, — Colin (talk) 08:37, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I changed my vote to support. Though in that picture from your link, it's much easier to see the edge of the camera—it's a very dark gray rather than blending into the background. but anyway. I've already tried callibrating my monitor the best I could but most of the guides refer to settings that don't exist in my monitor's menu...—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:50, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Uranus diagram.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Uranus diagram.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Another Neptune diagram.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Another Neptune diagram.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i want to translate your designs in ukrainian language, if you don't mind. :)
I will upload it to wikimedia and will leave links here.
I'm using Adobe Illustrator for vectors, so unsure if all compatibilities will be fine.
Will save them as SVG v.1.1, that version tags i saw in text editor.
Wyrrax (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lol go ahead!! Though adobe illustrator has caused some problems with file bloat && stuff so I wouldn't reccomend using itt—Love, Kelvinsong talk 17:52, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Here my first localisation, my old Ai CS4 cannot handle proper import of SVG effects so i decide to use Inkscape for it :)

I'll wait pair of weeks to check that i uploaded this file with right license and no copyright-cops are after me :))

Then I'll proceed with all the planets translation.

Wyrrax (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done :)

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ganymede_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Callisto_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earth_poster_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Europa_poster_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Io_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jupiter_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moon_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Saturn_diagram_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sun_poster_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Titan_poster_uk.svg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Earth%27s_atmosphere_uk.svg

It would be great if you add this localizations to your pages where all language versions are seen. It's cool when all this multilanguage stuff is gathered together :)

Wyrrax (talk) 15:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Omg thanks!! But can you please like keep the text data in the file on a hidden layer or something? It makes it a lot easier to retypeset the fonts and fix mistakes. I had to retype that entire saturn picture on a ukrainian keyboard...—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:10, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, i'm just tried to edit your english hidden texts and there was some troubles for me, don't remember, transparency was permanent or unselectable/uneditable text (because of Inkscape or my skill :) so i decide to not left any new Cyryllic glitched or bugged layers in this files :)

I see typos in new Ganymede version: "Полаярна шапка" instead of "Полярна" and "у позрізі" instead of "у розрізі"

Also there is no numbering of ices in ukrainian wikipedia, they just called "tetra-, hexa-, mono- etc., so лід (1h) or (6) will be confusing for pupils

Typos in new Saturn: "Полаярне сяйво" instead of "полярне" and "Полярній шестикутник" instead of "Полярний"

Wyrrax (talk) 07:27, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed—lol sorry I could have sworn I had fixed these alreadyyy—Love, Kelvinsong talk 21:48, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kelvinsong,

First of all, I would like to thank you for your beautiful and informative scientific images.

I am writing to suggest some corrections to the image you previously created for the microRNA page, which would make it even better.

1. It is the pre-miRNA (not the pri-miRNA) hairpin that exits the nucleus. Also, most pre-miRNAs have a 2 nucleotide 3’ overhang (rather than the 3 nucleotide 5’ overhang shown.

2. Dicer removes the hairpin loop as you have nicely shown. However, Dicer typically does not also trim off nucleotides at the base of the hairpin. I see that your reference 3 might be interpreted as saying otherwise, but that paper was studying a hairpin with a 3 nucleotide 5’ overhang, which the authors say is not typical of a pre-miRNA hairpin. The base of the typical pre-miRNA hairpin is not trimmed (see Figure 1 of PMID: 17381280).

3. In plant cells the microRNA is usually not perfectly complementary to the to the mRNA. There is usually at least one mismatch. Instead of “perfectly complementary to” you could say that it is “nearly perfectly complementary to”. (I’ve also corrected this wording in the text of the article.)

4. Each miRNA is associated with only one Argonaute protein.

5. The presence of the microRNA does not “block” translation, but you could say that it “reduces” translation. (What actually seems to be reduced is translation initiation, without any blocking/slowing of ribosomes that are translocating along the associated mRNA.)

6. With regard to the pairing to targets usually observed in animals, you might consider dropping the preference for an A or U across from nucleotide 9, since this is a weak preference compared to the other preferences that you illustrate. Although it would be good the keep the supplementary pairing to nucleotides 13-16, the text could say something like “Nucleotides 13-16: Perfect base pairing to this region can supplement pairing to the seed region but is not observed for most targets.” (see Figure 1 of PMID: 19167326).

Thank you again for your wonderful contributions to science education.

VTD (talk) 19:01, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!! Wow that's a lot of corrections but I'll see if I can get to thatt—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kelvin ! First of all, thank you very much for the great board of biology. I'm a french biology student and your work has been helpful and entertaining. However I've seen that your recent work isn't available in French, which is why I'm wondering if you'd be interested in a translation.

