It is approximately 12:31 PM where this user lives (South Korea). [refresh]

Deleted articles

edit

Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Davidgoodheart: Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, Gottlieb Fluhmann. plicit 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi Explict. I recently uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons a new logo of Moe's Southwest Grill (File:Moes Southwest Grill logo.png). On 21 November 2023, an IP user made an edit[1] that removed that logo from the article. The edit summary, in part, stated, "Removed outdated logo." After I had uploaded the new logo, I noticed that you had deleted the Wikipedia-stored image of File:Moes logo.png on 10 February 2024, with the rationale "F5: Unused non-free media file". Although I am unable to view it due to its deletion, the evidence above suggests that this was the previous logo of Moe's Southwest Grill. To me, the new logo does not qualify for copyright protection as it does not appear to meet the originality threshold required for copyright. The new logo appears to merely consist of text and geometric symbols (a box, three triangles, and a generic pepper symbol), although it appears certainly eligible for trademark protection. There seems to be some level of consensus that the pepper symbol (see the commons entry to File:Chili's Logo.svg) is not copyrightable. I could understand an argument the elements are combined in a way that would make it copyrightable, but for the reasons mentioned above, I don't find it particularly persuasive. Since you are the deleting administrator on the original logo and are an admin on Commons, I will defer to your judgment over whether the current logo is copyrightable or not. If you feel it does meet copyright protection and delete it from commons, I would like to upload the new logo to Wikipedia under fair use rational, unless you have any objections. Thanks! Wikipedialuva (talk) 12:41, 10 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Dumbdora3729.jpg

edit

When deleting files per WP:F8, please ensure that Commons has the high-resolution copy of the file, not just the bot-reduced WP:NFCC#3b version. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Stefan2: I have uploaded the higher resolution. plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg

edit

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:La malédiction de l'escargot, 2020.jpg? I think it's a reupload of the same file you deleted back in November. The licensing is almost certainly incorrect and the file's not being used anywhere; so, I don't see a way to convert it to non-free (at least not at the moment). I tagged the file with "npd" per F11, but this probably meets to criteria for F9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Marchjuly: Hi, it is indeed the same image. The use of {{npd}} works in this case. plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for checking. -- Marchjuly (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg

edit

Hi Explicit. Could you take a look at File:Pop-weaver-22pack.jpg? No source or license was provided, but I'm guessing the image comes from some website (same image can by found on several websites like here). This almost certainly wasn't taken by the uploader; so, that makes the photo non-free. The packaging imagery as well is also likely non-free. The non-free photo in and of itself would most likely fail WP:FREER since a free photo or 2D non-free image could be used instead; however, the way the file's currently being used in Weaver Popcorn Company#Pop Weaver most likely even means that a free or 2D non-free image of the packaging only would also fail NFCC#8. Should this be tagged with F4 or should it be tagged per F9? -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Jay Estiquita.jpg

edit

Could you also take a look at File:Jay Estiquita.jpg? It appears to be a reupload of a file you deleted per F4 yesterday, and it might be a selfie given how it's being used. The uploader has also uploaded several other files without licensing or source information too (some have already been deleted) that probably need to be assessed. File:OctoArtsFilms2017.jpg looks like it might be OK to convert to non-free, but I'm not sure the same can be said about File:MTRCBSPG2012.gif. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thank you for noticing my unsigned opinion and adding a signature! gidonb (talk) 19:18, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg

edit

File:Manmohanmisra.jpeg is another file you deleted that's been reuploaded. You deleted this or another file with the same name last August per F11. There's a claim of permission that this is a "family" photo received from photo subject's daughter, but there's nothing provided to verify that. This seems similar to what was claimed for the photo before. Do you think if this is the same photo that it's OK to tag with {{npd}} again or should it go to FFD this time around? FWIW, this is the same as File:In Cuttack -- late '90s rev.jpg uploaded to Commons by the same person; the Commons file, though, is being claimed as "own work", which is different from what's being claimned for the local file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

New message from DreamRimmer

edit
 
Hello, Explicit. You have new messages at User talk:DreamRimmer bot II/Reports/G13 eligible drafts.
Message added 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DreamRimmer (talk) 09:33, 17 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Marcus Younis

edit
@Das osmnezz: I have removed the page protection. plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail

edit
 
Hello, Explicit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Thesazh (talk) 04:18, 19 January 2025 (UTC)Reply