Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Pieris rapae close Richard Bartz.jpg

***

•  Info created & nominated by --Richard Bartz 11:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Info There is a total view and a closer view attached as versions.
  
  

V1 Close up

•  Support --Richard Bartz 11:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Looks oversharpened and has blown highlights. I would have loved a bit more DOF and a landscape layout instead of a portrait view, preferably seeing the whole critter. Lycaon 12:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I cant deliver that. The lens is at its maximum with f16 at a magnification of 2,5x. --Richard Bartz 12:23, 8 August 2007 (UTC) Forget it. --Richard Bartz 12:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Neutral es gefällt mir sehr gut, ich würde jedoch dieses Image:Pieris rapae total Richard Bartz.jpg relevanter sehen und auch ein Support dafür abgeben. --Böhringer 15:56, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Bergwolf 20:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Digitaldreamer 21:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support-LadyofHats 00:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Sharp. --Beyond silence 01:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose --Karelj 22:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Unnatural colours, composition.[reply]
•  Oppose I'm not sure why the comment above was crossed out. I am opposing for DoF reasons and because of what appears to be oversharpening. I'm unsure why EXIF information was not provided, since this allows me to make sure I don't oppose for bad reasons. -- Ram-Man 02:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Great detail of the head --Tony Wills 23:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. --Beyond silence 04:05, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

V2 Total view

•  Info Here is a total view.
•  Support --Richard Bartz 16:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose - Oversharpen, unnatural colours - Alvesgaspar 18:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Overexposed. --Beyond silence 18:50, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Question Is that Valerian (Valeriana offcinalis) it is sitting on? Lycaon 19:22, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats why he was so relaxed ? :) I agree --Richard Bartz 13:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --Bergwolf 20:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Overexposed and unsharp. --Digon3 ^talk 20:45, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support danke --Böhringer 10:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Digitaldreamer 21:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose Colours are good, composition is ace, but it is indeed oversharpened, and overexposed. Lycaon 22:00, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose --Karelj 22:00, 13 August 2007 (UTC) Colours, exposition.[reply]
•  Oppose Oversharpened, Overexposed. -- Ram-Man 02:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose as above --LC-de 09:03, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

result: 4 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. --Beyond silence 04:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]