User talk:Matanya (usurped)/Archive2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tip: Categorizing images

[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Matanya (usurped)!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

חתימה

[edit]

בוקר טוב, שבוע טוב,

אני עומד להציע אותך בתור מפעיל.

תוכל בבקשה לעשות לעצמך חתימה באותיות לטיניות, כדי שהאותיות העבריות לא יבלבלו אף אחד? ––Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:24, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

תודה רבה. הנה matanya talk 08:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Administrators/Requests/מתניה
אתה צריך לקבל את המינוי.
בהצלחה. ––Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:50, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
תודה, אם כי אני קצת פסימי. matanya talk 14:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, if you accept the nomination, you should leave a short message saying so in reply to Amir E. Aharoni's text on the nomination page (just above the Votes section). Thanks. –Tryphon 20:09, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks. matanya talk 20:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Manhattan02_ST_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

matanya talk 12:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Park_Nesher_map_1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

matanya talk 11:03, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ChaimdavidImages-4-.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Justass (talk) 16:17, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, the user claimed he is the copyright holder. delete it. matanya talk 16:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:DCP 0096.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--User:G.dallorto (talk) 23:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, should be deleted. matanya talk 23:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Arctic terns.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

---Nard the Bard 18:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Wpdms_terra_east_river.jpg

[edit]
العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wpdms_terra_east_river.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 12:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Based on public domain satellite photo courtesy NASA." => exact source is necessary. --High Contrast (talk) 12:52, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll find it. matanya talk 12:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
found and added. please revert the nomination. matanya talk 13:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --High Contrast (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. matanya talk 14:30, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

[edit]

I am sorry about that; unfortunately I do not read/speak Hebrew; therefore the problem. I will of course attribute them the way you want it in the future, cheers, TheRealHuldra (talk) 15:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, if you need help I'll be glad to assist. matanya talk 16:18, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Equallity.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Jujutacular T · C 21:52, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Democrtaicunion.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Latebird (talk) 11:27, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS

[edit]

Could you maybe add {{User OTRS}} to your page? I was kinda confused at first when i didn't see it--DieBuche (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. matanya talk 12:49, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Dinamit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wknight94 talk 13:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Franck_azulai.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Franck_azulai.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 19:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sirima_Bandaranaike.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Hekerui (talk) 16:18, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Files you uploaded may be deleted

[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 08:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rubin dimitrov.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:17, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:British_Penny.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84user (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moai_and_Esmeralda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gump Stump (talk) 15:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

מתניה שלום,
אודה על עזרתך במתן כרטיס אישור מתאים לתמונה שבכותרת

ביום 15 באוקטובר כתבתי לפרופסור תשבי:

פרופסור תשבי שלום רב,

שמי __ ואני פעיל באתר האינטרנט ויקיפדיה. ויקיפדיה היא מיזם אינטרנט התנדבותי לכתיבת אנציקלופדיה חופשית לשימוש. בעבר נכתב ערך העוסק בך (נפתלי תשבי) אך לצערנו לא מצאנו תמונה שנוכל לשלב בו. בוויקיפדיה ניתן להציג תמונות חופשיות בלבד. על פי רישיון cc-by-sa-3.0 (מצ"ב קישור) כולם יוכלו להשתמש בתמונה לכל מטרה, לרבות למטרה מסחרית, ובתנאי שיינתן לכם קרדיט מתאים (ניתן להציג כינוי כקרדיט). נשמח אם תצרף בדוא"ל חוזר תמונה השייכת לך, אשר אתה בעל הזכויות בה. בדרך כלל מדובר בתמונה שצילמת בעצמך או תמונה שהוזמנה על ידך. כמו כן, נשמח אם תענה על השאלות הבאות:

. מתי צולמה התמונה? . מי צילם את התמונה? . האם אתה מסכים להעלות את התמונה תחת רישיון cc-by-sa-3.0? . אם התמונה אינה פרי יצירתך, האם הוזמנה על ידך מידי הצלם?

בברכה, __


ביום 17 באוקטובר השיב לי פרופ' תשבי:

שלום רב, מצורפת תמונה שאפשר להשתמש בה לצורך העניין. התמונה צולמה במשרדי בינואר 2008. היא נעשתה להזמנתי ואין עליה זכויות יוצרים. הקרדיט הוא ל"נפתלי תשבי" . מסכים להעלותה תחת רישיון cc-by-sa-3.0. כל טוב ותודה על היוזמה. בברכה, נפתלי תשבי

תודה מראש על עזרתך Oyoyoy (talk) 07:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

בדיוק אותה בקשה גם בקובץ הזה. הוא כתב לי היום:

זה עתה קלטתי שגם בערך עלי בויקיפדיה אין תמונה.

