User talk:182.58.172.35: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
fix |
fix, not pinging bbb23 because I know the result let him continue his work |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock|reason={{ping|Zzuuzz}} I updated the following of {{ping|Arjayay}}'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Arjayay/Anti-Indian_Racist&diff=prev&oldid=880459683 Anti-Indian racist page] and commented on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=880568575 this noticeboard] of the following case, blocked by {{ |
{{unblock|reason={{ping|Zzuuzz}} I updated the following of {{ping|Arjayay}}'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Arjayay/Anti-Indian_Racist&diff=prev&oldid=880459683 Anti-Indian racist page] and commented on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=880568575 this noticeboard] of the following case, blocked by {{|}}. My block for previous IP eroded and as I see he blocked me on site without any information yet again, I do not know who is behind this IP address but I would like to hear CU results, I would also like to open an arbitration request if it fails, because I never registered a account nor ever will, this type of blocks prevent me from contributing to this vast encyclopedia, participate in supposed discussions and make common claims of "getting blocked", I am hoping that Zzuuzz justifies in these types of claimants. I am active in Sockpuppet investigations to prevent socking of other accounts. I just want to assert and state my IP address is static to dynamic in range and frequently restarts to assign a new static IP. I do not even have a clue what is going on and why I am being stuck in this case again and again. I added and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shellwood&diff=prev&oldid=880441361 gave a barnstar] to {{ping|Shellwood}} for his anti-vandalism activity, and a powerful minded CheckUser a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zzuuzz&diff=prev&oldid=880456108 barnstar for his high CheckUser activity]. Now may be these are not enough and trying https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India%E2%80%93Pakistan_border_skirmishes_(2016%E2%80%932018)&diff=prev&oldid=880447552 to improve encyclopedic information] by helping it is not enough. But I do not want to get into this again and again over the same supposed IP range, for which I myself can not help. This is my range and I am not going to "buy more routers", this is my permanent IP range, nothing to hide at all. Further more, this block is way too [[WP:NOPUNISH|punitively applied]], given my recent contributions it is not even disruptive and not at all enough to warrant a sincere block; blocks should be [[WP:BLOCKP|preventative in nature]] and comply with [[WP:WHYBLOCK|the policy]]. I must say, though I must not, this is a act of [[WP:ADMINABUSE|abuse of administrative privileges]] and misuse of [[m:CheckUser policy|the CheckUser policy]]. There should also be substantial amount of behavioral evidence to connect and say if its the "alleged same person". And the technical evidence should concur with it (since, it is a CheckUser block). Repeating once more, this block appeal is not disruptive, rather a formal way to inform the officials of this grave mistake (may be not). This block is inappropriate. [[Special:Contributions/182.58.172.35|182.58.172.35]] ([[User talk:182.58.172.35#top|talk]]) 04:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)}} |
||
Revision as of 04:22, 28 January 2019
182.58.172.35 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
@Zzuuzz: I updated the following of @Arjayay:'s Anti-Indian racist page and commented on this noticeboard of the following case, blocked by Bbb23. My block for previous IP eroded and as I see he blocked me on site without any information yet again, I do not know who is behind this IP address but I would like to hear CU results, I would also like to open an arbitration request if it fails, because I never registered a account nor ever will, this type of blocks prevent me from contributing to this vast encyclopedia, participate in supposed discussions and make common claims of "getting blocked", I am hoping that Zzuuzz justifies in these types of claimants. I am active in Sockpuppet investigations to prevent socking of other accounts. I just want to assert and state my IP address is static to dynamic in range and frequently restarts to assign a new static IP. I do not even have a clue what is going on and why I am being stuck in this case again and again. I added and gave a barnstar to @Shellwood: for his anti-vandalism activity, and a powerful minded CheckUser a barnstar for his high CheckUser activity. Now may be these are not enough and trying to improve encyclopedic information by helping it is not enough. But I do not want to get into this again and again over the same supposed IP range, for which I myself can not help. This is my range and I am not going to "buy more routers", this is my permanent IP range, nothing to hide at all. Further more, this block is way too punitively applied, given my recent contributions it is not even disruptive and not at all enough to warrant a sincere block; blocks should be preventative in nature and comply with the policy. I must say, though I must not, this is a act of abuse of administrative privileges and misuse of the CheckUser policy. There should also be substantial amount of behavioral evidence to connect and say if its the "alleged same person". And the technical evidence should concur with it (since, it is a CheckUser block). Repeating once more, this block appeal is not disruptive, rather a formal way to inform the officials of this grave mistake (may be not). This block is inappropriate. 