User talk:Túrelio: Difference between revisions

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ кыргызча ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

All requests for and notifications of re-use of my images on Commons have been moved to Requests & Notifications.

If you can't find a comment or an older discussion here, take a look whether it is in one of my archives:
Archive1 (latest), Archive2 (2007), Archive3 (2008) (big!), Archive4 (2009) (huge!), Archive5 (2010) (huge!), Archive6 (2011) (huge!), Archive7 (2012) (huge!).

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Túrelio!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 04:09, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for your kind support during this and the previous year. Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 19:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

			The Tireless Commons Administrator Barnstar
			I hereby award Administrator Túrelio this special barnstar for the extra huge contributions as Administrator on Commons. Well done and keep going! Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For more than a year, Túrelio has been consistently the most productive Administrator, doing about 13% of all Administrative actions.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:20, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	For all your input
	For you Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 09:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for my favorite admin :) ! Алый Король (talk) 18:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Túrelio (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Siehe User talk:Pill. Grüße, —Pill (talk) 02:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Danke, werds mir heut abend anschauen. --Túrelio (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Túrelio. You may remember having participated in a previous deletion discussion on this file. Another contributor has nominated it again for deletion, based on the generic copyright attached to any artistic work by French copyright law, regardless of the registration of the pattern. In view of the industrial nature of the product, I initially argued the copyright owner was assumed to be the company who released the product, then found evidence of the transfer of copyright to this company (in case of ownership by a company, the 70 years protection is computed from the publication). Your opinion would be welcome. There is a parallel discussion on File:Victory rooster.jpg, here.I apologize for my unsufficient initial argument which led to your initial closure . — Racconish ^Tk 09:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For your many thousands of contributions to Commons over the years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Túrelio, Harold Wahlberg is my grandfather. I inherited the photos I posted yesterday from him when he passed away several years ago. I see that you possibly found another copy of the A-12 photo on another website, is that correct? As far as I know he took the pictures I posted during the time he was stationed in Hawaii with the U.S. Army Air Corps. SuperAtomicAirplane (talk) 19:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, frohes Fest und vielen Dank fürs Aufräumen. Manchmal gibts Dinge, die gibts einfach gar nicht, so wie das fehlende "l" in Oberplanitz, und beim Versuch der Fehlerbehebung habe ich gleich den nächsten Bockmist gebaut. --Markscheider (talk) 10:57, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In EWTN[1]Diane Bish's [2] organ piece would not be so impressive if her cat would have failed to sing. Yes, her cat did not fail her, the cat did sing amusing us and the audience. In my 5,000+++ uploads here in Commons, since 2010 (when I stayed away from photobucket, facebook, blogger, friendster and flicker for reasons), images are not made, they are taken: under the sun, rear, front and side facade, under human stress often. Commons photos should not be copied from elsewhere, but often they are; there is a great deal of difference, original photos in Commons have extended data details, plus the human factor - they breathe, they move and have hearts, so impressive - the towns, the churches, the culture and the very rich past. Thus, your cat in Christmas, is very impressive for it is taken by you and donated to us. Happy New Year and Cheers.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For all the work you do - it really is a pleasure to work with those who work so hard :) Best for 2013 --Herby ^{talk thyme} 15:39, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio,

Thank you for your wishes for 2013. I wish you too the best for 2013. I remain for sure intended to further provide wikimedia with as accurate as possible info, including pictures of correctly identified plants. --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio!

Danke für deine Neujahrsgrüße! Ich wünsche dir auch das Beste und eine Fortführung unserer Kooperation! Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 16:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I took the image of the CD and I also took the original image used n the Mefkure CD

Hola, las imagenes son mías no se como indicarlo pero si me ayudas con gusto lo haré.

Hola Anonimo122, I hope you understand enough english, as my spanish is not that good.

This image File:SEGA40.png has surely been copied from the internet, right?

When was this image File:Campo patria.png really shot and by whom?

When was this image File:Nemesio diez.png really shot and by whom?

When was this image File:Toluca Años 30.png really shot and by whom?

When was this image File:Toluca segunda division.png really shot and by whom?

When was this image File:Toluca campeon.png really shot and by whom?

When was this image File:Hacienda la huerta.jpg really shot and by whom?