Hey Kelvin, I am thinking about using a couple of your AWESOME biology images in my PhD thesis introduction (particularly the organelles and protein synthesis). Could you please provide a couple of examples of a credit line that I could use as guide to comply with the licensing you have specified?

Thank you so much for your beautiful images that help us better understand/visualize complex concepts (you know what they say: "One (good) image is worth 1000 words.")

Thank you in advance for you response. Cheers, Belisa Santos

“Image created by Kelvin Song” and a link back to my user page or something if possible is fine (idrk if thesis introductions are a print or internet thing)—Love, Kelvinsong talk 01:06, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Return of the moon diagram.svg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Return of the moon diagram.svg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:18, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reviewed your nomination. Since there are several featured images, each of them needs to be manually added to the lists. Could you help please? The procedure is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Congratulations, and regards, Yann (talk) 21:29, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Np!  Done—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I find your diagrams about molecular biology to be more helpful than my textbooks. I sincerely appreciate your hard work and the fact that you translate these into Chinese, as I may practice my Chinese while studying for bio as well! 你很棒！ Austinprince (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Came across your work in the Picture of the Year voting. That glacier diagram is something else! Impressive. Good work. Cheers, Astrocog (talk) 13:55, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kelvin, This is a derivative version from your work done by one of Indonesian Wikipedia writing competition participant. Thanks for making this great work! --Beeyan (talk) 14:53, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Override Gamma (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Technical Barnstar

This is absolute crazy good vector artwork that you are delivering at a constant level. I tried to get into that some years ago but never reached your level of skills. I would love to see more explanatory texts how you created this artwork (which programs you used, etc). Nowadays I am more into 3d plotting than some years ago, so I would probably be able to help with e.g. rendering the wireframe of such a guy like File:CMB Timeline75.jpg to SVG (actually I studied astrophysics while I did not contribute to the commons). Keep going on!!! Sven (talk) 17:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Graphic Designer's Barnstar

Good God, man, the quality and quantity of work you produce is both incredible and humbling. I stumbled across your work thanks to the image of the year election and I was absolutely blown away by the set of diagrams that are up for the spot. Whether or not you win image of the year, you deserve some serious kudos from, well, humanity for sharing such great information in a beautiful, informative, and clear way. I'm not nearly as active as I used to be around here, so I haven't followed encyclopedic progress as much as I should, but the quality of the encyclopedia is significantly greater since you've come along and donated your time and skill toward the end goal of sharing knowledge with every human being connected to the Net. You make the Internet not suck. Well done. upstateNYer 03:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dear Kelvinsong!

I can`t correctly format your tablet of cenrosome.

Please, add the russian version in your table:

File:Centrosome (standalone version)-ru.svg

And I can`t make translation of borderless versions. Could you convert translated russian version(s?) into borderless?

I probably will translate your works some times.

Regard`s --Kirill Borisenko (talk) 01:21, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed and thanks sm!!—♥ Kelvinsong talk 23:11, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After reading your PDF and the typographyforlawyers blog post, I must say Wikimedia is never "democratic" but semi-meritocracy. It straightly denies democracy in "What Wikipedia Is Not" policy. Surprise surprise (actually you should have known that), Wikimedia Foundation does hire and pay employees like Google does, the only difference is that Google is for-profit but not Wikimedia. I have no problem with this system, but when it comes to type distribution, Commons is not an ideal platform for that because its management of resources is not meritocratic. I always have problem with the many low quality unusable sexual media files on Commons but no admins dare to wipe them out, ever. The sole reason I use Commons is entirely because other sister projects rely on Commons for copyleft media files. I think it make more sense to apply for a new wiki project like "Wikitype" for that very purpose. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk · contri.) 06:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Sameboat Yea Ik wikip/media is not a democracy; I meant that top-down approaches don't go well around here (cough Media Viewer). If I went to the WMF first I’m sure without community support I’d be brushed off, && even if it did approve it people would accuse them of being all unilateral or whatever & “wasting” resources. Important to keep the community in the loop. && I thought there was a “no new wiki projects” thing? Either way I think it's important that type be developed where it can be seen by users of type—♥ Kelvinsong talk 13:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting to here, to avoid distraction at the main thread... Re: your reply at Commons:Village_pump#Creating_a_free_and_open_source_typeface - Oh, I meant, I learned it as:

• Foundry -> Family -> 'Face -> Font

E.g.

