File:Reduviidae (10.5852-ejt.2022.788.1625) Figure 16.png
Size of this preview: 800 × 457 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 183 pixels | 640 × 365 pixels | 1,024 × 585 pixels | 1,280 × 731 pixels | 1,893 × 1,081 pixels.
Original file (1,893 × 1,081 pixels, file size: 1.65 MB, MIME type: image/png)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
editDescriptionReduviidae (10.5852-ejt.2022.788.1625) Figure 16.png |
English: Fig. 16. Aedeagus of outgroup species. Scale bars = 0.5 mm. |
Date | |
Source | https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.788.1625 |
Author | Castillo, S., Rédei, D., & Weirauch, C. (2022). Pseudocetherinae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) revisited: phylogeny and taxonomy of the lobe-headed bugs. European Journal of Taxonomy, 788(1), 1–95 |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 11:57, 3 April 2022 | 1,893 × 1,081 (1.65 MB) | Christian Ferrer (talk | contribs) | {{Information |description={{en|1=Fig. 16. Aedeagus of outgroup species. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.}} |date= 2022-01-11 |source=https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2022.788.1625 |author=Castillo, S., Rédei, D., & Weirauch, C. (2022). Pseudocetherinae (Hemiptera: Reduviidae) revisited: phylogeny and taxonomy of the lobe-headed bugs. ''European Journal of Taxonomy'', 788(1), 1–95 |permission={{cc-by-4.0}} |other versions= }} [[Category:Media from Castillo, Rédei and Weirauch 2022 - 10.5852/ejt.2022.788.162... |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author |
|
---|---|
Short title |
|
Image title |
|