Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Argynnis adippe 1 Richard Bartz.jpg

•  Info created & nominated by --Richard Bartz 10:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Richard Bartz 10:21, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support much better without the bright parts on the right --Simonizer 10:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Aber das Lichtspiel war doch so schön :-) --Richard Bartz 11:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support, I must say I liked the original better, but this is good enough too. --Aqwis 11:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Laitche 12:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Sorry Richard, but I can't support this one.  Oppose -- Laitche 05:51, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to say sorry, just take your time and decide :-) --Richard Bartz 06:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support The landscape version was great already. This one is better because it's more suitable for an encyclopaedic article.
   Question What flower is that? (Add this to the description.) Where was the photo taken? (Add coordinates.) --TM 13:26, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I guess that flower is a Centaurea sadleriana, but I'm not sure :) -- Laitche 13:41, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Or is it a Centaurea jacea? --TM 17:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support as former version --B.navez 13:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support RedCoat 14:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support--Wisnia6522 16:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support I also like this one, although the landscape version has such a nice bokeh on the right side... Chmehl 17:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you mean bokeh as in the Japanese ぼけ（bokeh）? I think the bokeh is just like this one. I have felt the landscape version like as Photoshop's Copy Stamp Tool then I opposed that one. -- Laitche 19:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, like in your example point-shaped lightsources in the background form these large bright "discs" in the landscape version. Chmehl 21:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

•  Support --MichaelMaggs 19:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- MJJR 20:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Digitaldreamer 21:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose I find the DOF to small really (only a few mm?). Lycaon 06:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Böhringer 18:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Wing-Chi 23:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support The Fritillary butterflies are some of my favorites, and this is a great picture. -- Ram-Man 02:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral => featured. Simonizer 10:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]