--Túrelio (talk) 22:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I dont speak very well english but I hope you understand me.

I edit this image File:SEGA40.png taking an image that already existed. The other pictures are photographs made by me, when I visit a museum. I tried not to shoot the same material, but to shoot to be different to the original material.

Hi Anonimo122, thanks for replying. However, I am sorry, you cannot go into a museum, take photos of existing photos made by somebody else and then upload them to Commons and say they are your photos. This might only be o.k., if the original photographer is dead for more than 70 years already.

The same with File:SEGA40.png: by making little changes to an existing photo of somebody else, you do not get any copyright over this photo. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das oben genannte Bild wurde von mir persöhlich aufgenommen, im Kloster in Krakau, wo ich damals, im Jahre 1981, ein Möchstudent war. Dieses Bild zeigt meine Person in dieser Zeit als einen Mönch: zeigt eine wirklich existierende Person, einem damal wirklichen Mönch in einem legalen und wirklichen Tracht. Dem Orden gehörte das Photoapparat mit Selbstauslöser, Photoraum und Photolaboratorium - welche für die Herstellung dieses Bilder benutz wurden. Zboralski (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Zboralski,

das o.g. Bild dürfte nun kein Problem mehr haben. Anders sieht es aber bei den von mir unten in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zakonnik-paulinski.jpg aufgelisteten anderen Uploads von dir aus, bei denen du dich in allen Fällen als Urheber (=Fotograf) eingetragen hast, was unwahrscheinlich bis unmöglich (Baby-Foto) ist. --Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, the original file is in the Republika daily's computer where I had worked previously as editor of the daily Republika, please see and check the following link: "http://static.republika.co.id/uploads/images/detailnews/pelecehan-seksual-ilustrasi-_120208180241-121.jpg".

So actually the admin of the website: "http://www.luwuraya.com/index.php/site/detailnews/3606/Siswi-SMP-Diperkosa-Oleh-Delapan-Pelajar-SMK/", who have violated the copyright by publishing the photo on his site without a permit approval from the Republika daily. ~~ Erwin Mulialim^(talk) 17:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

I just already sent an e-mail to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org", please check my e-mail, Thank You very much for your kind attention and your help. ~~ Erwin Mulialim^(talk) 14:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks. Though, it's no me to whom your email is directed, it's our OTRS volunteers; I am not one of them. --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So who resposible to give my picture back to this "Wikipedia Commons"? I need that picture to include it in my article in "ID Wikipedia".

Thank You. ~~ Erwin Mulialim^(talk) 14:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC).[reply]

OTRS volunteers --PigeonIP (talk) 14:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Erwin, as soon as your permission is confirmed by an OTRS volunteer, the image will be restored by me or any other admin. --Túrelio (talk) 16:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stadio Olimpico (Rome) the DR has been closed too early. (and here Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stadio dei Marmi) I have not had the opportunity to comment the choice of Sergio. For instance he kept the File:2012-02-11 Rome Olympic Stadium under the snow ITA - ENG rugby.jpg, but I don't find the exception of DM in this. Can thou help me? Raoli ✉ (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it tomorrow, too late now. --Túrelio (talk) 22:23, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK --Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Das Bild File:Vorwerk Logo.jpg ist eine URV (nicht korrekte Einhaltung der ursprünglichen Lizenz und Nennung des ursprünglichen Urheber) von de:File:Vorwerk Logo.svg. Vgl. auch Disk unter de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Ambross07#Änderungen der Logo Größe. --Atamari (talk) 18:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab mal einen LA gestellt. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Template:Pd-ItalyGov. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

--Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Túrelio,

If you or anyone, will delete my uploaded files, I will delete all my contributions to Wikipedia. I had a lot of work with a lot of articles and I will consider authentic vandalism from you and I will use all my LEGAL rights against you and Wikipedia. I have the express permission from all my sources, when they are not mine. I do not put someone else's work without expressed permission. All Seigokan files have authorization from the Hombu Dojo in Himeji, Japan, by Seigo Tada President, as I am the Secretary General (3rd Dan) of Seigokan Portugal. The other files are or my own work from adaptations of my sources or authorized sources.
So, please remove all notifications on the files.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Eduardo Lopes
Seigokanportugal (talk) 00:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eduardo, if we were on Wikipedia, you might be immediately blocked for issuing a legal threat against another user. Just to put things straight: you have no legal right at all to have anything hosted on Commons, which is also true for anybody else. Commons has no obligation to host anything from you (or anybody else). We offer to host media which are in our scope and which are free enough to be used by anybody for any purpose, including commercial uses.

