User talk:Jingiby: Difference between revisions
MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) m Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 31d) to User talk:Jingiby/Archive 17. |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
It is explained exelent from Buchanan, while Macedonan folklore belongs to Bulgaria as regional, ethnographic area. As per Peters, the Macedonian folk songs from Blagoevgrad province are also part of Macedonian Bulgarian folklore. Ask also Miladinovi. In their collection even the characters from this folk song are Bulgarian women. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 12:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
It is explained exelent from Buchanan, while Macedonan folklore belongs to Bulgaria as regional, ethnographic area. As per Peters, the Macedonian folk songs from Blagoevgrad province are also part of Macedonian Bulgarian folklore. Ask also Miladinovi. In their collection even the characters from this folk song are Bulgarian women. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 12:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
:So why didn't you say that? I suggest you reread Peters (2002) |
:So why didn't you say that? I suggest you reread Peters (2002) because she says nothing of the sort. Where does Buchanan (2006) even mention the song at all? Also, start using the 'preview' button when editing; you make even the simplest of grammatical and spelling mistakes in your frenzied edits. --[[User:WavesSaid|WavesSaid]] ([[User talk:WavesSaid|talk]]) 12:41, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
||
Thank you, my Australian friend. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 12:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you, my Australian friend. [[User:Jingiby|Jingiby]] ([[User talk:Jingiby#top|talk]]) 12:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:33, 7 December 2012
Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we are requesting your participation to help find a resolution. The thread is "Marko Cepenkov". Please take a moment to review the simple guide and join the discussion. Thank you!
EarwigBot operator / talk 11:34, 18 November 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 20Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Independent Macedonia (1944), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tito (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC) Association of Serbo-MacedoniansNeutralization? Do you yourself actually believe that? --WavesSaid (talk) 05:47, 4 December 2012 (UTC) Biljana platno belešeWhere does Peters (2002) say it's considered Bulgarian? Where does Buchanan (2006) even mention the song? --WavesSaid (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC) It is explained exelent from Buchanan, while Macedonan folklore belongs to Bulgaria as regional, ethnographic area. As per Peters, the Macedonian folk songs from Blagoevgrad province are also part of Macedonian Bulgarian folklore. Ask also Miladinovi. In their collection even the characters from this folk song are Bulgarian women. Jingiby (talk) 12:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Thank you, my Australian friend. Jingiby (talk) 12:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
|