User contributions for Rossami

13:4213:42, 5 September 2024 diff hist +17 m Bill Reilich bypassing disambiguation page
13:4113:41, 5 September 2024 diff hist +17 m Town of Greece v. Galloway resolving circular link
13:3813:38, 5 September 2024 diff hist +169 Town of Greece turning it into a disambiguation page current Tag: Removed redirect

19:2519:25, 18 November 2022 diff hist +687 User talk:Bon courage →re: Great Barrington Declaration talk page
19:1919:19, 18 November 2022 diff hist −8,426 m User talk:Rossami I think it might finally be cleaned up...
19:1619:16, 18 November 2022 diff hist −46,019 m User talk:Rossami yet more pruning. how long has this been???
19:1519:15, 18 November 2022 diff hist −16,290 m User talk:Rossami more pruning
19:1319:13, 18 November 2022 diff hist −49,710 m User talk:Rossami more pruning
19:1019:10, 18 November 2022 diff hist −149 Talk:Great Barrington Declaration →Not Fringe: Sorry, no. Concerns about the neutrality of content are 'exactly' on-point with the purpose of writing an encyclopedia. NOTAFORUM does not apply. If you think the user is wrong, explain why. Then allow time for debate and for 'someone else' to close the discussion. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
19:0519:05, 18 November 2022 diff hist −155,741 m User talk:Rossami pruning continues
19:0419:04, 18 November 2022 diff hist −38,610 User talk:Rossami overdue pruning of automated messages
18:5618:56, 18 November 2022 diff hist −141 Talk:Great Barrington Declaration →Not Fringe: No adequate reason given for closing this discussion, especially within 2 min of the opening comment. Reopening.
18:5118:51, 18 November 2022 diff hist +498 User talk:Bon courage →re: Great Barrington Declaration talk page: new section Tag: New topic

22:0522:05, 4 March 2022 diff hist −44 m Link rot →Causes: removing a template that belongs on the Talk page, not cluttering up the reader experience here.

15:2215:22, 16 February 2021 diff hist +972 Talk:Gurbir Grewal proposal to gut the New Jersey Attorney General section

19:3019:30, 26 February 2020 diff hist +167 Concurrent majority →Sources: adding one
19:2619:26, 26 February 2020 diff hist −538 Concurrent majority →Calhoun and nullification: Cleaning out some content that's not relevant to this topic.
19:2419:24, 26 February 2020 diff hist −85 Concurrent majority And doing some of that rewrite of the lead myself.
19:1419:14, 26 February 2020 diff hist −95 Concurrent majority Cleaning off two tags that probably should never have been applied in the first place. No supporting discussion of either on Talk. # of footnotes appears adequate to me and if someone wants to rewrite the lead, JUST DO IT. Don't distract readers with maintenance tags.

19:5319:53, 3 October 2019 diff hist −821 Plenary power "citation needed" is not the appropriate tag to use when you question the impartiality of the text.
19:4819:48, 3 October 2019 diff hist −59 Plenary power →Immigration law: Way too many "citation needed" tags are in this paragraph. It is especially egregious to add one to a sentence that is ACTUALLY CITED.
19:4619:46, 3 October 2019 diff hist −191 Plenary power Pretty much none of these alerts belong here cluttering up the reader's experience. Issues with articles are supposed to be dealt with on the Talk page. Only the most egregious alerts which are essential for reader understanding belong on the front. Also, many of the alerts are outdated and were resolved long ago.

20:3620:36, 9 April 2019 diff hist −39 United States v. Enmons →Details of the case: Another wrong citation tag. In this one, the relevant cite is in the characters immediately before the section break - the citation to the court's opinion in US v Enmons, current shown as Footnote 1.
20:3320:33, 9 April 2019 diff hist −34 United States v. Enmons →Controversy: Another demand for "citations" when the cite is right there in the very next sentence.
20:3220:32, 9 April 2019 diff hist −34 United States v. Enmons →Controversy: Good grief. The citation's right there in the very next sentence. And it's been there since before that tag was wrongfully applied.

21:4821:48, 25 January 2018 diff hist −43 Loreena McKennitt →Quinlan Road label: The "warning" box is bigger than the paragraph. And dated 2008. These sorts of maintenance requests belong on Talk, not cluttering up the article page.

20:0220:02, 16 October 2017 diff hist −77 m Venturing removing 2 obsolete maintenance tags & moving a category tag to bottom. Maintenance actions belong on Talk and categories belong at bottom, not at the top where they distract and confuse new editors.

21:3421:34, 6 July 2017 diff hist −86 Judgment notwithstanding verdict Removing an outdated (and mostly wrong) maintenance tag. The issues on the Talk page do not justify disrupting readers with that obnoxious tag.

18:2718:27, 21 April 2017 diff hist −34 m The Integral Trees Of course this article is based primarily on a single source. It's about a book and the primary source will always be the book itself. Concerns like that belong on the Talk page, not here.

19:5719:57, 30 March 2017 diff hist −34 Bonferroni correction →Criticism: While citations are needed for the bullets immediately above, they are not required for the generic disclaimer at the end of the section.
19:5319:53, 30 March 2017 diff hist −38 Bonferroni correction Removing a long-outdated template. While no article is ever "complete", the citations on this article are more than adequate. Future improvements should be requested and discussed on Talk.
19:5119:51, 30 March 2017 diff hist −32 Bonferroni correction I disagree. That reference is just fine. But to the extent you think a better one could/should be found, that comment belongs on the Talk page, not here cluttering up the user experience.