However, it is the uploader's obligation to provide evidence that either he/she is the true author or that the uploaded work is truely under a free license.

Lets see your disputed uploads:

• File:Charles George.jpg - an image from 1911, which you claim as own work. So, how old are you, 110 years? Who is the true photographer? When did he die?
• File:Eduardo Lopes.jpg - said to be from 1938 and claimed as own work, but found here. When challenged, said to be from your uncle (1997) and to be "an adaptation of a work done by Bernard Paris (Renard)"[3]. Thereby, not own work. Permission needed from 1) the original photographer and 2) the person who has done the adaptation.
• File:Mestre Seigo Tada2a.JPG - said to be from 1940 and sourced to a book, but again claimed as own work. Permission needed from the original photographer.

As a general note: In case you really don't know: if you reproduce a 2-dimensional work (photo), you do not earn any own copyright and you do not become its author. Instead you have to get the original photographers permission and put his name in the author entry. --Túrelio (talk) 09:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Be honest Túrelio. Does it hurt to see a foreign piece of art in front of your Deutsche bank? Please note Belgiums donot like the word Löschung, it reminds us of Endlösung. Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 10:11, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems trampling on the copyright of a Belgian artist doesn't hurt you. Will you pay the fees when he (or his agency) sues the WMF and re-users, as the Belgian owners of the Atomium regularly do? --Túrelio (talk) 10:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Get real dude Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial Jos met zijn bromfiets (talk) 10:41, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Túrelio, hab dir hier noch was dazugeschrieben! LG, Amada44  ^{talk to me} 08:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tùrelio - I would ask you your opinion and your help for this situation. As you can verify personally, in 2010 I transferred a lot of picture from the Wikipedia Italia image archive to the Commons Wikimedia. I did so in order to help, as they were looking for volunteers who would do that work, and I happily did so. Nowadays many many pictures are in the Commons Wikimedia store under my name, Decio Mure. Now I desire to find a solution to have those pictures not anymore under my name. I have personal issues and problems in real life that forbid me to spent time to take responsibility for these pictures... and some of them have legal problems/implications. Some of them have been already deleted for copyright or are in debate for various violations: File:Cimento moto alpino 1935 Roma.jpg , File:Vele di Scampia.jpg , File:Veduta_di_Mori_e_Montalbano.jpg , File:Francobollo_1_sterlina_LARGE_oro_autoadesivo.jpg , File:Pianto di uomo arte.jpg , File:Pianto di uomo arte 2.jpg...

--------------------------------------------------------------------

...and mainly I am worried for a large series of image of Pistoia, Italy: File:Giostra Orso Pistoia 1998.jpg and a whole series of pictures of the same kind, all uploaded under my name in 2010, because these are artistic work done in recent time and is controversial if thay can stay or not. Basically, for personal issue now I desire not to be involved in such debate, I have many problems in real life that ask fully my attention, so I would ask you what can be the best solution for all: I did that work in 2010 in order to help, but now, today, I really desire to have all those pictures re-transferred on Wikimedia Italia repository or deleted and uploaded by another user who may look after them and debate in the questions/problems may arise. What do you think? You have a long experience as administrator and maybe you can suggest me how to do. There is a person, Antonio G. here in Avellino, who would like to upload my pictures and give a look time to time on them, he is a student. We did so accordingly with File:Caserta_camera_di_commercio.jpg as you can verify, and I asked deletion for my file. We could do the same for all the uploaded file. Please suggest me the best solution because I really desire to not have any worries for copyright or similar issue now in that period of my private life.

I can also ask for the deletion of the entire personal account of mine, Decio Mure, but in such case what would be done of the pictures I uploaded? All erased? That's a pity... so please what would be for you the best solution? Greetings Decio Mure (talk) 11:17, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Decio Mure,

sorry to hear that. To start with your last proposal: a truly complete removal of a user account is not possible, as far as I know. What is possible is the removal of your user and usertalk pages. However, this wouldn't change anything with your uploads.

