Talk:Labidochromis caeruleus
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposal to alter
editI propose that Electric yellow cichlid be either be merged with this page OR the majority of information on the species Labidochromis caeruleus be moved here, with notable information on the yellow kept in the Electric yellow cichlid.
Why?
- Most Labidochromis caeruleus are blue.
- Wikipedia doesnt have other pages for naturally occuring colour variants of single species.
I can understand the benefits of keeping an article on electric yellows, but the article could (assuming it is kept) have the more general information on Labidochromis caeruleus moved to a page about the whole species.
Thoughts? MidgleyDJ 02:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Labidochromis caeruleus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org/ to http://www.iucnredlist.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 10 May 2017 (UTC)