User talk:-donald-/Archiv2
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |
Quality images
Hello Donald: Just wondering why you recently have declined the picture
as a quality image. This a sample picture from Quality Images page.
Here[1] is the link to that Quality Iamges page. If you think the picture I nominated is blurred, what about this picture? The picture is about flower. Which part of the flower do you want to see very clearly?
- The image "Kiss me quickly" is definitively unsharp because of the small DoF (Large aperture). And it is noisy. Why did you use ISO200? You could go to 100. The second image is really good. By the way, why did you change the nomination? --donald- 20:39, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
FP Promotion
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Ritterstern Blüte.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Ritterstern Blüte.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
QIC move to -> /candidate list
Is there any useful reason you made this change? It stuffs up the links to the templates used on that page so that when you're editing nominations you end up with a messed up preview etc - all in all a right pain. I'll wait a while before reverting it in case you're still editing and have some way of fixing the problem. --Tony Wills 11:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- As no one has attempted to fix the problem, I reverted it back. Have started discussion about it on Commons_talk:Quality_images_candidates#Reverted_move_of_images_to_subpage --Tony Wills 12:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
FP Promotion
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Seine wide.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Seine wide.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
Thanks for your support! I didn't know that the image had been nominated until I was told that it had been promoted; it was a pleasant surprise. Cnyborg 20:21, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
QICbot for consensual review?
Have you got any comments about my proposal for QI consensual review revamp[2] to assist QICbot use for Consensual Review decisions. --Tony Wills 22:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Commons Picture of the Year 2007 Competition
Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that become a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. --miya 16:01, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
inkscape
- hab die vorlage entfernt wegen kategorisierung, gruß --W!B: 21:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:39, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:WikiNews Election 2008 de.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Schreibfehler in Textbeispiel "Sütterlinschrift"
Hallo Donald, du hast am 30. September 2008 die Abbildung “Sütterlinschrift.svg” mit einem Textbeispiel in der Sütterlinschrift erstellt. Leider enthält sie in der achten Zeile einen Schreibfehler: “Kurrnetschrift” statt “Kurrentschrift”. Kannst du das bitte korrigieren? In der früheren Version “Sütterlinschrift.png” war es noch richtig. --129.187.36.95 20:39, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
FP Promotion
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Schloss Lichtenstein 04-2010.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Schloss Lichtenstein 04-2010.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
