Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hentai - yuuree-redraw.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is out of scope to be kept in Commons. It is the uploader's self-created form of artwork that provides no useful educational purposes. The file is not used in any other Wikimedia project, nor can it be considered realistically to have educational value. —stay (sic)! 08:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this deletion request. So far it seems that nothing has been productive out of this and I think this situation should cool down for now. —stay (sic)! 09:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For a similar Request for Deletion, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hentai - yuuree-redraw-no-halo.jpg.


COM:SCOPE says,

A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough.

 Kept, File is in use and therefore not out of scope. RE rillke questions? 13:00, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


File:Hentai_-_yuuree-redraw.jpg

pornographic 93.31.224.213 21:49, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, inappropriate nomination; free licensed image in wide use in Wikimedia, quality image, previous deletion discussion resulted in kept; no legitimate reason for deletion suggested. -- Infrogmation (talk) 22:30, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]