So, I think the best way to dissociate your username from your transfer-uploads would be 1) to identify and list all those images with a questionable copyright status (for example, derivatives) and get these deleted, and 2) for the remaining uploads (without any copyright problem) to get them re-uploaded by User:Antonio g60 and thereafter get your original upload deleted as duplicate. If you don't have enough time to start step 1) (listing) by yourself, I can try to take care of that, though it will take quite some time, as I am currently rather busy in RL and will even be completely offline for the next week. --Túrelio (talk) 21:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-

Hello Túrelio many thanks for your answer. Yes we can do as you suggested... and I will do the most of the job: it is my responsibility :) I'm sure with your help the problem will be easily solved. Ok! I will start to list the Giostra di Pistoia file with a questionable copyright status, and I will continue with the help of Antonio G. to upload the "ok" file and list as duplicate the files of mine. Ok! Great! And I will also de-link the referred pages (if any) from the old files to the new files! You, as administrator, can give me a great help just counselling me how to do things correctly regarding Wikimedia rules and policy. I will do the most of the work. If you want you can just proceed to deletion of Decio Mure files when the new file is provided and all is done correctly (de-link, etc. etc.) I will ask nothing more to you! I'm sure we can end this cycle in the best way just collaborating!

Many thanks again! :) Ciao Decio Mure (talk) 10:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I do not want to process ALL files... the files that are truly mine like the mountains, woods, nature, etc. I will keep on my account, without any problems, and I'll take care of them, and also will add others! :)

Hello, I listed as duplicate the following: File:Conflitti 2008.png , File:Double slit experiment a3xx.png , File:Licata Cristo morto.jpg , File:Lago di Starnberg.jpg

I have carefully de-linked all of them. The most are unused at all... like Conflitti 2008.png - even in such case is needed for you to redirect the old name to the new name? How can people look for the old name if unused (and unknown)? Is it unnecessary traffic for you? Anyway, as you can verify, I carefully delink each file. Greetings --Decio Mure (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Decio Mure, I've processed those 4 files. Well, for files such old, redirects are required as there may be external uses (hot-linking), where the image would disappear without a redirect. However, nothing in the visible description has an association to you. --Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) - Decio Mure (talk) 23:12, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm really sorry; I didn't realize the 1923 rule didn't apply in Europe. What should I do? Curly Turkey (talk) 10:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Due to the nature of his works, he resp. his heir(s) might be willing to give permission. However, first you need to do a research who currently holds the copyright of his works. --Túrelio (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the copyrights are handled by an agency called Bild-Kunst. I think this is all beyond me. I think it would be better to have the images deleted. Curly Turkey (talk) 11:44, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have maked the picture teunvdvelden.jpeg ...... Teun-185 (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teun-185,

are you identical to "Teun van der Velden" and are you also the depicted person with the yellow/green shirt? You do not need to answer that publicly, if you don't want; you may send me an email. --Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Buenas tardes to any and all administrators who would like to guide me in sharing wisdom to Commons. May I respectfully ask if it is possible like in Wikipedia, to be adopted by you and/or any Administrator? I am just looking at Wikipedia articles and found that there is such thing as adoption there for purposes. I want to learn more but as you know the tons of Commons and Wikipedia rules are very difficult for me, a slow learner, but I love photography. I discover Commons and it asks many lovers to join and share their wisdom, photos. Hence, like a prolific creater of Philippine towns, maps, etc.[4] User talk:TheCoffee, and Administrator [5] on Wikipedia, even in good faith, it so difficult not to commit mistakes. I believe that if I am guided by a Commons administrator, then, it will be easier for me to share my original photos here in Commons. Please help me and adopt me, best wishes ([6]Total editcount: commons.wikimedia.org 10:40, 27 January 201018,466 -17,099)--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ramon FVelasquez,

thanks for your confidence. Over the last months, I have seen that you have uploaded a lot of images from the Philippines, as I have added the rotation tag to a number of them. I had already in mind that we need to talk about a number of your images which depicted works of art that might still be copyrighted.

