User talk:Rlbberlin
Habe die Bilder vom Giuggenheim NY wieder aus Category:Frank Lloyd Wright rausgeschmissen, da sie in der Unter-Category:Guggenheim museum New York sitzen. —TomAlt 13:25, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion
[edit]Please be aware that we will not be deleting the image Image:On the Bank of the Seine, Bennecourt.jpg. The image you suggest replace it is a smaller version, and larger images are preferable.
There are simple ways of scaling down an image for an article. Consult the help section of your local wikipedia or here Images. I hope this is of assistance. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 12:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, well, that's a different story. Did you indicate that in your deletion request? I will delete the AIC image posthaste. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 14:23, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Arthur Garfield Dove
[edit]Hallo. Die Bildern von Arthur Garfield Dove die Du mit Speedy Delete gemarkt hast, sind nicht so einfach weil es sein könnte, dass {{PD-US}} wirklich verwenden kann, da Arthur Garfield Dove ein Amerikanisher Kunstler ist . Also müssen die Bildern den langsammen weg auf Commons:Deletion requests gelisted werden. Gruss Fred Chess 21:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Giovanni Boldini Crossing the Street.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Teofilo 13:00, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Giovanni Boldini Madame Leclanche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Teofilo 13:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Eva Gonzalès - Le petit lever.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Wst question 08:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC) .
Statue of Willem I
[edit]Hi, I saw your request and went today to the Noordeinde in The Hague to take a picture of the statue of Willem I. Here you are: Image:Ruiterstandbeeld Willem I.JPG. Regards, Joris1919 20:52, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Joris1919, thanks very much. So my Alfred Émilien de Nieuwerkerke has finaly a picture of one of his artworks. greetings --Rlbberlin 17:04, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Picture request
[edit]I suppose that your request about rue de Berne in Paris is linked to a painting. I will be able to provide it in next September. But please, which painter is concerned ? Gérard Janot 11:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
- There are three Paintings by Edouard Manet. --Rlbberlin 17:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Les_Prèsents_Chinois.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Les_Prèsents_Chinois.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 21:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. You need to provide a URL. Ρх₥α 20:12, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- Why? The painting is more than 100 years old, the painter more than 100 years dead. For what is an URL needed? --Rlbberlin 14:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Otto_Scholderer_Stilleben_mit_Birnen_und_Trauben_in_Kupferschale.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Ρх₥α 23:02, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
- You find the creator in the image-name: Otto Scholderer. There is another information in the Category: Otto Scholderer. And now I added the creator-tag. More informationen needed for this PD-art-artist? --Rlbberlin 18:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:Pinacotecaagnelli.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. |
--User:G.dallorto 17:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi We are doing research on Worth clients and just learned that Mery Laurent was one of them. The particular picture of her wearing fancy dark dress might represent one of Worth's designs. Do you by any chance have information who the picture was taken by. We will greatly appreciate any information. Thank you
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Gallery pages
[edit]Hello,
Please don't create gallery pages without media, as you did in Jean-Achille Benouville. They are more useful with media :). I added some images there. Cheers, Patrícia msg 18:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
File:Antoine Wiertz L'inhumation précipitée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Jappalang (talk) 01:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I just uploaded this from the flickr link you gave at the above deletion request. What do you think of it? Is it overly exposed? Should I alter the levels (curves)? In light of this portrait, should we delete the other two photos? Jappalang (talk) 01:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
File:Alfred_Sisley_-_Street_of_Marlotte_aka_Women_Going_to_the_Woods.jpg - Falscher Titel
[edit]DAs Bild heißt "Women Going to the Woods", aber nicht "Street of Marlotte", letzterer Titel gehört zu einem anderen Bild. Näheres auf der Diskussionsseite von dem Bild. -- Dynam1te3 (talk) 19:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Ramón Subercaseaux Vicuña - Antiguo Puente de Cal y Canto.jpg is uncategorized since 6 April 2009.
- Image:Ramón Subercaseaux Vicuña - Diques de Valparaíso.jpg is uncategorized since 6 April 2009.
- Image:Degas et Bartholomé.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2009.
