User talk:INeverCry: Difference between revisions
→m:User talk:INeverCry: resp |
m →m:User talk:INeverCry: cc |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
== [[m:User talk:INeverCry]] == |
== [[m:User talk:INeverCry]] == |
||
Imo, this conversation should be taken into consideration. There is this saying: you don't make music with one bell... That is also the reason why a lift of the block seems reasonable. Thank you for your time. [[User:Lotje|Lotje]] ([[User talk:Lotje|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC) |
Imo, this conversation should be taken into consideration. There is this saying: you don't make music with one bell... That is also the reason why a lift of the block seems reasonable. Thank you for your time. [[User:Lotje|Lotje]] ([[User talk:Lotje|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 20:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{reply|Lotje}} That is strange stuff. I've also seen WMF-banned editor {{U|Thekohser}} offer 50$ for a Wikipediocracy article on me. I don't find myself to be at all interest-worthy, especially as I was only an OTRS member for a grand total of 4 days, but apparently some others do. I don't know about getting unblocked - there's plenty of opposition to that, but I will be socking with constructive |
:{{reply|Lotje}} That is strange stuff. I've also seen WMF-banned editor {{U|Thekohser}} offer 50$ for a Wikipediocracy article on me. I don't find myself to be at all interest-worthy, especially as I was only an OTRS member for a grand total of 4 days, but apparently some others do. I don't know about getting unblocked - there's plenty of opposition to that, but I will be socking with constructive from now on. I'm saddened but resigned to what I've brought on myself. {{U|Russavia}} has been able to do [[:Category:Aviation Commons outreach|a lot of great work as a sockmaster here]], and so can I. Take care. [[User talk:INeverCry|<span style="text-shadow:gray 3px 3px 2px;"><font face="Comic sans ms" color="black"><b>lNeverCry</b></font></span>]] 00:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Talk page access == |
== Talk page access == |
Revision as of 00:15, 8 October 2017
Kick back and relax...
A kitten for you!Hope you're going well. Take care! We'll keep playing the music-
Events of yesterday...Oh dear... How could you? I have always appreciated your input and had come to deeply respect your involvement on both the English Wikipedia and on Commons. Yesterday it seems you wreaked havoc with Commons, including deleting the main page. I don't understand. Maybe understanding is not for me to have. But I would be lying if I said I was not very disappointed and/ or mystified by what has happened under whatever guise (as Daphne or any other). You do not owe me an explanation. Still, I would like to have one so I could forgive you. Is there an explanation?? KDS4444 (talk) 10:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC) DisappointedINC you were the best admin on this place by far and you had so much potential here you really did, As I said on the desysop page I'm not only shocked but I'm also very saddened because I considered you a best friend on here and as I said I thought you were the best admin this place has ever had, Anyway I wish you all the best for the future, Take care INC, Dave 19:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC) Disappointed, tooActually I too was disappointed to see that an admin with high potential like you used to be has been drawn by the Dark Side of the Force. I just wish that you didn't take Commons and its sister projects as a role-playing game. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC) BlocledI am sorry to hear that you are blocked due to abuse of multiple accounts. Actually both of you help me a lot, you two have contributed a lot on commons. May be after INC have been desysop, then you nominate Daphne for sysop. Actually being an admin is not important. Even you are not an admin, I can see your effort. So, don't give up yourself. I hope you can turn over a new leaf, identify why you are blocked, and promise not to do it again. The commons are always welcome for you. Best wishes. --B dash (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC) HiHi my friend....write me on my email if you need --LivioAndronico (talk) 21:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC) FarewellThank you INeverCry for all those contributions to Wikimedia Commons.--It's Kong of Lazers talk to me 23:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC) Your increasing socksINeverCry widely called as INC, by your recent sockpuppet creation am amazed to call u as a godfather of socks😂. While I might not know much about you because am only a year old but your regime as Daphne as admin I was amazed seeing your contributions. The day it came into light it was you behind the veil I was shocked by it. Your contribution to Commons is wide outstanding but your recent activities as a sock hurts all here at Commons. By your excellent contribution towards wikimedia projects they are Discussion whether to accept give u a fresh start. You know what is better for the development of Commons and u too know what sockpuppettery leads. So I request you that this 38 ends here and let's all function well. Am sure the Commons community not now but in future will forget your bad works compensating the good you perform. I hope you co-operate. Thanking you --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC) INeverCry please note the existence of the above proposal. For others: A request for comment has been raised at meta proposing that this account and the user be globally banned per m:Global bans. Comment should be made at the RFC page. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Imo, this conversation should be taken into consideration. There is this saying: you don't make music with one bell... That is also the reason why a lift of the block seems reasonable. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
Talk page accessHi, after your request I have opened talk page access for you. We both know that this may be a bit controversial, so please be careful. Jcb (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
|