• Adobe -> Adobe Garamond -> Adobe Garamond italic -> Adobe Garamond italic 11pt

But of course with the understanding that standards are never universal, and are usually introduced after centuries of messy history which doesn't fit well into tidy slots! That's all. :) Quiddity (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have looked at your typeface and you have some good considerations. Please email us if you want help with getting connected to Typographica. Thanks Vibhabamba

 Done—♥ Kelvinsong talk 01:04, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just uploaded a French version of your Ganymede diagram. You can add it to your Solar system subpage. --Flappiefh (talk) 07:04, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelvinsong, can you adapt the File Kaufungerwaldweg logo.svg on the Files F-Fulda-Diemel-Weg.svg and N-Nieste-Werra-Weg.svg, so that there is also a "HWGHV"? That would be great. Have a good weekend -- Feuermond16 (talk) 16:42, 10 April 2015 (UTC)  Done—♥ Kelvinsong talk 00:50, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Feuermond16 (talk) 18:54, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kelvinsong, First, I enjoy your illustrations and have been known to borrow a couple for my (free) website for my students (docpelletier.com). Second, I have been contacted by what I believe to be a for-profit company, called "Learnerator." (http://www.learnerator.com). in a recent email from them offering help for AP Biology, they included an illustration I recognized as from the wikipedia page on RNA transcription, created by you. Of course, it is possible they have an agreement with you to use your work. However, I wanted to make sure you were aware.

Take care. -Doc (Tony Pelletier)

dang, no, I did not…

I mean I suppose the only thing they did wrong was not give credit since for whatever reason I uploaded it without the -SA in the license but still… What should I do with this, it seems to be a pretty large operation—♥ Kelvinsong talk 04:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You could try getting in touch with them and letting them know they're engaged in a copyright violation, and that all they have to do to fix that is credit you. If they refuse, a DMCA claim is always an option. Though if they counterclaim or ignore you, you'd have to decide if you care enough to take them to court over that. — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 03:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Idk honestly I don’t really care enough to go down that rabbit hole with them—♥ Kelvinsong talk 21:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your images are great! Madboy74 (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!!!—♥ Kelvinsong talk 21:20, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kelvinsong! I am an editor on Portuguese Wikipedia and I started a work to feature the article about planet Saturn. I saw your diagram on English Wikipedia and I think it is a valuable illustration. I would like to ask you if you could translate this diagram in Portuguese, so that I can use it on the article. Here are the translations:

Saturn Saturno | all features drawn to scale Todos os componentes desenhados em escala | Titan Titã | Hyperion's orbit Órbita de Hyperion | Rhea Reia | Dione Dione | Mimas Mimas | Orbit of Janus and Epimetheus Órbita de Jano e Epimeteu | Enceladus Encélado | Tethy's orbit órbita de Tétis | Aurorae Aurora | North Pole Hexagon Hexágono no polo norte | Cloud layer (125mi) Camada de nuvens (200km) | Gassy hydrogen Hidrogênio gasoso | Frenkel Line Linha de Frenkel | Liquid hydrogen Hidrogênio líquido | Helium rain Chuva de hélio | Mettallic hydrogen and helium Hidrogênio e hélio metálico | Ices Gelo | Rocky core Núcleo rochoso | C ring Anel C | D ring Anel D | Maxwell gap Lacuna de Maxwell | Colombo gap Lacuna de Colombo | F ring Anel F | Roche division Divisão de Roche | A ring Anel A | Encke gap Lacuna de Encke | Keeler gap Lacuna de Keeler | B ring Anel B | Cassini division Divisão de Cassini | Huygens gap Lacuna de Huygens.

I hope I didn't forget anything! Thank you! WOtP (talk) 16:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, sir/ma'am. I'm working on a school project about the Solar System and I found your picture about Saturn. It's amazing and well-detailed. Then I visited your userpage and found more. Can I ask for your help? I'm wondering if I can ask for your works without captions, since I would like to translate it into Indonesian. You don't need to translate, but I sincerely ask for your works without captions and permission to edit it. I will credit them as yours :) Thanks in advance. Andrean182 (talk) 04:18, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Amazing artworks! What are the first steps to create imagery like that? What tools do you recommend? Kerkomen (talk) 09:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dude! I saw your tutorial on how to make the SVG Globe, i tried to make it but failed i've never done any coding before so i had no clue what to do or what all the numbers meant :(. I just really want a picture like https://gyazo.com/87c98777ff8406db6ea191dcfff78773 exactly like that with out the background, but i want the photo to have a much larger resolution. If you could help me out with a render of a globe with a larger resolution i'd be happy to transfer you $10 for you time. BTW the larger the resolution the better.

THANK YOU!!!

