IMDb RATING
6.2/10
6.9K
YOUR RATING
A young ballet dancer is poised to become the principal performer in a group of ballet dancers.A young ballet dancer is poised to become the principal performer in a group of ballet dancers.A young ballet dancer is poised to become the principal performer in a group of ballet dancers.
- Awards
- 2 nominations
Barbara E. Robertson
- Harriet
- (as Barbara Robertson)
Davis C. Robertson
- Alec - Joffrey Dancer
- (as Davis Robertson)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaNeve Campbell lost thousands of dollars of her own money to ensure that her fellow cast members received their wages.
- GoofsAt about 1:10 while counting during a rehearsal, Harriet skips the 6th count of 8.
- Quotes
Alberto Antonelli: Ry, honey, let's scramble some ideas, instead of some asshole who contradicts me.
- Crazy creditsAfter the closing credits begin rolling, the dancers continue to take their final bows, and the audience continues to applaud.
Featured review
The DVD extras with some movies make the film seem better than it did just watching it. "The Company" is a good example.
I'd wondered, briefly, why star Neve Campbell also got producer credit. The DVD 'making of' documentary explains that the whole project was her idea; she'd been a dancer long before she took up acting, and wanted to combine the two. She chose Altman to direct, because of his skill at portraying relations and interactions among people in groups.
Altman did a fine job depicting dance, both rehearsals and performances. Campbell showed she can still dance. Malcolm McDowell gave a great performance as the acerbic company director. The Joffrey dancers were brilliant. Altman has created a dazzling cinematic album of what the world of dance is like at the beginning of the 21st century.
But the story arc was weak. This was no accident. In a recent (October 2004) interview, Altman said:
Question: "Why do you think you're drawn to stories about big groups of people sharing the same space? Did it have anything to do with growing up in such a large, close-knit family?"
Robert Altman: "Possibly. I don't know. That's a little too cerebral for me. I'm not much interested in stories anyway. I'm more interested in reactive behavior."
That sums up "The Company" very nicely. The movie is a montage of scenes of "reactive behavior" among realistic characters, and in this it is more like real life than a more structured story would have been.
Of course there is some story structure here, involving the creation of a new dance. This story is engaging, because the outside choreographer is a fey flake, and dance disaster seems foredoomed. But the dancers, being good soldiers, follow his orders diligently. And despite all expectations, at least all of my expectations, their climactic performance is superb.
But this story is not central to the movie. Again like life, it unfolds amidst all sorts of other organizational and interpersonal drama.
And for this reason the movie left me unsatisfied. Part of what I look for in movies, and in books, is a story arc: a beginning, a middle, and an end. I look for this precisely because life is rarely that neat. Many directors deliver this arc (and many more try to, and fail). Robert Altman chose not to try. He is free to do that, and I am free to rate this movie 7/10.
I'd wondered, briefly, why star Neve Campbell also got producer credit. The DVD 'making of' documentary explains that the whole project was her idea; she'd been a dancer long before she took up acting, and wanted to combine the two. She chose Altman to direct, because of his skill at portraying relations and interactions among people in groups.
Altman did a fine job depicting dance, both rehearsals and performances. Campbell showed she can still dance. Malcolm McDowell gave a great performance as the acerbic company director. The Joffrey dancers were brilliant. Altman has created a dazzling cinematic album of what the world of dance is like at the beginning of the 21st century.
But the story arc was weak. This was no accident. In a recent (October 2004) interview, Altman said:
Question: "Why do you think you're drawn to stories about big groups of people sharing the same space? Did it have anything to do with growing up in such a large, close-knit family?"
Robert Altman: "Possibly. I don't know. That's a little too cerebral for me. I'm not much interested in stories anyway. I'm more interested in reactive behavior."
That sums up "The Company" very nicely. The movie is a montage of scenes of "reactive behavior" among realistic characters, and in this it is more like real life than a more structured story would have been.
Of course there is some story structure here, involving the creation of a new dance. This story is engaging, because the outside choreographer is a fey flake, and dance disaster seems foredoomed. But the dancers, being good soldiers, follow his orders diligently. And despite all expectations, at least all of my expectations, their climactic performance is superb.
But this story is not central to the movie. Again like life, it unfolds amidst all sorts of other organizational and interpersonal drama.
And for this reason the movie left me unsatisfied. Part of what I look for in movies, and in books, is a story arc: a beginning, a middle, and an end. I look for this precisely because life is rarely that neat. Many directors deliver this arc (and many more try to, and fail). Robert Altman chose not to try. He is free to do that, and I am free to rate this movie 7/10.
- How long is The Company?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Kumpanya
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $15,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $2,283,914
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $93,776
- Dec 28, 2003
- Gross worldwide
- $6,415,017
- Runtime1 hour 52 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content