Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Interactions at GGTF/Proposed decision: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Eric Corbett prohibited: Comment |
→Hiab removing evidence: new section |
||
Line 1,109:
:::Agreed that this might be used as a loophole here. - [[User:Knowledgekid87|Knowledgekid87]] ([[User talk:Knowledgekid87|talk]]) 01:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
::::There is no loophole. Arbitration sanctions are not optional, nor are they legalistic remedies to be parsed word by word to find "loopholes". The intent is what matters. Trying to game them based on [[WP:LAWYER|lawyering]] indicates not only that one is not following them, but that one intends deliberately to violate them, and such attempts are sanctioned accordingly. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]]</sup></small> 02:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
| |||