Talk:Finding Bigfoot

Television Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cryptozoology Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptozoology, an attempt to improve coverage of the pseudoscience and subculture of cryptozoology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CryptozoologyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptozoologyTemplate:WikiProject CryptozoologyCryptids Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The amount of slander and unverifiables should be corrected. This is mostly a overly subjective ad-hominem and blatently misinformation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canadian Archain (talk • contribs) 18:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is the above statement referring to? The poor usage of English makes it difficult to understand. 2605:E000:88C8:8000:CDD9:E5FE:20CC:C2D6 (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This program is listed here as a documentary. It is anything BUT a documentary. The program is highly stylized and edited by the producers in such a way to make a mythological monster appear to be a realistic animal. If it were to be called anything, it should be called either a "Reality TV Show" or a "Mockumentary". But please, don't allow it to mislead people into believing that it is a documentary. March 6, 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.78.68 (talk) 23:24, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. The show is definitely in the "documentary" format as it focuses on "documenting" what these people are doing. You can't claim that it's not a documentary simply because you don't agree with their beliefs. Style and relevancy have no bearing on whether or not the show is documentary.2605:E000:88C8:8000:CDD9:E5FE:20CC:C2D6 (talk) 14:35, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Documenting one's futility is allowed. There is no test for idiocy or even the existence of the subject. giggle (talk) 08:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The claim is made that, "Over the course of the series, the team has introduced many new bigfoot related terms into the American vernacular." Is there any evidence that these terms have actually entered the American vernacular, beyond the show itself and associated marketing? 50.37.124.19 (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]