182.58.172.35 (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Zzuuzz|Zzuuzz]]:</span> I updated the following of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]]:</span>'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Arjayay/Anti-Indian_Racist&diff=prev&oldid=880459683 Anti-Indian racist page] and commented on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=880568575 this noticeboard] of the following case, blocked by <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23 Bbb23]</span>. My block for previous IP eroded and as I see he blocked me on site without any information yet again, I do not know who is behind this IP address but I would like to hear CU results, I would also like to open an arbitration request if it fails, because I never registered a account nor ever will, this type of blocks prevent me from contributing to this vast encyclopedia, participate in supposed discussions and make common claims of "getting blocked", I am hoping that Zzuuzz justifies in these types of claimants. I am active in Sockpuppet investigations to prevent socking of other accounts. I just want to assert and state my IP address is static to dynamic in range and frequently restarts to assign a new static IP. I do not even have a clue what is going on and why I am being stuck in this case again and again. I added and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shellwood&diff=prev&oldid=880441361 gave a barnstar] to <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]]:</span> for his anti-vandalism activity, and a powerful minded CheckUser a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zzuuzz&diff=prev&oldid=880456108 barnstar for his high CheckUser activity]. Now may be these are not enough and trying [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India%E2%80%93Pakistan_border_skirmishes_(2016%E2%80%932018)&diff=prev&oldid=880447552 to improve encyclopedic information] by helping it is not enough. But I do not want to get into this again and again over the same supposed IP range, for which I myself can not help. This is my range and I am not going to "buy more routers", this is my permanent IP range, nothing to hide at all. Further more, this block is way too [[WP:NOPUNISH|punitively applied]], given my recent contributions it is not even disruptive and not at all enough to warrant a sincere block; blocks should be [[WP:BLOCKP|preventative in nature]] and comply with [[WP:WHYBLOCK|the policy]]. I must say, though I must not, this is a act of [[WP:ADMINABUSE|abuse of administrative privileges]] and misuse of [[m:CheckUser policy|the CheckUser policy]]. There should also be substantial amount of behavioral evidence to connect and say if its the "alleged same person". And the technical evidence should concur with it (since, it is a CheckUser block). Repeating once more, this block appeal is not disruptive, rather a formal way to inform the officials of this grave mistake (may be not). This block is inappropriate. [[Special:Contributions/182.58.172.35|182.58.172.35]] ([[User talk:182.58.172.35#top|talk]]) 04:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Zzuuzz|Zzuuzz]]:</span> I updated the following of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]]:</span>'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Arjayay/Anti-Indian_Racist&diff=prev&oldid=880459683 Anti-Indian racist page] and commented on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=880568575 this noticeboard] of the following case, blocked by <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23 Bbb23]</span>. My block for previous IP eroded and as I see he blocked me on site without any information yet again, I do not know who is behind this IP address but I would like to hear CU results, I would also like to open an arbitration request if it fails, because I never registered a account nor ever will, this type of blocks prevent me from contributing to this vast encyclopedia, participate in supposed discussions and make common claims of "getting blocked", I am hoping that Zzuuzz justifies in these types of claimants. I am active in Sockpuppet investigations to prevent socking of other accounts. I just want to assert and state my IP address is static to dynamic in range and frequently restarts to assign a new static IP. I