User talk:INeverCry: Difference between revisions

Picture of the day
Poster advertising Thurston, the magician's reproduction of the (mythical) East Indian rope-trick. It claims that it's the first time out of India, though the truth value of early twentieth-century theatrical posters isn't always 100%. Today is Halloween. +/− [en]

	Kick back and relax...
	But don't forget to come back! ;-) We hope (talk) 01:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you're going well. Take care!

Jee 03:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	We'll keep playing the music-
	and wait for you to come back and dance ;) We hope (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear... How could you? I have always appreciated your input and had come to deeply respect your involvement on both the English Wikipedia and on Commons. Yesterday it seems you wreaked havoc with Commons, including deleting the main page. I don't understand. Maybe understanding is not for me to have. But I would be lying if I said I was not very disappointed and/ or mystified by what has happened under whatever guise (as Daphne or any other). You do not owe me an explanation. Still, I would like to have one so I could forgive you. Is there an explanation?? KDS4444 (talk) 10:43, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INC you were the best admin on this place by far and you had so much potential here you really did, As I said on the desysop page I'm not only shocked but I'm also very saddened because I considered you a best friend on here and as I said I thought you were the best admin this place has ever had, Anyway I wish you all the best for the future, Take care INC, Dave 19:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I too was disappointed to see that an admin with high potential like you used to be has been drawn by the Dark Side of the Force. I just wish that you didn't take Commons and its sister projects as a role-playing game. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 16:38, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to hear that you are blocked due to abuse of multiple accounts. Actually both of you help me a lot, you two have contributed a lot on commons. May be after INC have been desysop, then you nominate Daphne for sysop. Actually being an admin is not important. Even you are not an admin, I can see your effort. So, don't give up yourself. I hope you can turn over a new leaf, identify why you are blocked, and promise not to do it again. The commons are always welcome for you. Best wishes. --B dash (talk) 03:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend....write me on my email if you need --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you INeverCry for all those contributions to Wikimedia Commons.--It's Kong of Lazers talk to me 23:43, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INeverCry widely called as INC, by your recent sockpuppet creation am amazed to call u as a godfather of socks😂. While I might not know much about you because am only a year old but your regime as Daphne as admin I was amazed seeing your contributions. The day it came into light it was you behind the veil I was shocked by it. Your contribution to Commons is wide outstanding but your recent activities as a sock hurts all here at Commons. By your excellent contribution towards wikimedia projects they are Discussion whether to accept give u a fresh start. You know what is better for the development of Commons and u too know what sockpuppettery leads. So I request you that this 38 ends here and let's all function well. Am sure the Commons community not now but in future will forget your bad works compensating the good you perform. I hope you co-operate. Thanking you --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

INeverCry please note the existence of the above proposal.

For others: A request for comment has been raised at meta proposing that this account and the user be globally banned per m:Global bans. Comment should be made at the RFC page.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw it. Given that a well-known aggressive Commons admin is badly insulting me there, I have to say that I've nothing to do with the IP who initiated the GB request, nor with the request itself; even though it's actually true that I live in Berlin most of the time. I'm not for GB of INC for the simple reason that it would be just useless. CU's shall feel free to checkuser me, I've nothing to hide. Thanks --A.Savin 00:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@A.Savin: I have no suspicion of you being behind this IP. I thought possibly Messina, Sro23, or the person who posted above, Kong of Lasers, who is now blocked here for socking. It doesn't strike me as a proxy, but I can give it a quick scan with nmap if I have a chance. lNeverCry 16:54, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The IP isn't me either. I don't know how I'm supposed to convince you it's not me, but it really isn't. I don't know who it is. Sro23 (talk) 17:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sro23 The only issue I have with you is your continued tagging of my socks on the user pages. These socks are supposed to be reported to AN/B or AN/V so an admin can handle them. If I were Guanaco I would be a bit unhappy that you are stepping on his toes a bit with your actions. He's perfectly well able to handle blocking and tagging socks. There have also been people impersonating me on various sites; what if you tag them wrongly as mine? What if you tag another Russavia sock as mine? In any event, I can't blame you for sock hunting, since I'm one of the all-time kings of it. I've gotten the resentment out of my system and will only be doing good edits from now on. lNeverCry 00:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imo, this conversation should be taken into consideration. There is this saying: you don't make music with one bell... That is also the reason why a lift of the block seems reasonable. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 20:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: That is strange stuff. I've also seen WMF-banned editor Thekohser offer 50$ for a Wikipediocracy article on me. I don't find myself to be at all interest-worthy, especially as I was only an OTRS member for a grand total of 4 days, but apparently some others do. I don't know about getting unblocked - there's plenty of opposition to that, but I will be socking with constructive edits from now on. I'm saddened but resigned to what I've brought on myself. Russavia has been able to do a lot of great work as a sockmaster here, and so can I. Take care. lNeverCry 00:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, after your request I have opened talk page access for you. We both know that this may be a bit controversial, so please be careful. Jcb (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: Thanks old friend. I'll only use this talk page for addressing my block and concerns that may be voiced on AN or elsewhere. lNeverCry 16:57, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]