רצ"ב תמונה שאני בעל זכויות היוצרים עליה, ואני מוכן להעביר את הזכויות לויקיפדיה.

האם תוכל בבקשה לטפל בזה? או שתפנה אותי למי שעיסוקו בכך?

תודה,

יבשם

תשלח את התכתובת ל: permissions-he@wikimedia.org בבקשה ואטפל בהן. matanya talk 16:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sturmabteilung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 19:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Someone just posted a message on the French Wikipedia, claiming she holds the rights for this image. Do you have any information? Thank you. Seudo (talk) 15:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I just transfered it from English wikipedia. matanya talk 16:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Weapons_mortar_81mm_3-1-.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avron (talk) 20:24, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guarana28.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Matanya

Yann Wolf, the photograph of this picture will send an agreement to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Do you receive a notifcation of that to cancel your deletion ?

Best Regards, --Eddy.caron (talk) 19:01, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've restored the file, please send permission within 7 days. best matanya talk 20:48, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hamalot_sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yosarian (talk) 09:38, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ahmmm... Do you know how do I get on with this deletion request? they simply ignored it - can you help with that? Yosarian (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded it, don't understand why you want to delete it. if you insist I can make it happen. matanya talk 13:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I do insist. As I said in the deletion request, at least the first version (but I prefer the whole thing). Thanks, Yosarian (talk) 09:13, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
fine. matanya talk 09:24, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done matanya talk 09:32, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Gayatri.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 10:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the videos

[edit]

Thanks for the OGV videos!!!! IDangerMouse (talk) 08:33, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure :) matanya talk 13:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:ANWhitehead.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

sугсго 08:37, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:CzechdollS.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Soundvisions1 (talk) 08:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aufruhr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 20:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:24. The Atomium - Brussels - Belgium.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Common Good (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This file has no description. It is not clear what it represents, or how it adds to Wikimedia Commons.

Can you please add an explanation to it? (The language is not important- we can translate that).

Also, I don't understand why it is in Category:Photographic flash- I have removed it from this category for the time being.

Ubcule (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it goes as a pair with file:Avikedmi105.jpg that shows the same object without using a flash. can you please fix the issue, so it will be clear they are a pair, or shall I unify them in an image manipulation software from some sort? matanya talk 20:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Sorry, yeah I figured that one out and am in the middle of doing that right now.
There's some text that I missed because it was on the opposite side of the page (being in Hebrew, which is obviously right-to-left). However, Google Translate seems to indicate that it is not a description.
Also, is the author's name "Avi Kedmi"? Thanks.
Ubcule (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
the description is "a picture of an object using flash". yes, the author's name is "Avi Kedmi" matanya talk 22:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 25cc88840b8427966839599cd30032fd

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Terrehaute_gurney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

78.55.104.78 07:14, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Request for License reviewer status was successful

[edit]

I have assigned you the image-reviewer right. Please review Commons:License review one more time before you start reviewing images. If you have any questions about reviewing you can ask here or on my talk page. Thank you for offering to help review images, MorganKevinJ(talk) 02:58, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you very much. matanya talk 19:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your manners

[edit]

Don't you frickin speak to me like that. I specifically requested the flickr user to change all the images of Penally Abbey which he kindly did but obviously missed one. So don't give me the PAY ATTENTION TO COPYRIGHT bullcrap when I went out of my way to get us those rare web images of the interior.Blofeld Dr. (talk) 12:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May I help you?

[edit]

So I hope it's all clear?

Fanofbollywood (talk) 12:33, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm sorry, my mistake reading the terms of use on the site. I apologize matanya talk 12:35, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hey not at all, rather thanks for check that really helps keeping quality intact.Fanofbollywood (talk) 12:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You are very kind. matanya talk 12:45, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Delete that photo now. Thanks.

✓ Done matanya talk 06:40, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller !

[edit]
Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi Matanya !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know about.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons. — [ Tanvir | Talk ] 13:42, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pset_logo.jpg

[edit]

It is a college logo of , I had downloaded from the site of purushottamgroup.org. and cropped for logo image it's actually the logo.Swarupbose10 (talk) 16:13, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Need your help

[edit]

Hello, can you please look into the matter: License Review Fanofbollywood (talk) 14:24, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read it, thats right. what sort of help you need further? matanya talk 14:37, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No actually, all of those photos were tagged for Licence Review and it went like that for hours, so I was just curious if there was something I could do, but thanks to User:Lymantria things are clean again. Thanks for your time. Fanofbollywood (talk) 06:46, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad it is solved. Keep up the good work. matanya talk 08:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Iupac-alkane-5.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

oliver s. (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  हिन्दी  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  العربية  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Matanya (usurped), congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