- Image:François Clouet - Portrait of Young Equestrian.jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Johannes Deiker -Selbstbildnis (Detail).jpg was uncategorized on 9 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can you please comment here as the disputed image's uploader? --Illythr (talk) 14:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
- Done --Rlbberlin (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Thomas Eakins paintings in the PAFA
[edit]If you want an authoritative and reliable list of Eakins paintings in the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, use this as your source. Raul654 (talk) 00:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi! Do you have any more info about this picture? How long it is in Japan, where it has been before, etc.Shakko (talk) 22:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Missing source information
[edit]Greetings, dear colleague. I should like to inform you that I have tagged File:Claude Monet Houses of Parliament.jpg as missing source information. I had replaced the image with a different, sourced photograph of the same painting, but I was reverted, so I decided to ascertain whether a source is essential for a public-domain image by taking this step; if the original image ends up deleted, I intend to upload the other one separately. Waltham, The Duke of 22:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- No problem, I added the source. Thanks for information. Greets --Rlbberlin (talk) 00:22, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- This is excellent, thank you. Going through the category of the Houses of Parliament paintings, I have found another two files which you have uploaded and which lack source information, namely File:Claude Monet - Houses of Parliament, London.jpg and File:Monet Houses of Parliament, Sunset.jpg. Perhaps you'd be so kind as to add the missing information there as well—provided that you have it, of course? Waltham, The Duke of 15:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, these were some of my very first uploads. I can't find them in my artbooks - so they must be from the Internet. File:Monet Houses of Parliament, Sunset.jpg is not in the National Gallery London. I think it is in a Private Collection and I don't know any source. The File:Claude Monet - Houses of Parliament, London.jpg has a source informationan "Art Institute of Chicago", but the colours on their homepage are different. Sorry, but I don't have anymore information now. Greets --Rlbberlin (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- About the former painting, I have read somewhere that it had been loaned to the National Gallery from a private collection; this was from several years ago, however, and the National Gallery website makes no mention of the painting, so it stands to reason that the loan has ended. Pity about the lack of information, but thank you anyway. I'll see if I can find the images on-line; http://tineye.com/ is a useful tool for this kind of thing. Waltham, The Duke of 17:16, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- PS: That link to the Art Institute of Chicago is my doing; it is only for the information on the painting, not for the specific image. I don't know if there is a way to make that clearer. Waltham, The Duke of 17:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
If you intend to create a gallery at Henri Rouart, then please create one that includes images. A single line of text is not a gallery and will be deleted. If you have questions, please put a note here. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
File:Jean_Béraud_Au_Café.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
68.42.80.133 10:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Jean_Béraud_Au_Café.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
68.42.80.133 10:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Édouard_Manet,_Woman_Fastening_Her_Garter_(1878–1879).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:19, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Fotografie von Manets Kristallvase mit Rosen, Tulpen und Flieder
[edit]Hallo, ist vielleicht eine etwas ungewöhnliche Frage, aber wir sind gerade fieberhaft dabei, den Ort, bzw. die Sammlung heraus zufinden, indem sich das von Ihnen fotografierte Werk befindet. Wir würden es gerne für eine unserer kommenden Ausstellungen ausleihen, haben aöllerdings keine Informationen darüber, wo es sich befindet, oder wem es mittlerweile gehört. Können Sie uns da eventuell weiterhelfen? Für Ihre Hilfe wäre ich Ihnen sehr dankbar.
Jessica Keilholz Schirn Kunsthalle Frankfurt
Hallo Frau Keilholz,
das Foto ist "nur" ein Scan von mir. Ich kann nicht mehr genau sagen, ob es aus "The last Flowers of Manet" von Andrew Forge ist, oder aus "Max Liebermann und die französischen Impressionisten " von G. Tobias Natter und Julius H. Schoeps. Der letztgenannte Katalog ist zu einer Ausstellung 1998 im Jüdischen Museum Wien erschienen und weist es als Privatbesitz USA aus. Möglicherweise befindet sich das Bild immer noch in den selben Händen und das Museum kann einen Kontakt herstellen. Sollte es zwischenzeitlich den Besitzer gewechselt haben, sind die großen Auktionshäuser eventuell behilflich. Ich wünsche auf jeden Fall frohes Gelingen bei der Ausstellung. Beste Grüße --Rlbberlin (talk) 23:47, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Vielen Dank! Wir werden in diese Richtung weiterforschen!