As opposed to some wikipedias, at Commons we have no mentorship or Adopt-a-user program. However, feel free to ask me, if I am around, or any other admin or experienced user.--Túrelio (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Muchos gracias, Túrelio and good morning, it is now 12 midnight March 25 here, beautiful Philippines. I am very much impressed with your great contributions, hard work and dedication to Commons. I pondered and ponder on contributing to Commons since 2009. I was enticed to share my photos, and I did solely for Commons since last year. I did stop uploading in any other site. However, I am not a Commons legal expert and I am quite stressed to see the tons of Rules in Commons. I comprehend that the same were made for good and to avoid legal actions. However, if I commit mistakes and/or errors because I do not know the rules, especially the very gray areas and finer points of law on copyright of Commons, what happens to my work, my passion, my expenses, and dedication, if one day, Commons rule would dictate that I be blocked. I found an administrator here who suffered, not blocked, yet, de-admin. I believe in destiny. My time has come, and I decided to put in Commons alone all my hard earned photos. Let me explain tersely how I shoot the subjects: a) I wake up at 10 am, b) ride an air-con bus to the places - Bataan, Nueva Ecija, Metro Manila (note, that I stayed in Pangasinan for 3 weeks last Nov-December for capture the landmarks until Dec. 4). Here in Bulacan, after I arrive at the town hall and churches, including landmarks earliest at 3 pm, I ride tricycle and shoot. I finish one town and shoot another ending at sunset at 6:00 pm. It would take 5-6 hours to return home. I begin uploading at 10 pm to 4 am. with very slow internet, maybe 2 mbps download and .06 upload speed in speedtest.net. You will notice that I was not rotating before, since I found that you would rotate and review or enjoy my photos. Lately, I was advised so I did rotate. Now, I contributed 18,000 edits since 2010 (then, I just contribute very very few photos). I sincerely desire that if you have time, please review and of course enjoy my hard earned photos, so that I would be advised by your kindness to avoid Commons violations. I am not familiar and it is very hard for me to comprehend the Commons rules. Please help me in your sweet time, please, please, and please. Best regards.--Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 16:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I see you do this work really systematically, serious "business". In the 2nd half of the week I'll try to identify potential problems. Magandang gabi. --Túrelio (talk) 22:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, la photgraphie du masque d'André Breton a été prise et donnée à Wikipedia par Laurence Iché, fille de René Iché. Cordialement, [[Utilisateur:Arcane17|Arcane17]] (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Túrelio, je t'assure que je suis bien l'auteur de la photographie qui a été modifié et de la modification de celle-ci, je ne sais comment te le prouver, mais je n'ais de toute façon pas modifié la licence ni l'auteur primaire .

hello, i'am the creator of the prime file sincerely Garitan (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Garitan, I have to write in english, as I am not that good in french. I see absolutely no problem with copyright. It is just that per our policy COM:OVERWRITE older images shall not be "overwritten" by largely modified versions. Instead the "new" version shall be written into a new file. Then the projects can decide by themselves whether to use the old or the new version. --Túrelio (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Desisto de tentar contribuir. Imagens de pessoas que já morreram e estão em todos os quatros cantos da internet, são livres. Como que eu vou consegui a permissão se nem sei quem é dono da imagem que deve ter milhões de copias?

Let's stick to the facts. You have claimed that you are the creator/photographer of File:Peter Tosh.jpg. For File:Jose Ermírio de Moraes.jpg you claimed that it has been created today and that is under a CC-0 license. Only the creator of that image can state that. Contributing requires a bit more than just copying images to Commons. Copyright remains with the author for 70 years after his/her death, not my making, but the law. --Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke erst mal für Deinen Hinweis. Aber was macht man, wenn der Künstler nicht bekannt ist? Trifft ja auf tausende Bilder in den Commons zu. Oft werden die Künstler ja erst durch die Zuarbeit von anderen eingetragen. OTFW (talk) 07:02, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wenn der Künstlername nicht auf dem Werk drauf oder dran steht, bist du rechtlich erstmal raus. Die Frage ist wie wir hier intern damit umgehen. Vielleicht wäre es fürs erste gut, an der Stelle wo du sonst den Künstlernamen einsetzen würdest, einfach "(von ?)" o.ä. zu schreiben. Die Angabe "unbekannt" ist eher ungeeignet, weil sie ein echt anonymes Werk nahelegt, was ja garnicht der Fall sein muss. Strategisch sollten wir vielleicht Pflegekategorien für Fotos von Werken in [Stadt] mit noch nicht bekanntem Künstlernamen o.ä. anlegen, falls nicht schon vorhanden. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Hi Tiberius876, both your uploads are credited in the EXIF data to TÓTH LÁSZLÓ. Explaination?"

