Urease

Its activity was first identified in 1876 by Frédéric Alphonse Musculus as a soluble ferment.^[4] In 1926, James B. Sumner, showed that urease is a protein by examining its crystallized form.^[5] Sumner's work was the first demonstration that a protein can function as an enzyme and led eventually to the recognition that most enzymes are in fact proteins. Urease was the first enzyme crystallized. For this work, Sumner was awarded the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1946.^[6] The crystal structure of urease was first solved by P. A. Karplus in 1995.^[5]

A 1984 study focusing on urease from jack bean found that the active site contains a pair of nickel centers.^[7] In vitro activation also has been achieved with manganese and cobalt in place of nickel.^[8] Lead salts are inhibiting.

The molecular weight is either 480 kDa or 545 kDa for jack-bean urease (calculated mass from the amino acid sequence). 840 amino acids per molecule, of which 90 are cysteine residues.^[9]

The optimum pH is 7.4 and optimum temperature is 60 °C. Substrates include urea and hydroxyurea.

Bacterial ureases are composed of three distinct subunits, one large catalytic (α 60–76kDa) and two small (β 8–21 kDa, γ 6–14 kDa) commonly forming (αβγ)₃ trimers stoichiometry with a 2-fold symmetric structure (note that the image above gives the structure of the asymmetric unit, one-third of the true biological assembly), they are cysteine-rich enzymes, resulting in the enzyme molar masses between 190 and 300kDa.^[9]

An exceptional urease is obtained from Helicobacter sp.. These are composed of two subunits, α(26–31 kDa)-β(61–66 kDa). These subunits form a supramolecular (αβ)₁₂ dodecameric complex.^[10] of repeating α-β subunits, each coupled pair of subunits has an active site, for a total of 12 active sites.^[10] It plays an essential function for survival, neutralizing gastric acid by allowing urea to enter into periplasm via a proton-gated urea channel.^[11] The presence of urease is used in the diagnosis of Helicobacter species.

All bacterial ureases are solely cytoplasmic, except for those in Helicobacter pylori, which along with its cytoplasmic activity, has external activity with host cells. In contrast, all plant ureases are cytoplasmic.^[9]

Fungal and plant ureases are made up of identical subunits (~90 kDa each), most commonly assembled as trimers and hexamers. For example, jack bean urease has two structural and one catalytic subunit. The α subunit contains the active site, it is composed of 840 amino acids per molecule (90 cysteines), its molecular mass without Ni(II) ions amounting to 90.77 kDa. The mass of the hexamer with the 12 nickel ions is 545.34 kDa. Other examples of homohexameric structures of plant ureases are those of soybean, pigeon pea and cotton seeds enzymes.^[9]

It is important to note, that although composed of different types of subunits, ureases from different sources extending from bacteria to plants and fungi exhibit high homology of amino acid sequences. The single plant urease chain is equivalent to a fused γ-β-α organization. The Helicobacter "α" is equivalent to a fusion of the normal bacterial γ-β subunits, while its "β" subunit is equivalent to the normal bacterial α.^[9] The three-chain organization is likely ancestral.^[12]

The k_cat/K_m of urease in the processing of urea is 10¹⁴ times greater than the rate of the uncatalyzed elimination reaction of urea.^[5] There are many reasons for this observation in nature. The proximity of urea to active groups in the active site along with the correct orientation of urea allow hydrolysis to occur rapidly. Urea alone is very stable due to the resonance forms it can adopt. The stability of urea is understood to be due to its resonance energy, which has been estimated at 30–40 kcal/mol.^[5] This is because the zwitterionic resonance forms all donate electrons to the carbonyl carbon making it less of an electrophile making it less reactive to nucleophilic attack.^[5]

The active site of ureases is located in the α (alpha) subunits. It is a bis-μ-hydroxo dimeric nickel center, with an interatomic distance of ~3.5 Å.^[5] > The Ni(II) pair are weakly antiferromagnetically coupled.^[13] X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) studies of Canavalia ensiformis (jack bean), Klebsiella aerogenes and Sporosarcina pasteurii (formerly known as Bacillus pasteurii)^[14] confirm 5–6 coordinate nickel ions with exclusively O/N ligation, including two imidazole ligands per nickel.^[8] Urea substrate is proposed to displace aquo ligands.

Water molecules located towards the opening of the active site form a tetrahedral cluster that fills the cavity site through hydrogen bonds. Some amino acid residues are proposed to form mobile flap of the site, which gate for the substrate.^[3] Cysteine residues are common in the flap region of the enzymes, which have been determined not to be essential in catalysis, although involved in positioning other key residues in the active site appropriately.^[15] In Sporosarcina pasteurii urease, the flap was found in the open conformation, while its closed conformation is apparently needed for the reaction.^[14]

When compared, the α subunits of Helicobacter pylori urease and other bacterial ureases align with the jack bean ureases.^[15]

The binding of urea to the active site of urease has not been observed.^[9]

One mechanism for the catalysis of this reaction by urease was proposed by Blakely and Zerner.^[16] It begins with a nucleophilic attack by the carbonyl oxygen of the urea molecule onto the 5-coordinate Ni (Ni-1). A weakly coordinated water ligand is displaced in its place. A lone pair of electrons from one of the nitrogen atoms on the Urea molecule creates a double bond with the central carbon, and the resulting NH₂⁻ of the coordinated substrate interacts with a nearby positively charged group. Blakeley and Zerner proposed this nearby group to be a Carboxylate ion, although deprotonated carboxylates are negatively charged.

