Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Mar 2016 at 23:14:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mooste mõisa auruveski 2013.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created and uploaded by Vaido Otsar - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:14, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:18, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support - Nice building, well positioned in the picture frame and well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Very pleasing combination of colours (blue, green, red), interesting building and high quality. --Code (talk) 06:02, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support per Code --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support And 7. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support Per above but perhaps slightly oversharpened. --Laitche (talk) 10:36, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support This is the sort of image that, normally, you'd see see a lot of "QI for sure, but ..." !votes on, probably including my own. But this one's just over the edge, got "that little extra push over the cliff" somehow ... maybe it's the effect of the gable on the right being smaller. Daniel Case (talk) 15:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support INeverCry 18:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --sfu (talk) 19:49, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 10:09, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Oppose A good QI for me, but not more. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 20:55, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:26, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
•  Support --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 23:57, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]