Hi Túrelio! Sorry but I don't understand the problem. "Tóth László" is my name. I'm beginner here so if it's a stupid answer, please forgive me. --Tiberius876 (talk) 08:49, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tiberius876, well, that identity was not evident. A lot of new uploaders take images from somebody else and claim them to be their own. Anyway, per our policy, you are not compelled to disclose your real name, as you have done now. Also, you should consider that others who re-use your photos, now will credit it only to "Tiberius876", as this is what is written in the author-entry. If that is o.k. for then, you need to do nothing. If you would re-users to credit your real name, you should either replace the author-entry by your real name and/or add the switch "|1=Tóth László" at the end of your license template (and remove the "self|" from it). --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Which license should I put there when it's my daughter (family)? This is a perforation of the ticket. Please add your free license.--Luppus (talk) 16:15, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I explained earlier on your talkpage. Did you ever read your talkpage? And if it's your daughter in this image, you have even more reason to add the personality-tag. It is for the protection of the depicted person against abuse by third parties. --Túrelio (talk) 16:17, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Turelio,

You deleted my photograph. I just wanted to know why, and how can I add it back?

Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Massiah1507 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 13. Apr. 2013‎ (UTC)

Hi Massiah1507,

though it wasn't actually me who deleted your 2 uploads, I had tagged them due to suspicion of copyvio. The reason was that both had in the EXIF-data the photographer entry "Amanda Stevenson Lupke", whereas you Massiah1507 had claimed to be the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

So how can I fix this so that I can have it displayed? I hired Amanda to take the photograph.

Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Massiah1507 (talk • contribs)

You need to prepare a permission form, using the template on Commons:OTRS, send it to her and ask her to sign/date it and send it back to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . For more detail see either Commons:Permission or Commons:OTRS. --Túrelio (talk) 21:07, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your never-slacking efforts here in the Commons. mr.choppers (talk)^-en- 06:19, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes big +1 :) -- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ ℗ 08:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...für Deine aufmerksamen Nachträge meiner verwendeten Fotos...man staunt schon, wo die Bilder wieder auftauchen. LG von --Geolina163 (talk) 10:33, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Danke fürs verschieben! Hekerui (talk) 22:00, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gern geschehn. --Túrelio (talk) 12:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Ich möchte mit diesem kleinen Orden einfach mal Danke für Deine schnellen Aktionen sagen. Ra Boe watt?? 22:29, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry to bother you with these questions regarding permissions : 1. Do the written permissions have to be handwritten or do you accept emailed letters ? 2. When several authorizations are awaited from a single person, does this person has to send one authorization by document or can he/she make one only list of the authorized documents ? Thank you very much. Best, --Joiesoudaine (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you need more than 1 permission from one licensor, you can put them together into one permission. For the process, see here Commons:OTRS/es and for permission templates see here: Commons:Modelos de mensajes. Permissions do not need to be handwritten, but they need to come directly from the licensor. --Túrelio (talk) 17:45, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. One of the permissions have already be sent by Jacques Burtin to <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org>. The three other permissions, from Bruno Montpied, should be sent today. Best regards, --Joiesoudaine (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The permissions for the three remaining documents have been sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org by Bruno Montpied, their copyright owner, this morning at 10:09.

