Talk:formaticus: difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary Tag: 2017 source edit |
→Divider: Reply |
||
Line 229:
*::::::::::*:::::I intended not to press this matter further because I hoped that you would acknowledge, even if only tactily, the truth that you are a beginner when it comes to Romance Linguistics. (Until you realize this, you will never be able to improve.) Instead you have continued to confidently blunder your way through arguments about the topic, which demonstrates that you still believe yourself to be an expert, or at the very least not the beginner that you objectively are. I will continue to point this out in hopes that the message will make it through to you.
*::::::::::*:::::Nobody is asking you to publicly confess this, just to understand it. You may yet make a good Romanist one day after thoroughly informing yourself on the subject. Having a good foundation in Classical Latin will help, but it is not nearly enough on its own. [[User:The Nicodene|The Nicodene]] ([[User talk:The Nicodene|talk]]) 23:40, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
== Conclusion ==
|