do not even have a clue what is going on and why I am being stuck in this case again and again. I added and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shellwood&diff=prev&oldid=880441361 gave a barnstar] to <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]]:</span> for his anti-vandalism activity, and a powerful minded CheckUser a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zzuuzz&diff=prev&oldid=880456108 barnstar for his high CheckUser activity]. Now may be these are not enough and trying [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India%E2%80%93Pakistan_border_skirmishes_(2016%E2%80%932018)&diff=prev&oldid=880447552 to improve encyclopedic information] by helping it is not enough. But I do not want to get into this again and again over the same supposed IP range, for which I myself can not help. This is my range and I am not going to "buy more routers", this is my permanent IP range, nothing to hide at all. Further more, this block is way too [[WP:NOPUNISH|punitively applied]], given my recent contributions it is not even disruptive and not at all enough to warrant a sincere block; blocks should be [[WP:BLOCKP|preventative in nature]] and comply with [[WP:WHYBLOCK|the policy]]. I must say, though I must not, this is a act of [[WP:ADMINABUSE|abuse of administrative privileges]] and misuse of [[m:CheckUser policy|the CheckUser policy]]. There should also be substantial amount of behavioral evidence to connect and say if its the "alleged same person". And the technical evidence should concur with it (since, it is a CheckUser block). Repeating once more, this block appeal is not disruptive, rather a formal way to inform the officials of this grave mistake (may be not). This block is inappropriate. [[Special:Contributions/182.58.172.35|182.58.172.35]] ([[User talk:182.58.172.35#top|talk]]) 04:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=<span class="template-ping">@[[User:Zzuuzz|Zzuuzz]]:</span> I updated the following of <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Arjayay|Arjayay]]:</span>'s [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Arjayay/Anti-Indian_Racist&diff=prev&oldid=880459683 Anti-Indian racist page] and commented on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=880568575 this noticeboard] of the following case, blocked by <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Bbb23 Bbb23]</span>. My block for previous IP eroded and as I see he blocked me on site without any information yet again, I do not know who is behind this IP address but I would like to hear CU results, I would also like to open an arbitration request if it fails, because I never registered a account nor ever will, this type of blocks prevent me from contributing to this vast encyclopedia, participate in supposed discussions and make common claims of "getting blocked", I am hoping that Zzuuzz justifies in these types of claimants. I am active in Sockpuppet investigations to prevent socking of other accounts. I just want to assert and state my IP address is static to dynamic in range and frequently restarts to assign a new static IP. I do not even have a clue what is going on and why I am being stuck in this case again and again. I added and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shellwood&diff=prev&oldid=880441361 gave a barnstar] to <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]]:</span> for his anti-vandalism activity, and a powerful minded CheckUser a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zzuuzz&diff=prev&oldid=880456108 barnstar for his high CheckUser activity]. Now may be these are not enough and trying [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=India%E2%80%93Pakistan_border_skirmishes_(2016%E2%80%932018)&diff=prev&oldid=880447552 to improve encyclopedic information] by helping it is not enough. But I do not want to get into this again and again over the same supposed IP range, for which I myself can not help. This is my range and I am not going to "buy more routers", this is my permanent IP range, nothing to hide at all. Further more, this block is way too [[WP:NOPUNISH|punitively applied]], given my recent contributions it is not even disruptive and not at all enough to warrant a sincere block; blocks should be [[WP:BLOCKP|preventative in nature]] and comply with [[WP:WHYBLOCK|the policy]]. I must say, though I must not, this is a act of [[WP:ADMINABUSE|abuse of administrative privileges]] and misuse of [[m:CheckUser policy|the CheckUser policy]]. There should also be substantial amount of behavioral evidence to connect and say if its the "alleged same person". And the technical evidence should concur with it (since, it is a CheckUser block). Repeating once more, this block appeal is not disruptive, rather a formal way to inform the officials of this grave mistake (may be not). This block is inappropriate. [[Special:Contributions/182.58.172.35|182.58.172.35]] ([[User talk:182.58.172.35#top|talk]]) 04:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}