Talk:Sokhta Koh

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. South Asia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. India: History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

A couple changes this otherwise excellent article needs:

1) The extended quote at the bottom is actually two quotes, and should be presented as such. The length of the quotes is a little too long. The article is copyrighted, it would be better to hold the quotes down to a couple sentences, each. (No, it doesn't matter, for Wikipedia, if you are the original writer, or otherwise own the material, Wikipedia material must be in the public domain.)

2) More footnotes should be added in the text, itself, particularly on statements that might be open to question. See, for example WP:IC.

3) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and subjective comments that are appropriate in an essay aren't appropriate here. "difficult to appreciate", "rather anemic", "bound to reveal" and "little can be said" are subjective rhetorical devices that don't belong.

That all being said, the article made great reading, and I hope you plan to write more Wiki articles!!

24.130.9.180 (talk) 10:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Harappan Interaction Networks1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:39, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]