A hydroxide ligand on the six coordinate Ni is deprotonated by a base. The carbonyl carbon is subsequently attacked by the electronegative oxygen. A pair of electrons from the nitrogen-carbon double bond returns to the nitrogen and neutralizes the charge on it, while the now 4-coordinate carbon assumes an intermediate tetrahedral orientation.

The breakdown of this intermediate is then helped by a sulfhydryl group of a cysteine located near the active site. A hydrogen bonds to one of the nitrogen atoms, breaking its bond with carbon, and releasing an NH₃ molecule. Simultaneously, the bond between the oxygen and the 6-coordinate nickel is broken. This leaves a carbamate ion coordinated to the 5-coordinate Ni, which is then displaced by a water molecule, regenerating the enzyme.

The carbamate produced then spontaneously degrades to produce another ammonia and carbonic acid.^[17]

The mechanism proposed by Hausinger and Karplus attempts to revise some of the issues apparent in the Blakely and Zerner pathway, and focuses on the positions of the side chains making up the urea-binding pocket.^[5] From the crystal structures from K. aerogenes urease, it was argued that the general base used in the Blakely mechanism, His³²⁰, was too far away from the Ni2-bound water to deprotonate in order to form the attacking hydroxide moiety. In addition, the general acidic ligand required to protonate the urea nitrogen was not identified.^[18] Hausinger and Karplus suggests a reverse protonation scheme, where a protonated form of the His³²⁰ ligand plays the role of the general acid and the Ni2-bound water is already in the deprotonated state.^[5] The mechanism follows the same path, with the general base omitted (as there is no more need for it) and His³²⁰ donating its proton to form the ammonia molecule, which is then released from the enzyme. While the majority of the His³²⁰ ligands and bound water will not be in their active forms (protonated and deprotonated, respectively,) it was calculated that approximately 0.3% of total urease enzyme would be active at any one time.^[5] While logically, this would imply that the enzyme is not very efficient, contrary to established knowledge, usage of the reverse protonation scheme provides an advantage in increased reactivity for the active form, balancing out the disadvantage.^[5] Placing the His³²⁰ ligand as an essential component in the mechanism also takes into account the mobile flap region of the enzyme. As this histidine ligand is part of the mobile flap, binding of the urea substrate for catalysis closes this flap over the active site and with the addition of the hydrogen bonding pattern to urea from other ligands in the pocket, speaks to the selectivity of the urease enzyme for urea.^[5]

The mechanism proposed by Ciurli and Mangani^[19] is one of the more recent and currently accepted views of the mechanism of urease and is based primarily on the different roles of the two nickel ions in the active site.^[14] One of which binds and activates urea, the other nickel ion binds and activates the nucleophilic water molecule.^[14] With regards to this proposal, urea enters the active site cavity when the mobile ‘flap’ (which allows for the entrance of urea into the active site) is open. Stability of the binding of urea to the active site is achieved via a hydrogen-bonding network, orienting the substrate into the catalytic cavity.^[14] Urea binds to the five-coordinated nickel (Ni1) with the carbonyl oxygen atom. It approaches the six-coordinated nickel (Ni2) with one of its amino groups and subsequently bridges the two nickel centers.^[14] The binding of the urea carbonyl oxygen atom to Ni1 is stabilized through the protonation state of His^α222 Nԑ. Additionally, the conformational change from the open to closed state of the mobile flap generates a rearrangement of Ala^α222 carbonyl group in such a way that its oxygen atom points to Ni2.^[14] The Ala^α170 and Ala^α366 are now oriented in a way that their carbonyl groups act as hydrogen-bond acceptors towards NH₂ group of urea, thus aiding its binding to Ni2.^[14] Urea is a very poor chelating ligand due to low Lewis base character of its NH₂ groups. However the carbonyl oxygens of Ala^α170 and Ala^α366 enhance the basicity of the NH₂ groups and allow for binding to Ni2.^[14] Therefore, in this proposed mechanism, the positioning of urea in the active site is induced by the structural features of the active site residues which are positioned to act as hydrogen-bond donors in the vicinity of Ni1 and as acceptors in the vicinity of Ni2.^[14] The main structural difference between the Ciurli/Mangani mechanism and the other two is that it incorporates a nitrogen, oxygen bridging urea that is attacked by a bridging hydroxide.^[17]

Bacterial ureases are often the mode of pathogenesis for many medical conditions. They are associated with hepatic encephalopathy / Hepatic coma, infection stones, and peptic ulceration.^[20]

Infection induced urinary stones are a mixture of struvite (MgNH₄PO₄•6H₂O) and carbonate apatite [Ca₁₀(PO₄)6•CO₃].^[20] These polyvalent ions are soluble but become insoluble when ammonia is produced from microbial urease during urea hydrolysis, as this increases the surrounding environments pH from roughly 6.5 to 9.^[20] The resultant alkalinization results in stone crystallization.^[20] In humans the microbial urease, Proteus mirabilis, is the most common in infection induced urinary stones.^[21]

Studies have shown that Helicobacter pylori along with cirrhosis of the liver cause hepatic encephalopathy and hepatic coma.^[22] Helicobacter pylori release microbial ureases into the stomach. The urease hydrolyzes urea to produce ammonia and carbonic acid. As the bacteria are localized to the stomach ammonia produced is readily taken up by the circulatory system from the gastric lumen.^[22] This results in elevated ammonia levels in the blood, a condition known as hyperammonemia; eradication of Helicobacter pylori show marked decreases in ammonia levels.^[22]

Helicobacter pylori is also the cause of peptic ulcers with its manifestation in 55–68% reported cases.^[23] This was confirmed by decreased ulcer bleeding and ulcer reoccurrence after eradication of the pathogen.^[23] In the stomach there is an increase in pH of the mucosal lining as a result of urea hydrolysis, which prevents movement of hydrogen ions between gastric glands and gastric lumen.^[20] In addition, the high ammonia concentrations have an effect on intercellular tight junctions increasing permeability and also disrupting the gastric mucous membrane of the stomach.^[20][24]

Urea is found naturally in the environment and is also artificially introduced, comprising more than half of all synthetic nitrogen fertilizers used globally.^[25] Heavy use of urea is thought to promote eutrophication, despite the observation that urea is rapidly transformed by microbial ureases, and thus usually does not persist.^[26] Environmental urease activity is often measured as an indicator of the health of microbial communities. In the absence of plants, urease activity in soil is generally attributed to heterotrophic microorganisms, although it has been demonstrated that some chemoautotrophic ammonium oxidizing bacteria are capable of growth on urea as a sole source of carbon, nitrogen, and energy.^[27]

The inhibition of urease is a significant goal in agriculture because the rapid breakdown of urea-based fertilizers is wasteful and environmentally damaging.^[28] Phenyl phosphorodiamidate and N-(n-butyl)thiophosphoric triamide are two such inhibitors.^[29]

By promoting the formation of calcium carbonate, ureases are potentially useful for biomineralization-inspired processes.^[30] Notably, microbiologically induced formation of calcium carbonate can be used in making bioconcrete.^[31]

In addition to acting as an enzyme, some ureases (especially plant ones) have additional effects that persist even when the catalytic function is disabled. These include entomotoxicity, inhibition of fungi, neurotoxicity in mammals, promotion of endocytosis and inflammatory eicosanoid production in mammals, and induction of chemotaxis in bacteria. These activities may be part of a defense mechanism.^[12]

Urease insect-toxicity was originally noted in canatoxin, an orthologous isoform of jack bean urease. Digestion of the peptide identified a 10-kDa portion most responsible for this effect, termed jaburetox. An analogous portion from the soybean urease is named soyuretox. Studies on insects show that the entire protein is toxic without needing any digestion, however. Nevertheless, the "uretox" peptides, being more concentrated in toxicity, show promise as biopesticides.^[12]

Many gastrointestinal or urinary tract pathogens produce urease, enabling the detection of urease to be used as a diagnostic to detect presence of pathogens.

Urease-positive pathogens include:

• Proteus mirabilis and Proteus vulgaris
• Ureaplasma urealyticum, a relative of Mycoplasma spp.
• Nocardia
• Corynebacterium urealyticum
• Cryptococcus spp., an opportunistic fungus
• Helicobacter pylori
• Certain Enteric bacteria including Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp., Morganella, Providencia, and possibly Serratia spp.
• Brucella
• Staphylococcus saprophyticus
• Staphylococcus aureus^[32]

A wide range of urease inhibitors of different structural families are known. Inhibition of urease is not only of interest to agriculture, but also to medicine as pathogens like H. pylori produce urease as a survival mechanism. Known structural classes of inhibitors include:^[33][34]

• Analogues of urea, the strongest being thioureas like 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-palmitoylthiourea.
• Phosphoramidates, the most commonly used in agriculture (see above).
• Hydroquinone and quinones. In medicine, the most interesting are quinolones, already a class of widely used antibiotics.
• Some plant metabolites are also urease inhibitors, an example being allicin. These have potential both as environmentally-friendly fertilizer additives^[35] and natural drugs.

First isolated as a crystal in 1926 by Sumner, using acetone solvation and centrifuging.^[36] Modern biochemistry has increased its demand for urease. Jack bean meal,^[37] watermelon seeds,^[38] and pea seeds^[39] have all proven useful sources of urease.

• Urea carboxylase
• Allophanate hydrolase
• Urease test

• Mobley HL (2001). "Chapter 16:Urease". In Mobley HL, Mendz GL, Hazell SL (eds.). Helicobacter pylori: Physiology and Genetics. Washington (DC): ASM Press. ISBN 978-1-55581-213-3. PMID 21290719.