File:Guido Reni The Penitent Magdalen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— billinghurst sDrewth 15:29, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for information. We have a better version now - no problem with the deletion. --Rlbberlin (talk) 16:55, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]For your uploads, those are very nice pictures! Palosirkka (talk) 19:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Queenshouse.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Queenshouse.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Stefan4 (talk) 00:49, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
PD-Art taggings
[edit]Hi, I noticed you added {{PD-Art|PD-old-100}} to File:In the Conservatory.jpg and some other files which already have this tag. I've reverted you. Additionally, please use {{Licensed-PD-Art}} on images where we have a license from the photographer, as I've demonstrated at File:Edouard manet, al bar delle folies-bergere, 1881-1882, 09.JPG. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 00:43, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Dcoetzee (talk) 05:09, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Vincent van Gogh - Boats at Saintes-Marie watercolour.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Vincent van Gogh - Boats at Saintes-Marie watercolour.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 09:04, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
- There was already a PD-tag. --Rlbberlin (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Rlbberlin⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Rlbberlin,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Jean Béraud The Magdalen at the House of the Pharisees.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
The Traditionalist (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Édouard Manet - Berthe Morisot - Lithograph, 1872, H 73.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Édouard Manet - Berthe Morisot - Lithograph, 1872, H 73.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 02:29, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Rlbberlin,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Gilbert Stuart Williamstown Portrait of George Washington.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
206.82.21.254 12:55, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
File:Helmut Newton Grave.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Animalparty (talk) 05:44, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
File:Edouard Manet Portrait Faure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
StellarHalo (talk) 04:52, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Édouard Manet - Lecture de l'illustré.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
StellarHalo (talk) 07:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Édouard Manet - Femme au fichu noir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
StellarHalo (talk) 07:06, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Monet On the Boat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
StellarHalo (talk) 04:59, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Claude Monet - La Mère Paul (Eugénie Graff).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
StellarHalo (talk) 20:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Gustave Caillebotte - Rue Halévy, vue d'un sixième étage.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gustave Caillebotte - Rue Halévy, vue d'un sixième étage.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Claude Monet - Vue d'un port.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Giovannicaciotta.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Gustave Caillebotte - Prairie, Yerres (CR 127).jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Gustave Caillebotte - Prairie, Yerres (CR 127).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Claude Monet - Coin du bassin aux nymphéas (W 1880).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Claude Monet - Coin du bassin aux nymphéas (W 1880).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Claude Monet - Coin du bassin aux nymphéas (W 1880).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
File:Robert Vonnoh - Spring in France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ixfd64 (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Chaim Soutine - La Folle (P14).jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Chaim Soutine - La Folle (P14).jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Chaim Soutine - La Folle (P14).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Julie Manet Portrait 1894 by Renoir
[edit]Is the Julie Manet Portrait in Frane Museum a copy or original? I have same painting verified with Renoir brush strokes. Mine has signature wonder why theora doesn't? Just curious 🤔?
If anyone has seen it personally and knows I would love to know. 169.150.169.206 13:17, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
- The painting in the Musée Marmottan in Paris is an original painting. --Rlbberlin (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Costas Varotsos - The Runner - Athens II.jpg
- File:Costas Varotsos - The Runner - Athens III.jpg
- File:Costas Varotsos - The Runner - Athens IV.jpg
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Edgar Degas - Chez la modiste.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Edgar Degas - Chez la modiste.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Edgar Degas - Chez la modiste.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
File:Alfred Sisley - The Seine at Argenteuil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 23:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 002.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 012.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 013.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 014.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 015.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 03:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 004.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 005.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 006.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 007.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 008.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 009.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 010.JPG
- File:Auditorio de Tenerife 011.JPG
Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Marie Bracquemond - Fauconnerie.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Marie Bracquemond - Fauconnerie.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Marie Bracquemond - Fauconnerie.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Building of the George Economou Collection.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 18:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:James McNeill Whistler - Portrait of George W. Vanderbilt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PancoPinco (talk) 14:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Amedeo Modigliani - Nudo sdraiato (Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna Roma.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Amedeo Modigliani - Nudo sdraiato (Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna Roma.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Amedeo Modigliani - Nudo sdraiato (Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna Roma.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Rubens Crowning of Saint Catherine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Oursana (talk) 10:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
File:Giovanni Boldini Madame Leclanche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Niketto sr. (talk) 17:54, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Giovanni Boldini - Portrait de madame de Florian.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Niketto sr. (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Lorenzo Ghiberti (Workshop) - Madonna and child (Former huldschinsky Collection Berlin).png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Lorenzo Ghiberti (Workshop) - Madonna and child (Former huldschinsky Collection Berlin).png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Lorenzo Ghiberti (Workshop) - Madonna and child (Former huldschinsky Collection Berlin).png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)