If you're interested please contact me on benjaminisgo@gmail.com

Hello! I've been trying to upload a file about Jupiter (Spanish version), but somehow some information is lost. The file is: File:Diagrama de Júpiter.svg . Is anything wrong with it? Too large, maybe? (I added some details as the images of Jupiter's main moons)... Was it wrong? Thank you for your attention! Chocofrito (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Your work is amazing mate :) The amount of effort and care really comes across. Thank you for making the cells and the planets far more easy to understand. Please keep it up, you're enlightening so many people to the complex universe we live in. Drjonesgp (talk) 16:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Wow. I was impressed when I saw File:Animal Cell.svg, then I looked through your user page and your portfolio and saw your amazing work — and that it's all CC0-licensed. Wow. Thank you. — OwenBlacker (talk) 23:41, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Gracias por tu trabajo Ortisa (talk) 16:59, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is a mispelling on your diagram of the atmosphere. "Noctilucent" is spelled as "noctiluscent". https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/Earth%27s_atmosphere.svg Qwed117 (talk) 19:54, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	These vector illustrations are simply delicious! Jamadagni (talk) 09:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	thank you! Whirlpool4 (talk) 03:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your amazing diagrams, they really helped me understand scientific concepts! Can't wait to see more diagrams, especially molecular biology and genetics. Your diagrams are wonderful! Fzxgao (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelvin, writing in regards to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropical_cyclone&action=submit#/media/File:Hurricane-en.svg. It's been pointed out that the graphic labels rotation as clockwise. However, the circulation at low-levels in an NH TC is counter-clockwise (at upper-levels, the anticyclone above it will relate clockwise). You've shown all this with the arrows correctly, and the graphic is perfect, except your labeling at the bottom left of the figure. Any chance you could change that? Thanks a lot :-) JeopardyTempest (talk) 10:24, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@JeopardyTempest: The labeling is correct, the storm rotates counterclockwise from below, but clockwise from above. The red circular arrow is traveling in the correct direction. This was brought up when the picture stood FP review.—♥ Kelvinsong talk 19:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I can actually see what you're saying I believe... you're saying if you look up in the sky at it, it rotates clockwise above you from your perspective? A unique way of looking at it... 15 years of meteorology, can't say I've ever heard it described that way... though honestly I KNOW I actually struggled with quite a few ideas\equations for a while in college because of exactly this. I wonder if it's some kind of education perpetuation... or based upon dominant experiences... or brain weighting... or self image or who knows what that some people are most comfortable one way while others are the opposite.

Definitely can still be seen as a perplexing way of putting it... it would be like me telling you that you've raised your left hand when you put up what you see as your right... perspective is sure a peculiar thing. I'd say that your figure sits contrary to the way science has chosen to define the right hand rule. But honestly we all say things like "the sun rises"... and scientists still debate the "ficticious" quality of Coriolis and centripetal\centrifugal forces... so what's in word at all when it comes to perspective differences like this? I just wouldn't be too surprised if you end up with some more meteorologists (or just regular folk) stopping on by to ask again. But shan't be a problem here. Thanks for helping me understand your thinking :-) JeopardyTempest (talk) 07:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:C7F:2C13:3F00:FC55:D7D0:228F:C44D (talk) 11:36, 02 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am currently an undergraduate major in medicine in Taiwan. I would love to help you on translating your cell organelle diagrams into Chinese(Traditional). May I have your consent to do so? How should I upload the translated version into the collection? May I substitute your proprietary(I presume?) font for Noto Sans? Thanks for your response. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tom282f3 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Translations should be uploaded and categorized the same way as any other Commons contribution, just make sure to add it to the translations template for ease of access. Substituting the font is fine.—♥ Kelvinsong talk 21:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hullo,

I hope I'm going about this the right way. I have made a note in the Talk page for the Wikipedia article "Electoral College (United States)" that might be of interest to you. I don't mean to be antagonistic in the least, just wanted to raise a point about it (and actually about the political map above it as well), mostly about the captions or legends rather than the maps per se. Cordially,

NicholasNotabene (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kelvin, I just noticed a small error in your picture for the chloroplast cycle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chloroplast_division.svg). In the lower right you switched the labels of outer and inner membrane. Just a small error but you had me confused there for a second.

greetings — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 134.93.165.120 (talk) 15:19, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Wow, you are right! I’ve corrected the picture, thanks for the catch! don’t know how that went unnoticed for 3 years…—♥ Kelvinsong talk 18:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have made a number of new illustrations, including some I now wish deleted. Come see! I owe rather more than you realize to your instruction, for which I remain forever grateful! (still... not a fucking barnstar in sight. aint that the way of it). KDS4444 (talk) 10:54, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

wait why are you trying to delete them lmao—♥ Kelvinsong talk 01:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]