Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Romanesco Brassica oleracea Richard Bartz.jpg

•  Info created , uploaded & nominated by --Richard Bartz 17:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Question Do you like space vegetables ? -- You should see this in 100% size ;-)
•  Info Romanesco broccoli or fractal broccoli is an edible flower of the species Brassica oleracea and a variant form of cauliflower.
•  Support Nice details --Richard Bartz 17:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Dust spots throughout, and possibly a clone job gone bad at the top. They should be fixed as it doesn't take much effort to do so. Dori - Talk 18:31, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose It lacks something but I can't quite put my finger on it. The lighting bothers me, perhaps not enough front lighting. The tips at the top are too white maybe. It's valuable, but it seems to lack some of that undefinable wow. Maybe others will disagree. -- Ram-Man 01:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is lacking in quality perhaps? -- carol 08:31, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Question Whats that? Is it a flower, fruit or stem? How big it is? Can you offers some article e.g. in English about this?--Juan de Vojníkov 01:20, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Check out this. Lycaon 01:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Oppose Well, now I know what is that, but I had to ask. I dont like it - its plain and it should be in the context. So even its nice I am oppose. It can be Callus or something like that.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:37, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Info created , uploaded & nominated by --Richard Bartz 17:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Comment A tad more impressive --Richard Bartz 17:42, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Sorry Richard, I really like your work so don't think I'm after you or something. I think the lighting could be a lot better here to make it interesting enough for FP. Also don't like the composition that much. Dori - Talk 18:29, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support: Whoever said dust spots, clean your monitor. DragonFire1024 02:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Chmehl 07:10, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Bergwolf 10:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose No WOW factor, piece of vegetable is only piece of vegetable. --Karelj 20:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Nice piece of vegetable ;) nice details. Acarpentier 22:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Quality isn't that great and the resolution is too low. -- Ram-Man 01:37, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Aqwis 13:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I like it but the resolution is mediocre, whatever lens you used isn't meant to go up to f/32. Excellent illustration of Fibonacci numbers in nature. Calibas 20:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose The details look rather noisy to me. Estrilda 08:09, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose There is something bad in the bottom part of the picture, and maybe becouse it is not so common it would need a scale.--Juan de Vojníkov 08:40, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Mywood 10:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]