User talk:Some people: Difference between revisions
Some people (talk | contribs) m |
Some people (talk | contribs) →Blocked: m userlinks |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Image:Red_warning.png|left|20px]] '''Blocked:''' I have blocked you indefinitely as a reincarnation of the editor who formerly posted from the IP address 195.82.106.244, who was banned from Wikipedia for one year under [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris]]. Your contribution style and content identifies you as either the editor himself or someone posting content on his behalf. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 12:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
[[Image:Red_warning.png|left|20px]] '''Blocked:''' I have blocked you indefinitely as a reincarnation of the editor who formerly posted from the IP address 195.82.106.244, who was banned from Wikipedia for one year under [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris]]. Your contribution style and content identifies you as either the editor himself or someone posting content on his behalf. [[User talk:Thatcher131|Thatcher131]] 12:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC) |
||
{{unblock| I think Mr Thatcher131 has stepped over the line here and provided no reasonable evidence to support his accusations. Firstly, I was blocked claiming a "3RR" - which I had not done - on the basis of accusations made by |
{{unblock| I think Mr Thatcher131 has stepped over the line here and provided no reasonable evidence to support his accusations. Firstly, I was blocked claiming a "3RR" - which I had not done - on the basis of accusations made by user |Riveros11, already on probation for edit warring and ownership with a history of similar documented attacks on others. |
||
Now, I have received permanent block due to the same on a whim. In ignorance of the work I have done, it would appear to be prejudiced and excessively autocratic.}} |
Now, I have received permanent block due to the same on a whim. In ignorance of the work I have done, it would appear to be prejudiced and excessively autocratic.}} |
Revision as of 16:33, 29 January 2007
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of 195.82.106.244 (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Blocked
Blocked: You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule on Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University. Also, based on your contribution style and content, I suspect you of being the editor who formerly posted from the IP address 195.82.106.244, and who was banned from editing Wikipedia for one year per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. I am still investingating the banned user problem, in the meantime you are blocked for edit warring. Thatcher131 19:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Please note that the article is on probation. I am not certain, almost certain that we can not "qoute" the murlis even if you think it is the word of God. You can quote academics that cite the murlis and other books. Please prove the following when entering material:
(Name)"Peace and Purity: The Story of the Brahma Kumaris, A Spiritual Revolution"(who wrote it) by Hodgkinson, Liz,(year) 2002, (the ISBN #)ISBN 0754609510 If you provide all of the above the entry will most likely be more appriciated. PEACETalkAbout 00:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Blocked
Blocked: I have blocked you indefinitely as a reincarnation of the editor who formerly posted from the IP address 195.82.106.244, who was banned from Wikipedia for one year under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris. Your contribution style and content identifies you as either the editor himself or someone posting content on his behalf. Thatcher131 12:56, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Some people (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I think Mr Thatcher131 has stepped over the line here and provided no reasonable evidence to support his accusations. Firstly, I was blocked claiming a "3RR" - which I had not done - on the basis of accusations made by user [[User:Riveros11|Riveros11]] <span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Riveros11|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/Riveros11|contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:DeletedContributions/Riveros11|deleted contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Log/Riveros11|logs]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Riveros11 filter log] <b>·</b> [[Special:Block/Riveros11|block user]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog%2Fblock&page=User%3ARiveros11 block log])</span>, already on probation for edit warring and ownership with a history of similar documented attacks on others. Now, I have received permanent block due to the same on a whim. In ignorance of the work I have done, it would appear to be prejudiced and excessively autocratic. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1= I think Mr Thatcher131 has stepped over the line here and provided no reasonable evidence to support his accusations. Firstly, I was blocked claiming a "3RR" - which I had not done - on the basis of accusations made by user [[User:Riveros11|Riveros11]] <span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Riveros11|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/Riveros11|contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:DeletedContributions/Riveros11|deleted contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Log/Riveros11|logs]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Riveros11 filter log] <b>·</b> [[Special:Block/Riveros11|block user]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog%2Fblock&page=User%3ARiveros11 block log])</span>, already on probation for edit warring and ownership with a history of similar documented attacks on others. Now, I have received permanent block due to the same on a whim. In ignorance of the work I have done, it would appear to be prejudiced and excessively autocratic. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1= I think Mr Thatcher131 has stepped over the line here and provided no reasonable evidence to support his accusations. Firstly, I was blocked claiming a "3RR" - which I had not done - on the basis of accusations made by user [[User:Riveros11|Riveros11]] <span class="plainlinks">([[User talk:Riveros11|talk]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Contribs/Riveros11|contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:DeletedContributions/Riveros11|deleted contribs]] <b>·</b> [[Special:Log/Riveros11|logs]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AAbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Riveros11 filter log] <b>·</b> [[Special:Block/Riveros11|block user]] <b>·</b> [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog%2Fblock&page=User%3ARiveros11 block log])</span>, already on probation for edit warring and ownership with a history of similar documented attacks on others. Now, I have received permanent block due to the same on a whim. In ignorance of the work I have done, it would appear to be prejudiced and excessively autocratic. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}