Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Day Out With Friends (12301151076).jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unused personal photo. Out of project scopeā. ~Moheen (keep talking) 07:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as good quality example of Category:Men of Bangladesh. (various other photos there are low quality or suspected copyvio) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 09:13, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 05:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @George Chernilevsky: is it out of scope to have at least some photos of people from different nationalities? I can hardly imagine the answer being "no". This photo has good quality and no questionable copyright status. If there is some sort of of urge to delete something, I would be happy to trade this DR for another one to delete some copyvio and/or low quality unused personal photos. (more than one) But that'll be on the condition that this photo is kept. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have the right to my opinion, OK? It's just my vote. Let another administrator close this nomination. Very friendly, George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I was just asking a question. Wouldn't mind if you would answer it: is it out of scope to have at least some photos of people from different nationalities? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why not? But we have hundreds of notable photos in the Category:Men of Bangladesh (see subcategories Category:Men at work in Bangladesh etc). This one, most likely, will never be used in any project. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @George Chernilevsky: Thats why I started this discussion. ~Moheen (keep talking) 06:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @George Chernilevsky: we don't have hundreds. Many are low quality, suspected copyvio or less useful as an example of "man from Bangladesh" because of the angle/setting. If you ignore all those you will be hard-pressed to find even a dozen photos of men from Bangladesh, and this one will be one of the best if not the best example of a "man from Bangladesh". If we really had hundreds of good examples and dozens with better quality than this one, I would fully agree with you, but that's not the case. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:28, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why not? But we have hundreds of notable photos in the Category:Men of Bangladesh (see subcategories Category:Men at work in Bangladesh etc). This one, most likely, will never be used in any project. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I was just asking a question. Wouldn't mind if you would answer it: is it out of scope to have at least some photos of people from different nationalities? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- I have the right to my opinion, OK? It's just my vote. Let another administrator close this nomination. Very friendly, George Chernilevsky talk 05:39, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- @George Chernilevsky: is it out of scope to have at least some photos of people from different nationalities? I can hardly imagine the answer being "no". This photo has good quality and no questionable copyright status. If there is some sort of of urge to delete something, I would be happy to trade this DR for another one to delete some copyvio and/or low quality unused personal photos. (more than one) But that'll be on the condition that this photo is kept. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, per George Chernilevsky. Unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)