Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard
Wikipedia Arbitration |
---|
|
Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion regarding PIA Canvassing
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Since at least October 2023, there has been an ongoing effort by one or more banned editors to canvass discussions within the Israel-Palestine topic area and asking for proxy edits to promote a pro-Israel point of view. Based on the evidence received by the Committee, the following discussions have been targeted:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genocide against Palestinians
- Talk:Allegations of war crimes against Israel#Requested move 11 October 2023
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakba denial
- Talk:Israel#Request for Comment on apartheid charges
- Talk:United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine#Unexplained removal
- Talk:Ahed Tamimi#Instagram account suspended following call to butcher civilians
- Talk:From the river to the sea#Lead dominant View
- Talk:From the river to the sea#For Clarity on Removal of Kelley Source
- Talk:Gaza Strip#"Oppressive one-party state"
- Template talk:Genocide navbox#Correction of date range and citation in need of correction
- Talk:Human shields in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict#Merge proposal
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glorification of martyrdom in Palestinian society
- Talk:Israel#RFC on human rights language in lead
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit Rima massacre
- Talk:2023 Israel–Hamas war#RfC on sexual violence in lead section
The Arbitration Committee would like to thank the editors who reported canvassing. If editors have any additional canvassing evidence, please bring it to the Committee's attention. The Arbitration Committee asks the Wikimedia Foundation for assistance creating technical measures to prevent the ongoing abuse.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth (talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Dovidroth (talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech (talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, he is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that EytanMelech (talk · contribs) most likely made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
Based on information from the checkuser tool and on information received, the Committee determines that Homerethegreat (talk · contribs) most likely participated in discussions due to canvassing and made proxy edits for a banned editor. As a result, they are indefinitely topic banned from making edits related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed immediately after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
For the Arbitration Committee, Aoidh (talk) 15:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Arbitration motion regarding PIA Canvassing
Motion on use of remind, warn, and admonish
A motion to formalize the Arbitration Committee's usage of remind, warn, and admonish in the procedures is now being considered at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Barkeep49 (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 51 § Motion on use of remind, warn, and admonish
Feedback requested for AE's "Information for administrators" section
Feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE. The draft text and feedback section can be found at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Consultation: Admin information draft. Thank you to everyone who participates. Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Feedback requested for AE's "Information for administrators" section
Arbitration motion regarding the severity of remedies
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Add the following to the Arbitration Procedures as a subsection of "Arbitration Proceedings"
When used in arbitration motions or remedies, the words below should be considered to have the following order of severity:
- Remind (weakest)
- Warn
- Admonish (strongest)
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 06:50, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding the severity of remedies
Change to the CheckUser team, January 2024
Following a request to the Committee, Wugapodes' CheckUser access has been removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks Wugapodes for their service as a CheckUser and their continuing service as an Oversighter.
On behalf of the Committee, Sdrqaz (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Change to the CheckUser team, January 2024
Motions on amending the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee
Two motions are proposed to amend the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee at Arbitration/Requests/Motions. Community feedback is invited and welcomed. Maxim (talk) 16:45, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Motions on amending the scope of appeals considered by the Arbitration Committee
Arbitration motion regarding Mzajac
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
Given Mzajac (talk · contribs)'s absence from editing, the Mzajac case will be suspended for a period of three months and Mzajac will be temporarily desysopped.
Should Mzajac return to active editing on the English Wikipedia during this time and request that this case be resumed, the Arbitration Committee shall unsuspend the case by motion and it will proceed through the normal arbitration process. Such a request may be made by email to arbcom-enwikimedia.org or at the clerks' noticeboard. Mzajac will remain temporarily desysopped for the duration of the case.
If such a request is not made within three months of this motion or if Mzajac resigns his administrative tools, this case shall be automatically closed, and Mzajac shall remain desysopped. If tools are resigned or removed, in the circumstances described above, Mzajac may regain the administrative tools at any time only via a successful request for adminship.
For the Arbitration Committee, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 20:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)