[ Tanvir | Talk ] 14:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator

[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  हिन्दी  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  العربية  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Matanya (usurped), congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators:#wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations and welcome to the team. You may find this list of Admin tools helpful. Suggestions and comments are welcome. I've asked at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard where it ought to be moved.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ברכות מתניה. את ההצבעה הזו פספסתי. :) Geagea 21:24, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matanya, as you are now an admin, please add the admin-bit to your babel-box. Thanks and happy administrating. --Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all. Túrelio - ✓ Done matanya talk 07:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Matanya, now I need your help. I am building a memorial page for deceased Commons contributors; see my draft at User:Túrelio/sandbox. Most of my input came from the corresponding pages on the local projects. As :he wikipedia also has such a memorial page, I would like to check/know whether the users mentioned on that page, were also active on Commons, but I can't read Hebrew and therefore don't know the corresponding usernames on Commons. Could you check this for me? --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, one is user:john doe, he wasn't active on commons. The second one is User:Avin, he was active here. matanya talk 07:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have added User:Avin to our memorial. Could you provide me his dates of birth and death, it available on :he, and his realname, if it's public? Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know birth date. death - august 5 2010. Real name is אבי נחמיאס. My turn for a request - please rename user:Martin1978 - an impersonator. Thanks matanya talk 08:31, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Re:Martin1978, but whom does he impersonate? Well, you blocked him anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
np. He impersonates de user Martin1978. and breaking his option to SUL. matanya talk 08:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, though I wouldn't call that "impersonating" without having further evidence. After reading Commons:Changing username/Usurp requests, I think we need a short confirmation by CU, as this will require a "hostile usurpation". Regrettably, Martin H. is off-line since some days and none of the remaining CU speaks German. As per Category:Sockpuppets of Jerry Dandridge, I see that Martin H. had dealt with this case earlier. --Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me, no rush anyway. matanya talk 09:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Samlarkungen

[edit]

Why are you taking my pictures away, I have send almost ten mails to different Wiki kings and presidents etc and they told me that they where alright to use. And what do you know about team Djurgården ?

Hello, can you please link the file you are talking about? matanya talk 19:52, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christoffer_Matwiejew

I uploaded a new photo, the old one was not good for you? Are you knowing anything of team Djurgården?

Please send a permission to use this file according COM:OTRS. matanya talk 17:21, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have already done that, a long time ago, but as you can see I made a new photo. Hope you are satisfied with that one. What do you know about team Djurgården??????????

that is a local image, nothing to do with commons. matanya talk 10:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is a local image?

never mind. it's fine now. matanya talk 20:00, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me know, what is a " Local image"?

Image that is stored on a local wikipedia project, not on commons. matanya talk 09:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Photos from Commons which are not even copyrighted.

[edit]

3 Days ago, you deleted Photos from Commons which was linked on this Article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olongapo_City

Your reason of deletion was: Media missing permission as of 25 March 2011

History: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Olongapo&action=history

Do you know that those photos are free-to-share? It's quite abusive for you to just deleting Photos which you do not know where it came from. You just ruined the article about our city.

Hello, sorry I made you feel bad, but according to commons policy, files that someone else owns should have a permission to use. The file was deleted since no permission was sent to COM:OTRS. matanya talk 20:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case and we have to contact someone for the license, then there's no one that we had to contact because those photos are in public domain property
We still need the creators permission to state a file as PD, I'll be glad to resore the file if proper OTRS ticket is recived. matanya talk 09:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The writer above should read at leat Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. Just because the photo is on the internet and because the uploader not knows who made the photo does not mean that the image is public domain (free of rights) or even "free to share". Thats just wrong. --Martin H. (talk) 11:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Blavatnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sillyfolkboy (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image: Italian traffic signs - Zona a traffico limitato.png

[edit]

Dear Matanya,
The image can be deleted after 7 days since the posting day of the warning on my wall (read here)! Today you have posted the warning, so you can delete the image on 17th April 2011, not today!
You have also posted the warning on my Commons wall, but there's a notice: "To see and to write on Luckok's talk page: GO HERE!!! Thanks!". Please, reply me on my Italian wall.
(Sorry for my not perfect English!) Bye! --Luckok (talk) 17:25, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, Commons had an error: today, when I watched my Commons page - I watch rarely that page (in fact I inserted the advice to go to my Italian page) - your message was dated 10th May 2011 (I watched 2 times), now is 10th April 2011.
Please, tell me: what the precise reason to delete my image was? Thank you!
Bye. --Luckok (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is fine, no worries. The reason was "no permission since 10 of April 2011." matanya talk 06:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot