Talk:Borough of Barrow-in-Furness

Image:Arms-barrow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I believe it would be better to merge this article with Barrow-in-Furness (the main settlement) to lack confusion, a nd make things simpler. An example of such a merge is the Preston article, which has information on the city and district/ borough in one. Please leave your comments below. Stevvvv4444 (talk) 15:50, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

There's been no discussion or follow up on this so I'll tentatively remove the proposed merger thing from both. I don't particularly feel that it is particularly beneficial: for one thing, the two areas are slightly different; and there clearly has not been a swell of support for the merge. --Pretty Green (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It appears to fail every criteria (except perhaps having a small number of parishes) at WP:UKDISTRICTS to be combined, see User:Crouch, Swale/District split#Others. In any case Preston, Lancashire/City of Preston, Lancashire are now separate articles and the district is going to be abolished and a parish created so its likely somewhat moot anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Borough of Barrow-in-Furness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927093234/http://www.barrowbc.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=3851 to http://www.barrowbc.gov.uk/Default.aspx?page=3851

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply