Scjessey
Nomination of Lauren Hodges for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Lauren Hodges, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Hodges until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Pres of B. O.
Do you smell socks? Grsz11 17:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:04, 12 November 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Barack Obama and poll results
Hello, Simon. I agree with you that poll results may not be biographically significant. However, they are an indicator of public image and that is why I think they should included in the relevant section of the article. After all, when Bush was President, approval ratings data was constantly updated on his page. Sasha best (talk) 16:33, 12 November 2010 (UTC) Simon, I can't understand why you reverted my edit again. I used gallup data this time, as you and DD2K had asked me. Please remember that poll data is already in the main article, so there is nothing wrong about updating it. If you are against mentioning approval ratings in the main article you should delete poll data altogether. However, I can't help feeling that it's a double standard, as Bush approval ratings were updated all the time in the main article and nobody ever objected to this or doubted its biographical significance. Sasha best (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
I've done everything to meet your demands, no matter how absurd they are. But if you revert edits bacause they fail to comply with your political position, we can't come to any compromise with you. Please continue to do so. But do not allude to NPOV then. Happy editing!Sasha best (talk) 18:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)