Best regards,

--Joiesoudaine (talk) 08:40, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La fotografía del Palacio Díaz Vélez es de mi propiedad y ha estado en mi familia desde fines del siglo XIX. ¿Suficiente? Eso espero. Gracias por borrar los cuadros colorados tan poco amigables. --Inesbugsbunnyines (talk) 16:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But what is the original source? Is it a print in a book or a printed photo? --Túrelio (talk) 17:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La imagen Martín Rodríguez 2 la obtuve de la obra "Memorias del general Lamdrid", un libro de mi propiedad que data de fines del siglo XIX. Los datos completos de la obra ya los puse en la primera contribución que hice y que fue borrada arbitrariamente. Espero que no borres esta y que quites ese cuadro rojo tan poco amigable. Gracias.--Inesbugsbunnyines (talk) 16:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the book differs between the 2 image versions. 1) "Memorias del General Gregorio Aráoz de la Madrid" 2) "Memorias del General Aráoz de Lamdrid". I assume that the first is correct, right? You wrote "Aráoz de Lamdrid" in the author entry. I assume that this person is the author of the total book, right? But is he really also the artist who created the drawing of Martín Rodríguez? Also, the license nbeeds to be changed, as you are not the author and you cannot self-license it. It's probably PD already. --Túrelio (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado: La foto es de mi propiedad, yo la saqué de un caudro propio de circa 1910. ¿O.K.? Favor de eliminar el poco amigable cuadro colorado. Gracias.

I am not sure I understand you correctly. Are you really saying that you shot the original photography in the oval frame? In addition, I doubt your date of 1910. The lady is born 1899, she would have been a girl a 10-11 years in 1910. --Túrelio (talk) 18:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

La foto es trabajo propio, de mi propiedad su original, que data circa 1910. Tode está bien. Favor de eliminar el nada amigable resaltado color rojo. Gracias.--Inesbugsbunnyines (talk) 16:36, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"La foto es trabajo propio" - congratulations, you are more than 100 years old? Possession of a printed photo or even a film-negative does not equal authorship. You need to provide the name of the author. --Túrelio (talk) 18:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Por facor, basta de incluir esos cuadros horribles colorados. Dedico parte de mi tiempo en contribiur con la enciclopedia. Por favor no estropeen el trabajo de otros. La foto la tomé personalmente de una foto de mi propiedad que data de principios del siglo XX. ¿Suficiente? Gracias por eliminar de mi contribución el cuadro colorado.--Inesbugsbunnyines (talk) 16:39, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again, possession of a copy (photo) of a work by someone else (original photographer) does not give you any copyright or authorship. This photo is not your own work. What is the original, a photo in a book or a printed photo? Is there any author or studio information on the front or on the backside?

STOP attacking me. It is you who gave me additional workload because you put wrong and insufficient information into the description at upload. And please stop complaining about our problem-messages. This is our default, not my personal choice. If there hadn't been problems with your uploads, then there would have been not need for such messages. So, it's you own doing. --Túrelio (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Estimado: No puedo, por el momento, satisfacer tu interrogante ya que el libro en cuestión está en mi estancia y yo estoy en la ciudad. En mejor memento, te contestaré. Atte.--Inesbugsbunnyines (talk) 23:48, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O.k., if you need longer than April 28th, notify me again to prevent automatic deletion of the file. --Túrelio (talk) 06:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phalaenopses is the correct plural form of Phalaenopsis, as in crisis--crises. Moving categories such as "Magenta Phalaenopses" to "Magenta Phalaenopsis" changed the names from format "Adjective nouns" to "Adjective noun", which is against our way of naming cats. --Pitke (talk) 07:00, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't tag them, just performed the badname-deletion requests, which seemed sensible to me. Please discuss this first with User:Orchi, as the several renames had more than Phalaenopses-to-Phalaenopsis transition. --Túrelio (talk) 07:07, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my name is Petr Elfimov, and I beg you to replace my profile picture http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%95%D0%BB%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%9F%D1%91%D1%82%D1%80_%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87&stable=0#.D0.9B.D0.B8.D1.87.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D0.B6.D0.B8.D0.B7.D0.BD.D1.8 I registered this photo http://www.flickr.com/photos/95194193@N03/8676685921/in/photostream/lightbox/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petr Elfimov (talk • contribs)

You can upload it by yourself under a different filename than File:Petr Elfimov.jpg from http://www.flickr.com/photos/95194193@N03/8676685921/in/photostream/. However, as it is (C) All rights reserved on Flickr, you need to send a separate authorship and license statement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This again Petr Elfimov. I'm sorry, but I do not quite understand what and where I need to send?

This seems to be a language problem. Please contact my Russian-speaking colleague User talk:EugeneZelenko. --Túrelio (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You could email someone like this user at their private email address. They may be able to verify the info and forward only the needed info to OTRS for a ticket number. Just a thought.--Canoe1967 (talk) 04:28, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned a more 'secure' method to send a licence to OTRS on that French military image that caused all the uproar over there.--Canoe1967 (talk) 13:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, o.k. Well, that was meant as a proposal for the OTRS people, of which I am none. Anyway, I'll possibly try at the weekend. --Túrelio (talk) 13:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me to send an informal confirmation to OTRS that I took this photo. Why? The original on Flickr is already CC-BY-SA. My username is obviously related to the account on Flickr, which you noted yourself. I asserted my rights already with the UploadWizard. Why is extra confirmation required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NeilK421 (talk • contribs)

Your username NeilK421 is possibly related to Flickr-user Neil Kandalgaonkar. I don't remember whether it was CC-BY-SA when I checked. As you may know, licenses on Flickr can easily be changed by the user, without leaving any record about the former license. "I asserted my rights .." - for a honest uploader this may seem to be clear enough. However, as you as a new user may not know, each day hundreths of uploaders to Commons assert us being the photographer or having the rights, when in fact they aren't, but simply have copied an image from somewhere. From your position as a Flickr-user you should be thankful that on Wikimedia-Commons unpaid volunteers check new uploads in order to protect the intellectual property of content creators, which does not happen at Flickr, PhotoBucket, etc., as far as I know. Anyway, I have now ordered a bot to record the current license of this image on Flickr. So, you don't need to do anything. --Túrelio (talk) 21:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -

You have alerted me to missing source info on a jpg file. I'm not sure how to enter new information on to the wiki format lines that are provided. I did try to make a change to the format line 'source' to include the reference info as to where the photo was originally published. Not sure if it worked. The photograph was used by the National Cyclopedia of American Biography, but it actually comes from the estate of Sylvester Poli. Being his grand-daughter, I have permission of use. Can you help me in any way with this, or possibly educate me on how to change source info?

Thank you!

Gramps101 (talk) 19:17, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gramps101,

though both images may be in the public domain, we need all available information about the source, the author (photographer) and the date (year) of publication, in order to evaluate the copyright status. In the description of both images you put your username into the author-entry. This may be the result of a misunderstanding, but is rather surely wrong, as you don't earn any copyright by reproducing an existing image. So, you should try to find out the name of the photographer/photo studio (backside of the original print/postcard?). If you honestly do not find anything, you need to write "unknown" in the author-entry. The same for the date. This is rather important for the evaluation of U.S. copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 19:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I know that exists the original colour version of that image, but I could not find it. I saw it time ago. So I did colorized it. Maybe is it better upload separately the b/w and the colour version? --Vanzanten (talk) 15:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Per our overwrite-policy that would have been better. However, I also find the authorship claim for the original b/w version questionable. The username RiccardoP1983 suggests that the user was born in 1983 and he would not have been able to personally creative a photo in 1960ies or 1944. --Túrelio (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you divide the b/w version and the colorized version of those photos in two different pages? I do not know how do it. Thank you! :) --Vanzanten (talk) 15:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try, but likely only tomorrow. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Vanzanten (talk) 16:13, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benvolguts,

Us comunico que com a President del Consell Comarcal de l'Alt Empordà dono permís per a la difusió pública sense restriccions de la següent imatge.

File:DOP Oli de l'Empordà.jpg

Salutacions.

Xavi Sanllehí. President del Consell Comarcal de l'Alt Empordà

Dear,

As the President of the Consell Comarcal de l'Alt Empordà I give permission for unrestricted public diffusion of this picture:

File:DOP Oli de l'Empordà.jpg

Best regards.

Xavi Sanllehí. President of the Consell Comarcal de l'Alt Empordà — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xasab (talk • contribs)

Hello, Túrelio. You have new messages at xavisanllehi's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ��� Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

That's my job. It is made with my camera. What's the problem? "You need to put source/author information for all images in this collage into the description." - Done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenikum 447 (talk • contribs)

So, you are saying that you personally created every one of the 7 images in File:Collage1234.jpg, right? And you did also paint/draw the Lenin-portrait? --Túrelio (talk) 14:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Túrelio. Check your email—you've got mail! You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

--Steinsplitter (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]